In the early days of EA, people often tracked their giving on personal websites, or at least wrote about each year's donations. I read about it and felt inspired (and a bit competitive).
This is less popular now. I want to see more.
How to track donations
Here's a list of examples. Some people write long posts with all their reasoning, others just share numbers. More info is nice, but anything beats nothing.
My approach is minimal — a page explaining why I give in general, and a spreadsheet with names, numbers, and brief notes. It takes me like 20 minutes a year.
Why track?
The classic EA pitch is "you can improve the world".
Another pitch, which many people find more compelling, is "join a community of kind, interesting people who are trying to improve the world".
The more of us talk about our giving, the easier it is to see what our community is like. People like it when you live by your values, and the nerds in our core audience like it when claims are backed by data.
Also, if someone hears about EA, it makes a big difference if they know even a single donor personally — the difference between "those are weird nerds" and "hey, that's Aaron!" You can be your friends' first impression of effective giving.
Finally, the current state of affairs seems like a waste. There are 10,000+ Giving What We Can members who claim to give 10% of their income, but 95% of them don't say anything more — it's just a long list of names, with an occasional "I took the pledge!" tweet.
While not everyone keeps the pledge, thousands surely do. I wish they'd spend more time promoting that fact, explaining where they give, and sharing the data for people to see. (Same goes for non-pledgers, of course!)
In the golden age of public giving, the EA community spent most of its time thinking about where to give. Now, it's more about finding the right job. That's appropriate; the average person can make a much bigger impact by working than giving.
However:
- They aren't mutually exclusive. We can simultaneously convey "it's really good to find an impactful career" and "it's also good to donate, lots of us do it".
- Donating is easy to explain. I find it hard to describe my employer to people who aren't familiar with EA — as do many other people, especially in the AI/meta space. "I give 10% of my income, here are some charities I support" is easy to explain and leaves a lasting impression.
- Donating reaches more people. Most of my friends are doctors and lawyers and insurance agents who aren't going to change their jobs no matter what I tell them. But lots of them have asked me about charity over the years, because I talk about my giving and put the details on my website.
- You should also write about your job. No hypocrisy here!
Why not track?
- I don't give very much because I take a low salary to support my employer, live off small grants, have family to support, need savings to stay flexible, etc.
- Makes sense! That said, if you are in fact donating something like 10%, even from a small salary, that will still be cool or inspiring to many people.
- To be clear, this isn't an argument for giving more — just talking about whatever giving you do.
- I don't have anything interesting to say — I give 10% to GiveWell, unrestricted.
- You don't have to be interesting! It's still cool to live in a world where more people are talking about the causes they believe in. Also, most people have no idea what GiveWell is, including some of the people you know.
- I give to weird or controversial causes that will not endear people to EA — it's all AI research, meta stuff, and political campaigns.
- Makes sense! But you (a) can write about some but not all donations if you want, and (b) may find it interesting to explain why you chose those causes — maybe you'll convince someone.
- If you're worried about political donations making it hard to get a job later, remember that U.S. campaign giving is already public; the AI hiring bots of the future will find you anyway. But it's reasonable not to broadcast your support for e.g. partisan think tanks whose donors aren't disclosed.
- I worry that people in EA will shame me for donations they think are suboptimal, or start annoying arguments I don't want to engage in.
- Yep, that does sound plausible :-/ For what it's worth:
- If you want to ignore critics of your giving, that's entirely fair. You have no obligation to engage; a single post still beats not saying anything.
- No one's donations will look good to every other person. Your critic, if they shared their own views, would have critics of their own.
- Even Coefficient Giving gets regular criticism, and that's a team of full-time professional grantmakers trying really hard to get things right. Getting criticized doesn't mean you're a bad person, bad EA, whatever.
- I've been tracking donations for twelve years and exactly one person has tried to shame me (they're a friend, we got past it).
- Yep, that does sound plausible :-/ For what it's worth:
- I don't have anywhere to put the information.
- Make a Google Sheet and put the link on your profiles. Feel free to copy mine.
- Once a year, make a post somewhere about where you gave. No need to explain your reasons — one sentence about each charity, or even just a link, is great.
But actually, track your donations
I've found this habit incredibly worthwhile, and I think you should try it.
You can set up a page or spreadsheet and a quick statement of intent in less than an hour. If you want, you can fill in your entire donation history in another hour or two.
If you don't have time today, or want to procrastinate, put this post in your calendar for November 21st and do it before Giving Tuesday. Let's show the world what EA looks like!
Appendix: Who tracks?
This includes anyone I think of as connected to effective altruism, even if they wouldn't describe themselves that way. (Ask me if you'd like to be removed.)
I'd love to grow this list. If I missed you, or you start tracking after this post, let me know!
- Aaron Gertler (80,000 Hours)
- Jaan Tallinn (entrepreneur)
- Jeff Kaufman and Julia Wise (SecureBio, CEA)
- Members of Effective Altruism DC — amount of info varies
- Michael Dickens (independent researcher)
- Ross Rheingans-Yoo (angel investor)
- Peter Wildeford (Institute for AI Policy and Strategy) — can't find on his current site
- Staff members at Coefficient Giving staff
- Staff members at GiveWell
- Staff members at Giving Green
- Vitalik Buterin (entrepreneur) — probably incomplete
The "Donation Writeup" tag has more examples, like the 2025 donation celebration post.

I agree :) I have written 6 posts about effective giving during the past year on Substack. And the latest one, which also got the most views relatively (still only around 100), was about my personal donations in 2025.
Also, consider writing in your native or local language! Example: As far as I know, there are <10 people (or organisations) who have ever written about effective giving in Finnish, and I'm the only one doing it semi-consistently. Most people in my target audience in Finland are essentially fluent in English, but many prefer reading in Finnish if they can, as it might be faster and easier to connect. I'm also not writing anything particularly novel, so few EAs miss out on anything. But my content could be a way to spark the initial curiosity, so that people get the motivation to read more in English (in which there's a lot more content that I often reference in my posts).
@Ben Kuhn has a log at https://www.benkuhn.net/ea/ , though the last donation is 2019. I don't know if that's putting giving on hold vs no longer updating the list?