Hide table of contents

Effective giving is a core part of effective altruism as a project — and we’d love to see EA groups, networks of people in the EA community, and individuals helping to promote it, this Giving Season.

There’s a lot less funding available to many effective charities than there was last year,and that means that we’re making less progress than we might have otherwise on pressing global problems. Increasing the funds raised for effective charities by promoting effective giving remains one of the best ways for many of us to prevent deaths and suffering now and into the future.

Below, I’ve listed some actions for both groups/networks and individuals to take. If you have any other ideas for promoting effective giving, we are all ears and would love to figure out how to support you! Feel free to share ideas with others in the comments!

Actions for groups or networks:

Ask us to host a talk for your group, workplace, social club, etc.

We’re excited about giving talks about effective giving to groups of more than 20 people online or in-person (in locations that are feasible for us). We can also connect you with other organisations or speakers!

We have a particularly good new talk that’s been really well received by several consulting and tech companies!

Fill out this form to let us know you’re interested

Host your own Giving Game, everyday philanthropist or fundraising event

GWWC will sponsor donations for each participant in a Giving Game and has training and materials to help you run this smoothly! We also have a long list of ideas for fundraising events.

Additionally, we think Everyday Philanthropist events could be a really great way to engage both new and existing givers. Here’s a brief explanation of how they work (from our event guide):

  • Invite your attendees to help in making a real-world donation decision. One or more donors will play the role of a philanthropist and the attendees will help the donor decide on where they will donate.
  • Ideally the donors will provide a document with what their intentions are (e.g. "most improve the lives of farmed animals") and some suggested charities to help guide the discussion. This works best if either the donor or event organising team provide good summary information on each of the charities.

This makes for a great end-of-year event, helps to showcase real people who make effective giving a part of their lives, and offers an opportunity for those without an income to also be involved in effective giving.

Giving Game materials and sponsorship request

Fundraising event ideas

How to run an Everyday Philanthropist event

Start a fundraising page for your group

You can request to set up a GWWC fundraising page for up to 3 of our supported charities. Why not set a target and encourage your group to ask friends and family to donate?

Create a fundraising page with GWWC

Host a pledge panel in the new year

Hearing from people about their experiences taking a pledge with GWWC can be a great way to answer questions that people might have about the pledge, or help someone feel that it’s more achievable and rewarding than they previously thought.

Pledge panel event guide

Actions for individuals:

Contribute a post to the EA Forum about your giving during Giving Season

Share your experience with giving and more during a themed week on the EA Forum. Your thinking could influence others to donate more, or differently — and we’d love to see a variety of opinions out there!

Themed weeks you might want to contribute to

Vote and discuss as part of the EA Forum’s Donation Election

EA Forum users will have the opportunity to vote on which charities will receive a portion of the Donation Election Fund (which you can also contribute to), as well as discuss on the Forum why your favourite charity should receive the funding.

Post on participating in the Donation Election

Share the latest giving recommendations with friends and family

Point your friends and family towards highly effective donation options this Giving Season. Giving What We Can will be releasing our new recommendations towards the end of the month!

Our recommended charities

Sign up to our mailing list to get the new recommendations once they’re released!

Start a fundraising page instead of asking for presents over the holidays

You can request to set up a GWWC fundraising page for up to 3 of our supported charities. If you’re not interested in receiving gifts, consider asking for donations instead — not only does this raise funds, it raises awareness of highly effective charities.

Create a fundraising page with GWWC

Ask us to host a talk for your group workplace, social club, etc.

We’re excited about giving talks about effective giving to groups of more than 20 people online or in-person (in locations that are feasible for us). We can also connect you with other organisations or speakers

Fill out this form to let us know you’re interested

Talk about your pledge in person or on social media

Especially around the new year, people are often looking to make commitments in line with their values. Reflecting on how the pledge has positively impacted your life, and suggesting interested friends and family take a trial pledge to begin with (perhaps 1% for a year or 10% for 6 months) could be a great way to help them find an impactful resolution.

Here’s a nice example from David Kile

Here are some more ideas of how to talk about your Pledge on social media



 

Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Hi! I have for some time contemplated a fundraiser for my birthdays but do not know how to get most impact? Is the most impactful process what you outline above in terms of setting up a fundraiser on your webpage and then sharing that on e.g. Facebook? I am asking as I think intuitively the Facebook integrated fundraiser function is more helpful in that it shows everyone in my network how much is raised and our progress towards the goal which hopefully inspire more of my non-EA friends to give, and to give more.

Moreover, I have been contemplating sharing personal fundraisers with other EAs: It seems there is potential value in EAs who are anyway donating, instead donating to a personal, effective fundraiser. That way, all the non-EA people in that person's network get to see the large amounts that individual is able to raise and this might make more people contemplate and hopefully even donate themselves.

In general, I feel like there is value in making EA donations much more visible to all the non-EAs in the networks of EAs. But I think perhaps you have done much more work on figuring out how to use EAs' networks to get even more donation and make giving and effective giving more of a social norm.

