Hide table of contents

Nearly a year ago, I posted on this forum asking the global Effective Altruism community to help me install a grain cleaning, drying and storage facility that would enable the rural poor in my region of Busoga, in eastern Uganda, to access markets for their grains. 

This facility, if installed, would enhance our postharvest handling and storage capability, enabling my project (the UCF) to expand our current white sorghum project with the goal of covering every part of Kamuli & Buyende, and eventually our entire region of Busoga -- a region that currently has the most dreaded levels of poverty in Uganda. 

This facility, if installed, would also enable us to engage big institutional buyers of grains, as well as international relief agencies like the UN's WFP, Red Cross, UNHCR, GOAL, World Vision etc (who buy grains in their relief work) -- plus all breweries across east Africa.

The UN's WFP, alone, is currently the biggest buyer of grains in Africa, and buying from rural smallholder farmers is their main priority, but their suppliers must meet strict postharvest handling standards (due to things like aflatoxin contamination in grains), and this is what our intended grain facility was going to help with.

This, in turn, would have enabled rural poor farmers in our region to access high value markets for their produce, placing them on a self-sustainable path from chronic poverty. 

 

How it all went:

My request simply didn't make it, for two reasons: 

1) some people here said my request was difficult to assess from an EA standpoint.

2) after a detailed discussion with the UK firm Alvan Blanch -- the people who were going to install for us this facility -- they said the GBP 339,403 that they had quoted for us only included the cost of plant equipment, and shipment to Mombasa (Kenya), not Uganda. 

Alvan Blanch said this money doesn't include civil works and sitework, i.e., the actual installation of the facility; the needed mechanical and electrical installations; wiring materials; crane and forklift hire; personnel lifting equipment and its hire, the warehouse that will house this facility -- as well as taxation and freight from Mombasa to Kamuli. 

After a detailed discussion with Alvan Blanch, we found that, when all these things are included, the total cost for installing this facility would be $814,000 (or £656,000), nearly twice the original estimate. 

Still, since this facility would have given us the capacity to work with rural poor farmers in every part of Kamuli & Buyende, and eventually our entire region of Busoga -- a region the size of the west African country "Gambia" -- to me, the £656,000 would still be worth it, if I was able to find people who are willing to help us get this facility installed.  

 

Some EAs genuinely wanted to help:

After posting my original request on this forum last April, one person here named Roddy not only donated to the UCF, but also said he was willing to work together with other EAs to assess the cost-effectiveness of our intended grain facility, and to provide funding. 

Roddy's offer didn't go any further, because no other EAs engaged with him on this.

Another person on this forum named Michael emailed me saying he was personally willing to fund the silo alone (which was priced at £92,761 in Alvan Blanch's original quote), so we can later expand from there. However, after having a detailed discussion about Alvan Blanch's quote, and realizing that the total cost indicated in that quote didn't include many other things that were essential, Michael, too, simply pulled back. 

That is where the whole talk about my intended grain facility ended. 

 

Still:

After reading my original post, some people here (~3 people in total) donated to the UCF. These included Roddy; someone named Benjamin Plaut who gave $1,000 via DonorBox, and another who anonymously donated $1,000 via Benevity, but whom I suspect to have originated from this forum because his donation came in the same week that I posted here. Altogether, these people donated $2,200, which was used to run our sorghum work.

Photos from our work in 2024 are in this Microsoft OneDrive folder, and also on this page.

 Currently, the UCF provides all our target farmers with all the needed inputs (seed, tarpaulins, liquid fertilizers/pesticides, spray pumps etc) free of charge, only as a hand-up, because many can’t afford them. 

Our intended grain facility is the only thing that would have catalyzed self-sustainability, by enabling our target farmers to access better markets for their produce, which in turn would give these farmers the self-urge to produce more -- hence the ability to use their own incomes to secure the needed inputs on their own, making our work self-sustaining. 

 

Moreover:

My ultimate intent for this grain facility wasn't to make it another traditional capitalist endeavor, nope. As someone who hereditarily belongs to this rather impoverished part of the world, my goal was to ultimately make this grain facility community-owned.

