Hide table of contents

TLDR: We made a retreat which was not funded but was paid by attendees. We managed to find a very nice place very affordably, and the organization was quite light for quite nice results. We'd encourage other clubs to consider whether they could make meet-ups (either within the country or between countries) which are light on ops, don't require funding, but are a meaningful time for attendees.


In August 2024, EA Serbia and EA Hungary organized a self-funded, three-day EA Serbia retreat, bringing together 17 participants from 6 countries: Serbia, Romania, Hungary, and further afield, including Russia, Kenya, and the U.S. 

The retreat aimed to make and strengthen connections across regional EA communities, allowing participants to collaborate, exchange ideas, and engage deeply with the movement’s core principles, as well as learn from how things are done in other countries.

We chose Majkin Salaš, an ethno venue near Subotica, Serbia for hosting the event. The setting—a picturesque space surrounded by nature—created a nice atmosphere for reflection, discussion, and bonding. Participants had access to an outdoor swimming pool, a restaurant offering local cuisine (with a specially arranged vegan menu), and an open-air museum with lots of animals (kept in good conditions :) ). 

Cost & Logistics:

The total cost per person ranged between €150 and €200, covering accommodation for two nights (2-3 people rooms), snacks and 5 meals, and additional costs like transportation (bus or gas for the car). The retreat was self-funded, with attendees covering their own expenses.

Program & Structure: 

The retreat followed an unconference model, which gave us flexibility in shaping the agenda but also kept organization easy. Each attendee had the opportunity to propose and vote on topics they were passionate about, and each session was decided on the spot, so that as people learned things during one session they could immediately propose a different session for next slot, allowing ideas to progress naturally. Popular topics included career strategy within EA, local community building, and ethical dilemmas in long-termism.

Despite a packed schedule, time constraints meant that not all topics could be covered in the main sessions. This resulted in organic spillover discussions during meals, outdoor walks, and free time, which turned into some of the most rewarding conversations.

What went well: 

The post-retreat survey provided positive feedback, with 100% of attendees likely to recommend the retreat to others and 90% overall satisfaction with the event's structure. Here’s what some participants shared:

  • “I really enjoyed the sense of community, the group dynamics, and getting inspired by the clever and interesting people present.”
  • “I made valuable connections and finally met people in person that I had previously only interacted with online. It was also helpful to hear about the EA landscape in other countries.”

We also got positive feedback on the retreat being in a place so full of nature, so when picking a spot for an event, try to aim for something surrounded by forest rather than a hotel in the industrial zone, all else equal.

What could have been better: 

  1. Length: Everyone had suggested extending the event to a full 3 days to allow for more in-depth conversations. (since a lot of the cost is transport, this would not influence the price much, total cost would go up by ~40 Euros per person).
  2. Transportation: The venue, being somewhat remote, was difficult to reach for those without cars. We had people driving others from the bus stop to the venue, but that was a bit ad-hoc and could have been better.
  3. Dietary Preferences: We provided vegan meal options, but the restaurant (being a traditional restaurant) did not make vegan meals as diverse as we'd like. They were open to feedback and wanted to improve, but we wish we'd discussed the menu of each day in more detail with them beforehand.
  4. Size: The next retreat that we are planning to organize SHOULD be more global. We aimed to accomodate people from the nearby countries due to the location but actually it would be also great to make it more international and reach out to more communities 

Highlights for Other EA Communities to Consider:

  • Unconference Format: Allowing participants to shape the agenda based on shared interests is both less effort for the organizers and more organic way to let people choose their path of learning.
  • Self Funding: We recomend that others also consider organizing such events from individual funding instead of waiting/asking for funding from funders. If it can be made cheaply enough (by hosting it outside of town but ~convenient by transport) then it can still be attended by many people and is better than no event. Some small funds can be used to fund needs-based attendees, in our case we had some better off attendees pay some expenses of others who needed it more. A model we are excited to try is to ask people to pay either X (cost of the program) or more than X and then use that to allocate funding to those who need it. So far, we have been a small enough event to do this by hand, but as we scale, it matters to consider this.
  • Informal Networking is nice: Hosting the event in a casual environment like Majkin Salaš, complete with outdoor activities and communal spaces, fostered organic networking and created lasting bonds between participants. This can be a powerful tool for deepening connections in the EA community. It is hard to put an EV on it precisely, but if funds are not coming out of charity funds we encourage people to explore more options for making these bonds.

Next Steps & Future Plans: 

Given the overwhelmingly positive feedback and the eagerness for a longer event, we plan to host another retreat next year. We’ll aim to incorporate the lessons learned from this experience, and for the first time promote it openly.

This retreat was an opportunity to test the waters with smaller, community-led events that can still have a big impact. We hope that other EA groups find this model useful and are inspired to create similar experiences within their own regions.

Gratitude to: @Gergő Gáspár and @EA Hungary team for coming over, @Ariel Pontes and our other Romanian guest for making the longer trek to here, Milan Alexy for bringing books for our club, and Julia Skuratova (THE grandma) for taking care of our baby Teodor while we focus on growth ;) 

40

1
0
3
1

Reactions

1
0
3
1

More posts like this

Comments4


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

This is great! Thank you very much for writing this up. I'd be extremely excited for more local groups to self-fund retreats like this. I have seen similar events have large impacts on people's goals/career choices/etc. and they seem pretty viable to do without a huge amount of planning/money.