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
(Audio version here, or search for "Joe Carlsmith Audio" on your podcast app.) > “There comes a moment when the children who have been playing at burglars hush suddenly: was that a real footstep in the hall?”  > > - C.S. Lewis “The Human Condition,” by René Magritte (Image source here) 1. Introduction Sometimes, my thinking feels more “real” to me; and sometimes, it feels more “fake.” I want to do the real version, so I want to understand this spectrum better. This essay offers some reflections.  I give a bunch of examples of this “fake vs. real” spectrum below -- in AI, philosophy, competitive debate, everyday life, and religion. My current sense is that it brings together a cluster of related dimensions, namely: * Map vs. world: Is my mind directed at an abstraction, or it is trying to see past its model to the world beyond? * Hollow vs. solid: Am I using concepts/premises/frames that I secretly suspect are bullshit, or do I expect them to point at basically real stuff, even if imperfectly? * Rote vs. new: Is the thinking pre-computed, or is new processing occurring? * Soldier vs. scout: Is the thinking trying to defend a pre-chosen position, or is it just trying to get to the truth? * Dry vs. visceral: Does the content feel abstract and heady, or does it grip me at some more gut level? These dimensions aren’t the same. But I think they’re correlated – and I offer some speculations about why. In particular, I speculate about their relationship to the “telos” of thinking – that is, to the thing that thinking is “supposed to” do.  I also describe some tags I’m currently using when I remind myself to “really think.” In particular:  * Going slow * Following curiosity/aliveness * Staying in touch with why I’m thinking about something * Tethering my concepts to referents that feel “real” to me * Reminding myself that “arguments are lenses on the world” * Tuning into a relaxing sense of “helplessness” about the truth * Just actually imagining differ
Garrison
 ·  · 7m read
 · 
This is the full text of a post from "The Obsolete Newsletter," a Substack that I write about the intersection of capitalism, geopolitics, and artificial intelligence. I’m a freelance journalist and the author of a forthcoming book called Obsolete: Power, Profit, and the Race to build Machine Superintelligence. Consider subscribing to stay up to date with my work. Wow. The Wall Street Journal just reported that, "a consortium of investors led by Elon Musk is offering $97.4 billion to buy the nonprofit that controls OpenAI." Technically, they can't actually do that, so I'm going to assume that Musk is trying to buy all of the nonprofit's assets, which include governing control over OpenAI's for-profit, as well as all the profits above the company's profit caps. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman already tweeted, "no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want." (Musk, for his part, replied with just the word: "Swindler.") Even if Altman were willing, it's not clear if this bid could even go through. It can probably best be understood as an attempt to throw a wrench in OpenAI's ongoing plan to restructure fully into a for-profit company. To complete the transition, OpenAI needs to compensate its nonprofit for the fair market value of what it is giving up. In October, The Information reported that OpenAI was planning to give the nonprofit at least 25 percent of the new company, at the time, worth $37.5 billion. But in late January, the Financial Times reported that the nonprofit might only receive around $30 billion, "but a final price is yet to be determined." That's still a lot of money, but many experts I've spoken with think it drastically undervalues what the nonprofit is giving up. Musk has sued to block OpenAI's conversion, arguing that he would be irreparably harmed if it went through. But while Musk's suit seems unlikely to succeed, his latest gambit might significantly drive up the price OpenAI has to pay. (My guess is that Altman will still ma
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
When we built a calculator to help meat-eaters offset the animal welfare impact of their diet through donations (like carbon offsets), we didn't expect it to become one of our most effective tools for engaging new donors. In this post we explain how it works, why it seems particularly promising for increasing support for farmed animal charities, and what you can do to support this work if you think it’s worthwhile. In the comments I’ll also share our answers to some frequently asked questions and concerns some people have when thinking about the idea of an ‘animal welfare offset’. Background FarmKind is a donation platform whose mission is to support the animal movement by raising funds from the general public for some of the most effective charities working to fix factory farming. When we built our platform, we directionally estimated how much a donation to each of our recommended charities helps animals, to show users.  This also made it possible for us to calculate how much someone would need to donate to do as much good for farmed animals as their diet harms them – like carbon offsetting, but for animal welfare. So we built it. What we didn’t expect was how much something we built as a side project would capture peoples’ imaginations!  What it is and what it isn’t What it is:  * An engaging tool for bringing to life the idea that there are still ways to help farmed animals even if you’re unable/unwilling to go vegetarian/vegan. * A way to help people get a rough sense of how much they might want to give to do an amount of good that’s commensurate with the harm to farmed animals caused by their diet What it isn’t:  * A perfectly accurate crystal ball to determine how much a given individual would need to donate to exactly offset their diet. See the caveats here to understand why you shouldn’t take this (or any other charity impact estimate) literally. All models are wrong but some are useful. * A flashy piece of software (yet!). It was built as
Recent opportunities in Effective giving
63
· · 1m read