Hide table of contents

Effective giving is a core part of effective altruism as a project — and we’d love to see EA groups, networks of people in the EA community, and individuals helping to promote it, this Giving Season.

There’s a lot less funding available to many effective charities than there was last year,and that means that we’re making less progress than we might have otherwise on pressing global problems. Increasing the funds raised for effective charities by promoting effective giving remains one of the best ways for many of us to prevent deaths and suffering now and into the future.

Below, I’ve listed some actions for both groups/networks and individuals to take. If you have any other ideas for promoting effective giving, we are all ears and would love to figure out how to support you! Feel free to share ideas with others in the comments!

Actions for groups or networks:

Ask us to host a talk for your group, workplace, social club, etc.

We’re excited about giving talks about effective giving to groups of more than 20 people online or in-person (in locations that are feasible for us). We can also connect you with other organisations or speakers!

We have a particularly good new talk that’s been really well received by several consulting and tech companies!

Fill out this form to let us know you’re interested

Host your own Giving Game, everyday philanthropist or fundraising event

GWWC will sponsor donations for each participant in a Giving Game and has training and materials to help you run this smoothly! We also have a long list of ideas for fundraising events.

Additionally, we think Everyday Philanthropist events could be a really great way to engage both new and existing givers. Here’s a brief explanation of how they work (from our event guide):

  • Invite your attendees to help in making a real-world donation decision. One or more donors will play the role of a philanthropist and the attendees will help the donor decide on where they will donate.
  • Ideally the donors will provide a document with what their intentions are (e.g. "most improve the lives of farmed animals") and some suggested charities to help guide the discussion. This works best if either the donor or event organising team provide good summary information on each of the charities.

This makes for a great end-of-year event, helps to showcase real people who make effective giving a part of their lives, and offers an opportunity for those without an income to also be involved in effective giving.

Giving Game materials and sponsorship request

Fundraising event ideas

How to run an Everyday Philanthropist event

Start a fundraising page for your group

You can request to set up a GWWC fundraising page for up to 3 of our supported charities. Why not set a target and encourage your group to ask friends and family to donate?

Create a fundraising page with GWWC

Host a pledge panel in the new year

Hearing from people about their experiences taking a pledge with GWWC can be a great way to answer questions that people might have about the pledge, or help someone feel that it’s more achievable and rewarding than they previously thought.

Pledge panel event guide

Actions for individuals:

Contribute a post to the EA Forum about your giving during Giving Season

Share your experience with giving and more during a themed week on the EA Forum. Your thinking could influence others to donate more, or differently — and we’d love to see a variety of opinions out there!

Themed weeks you might want to contribute to

Vote and discuss as part of the EA Forum’s Donation Election

EA Forum users will have the opportunity to vote on which charities will receive a portion of the Donation Election Fund (which you can also contribute to), as well as discuss on the Forum why your favourite charity should receive the funding.

Post on participating in the Donation Election

Share the latest giving recommendations with friends and family

Point your friends and family towards highly effective donation options this Giving Season. Giving What We Can will be releasing our new recommendations towards the end of the month!

Our recommended charities

Sign up to our mailing list to get the new recommendations once they’re released!

Start a fundraising page instead of asking for presents over the holidays

You can request to set up a GWWC fundraising page for up to 3 of our supported charities. If you’re not interested in receiving gifts, consider asking for donations instead — not only does this raise funds, it raises awareness of highly effective charities.

Create a fundraising page with GWWC

Ask us to host a talk for your group workplace, social club, etc.

We’re excited about giving talks about effective giving to groups of more than 20 people online or in-person (in locations that are feasible for us). We can also connect you with other organisations or speakers

Fill out this form to let us know you’re interested

Talk about your pledge in person or on social media

Especially around the new year, people are often looking to make commitments in line with their values. Reflecting on how the pledge has positively impacted your life, and suggesting interested friends and family take a trial pledge to begin with (perhaps 1% for a year or 10% for 6 months) could be a great way to help them find an impactful resolution.

Here’s a nice example from David Kile

Here are some more ideas of how to talk about your Pledge on social media



 

Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Hi! I have for some time contemplated a fundraiser for my birthdays but do not know how to get most impact? Is the most impactful process what you outline above in terms of setting up a fundraiser on your webpage and then sharing that on e.g. Facebook? I am asking as I think intuitively the Facebook integrated fundraiser function is more helpful in that it shows everyone in my network how much is raised and our progress towards the goal which hopefully inspire more of my non-EA friends to give, and to give more.

Moreover, I have been contemplating sharing personal fundraisers with other EAs: It seems there is potential value in EAs who are anyway donating, instead donating to a personal, effective fundraiser. That way, all the non-EA people in that person's network get to see the large amounts that individual is able to raise and this might make more people contemplate and hopefully even donate themselves.

In general, I feel like there is value in making EA donations much more visible to all the non-EAs in the networks of EAs. But I think perhaps you have done much more work on figuring out how to use EAs' networks to get even more donation and make giving and effective giving more of a social norm.

Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f
LewisBollard
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
> How the dismal science can help us end the dismal treatment of farm animals By Martin Gould ---------------------------------------- Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- This year we’ll be sharing a few notes from my colleagues on their areas of expertise. The first is from Martin. I’ll be back next month. - Lewis In 2024, Denmark announced plans to introduce the world’s first carbon tax on cow, sheep, and pig farming. Climate advocates celebrated, but animal advocates should be much more cautious. When Denmark’s Aarhus municipality tested a similar tax in 2022, beef purchases dropped by 40% while demand for chicken and pork increased. Beef is the most emissions-intensive meat, so carbon taxes hit it hardest — and Denmark’s policies don’t even cover chicken or fish. When the price of beef rises, consumers mostly shift to other meats like chicken. And replacing beef with chicken means more animals suffer in worse conditions — about 190 chickens are needed to match the meat from one cow, and chickens are raised in much worse conditions. It may be possible to design carbon taxes which avoid this outcome; a recent paper argues that a broad carbon tax would reduce all meat production (although it omits impacts on egg or dairy production). But with cows ten times more emissions-intensive than chicken per kilogram of meat, other governments may follow Denmark’s lead — focusing taxes on the highest emitters while ignoring the welfare implications. Beef is easily the most emissions-intensive meat, but also requires the fewest animals for a given amount. The graph shows climate emissions per tonne of meat on the right-hand side, and the number of animals needed to produce a kilogram of meat on the left. The fish “lives lost” number varies significantly by