Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
JDBauman3
0
0

This looks really cool!

Reply
See in context
by DavidNash
5 min read 1

31

Career choiceGlobal health & developmentOpportunities to take actionPolicyApplication announcementsEconomic growthFellowships and internships
Frontpage

I'm organising a free 7-week program exploring different approaches to impact in global development. There will be both a virtual version and in-person (in London) version.

If this is something you may find useful (now or in the future), sign up to indicate interest and I will send out more info if enough people sign up. It would be helpful if you could also share with other individuals/organisations who may find this kind of program relevant.

Sign up to indicate interest

The Program

Through weekly readings and discussions, we'll examine multiple pathways to creating positive change at scale.

I've included more links than you'd be expected to read. It's to give a sense of the types of topics we could discuss each week, and for people to dive into after a discussion. Also if you have ideas on relevant articles/videos/etc for each topic, let me know.

 

  • Week 1 - A history of global development
    • How has poverty changed over the last two centuries? (and what was life like before 1825)
    • A history of global health - Our World in Data
    • 1940-80s
      • Bretton Woods institutions, United Nations, WHO, Marshall Plan, Green Revolution, vaccination campaigns, development economics
    • What has happened in the last few decades
      • Washington Consensus policies, rise of NGOs and civil society, rise of evidence-based development,  internet, mobile phones, and growth in China & India
    • Winning the war on child mortality - Hans Rosling
    • Why have some regions developed faster than others?
    • Which areas do you think were most transformative for human welfare?
      • Industrial revolution and mass production
      • The germ theory of disease and modern medicine
      • Spread of electricity and modern energy
      • Mass education and literacy
      • Scientific advancement and research methods
      • Spread of democracy and rights
      • Global trade and economic integration
      • Agricultural productivity
Our World in Data
  • Week 2 - Evidence-based interventions, RCTs, global health & charities
    • A history of RCTs
    • Global Health & Development: An Impact-Focused Overview
    • A history of JPAL
    • Comparing charities: How big is the difference?
    • PEPFAR and the Costs of Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • The Rapid Rise of the Randomistas and the Trouble with the RCTs
    • What makes RCTs the "gold standard" for evidence? What are their limitations?
    • What alternatives exist when RCTs aren't feasible?
    • What are the challenges in scaling interventions that worked well in trials?
    • How do we compare measurable and hard to measure interventions?

 

  • Week 3 - Economic growth
    • Global economic inequality - OWID
    • Economic Growth in LMICs - Open Philanthropy
    • Rethinking evidence and refocusing on growth in development economics - Lant Pritchett
    • How Asia Works - Joe Studwell
    • Poor Numbers: The Politics of Improving GDP Statistics in Africa  - Morten Jerven
    • How do you know how well the World is doing? - Yaw
    • Growth and the case against randomista development
    • Does growth improve wellbeing for the poorest?
    • What may not be captured by economic growth metrics?
    • Is it possible to identify reliable interventions to promote growth?
    • Is there anything neglected you could do as a donor or  with your career?

 

 

  • Week 5 - Startups and large firms
    • Why and how to start a for-profit company serving emerging markets
    • Want Growth? Kill Small Businesses - Karthik Tadepalli
    • Direct Work For-Profit Entrepreneurship is Underrated
    • When are market solutions more effective than other approaches?
    • How do we balance social impact with financial sustainability?
    • How neglected is this sector, will you be able to have counterfactual impact?

 

  • Week 6 - Innovation & science
    • Global Health R&D, Innovation Policy , Scientific Research - OP programs
    • Salt, Sugar, Water, Zinc: How Scientists Learned to Treat the 20th Century’s Biggest Killer of Children
    • How to get involved in metascience
    • Tom Kalil on Institutions for Innovation
    • Patrick Collinson - Progress
    • How do we identify and foster  innovation pathways?
    • How do we think about the counterfactual impact of supporting innovation?
    • How can we better direct innovation toward neglected problems?
    • What factors have historically enabled or hindered progress?
    • Is this an area where extra money/people will make a difference?

 

Agricultural drone in the Mekong River delta - Chiara Negrello
  • Week 7 - AI, data and the future of development

 

Each week combines curated readings, structured discussions and case studies. The time commitment is 2 hours per week, 1 hour of reading and 1 hour of discussion.


Who It's For

The program is relevant for:

  • Professionals outside of development considering a career transition
  • Global development professionals considering shifting into another part of development they are less familiar with
  • Anyone wanting to understand & discuss effective approaches to global development


Format

  • Duration: 7 weeks
  • Time Commitment: ~2 hours/week
  • Cost: Free
  • Startdate: March 2025
  • Two options:
    • Virtual Cohort: Weekly online sessions
    • London Cohort: Weekly in-person discussions

If you're interested in joining either cohort or a future version, you can express interest here.

 

Why?

There are quite a few programs for other areas[1], but I hadn't seen anything related to broader global development. Most EA related courses have a section on starting a charity or earning money to donate effectively but not much about the wider range of areas you can have impact, and the global development focused courses like MIT micromasters were generally at least 11 weeks and each one had a relatively narrow focus.

