Hide table of contents

Intended Audience: EAs exploring a return to school to pursuing applied math-oriented EA studies (including computer science, economics, etc).

Source: An intense 45 minute conversation with a math adviser at my local community college.

Requests: If you are an EA career changer (especially math-oriented or older) interested in forming a peer support network for a EA-oriented return to school, please PM me. I'd also appreciate even a very brief comment if this post helped you (such as "Helpful") so I can gauge whether it's worth further cleaning & posting of such interviews.

Big takeaways:

  • Math is a good starting point for EA career development because it's widely applicable.
  • Prove to yourself that you can do and enjoy it, maybe by taking a challenging course in physics/statistics/coding.
  • Skill in coding and Excel is also a plus.
  • Have many conversations with your teachers and advisers in departments that teach EA-related concepts.
  • There's a distinction between pure and applied math. The latter might be a better fit for EA causes or people who are people-oriented yet want to study math.
  • Know the prerequisites for grad programs of interest. If you miss something, it might be offered just once a year.
  • Calculus-based math courses move fast. Make sure you're strong in algebra before proceeding.
  • Cold-email academics working on problems that interest you. Find out about their educational background, current work, institution, collaborators, and advice on a path to working on similar problems or at a similar level.

Project Ideas:

  • Write and vet a form email for cold contacting academics/researchers. It should be of appropriate length, well-structured, and ask the right questions.
  • List widely available precalc-based math activities that can demonstrate to oneself a significant inclination for math.
  • Interview summaries might be beneficial to the EA community.
  • List specific grad programs/professors working on EA-oriented projects. Get advice from current EA-oriented grad students on how to bring an EA approach to departments where it's not present.

3

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 38m read
 · 
In recent months, the CEOs of leading AI companies have grown increasingly confident about rapid progress: * OpenAI's Sam Altman: Shifted from saying in November "the rate of progress continues" to declaring in January "we are now confident we know how to build AGI" * Anthropic's Dario Amodei: Stated in January "I'm more confident than I've ever been that we're close to powerful capabilities... in the next 2-3 years" * Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis: Changed from "as soon as 10 years" in autumn to "probably three to five years away" by January. What explains the shift? Is it just hype? Or could we really have Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)[1] by 2028? In this article, I look at what's driven recent progress, estimate how far those drivers can continue, and explain why they're likely to continue for at least four more years. In particular, while in 2024 progress in LLM chatbots seemed to slow, a new approach started to work: teaching the models to reason using reinforcement learning. In just a year, this let them surpass human PhDs at answering difficult scientific reasoning questions, and achieve expert-level performance on one-hour coding tasks. We don't know how capable AGI will become, but extrapolating the recent rate of progress suggests that, by 2028, we could reach AI models with beyond-human reasoning abilities, expert-level knowledge in every domain, and that can autonomously complete multi-week projects, and progress would likely continue from there.  On this set of software engineering & computer use tasks, in 2020 AI was only able to do tasks that would typically take a human expert a couple of seconds. By 2024, that had risen to almost an hour. If the trend continues, by 2028 it'll reach several weeks.  No longer mere chatbots, these 'agent' models might soon satisfy many people's definitions of AGI — roughly, AI systems that match human performance at most knowledge work (see definition in footnote). This means that, while the compa
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
SUMMARY:  ALLFED is launching an emergency appeal on the EA Forum due to a serious funding shortfall. Without new support, ALLFED will be forced to cut half our budget in the coming months, drastically reducing our capacity to help build global food system resilience for catastrophic scenarios like nuclear winter, a severe pandemic, or infrastructure breakdown. ALLFED is seeking $800,000 over the course of 2025 to sustain its team, continue policy-relevant research, and move forward with pilot projects that could save lives in a catastrophe. As funding priorities shift toward AI safety, we believe resilient food solutions remain a highly cost-effective way to protect the future. If you’re able to support or share this appeal, please visit allfed.info/donate. Donate to ALLFED FULL ARTICLE: I (David Denkenberger) am writing alongside two of my team-mates, as ALLFED’s co-founder, to ask for your support. This is the first time in Alliance to Feed the Earth in Disaster’s (ALLFED’s) 8 year existence that we have reached out on the EA Forum with a direct funding appeal outside of Marginal Funding Week/our annual updates. I am doing so because ALLFED’s funding situation is serious, and because so much of ALLFED’s progress to date has been made possible through the support, feedback, and collaboration of the EA community.  Read our funding appeal At ALLFED, we are deeply grateful to all our supporters, including the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which has provided the majority of our funding for years. At the end of 2024, we learned we would be receiving far less support than expected due to a shift in SFF’s strategic priorities toward AI safety. Without additional funding, ALLFED will need to shrink. I believe the marginal cost effectiveness for improving the future and saving lives of resilience is competitive with AI Safety, even if timelines are short, because of potential AI-induced catastrophes. That is why we are asking people to donate to this emergency appeal
Recent opportunities in Community
73
· · 3m read