Follow up Q: Should 'this is also to captivate attention' be sometimes understood regarding some materials from the broader EA networks?

To what extent should possible attention captivation motivations of some of the broader EA community resources be sometimes implied, so that influential people (who may be interested in traditional entertainment) consider the wellbeing of non-powerful individuals in their decisionmaking and this consideration is institutionalized in the long term?

Follow up on: Ends vs. Means: To what extent should we be willing to sacrifice nuance and epistemic humility when communicating with people outside EA?