Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
gergo2
0
0
1

thanks for the reminder :)

Reply
See in context
by gergo, Joshua Landes, James Herbert, Jelle Donders, Natalia Matuszczyk, Margot Stakenborg, ENAIS
5 min read 4

43

AI safetyBuilding effective altruismCareer choiceExistential riskOpportunities to take actionAI safety groupsAnnouncements and updatesBuilding the field of AI safetyJob listing (open)Application announcements
Frontpage

TLDR:

ENAIS is teaming up with community builders from The Netherlands to seed AIS Netherlands. You can read about the role below, and if you would be interested in founding such an organisation, fill out this expression of interest form. We are currently in discussions with funders about seeding city and national groups across the world, so we would like to get a better sense of the local talent pool that would be interested in starting such an initiative. You can also (anonymously) refer people for us to contact here.

Co-signers:

  • Gergő Gáspár (Director, The European Network for AI Safety)
  • Joshua Lander (Community manager, Bluedot Impact)
  • James Herbert (Co-director, EA Netherlands)
  • Otto Barten (Director, Existential Risk Observatory)
  • Jelle Donders (Founder, Eindhoven AI Safety Team and Tilburg AI Safety Initiative)
  • Natalia Matuszczyk (Founder, AI Governance Rotterdam)
  • Margot Stakenborg (Independent researcher)

If you are not based in the Netherlands but are interested in community building, you can fill out the same form and indicate the location from where you would like to start a group.

Job title

Founding Executive Director – AIS Netherlands

Location

Randstad (Preferred) / Remote within the Netherlands

Work hours

Part-time to full-time role requiring 20-40 hours per week. Flexible working arrangements are available.

About AIS Netherlands

AIS Netherlands will be an organization focused on advancing the field of AI safety and ethical AI governance within the Netherlands and the EU. The founder of AIS Netherlands will work to build AI governance and technical talent, provide career advice, run courses and foster connections among members of the local and global AI Safety community. 

Position summary

AIS Netherlands will need a skilled and forward-thinking leader to serve as its Executive Director. In this foundational role, you'll guide the organization's growth, build its network, and develop its impact strategy. The Executive Director will be responsible for establishing AIS Netherlands’s initial programs and partnerships, focusing on communitybuilding, talent development, and educational outreach. The role calls for someone with a deep understanding of AI Safety, and experience in project and people management.

Key responsibilities

  • Strategic vision and program development
    • Shape the strategic direction of AIS Netherlands, designing programs aligned with the organization's mission to advance AI safety, based on insights and the evolving needs of the Dutch AI safety ecosystem.
    • Develop and launch programs, including educational courses, career support, and community-building activities to connect and support professionals in the Netherlands’s AI policy landscape.
  • Communitybuilding
    • Lead efforts to strengthen the AI safety community in the Netherlands, connecting students and professionals across AI governance and technical research, and related fields.
    • Organize networking events, facilitate AI safety meetups, and establish groups to build a collaborative and supportive community.
    • Coordinate with and support
      • Existing AI Safety organisations: Timaeus, Catalyze, Existential Risk Observatory, Legal Safety Lab etc.
      • Existing local groups: AIS Amsterdam, Delft, Eindhoven, Tilburg, Groningen Utrecht, Nijmegen, Maastricht, AIG Rotterdam etc.
  • Talent Development and Career Support
    • Provide resources and guidance to help individuals find impactful roles in AI governance and technical research
    • Develop partnerships with think tanks, universities, and other organizations to offer career support and networking opportunities.
  • Operational and Organizational Leadership
    • Oversee the operational setup of AIS Netherlands, including budgeting, compliance, staffing, and organizational development.
    • Collaborate with board members to ensure that the organization's programs and goals align with its mission and long-term objectives.

Program strategy and potential initiatives

AIS Netherlands will focus on two primary objectives:

  • Channeling Talent to High-Impact Roles
    • Career Advice and Connections: Build a team dedicated to helping professionals transition into AI safety roles in the Netherlands, providing mentorship and key connections within the Dutch policy ecosystem.
    • Educational Programs: Implement specialised courses, such as BlueDot or CAIS-type programs, aimed at students or experienced professionals. Follow up with participants to help them find meaningful roles in AI safety.

Key metrics: number of people getting into research fellowships, founding projects, transitioning to AI Safety careers

  • Building a Supportive Community
    • Networking Events and Retreats: Organize gatherings and retreats to unite people in AI safety, encourage collaboration, and foster new ideas.
    • Policy Fellowships and Visitor Programs: Create fellowship programs for mid-career professionals to gain experience at NL-based AI policy organisations, contributing to the broader community's impact.

Key metrics: number of new connections facilitated, number of policy fellows

As AIS Netherlands grows, the Executive Director may work with advisors and consultants to help identify and prioritize high-impact activities, refining the program strategy based on the Netherlands’s needs and opportunities.