With the grain facility in place, my goal was to simply use it as a leverage, to enable me develop an INTEGRATED agro-processing plant that would create market linkages for 6-10 different types of crops (all grains/cereals, cassava, mangoes, pineapples, oranges etc), enabling the rural poor in our region to diversify their incomes and escape poverty. 

The integrated plant itself, meanwhile, would be 80% owned by all the rural poor farmers across Busoga who would be supplying produce to this plant, with the other 20% owned by the UCF itself as a way of sustaining our underlying work of supporting more farmers. 

 

I am not ready to give up:

Looking at where I am coming from (i.e., my own lifelong battle with poverty), and local people's circumstances in my region, I am not happy sitting back, or sitting idly by.

 

The last resort:

Towards the end of 2024, I made one other effort to try and raise support for the intended grain facility: a campaign that I addressed to the crypto/web3 community.

That campaign, too, didn't work. But it gave me some basic knowledge of crypto/web3. Before that, I didn't know anything about crypto. 

So, recently, I decided to take one more step that I think may ultimately enable me to at least self-fund the grain facility alone: getting into crypto myself, not as a daily trader, but by only acquiring those tokens that have real utility, when they are still at very low prices, and then holding until prices go up. 

In other words, I want to use crypto HODLing as a way of self-funding my work on poverty.

 

My final request for EA:

If I had ~$10,000 to invest in some low cap utility tokens now, I believe I will ultimately be able to self-finance our intended grain facility in the not-so-distant future, and even keep some money to provide initial inputs to our target farmers (after installing this facility).

If you are reading this, and would like to help me raise the $10,000 to enable me do just that (which in turn could mean self-sustainability for our work on extreme poverty), I have created some crypto addresses where you can contribute now, if you use crypto.

If you don't use crypto, you can also help by making a bank transfer using the info here.

The crypto addresses are:

USDT (network: TRC20):  TBnop4ZCcHLK2BUDsRPy6bL9Bd6EPg6Y44

BTC (network: Bitcoin):  3BqtsGXDs49XzwmeT91L3uTCW4kjB5rqcn

Eth (net: Ethereum):  0xb91fedacbed4170eebc0af44b8389d93eb309f44

SOL (net: Solana):  DscAs9xkCb4XrRtxrL9v5kxULMiaL8rjS7e1m9WPifAU

 

Conclusion:

From the little that I know about EA, you are a community of people who believe not just in cost-effectiveness, but also in amplified impact. The $10,000 that I am asking you, with its potential to result in the installation of our $814,000 intended grain facility, is one way to amplify your support in a truly impoverished part of the world.

 

Anthony, founder UCF     |     anthony@ugandafarm.org

x.com/KaluluAnthony     |      whatsapp:  +256 759 908591

voice calls:  +256 771 497121    /     +256 782 601073

skype:  organic_persp  (I am available for video calls any day, with anyone who wants to speak with me).

Comments11


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Don't put all of your savings into shady cryptocurrencies. If it sounds good to be true, it is because it probably is.

Another person on this forum named Michael emailed me saying he was personally willing to fund the silo alone

For the record, I did not say this. The most relevant quotes from my email are

I saw your recent posts on the EA Forum and I am thinking about the cost-effectiveness of your plan to build a grain drying / processing plant.

and

Given the considerable expense of building a processing facility, why don't you want to start with a storage silo, which would be much cheaper, and expand from there?

You may have interpreted the 2nd quote as an offer to fund the silo, which it wasn't. If that's what happened then I should have communicated better.

Michael, I can see, I misinterpreted your message. Still, by writing to me with those words, you are one of the people who gave me real hope (it is why I interpreted your message in an even bigger way).

Anthony 

If you look at the previous threads you posted, you'll see I was a strong defender of giving your project a chance. I think grassroots outreach and support in areas like yours is a very good thing, and I'm glad to see you transparently report on your progress with the project. 

That being said, I have to agree with the others here that investing in crypto coins like the one you mentioned is generally a bad idea. I have not heard of either of the people you claim are backing the project. The statement that "most people believe Jelly will soon be the new tiktok in the west" is not at all true. I live in the west and I guarantee you that almost nobody has ever heard of this project, and there has not been significant buzz around crypto projects in the west for a good couple of years now.

