Security engineer, digital rights activist, AI safety and policy researcher. Beloved in these communities.

Eckersley is most famous as an advocate/developer at the intersection of tech and legal activism. His work on the Let's Encrypt free certificate authority, HTTPS Everywhere, and the SSL Observatory made the internet significantly less terrible. Mizza:

Let's Encrypt is something we all came to take for granted very quickly, but lots of us remember when getting an SSL certificate was an expensive and tedious process. Deprecating a billion dollar industry overnight and providing better security for internet users everywhere is a hell of a legacy to leave behind, and I hope one that will be an inspiration for generations to come.

He identified "device fingerprinting" as a major privacy hole and spent a long time trying to mitigate it. His PhD thesis was a characteristic mix of software engineering, economic theory, and law. We'd call it Web3 these days.

He was the 8th person ever to take the GWWC pledge. A few places say he was on the board of CEA US at some point.

Around 2017 he went into AI risk. His work bridged AI ethics and AI safety, covering recidivism prediction, self-driving carssecurity against ML hacking, and military AI but also big-brain topics like impossibility theorems in social choice and ML, the cybersecurity implications of emulated minds, and the queer theory of human alignment. At the end, he was running the AI Objectives Institute (notable for mobilising people already concerned about corporate maximisation) and mentoring for PIBBSS. He was on many of the big "technical AI policy" papers of the last few years. The Alignment Problem is dedicated to him, after he convinced his friend Brian Christian of it.

During covid he worked intensely on private contact tracing algorithms. More than one notable service could not have been done without him.

He received a cancer diagnosis a week before his death. A minor consolation of dying in the present age is people telling beautiful stories about you for strangers and for posterity. So you can know that he was fluent in French, that he organised guerilla meetups, that he was an avid cyclist, that he was a memorable remedial teacher of programming. This is an Eckersley quotes account. Similarly, I can tell you he was writing code until one month before his death. He lived sans LinkedIn.

Comments9


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

A Wikipedia page was created about him.

Collection of eulogies for Peter, found on Twitter: (non-exhaustive, last updated Sep 5)

I interviewed Peter for Wave in 2016. He blew us all away with his extensive knowledge. He didn't take the job but he's done some amazing work. Since meeting him he also introduced me to several people who we either hired or became good friends with. He was an incredibly nice guy who cared so much about the world and made a big impact on me. Incredibly sad news. 😭

I first met Peter at an event I organized in 2018 on AI safety. I found him to be a direct, fresh, and generous human. Last time we discussed was at EAG in late July. After syncing up our respective histories, we shared on active/potential projects - doing so I felt cherished by his enthusiasm and great feedback. He surprised me by holding the full conversation in French. I wish for his recent project, the AI Objectives Institute, to live on and be positively transformative.

I knew Peter way way way back when we both volunteered at Computerbank Victoria refurbishing  machines and provisioning them with Linux for Low Income and Unwaged folks.
Passionate and possessed of Clear Vision.

Thank you for the post.

I didn't know Peter played such an important role in Let's Encrypt. I will think of him when I'm waiting just a few seconds for new SSL certs to be issued.

Securing websites before Let's Encrypt was not fun.

For example, there was a period where the WP Engine dedicated server for 80000hours.org was not using Let's Encrypt, for reasons out of my control. The server was managed by WP Engine, and issues relating to SSL renewal caused the three most severe website outages we had since 2014 (when I started running the site). Thankfully we're now using Let's Encrypt—zero SSL issues since the switch.

I was incredibly sad when I heard he passed away and only heard of his Let's Encrypt work when I saw a eulogy for Eckersley on the front page of HackerNews the day after his passing.

We met at his home in San Francisco and ended up having a wonderful discussion about AI safety and how to use incentive-based governance mechanisms in a holistic complex model of society to align decision-makers. He had a wonderfully inquisitive and original mind with an amazing person inhabiting it and will always have a positive impact on the safety of our future.

Thank you for posting this, Gavin. For the title, Facebook says he was born June 15, 1979.

I’m stunned and heavy with the loss of such a wonderful man.

thanks.

The irony of you and me is that we're digging around in a privacy advocate's data exhaust. But at least it's out of love.

Due to the sudden work of unsung heroes, he was cryopreserved despite not having been signed up at the time of his deänimation.

More from technicalities
263
· · 1m read
187
· · 2m read
Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f
LewisBollard
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
> How the dismal science can help us end the dismal treatment of farm animals By Martin Gould ---------------------------------------- Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- This year we’ll be sharing a few notes from my colleagues on their areas of expertise. The first is from Martin. I’ll be back next month. - Lewis In 2024, Denmark announced plans to introduce the world’s first carbon tax on cow, sheep, and pig farming. Climate advocates celebrated, but animal advocates should be much more cautious. When Denmark’s Aarhus municipality tested a similar tax in 2022, beef purchases dropped by 40% while demand for chicken and pork increased. Beef is the most emissions-intensive meat, so carbon taxes hit it hardest — and Denmark’s policies don’t even cover chicken or fish. When the price of beef rises, consumers mostly shift to other meats like chicken. And replacing beef with chicken means more animals suffer in worse conditions — about 190 chickens are needed to match the meat from one cow, and chickens are raised in much worse conditions. It may be possible to design carbon taxes which avoid this outcome; a recent paper argues that a broad carbon tax would reduce all meat production (although it omits impacts on egg or dairy production). But with cows ten times more emissions-intensive than chicken per kilogram of meat, other governments may follow Denmark’s lead — focusing taxes on the highest emitters while ignoring the welfare implications. Beef is easily the most emissions-intensive meat, but also requires the fewest animals for a given amount. The graph shows climate emissions per tonne of meat on the right-hand side, and the number of animals needed to produce a kilogram of meat on the left. The fish “lives lost” number varies significantly by