Thanks for your thoughts, Caleb! Yes, I come from 10 years in orgs where most retreats are self-funded, and we always had a good time - learning that in EA retreats are funded was a culture shock for me. For bigger conferences, I still think it is important to be able to give free tickets and even food and travel subsidies in part or full because diversity the of thought and inclusion of those who cannot afford it matters a lot. For something this small, where I expect we can recognize such cases, I think self-funded events are quite great.

It looks great! I'm happy to see events that are fairly bottom-up and grassroots in the organization. Do you think that this template/model could be used by other groups (say, in Latin America, or in Southeast Asia) with some reasonable adaptations?

Yes! The main reason for a relatively detailed write up is because I think this model can be easily replicated and is very much not dependant on our region.

Curated and popular this week
Ben_West🔸
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
> Summary: We propose measuring AI performance in terms of the length of tasks AI agents can complete. We show that this metric has been consistently exponentially increasing over the past 6 years, with a doubling time of around 7 months. Extrapolating this trend predicts that, in under a decade, we will see AI agents that can independently complete a large fraction of software tasks that currently take humans days or weeks. > > The length of tasks (measured by how long they take human professionals) that generalist frontier model agents can complete autonomously with 50% reliability has been doubling approximately every 7 months for the last 6 years. The shaded region represents 95% CI calculated by hierarchical bootstrap over task families, tasks, and task attempts. > > Full paper | Github repo Blogpost; tweet thread. 
Joris 🔸
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
Last week, I participated in Animal Advocacy Careers’ Impactful Policy Careers programme. Below I’m sharing some reflections on what was a really interesting week in Brussels! Please note I spent just one week there, so take it all with a grain of (CAP-subsidized) salt. Posts like this and this one are probably much more informative (and assume less context). I mainly wrote this to reflect on my time in Brussels (and I capped it at 2 hours, so it’s not a super polished draft). I’ll focus mostly on EU careers generally, less on (EU) animal welfare-related careers. Before I jump in, just a quick note about how I think AAC did something really cool here: they identified a relatively underexplored area where it’s relatively easy for animal advocates to find impactful roles, and then designed a programme to help these people better understand that area, meet stakeholders, and learn how to find roles. I also think the participants developed meaningful bonds, which could prove valuable over time. Thank you to the AAC team for hosting this! On EU careers generally * The EU has a surprisingly big influence over its citizens and the wider world for how neglected it came across to me. There’s many areas where countries have basically given a bunch (if not all) of their decision making power to the EU. And despite that, the EU policy making / politics bubble comes across as relatively neglected, with relatively little media coverage and a relatively small bureaucracy. * There’s quite a lot of pathways into the Brussels bubble, but all have different ToCs, demand different skill sets, and prefer different backgrounds. Dissecting these is hard, and time-intensive * For context, I have always been interested in “a career in policy/politics” – I now realize that’s kind of ridiculously broad. I’m happy to have gained some clarity on the differences between roles in Parliament, work at the Commission, the Council, lobbying, consultancy work, and think tanks. * The absorbe
Max Taylor
 ·  · 9m read
 · 
Many thanks to Constance Li, Rachel Mason, Ronen Bar, Sam Tucker-Davis, and Yip Fai Tse for providing valuable feedback. This post does not necessarily reflect the views of my employer. Artificial General Intelligence (basically, ‘AI that is as good as, or better than, humans at most intellectual tasks’) seems increasingly likely to be developed in the next 5-10 years. As others have written, this has major implications for EA priorities, including animal advocacy, but it’s hard to know how this should shape our strategy. This post sets out a few starting points and I’m really interested in hearing others’ ideas, even if they’re very uncertain and half-baked. Is AGI coming in the next 5-10 years? This is very well covered elsewhere but basically it looks increasingly likely, e.g.: * The Metaculus and Manifold forecasting platforms predict we’ll see AGI in 2030 and 2031, respectively. * The heads of Anthropic and OpenAI think we’ll see it by 2027 and 2035, respectively. * A 2024 survey of AI researchers put a 50% chance of AGI by 2047, but this is 13 years earlier than predicted in the 2023 version of the survey. * These predictions seem feasible given the explosive rate of change we’ve been seeing in computing power available to models, algorithmic efficiencies, and actual model performance (e.g., look at how far Large Language Models and AI image generators have come just in the last three years). * Based on this, organisations (both new ones, like Forethought, and existing ones, like 80,000 Hours) are taking the prospect of near-term AGI increasingly seriously. What could AGI mean for animals? AGI’s implications for animals depend heavily on who controls the AGI models. For example: * AGI might be controlled by a handful of AI companies and/or governments, either in alliance or in competition. * For example, maybe two government-owned companies separately develop AGI then restrict others from developing it. * These actors’ use of AGI might be dr
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
46
Ivan Burduk
· · 2m read