Qualifications

  • Strategic and Visionary Leader: Experienced in guiding organizations or programs, ideally within the nonprofit, policy, or technology sectors.
  • Relationship Builder: Strong network in AI policy, governance, or related fields, with a proven ability to build effective partnerships.
  • Operational Skills: Skilled in managing budgets, operations, and staff oversight, with experience building sustainable organizational structures.
  • Community Development: Successful track record in fostering engaged communities through events, programs, and partnerships.
  • Understanding of AI Governance: Familiarity with AI safety concepts, knowledge of the Dutch and EU policy landscape and understanding of governance frameworks is necessary.

We recommend people to sign up even if they don't check all of these boxes, the ENAIS team will be ready to support you in developing new skills as part of the role.

Potential candidate profiles

AIS Netherlands is open to candidates from a variety of professional backgrounds who bring experience in one or more of the following areas:

  • Policy Connector: Experienced in the EU policy space, with skills in organizing events and building strategic alliances.
  • Educator: Skilled program managers with expertise in AI safety education, ideally focused on experienced professionals.
  • Consultant: Able to identify and assess fieldbuilding needs within the EU policy sphere, working with different stakeholders to design and implement projects.
  • Community Organizer: Skilled in community management, event planning, and outreach, committed to fostering collaboration in AI safety.

Compensation & benefits

We would like to make it clear that the funding is not yet secured for the organisation. We are currently in discussion with funders about the project and plan to either hold an open hiring process or help the top candidate(s) apply for funding for themselves. For this reason, we recommend filling out the EOI form and not waiting for the public job announcement.

We are currently fundraising for AIS Netherlands and for a full-time role, will aim to offer a competitive salary to a contractor in the range of 45,000 EUR - 78,000 EUR (gross salary), based on experience, along with a comprehensive benefits package, including:

  • 25 days of paid leave
  • Flexible working arrangements
  • Professional development support and advising
  • Community engagement - participating in team-building activities and retreats organised by the European Network for AI Safety and other community-builders in the Netherlands

How to register your interest

Please sign up on this form. EOIs will be reviewed on a rolling basis. As mentioned above, we will either hold an open hiring round or help the top candidate(s) to fundraise independently, so early submissions are encouraged. If you are not based in the Netherlands but are interested in community building, you can fill out the same form and indicate the location from where you would like to start a group. If you are not based in the Netherlands but are interested in community building, you can fill out the same form and indicate the location from where you would like to start a group.

43

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments4


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
BrianTan2
0
0
1

Cool initiative! (Btw the last sentence is cut off / doesn't have a link)

Reply
gergo4
0
0

Thanks for flagging, fixed it now!

Reply
Teun van der Weij1
0
0

Let's go!

Maybe you should cross-post it to LW too?

Reply
gergo2
0
0
1

thanks for the reminder :)

Reply
More from gergo
63
Why AI Safety Camp struggles with fundraising (FBB #2)
gergo
· · 8m read
10
10
42
Your group needs all the help it can get (FBB #1)
gergo
· · 5m read
6
6
37
Introducing The Field Building Blog (FBB #0)
gergo
· · 3m read
3
3
View more
Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
LintzA
 ·  · 15m read
 · 
Cross-posted to Lesswrong Introduction Several developments over the past few months should cause you to re-evaluate what you are doing. These include: 1. Updates toward short timelines 2. The Trump presidency 3. The o1 (inference-time compute scaling) paradigm 4. Deepseek 5. Stargate/AI datacenter spending 6. Increased internal deployment 7. Absence of AI x-risk/safety considerations in mainstream AI discourse Taken together, these are enough to render many existing AI governance strategies obsolete (and probably some technical safety strategies too). There's a good chance we're entering crunch time and that should absolutely affect your theory of change and what you plan to work on. In this piece I try to give a quick summary of these developments and think through the broader implications these have for AI safety. At the end of the piece I give some quick initial thoughts on how these developments affect what safety-concerned folks should be prioritizing. These are early days and I expect many of my takes will shift, look forward to discussing in the comments!  Implications of recent developments Updates toward short timelines There’s general agreement that timelines are likely to be far shorter than most expected. Both Sam Altman and Dario Amodei have recently said they expect AGI within the next 3 years. Anecdotally, nearly everyone I know or have heard of who was expecting longer timelines has updated significantly toward short timelines (<5 years). E.g. Ajeya’s median estimate is that 99% of fully-remote jobs will be automatable in roughly 6-8 years, 5+ years earlier than her 2023 estimate. On a quick look, prediction markets seem to have shifted to short timelines (e.g. Metaculus[1] & Manifold appear to have roughly 2030 median timelines to AGI, though haven’t moved dramatically in recent months). We’ve consistently seen performance on benchmarks far exceed what most predicted. Most recently, Epoch was surprised to see OpenAI’s o3 model achi
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f
Recent opportunities in AI safety
43
AIS Netherlands is looking for a Founding Executive Director (EOI form)
7 authors
· · 5m read
4
4
22
Last week to apply for the Futurekind AI Fellowship! (deadline: April 1)
Jay Luong
· · 1m read
0
0
3
Apply to become a Futurekind AI Facilitator or Mentor (deadline: April 10)
Jay Luong
· · 2m read
0
0
View more