3 min read 7

168

Audio is here if you prefer. Hope you like it.

 

I got something to offer, all I ask is your time.
And forgiveness for the form: a cheesy rhyme.
You’re skeptical? Makes sense. But I know your type's vice.
You strike me as a purveyor, of do-gooder advice.

And it’s pretty damn good, I don't mean to boast, 
This advice always fits. Well…sort of. Almost!
Listen good, take your time, to ensure I'm understood,
As I tell you how to do the utmost good.

But first let’s all travel, to that fateful day.
When you first got involved, with that thing called EA.
Maybe a colleague, a classmate, or old childhood friend,
Solemnly broke the news, of how this world will end.

Or perhaps it was fanfic, of a boy with a wand,
career tips, free pizza, or a child in a pond.
Well, you found the people, who in turn shaped the art,
of how to do good with the head and heart.

Do-gooder nerds, you knew through and through,
You found it! Well done! Your purpose. Your crew. 
So to all of you, here it is: my tip, my advice.
Alright! I’ll tell you. You don’t need to ask twice.

To help those not yet born. The ill. The caged birds,
And if that wasn’t enough, it’s only 8 words,
An elegant plan, a simple process:
Do what you can. No more. No less.

“Well that’s cute and that’s neat” I can hear you retort
“But it’s hardly a plan that can hold down the fort: 
To reduce the myriad, global catastrophic risks,
Spare the shrimp, help the poor, and those who don’t yet exist.

Now don’t get me wrong, I don’t think you’re some jerk,
But the world is on fire…I should get back to work.
Thanks for the rhyme. It was silly and sweet.
But it’s got too much fluff, needs to be more concrete.”

I’m so glad you asked, it’s a fair thing to do,
Coz I saved my best bits for last (and wrote your lines too). 
So let’s get specific, let’s chat details, 
Let’s get some shit done, put some wind in those sails.

If you do what you can, and I do it too,
Imagine all the things, that we both can do.
Rid the paint of the lead, take the birds out of cages,
Stop a pathogen’s spread, double a village’s wages.

Convince others to join you, more people is better,
The EV goes up, the more you go meta.
As a powerful clan, begins to coalesce,
When you do what you can. No more. No less.

If you can do more than that, then that is your mission.
Do as much as you can, with your skills and ambition.
Train up and network, guard your health and routine,
Improvements compound, you do-gooder machine.

And don’t bother comparing, against what others can do.
They’ll do what they can, and you’ll do the same too.
Because all you can do, is your personal best,
So just do what you can. No more. No less.

And sometimes the winds blow, in the wrong direction,
Ag-gag laws. FTX. Despot wins an election.
And sometimes the storm rages, right over your head,
Grant rejected. RSI. Too sad to get out of bed.

In times like these, my recommendation,
Is to look after yourself, maybe take a vacation.
Take time off with loved ones, tend your wounds, nurse your cuts.
As long as is needed, no ifs, ands, or buts.

If you’re feeling disillusioned, fed up, or impatient,
Well, this phrase still applies, if you’re EA adjacent. 
Don’t need to attend meetups, or read Slatestarcodex, 
To still do what you can. No more. No less.

And I’m sorry if my words, land flippant or trite. 
Like cheering  “hit good better!”, when you’ve just lost a fight.
I’m hoping these words, will resonate with someone,
If that someone ain’t you, close this page, get some sun.

And if you’re done and you quit, done with doing good.
I’m so sorry. I don’t know what happened that got you to this point. But I know it must have been really hard. Thank you for trying. I wish it had worked out differently. My heart goes out to you.

Look. Words are just words, and action is action,
The goal is do good. The rest is distraction.
Whether you got a PhD, from Harvard at seventeen,
Or you’re an average Joe, or median Josephine.

If you’ve made it this far, there’s a reason you stayed,
The world is on fire, and you’ve come to give aid.
Some days you’ll do lots, some months do jack shit,
We all play our part. But it builds bit by bit.