If you are skeptical, I recommend you go onto reddit and ask people in non-crypto spaces if they have heard of Jelly or are excited about the idea. 

People can make money off crypto: but for the average user it's more or less a casino, where the odds are not in your favour. 

I apologise if this comes off as overly critical, but I have heard of a lot of people who have fallen victims to scammers and scoundrels in the crypto space, and I don't want you to be one of them. 

I know we had a couple of disagreements about the content of your last post, but I really love the transparency and honesty here about your fundraising efforts and the unexpected increased cost of the facility@Anthony Kalulu, a rural farmer in eastern Uganda. It saddens me to say that level of transparancy quite unusula from my experience in Uganda so good on you for that.

Good on you and all the best with your development endeavors.

And like @MathiasKB🔸 said, advise against the crypto investment!

Also I suspect due to the style, and request in this post you might be downvoted quite a bit but dont be discouraged. This forum isn't an easy place!

Hi Nick, 

I am very grateful to hear from you too, and thanks so much for this really encouraging message. True, I understand this post might surely attract some downvotes, or even some pushback especially on that part of crypto, but I have also gradually gotten used to this, so I will certainly take it easy. 

I have only decided to turn to crypto as a way of raising money for our intended facility only as a last resort -- because everything else didn't work (and I wouldn't like to give up). I also think the crypto token in particular that I had in mind at least has a solid background (given its founders and its intended use). 

Just realise that betting on crypto is like betting on a casino. Probably worse, if it's a memecoin which has apparently lost nearly all of its value in the last two months. Then decide whether something like a casino but probably worse is how you would want to invest the last $10k which you could still help your fellow farmers with.

FWIW I remember liking your original post and your ambition. I might have some ability to assist with grant application writing. But only if you spend any funds you can get on helping fellow Ugandans, not crypto!

David,

If there is anything you can do to help, it will be much appreciated.

Crypto is something I first engaged with (for the very first time) only months ago -- after I had already posted on this forum seeking support (in vain).

I am not a crypto person, just trying to cling on it as a last resort after everything else had failed.

FYI, titotal:

Iqram and Lessin are also giving regular interviews, and are making weekly twitter spaces about their new social media app JellyJelly:

 https://x.com/iqramband/status/1900274440199692779

Not to justify anything, but just to let you know this. Also, they are not merely "backers". They are the project's founders.

Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f
LewisBollard
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
> How the dismal science can help us end the dismal treatment of farm animals By Martin Gould ---------------------------------------- Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- This year we’ll be sharing a few notes from my colleagues on their areas of expertise. The first is from Martin. I’ll be back next month. - Lewis In 2024, Denmark announced plans to introduce the world’s first carbon tax on cow, sheep, and pig farming. Climate advocates celebrated, but animal advocates should be much more cautious. When Denmark’s Aarhus municipality tested a similar tax in 2022, beef purchases dropped by 40% while demand for chicken and pork increased. Beef is the most emissions-intensive meat, so carbon taxes hit it hardest — and Denmark’s policies don’t even cover chicken or fish. When the price of beef rises, consumers mostly shift to other meats like chicken. And replacing beef with chicken means more animals suffer in worse conditions — about 190 chickens are needed to match the meat from one cow, and chickens are raised in much worse conditions. It may be possible to design carbon taxes which avoid this outcome; a recent paper argues that a broad carbon tax would reduce all meat production (although it omits impacts on egg or dairy production). But with cows ten times more emissions-intensive than chicken per kilogram of meat, other governments may follow Denmark’s lead — focusing taxes on the highest emitters while ignoring the welfare implications. Beef is easily the most emissions-intensive meat, but also requires the fewest animals for a given amount. The graph shows climate emissions per tonne of meat on the right-hand side, and the number of animals needed to produce a kilogram of meat on the left. The fish “lives lost” number varies significantly by
Recent opportunities in Community
59
John Salter
· · 4m read
6
2 authors
· · 3m read