There didn't seem to be anything between broad EA and broad global development, even outside of EA (although if you know of one, that'd be useful to hear about). I'm hoping this could bridge that gap, and if this trial goes well it could be scaled up.

 

  1. ^
    • Bluedot for AI/biosecurity
    • AAC for animal advocacy
    • EA virtual programs for EA & the Precipice
    Show all footnotes

    31

    0
    0

    Reactions

    0
    0
    Mentioned in

    More posts like this

    Comments2


    Sorted by
    New & upvoted
    Click to highlight new comments since:
    JDBauman    3
    0
    0

    This looks really cool!

    Reply
    [comment deleted]0
    0
    0
    Deleted by CaptainAmerica,
    More from DavidNash
    143
    Nigeria's Missing 50 Million People
    DavidNash
    · · 14m read
    17
    17
    56
    Looking into Project 2025: USAID
    DavidNash
    · · 7m read
    6
    6
    136
    Economic Growth - Donation suggestions and ideas
    DavidNash
    · · 9m read
    29
    29
    View more
    Curated and popular this week
    LintzA
     ·  · 15m read
     · 
    Cross-posted to Lesswrong Introduction Several developments over the past few months should cause you to re-evaluate what you are doing. These include: 1. Updates toward short timelines 2. The Trump presidency 3. The o1 (inference-time compute scaling) paradigm 4. Deepseek 5. Stargate/AI datacenter spending 6. Increased internal deployment 7. Absence of AI x-risk/safety considerations in mainstream AI discourse Taken together, these are enough to render many existing AI governance strategies obsolete (and probably some technical safety strategies too). There's a good chance we're entering crunch time and that should absolutely affect your theory of change and what you plan to work on. In this piece I try to give a quick summary of these developments and think through the broader implications these have for AI safety. At the end of the piece I give some quick initial thoughts on how these developments affect what safety-concerned folks should be prioritizing. These are early days and I expect many of my takes will shift, look forward to discussing in the comments!  Implications of recent developments Updates toward short timelines There’s general agreement that timelines are likely to be far shorter than most expected. Both Sam Altman and Dario Amodei have recently said they expect AGI within the next 3 years. Anecdotally, nearly everyone I know or have heard of who was expecting longer timelines has updated significantly toward short timelines (<5 years). E.g. Ajeya’s median estimate is that 99% of fully-remote jobs will be automatable in roughly 6-8 years, 5+ years earlier than her 2023 estimate. On a quick look, prediction markets seem to have shifted to short timelines (e.g. Metaculus[1] & Manifold appear to have roughly 2030 median timelines to AGI, though haven’t moved dramatically in recent months). We’ve consistently seen performance on benchmarks far exceed what most predicted. Most recently, Epoch was surprised to see OpenAI’s o3 model achi
    Dr Kassim
     ·  · 4m read
     · 
    Hey everyone, I’ve been going through the EA Introductory Program, and I have to admit some of these ideas make sense, but others leave me with more questions than answers. I’m trying to wrap my head around certain core EA principles, and the more I think about them, the more I wonder: Am I misunderstanding, or are there blind spots in EA’s approach? I’d really love to hear what others think. Maybe you can help me clarify some of my doubts. Or maybe you share the same reservations? Let’s talk. Cause Prioritization. Does It Ignore Political and Social Reality? EA focuses on doing the most good per dollar, which makes sense in theory. But does it hold up when you apply it to real world contexts especially in countries like Uganda? Take malaria prevention. It’s a top EA cause because it’s highly cost effective $5,000 can save a life through bed nets (GiveWell, 2023). But what happens when government corruption or instability disrupts these programs? The Global Fund scandal in Uganda saw $1.6 million in malaria aid mismanaged (Global Fund Audit Report, 2016). If money isn’t reaching the people it’s meant to help, is it really the best use of resources? And what about leadership changes? Policies shift unpredictably here. A national animal welfare initiative I supported lost momentum when political priorities changed. How does EA factor in these uncertainties when prioritizing causes? It feels like EA assumes a stable world where money always achieves the intended impact. But what if that’s not the world we live in? Long termism. A Luxury When the Present Is in Crisis? I get why long termists argue that future people matter. But should we really prioritize them over people suffering today? Long termism tells us that existential risks like AI could wipe out trillions of future lives. But in Uganda, we’re losing lives now—1,500+ die from rabies annually (WHO, 2021), and 41% of children suffer from stunting due to malnutrition (UNICEF, 2022). These are preventable d
    Rory Fenton
     ·  · 6m read
     · 
    Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f
    Recent opportunities in Career choice
    31
    Impact in Global Development: A Discussion Series
    DavidNash
    · · 5m read
    1
    1
    133
    Projects I'd like to see in the GHW meta space
    Melanie Basnak🔸
    · · 8m read
    3
    3
    19
    GiveWell is hiring a Talent Acquisition Specialist
    GiveWell
    · · 1m read
    0
    0
    View more