You won’t fix it all. But that was never your mission. 
Help others. The rest, is footnotes and addition.
That’s it. That’s the plan. I wish you success.
Do what you can. No more. No less.

168

6
0
36

Reactions

6
0
36

More posts like this

Comments7


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:
kta
8
0
0
4

Thanks for making this 🥺 honestly just reading you write words about RSI and not getting out of bed, and then having you even recommend rest, for some reason slaps me hard? 🥺

Got me teary eyed whilst reading the forum. wow. thank you.

this was lovely, thanks for sharing!

Thank you so, so much, Elliot, for writing this and being so caring and kind. This is so cleverly worded and beautifully read, we need more of this.

Love this, and love that there was also audio

This is beautiful, Teps. Thanks for sharing.

This is lovely and heartfelt, Elliot! I loved listening to your rendition. Makes me think an EA-themed poetry slam would a great idea.

Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Neel Nanda
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
TL;DR Having a good research track record is some evidence of good big-picture takes, but it's weak evidence. Strategic thinking is hard, and requires different skills. But people often conflate these skills, leading to excessive deference to researchers in the field, without evidence that that person is good at strategic thinking specifically. I certainly try to have good strategic takes, but it's hard, and you shouldn't assume I succeed! Introduction I often find myself giving talks or Q&As about mechanistic interpretability research. But inevitably, I'll get questions about the big picture: "What's the theory of change for interpretability?", "Is this really going to help with alignment?", "Does any of this matter if we can’t ensure all labs take alignment seriously?". And I think people take my answers to these way too seriously. These are great questions, and I'm happy to try answering them. But I've noticed a bit of a pathology: people seem to assume that because I'm (hopefully!) good at the research, I'm automatically well-qualified to answer these broader strategic questions. I think this is a mistake, a form of undue deference that is both incorrect and unhelpful. I certainly try to have good strategic takes, and I think this makes me better at my job, but this is far from sufficient. Being good at research and being good at high level strategic thinking are just fairly different skillsets! But isn’t someone being good at research strong evidence they’re also good at strategic thinking? I personally think it’s moderate evidence, but far from sufficient. One key factor is that a very hard part of strategic thinking is the lack of feedback. Your reasoning about confusing long-term factors need to extrapolate from past trends and make analogies from things you do understand better, and it can be quite hard to tell if what you're saying is complete bullshit or not. In an empirical science like mechanistic interpretability, however, you can get a lot more fe
Ronen Bar
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
"Part one of our challenge is to solve the technical alignment problem, and that’s what everybody focuses on, but part two is: to whose values do you align the system once you’re capable of doing that, and that may turn out to be an even harder problem", Sam Altman, OpenAI CEO (Link).  In this post, I argue that: 1. "To whose values do you align the system" is a critically neglected space I termed “Moral Alignment.” Only a few organizations work for non-humans in this field, with a total budget of 4-5 million USD (not accounting for academic work). The scale of this space couldn’t be any bigger - the intersection between the most revolutionary technology ever and all sentient beings. While tractability remains uncertain, there is some promising positive evidence (See “The Tractability Open Question” section). 2. Given the first point, our movement must attract more resources, talent, and funding to address it. The goal is to value align AI with caring about all sentient beings: humans, animals, and potential future digital minds. In other words, I argue we should invest much more in promoting a sentient-centric AI. The problem What is Moral Alignment? AI alignment focuses on ensuring AI systems act according to human intentions, emphasizing controllability and corrigibility (adaptability to changing human preferences). However, traditional alignment often ignores the ethical implications for all sentient beings. Moral Alignment, as part of the broader AI alignment and AI safety spaces, is a field focused on the values we aim to instill in AI. I argue that our goal should be to ensure AI is a positive force for all sentient beings. Currently, as far as I know, no overarching organization, terms, or community unifies Moral Alignment (MA) as a field with a clear umbrella identity. While specific groups focus individually on animals, humans, or digital minds, such as AI for Animals, which does excellent community-building work around AI and animal welfare while
Recent opportunities in Community
46
Ivan Burduk
· · 2m read