The definitions of the types and subtypes of information hazards described in Bostrom 2011, by information transfer mode and effect, are presented below.
Information hazard: A risk that arises from the dissemination or the potential dissemination of (true) information that may cause harm or enable some agent to cause harm.
Data hazard: Specific data, such as the genetic sequence of a lethal pathogen or a blueprint for making a thermonuclear weapon, if disseminated, create risk.
Idea hazard: A general idea, if disseminated, creates a risk, even without a data-rich detailed specification.
Attention hazard: The mere drawing of attention to some particularly potent or relevant ideas or data increases risk, even when these ideas or data are already “known”.
Template hazard: The presentation of a template enables distinctive modes of information transfer and thereby creates risk.
Signaling hazard: Verbal and non-verbal actions can indirectly transmit information about some hidden quality of the sender, and such social signaling creates risk.
Evocation hazard: There can be a risk that the particular mode of presentation used to convey some content can activate undesirable mental states and processes.
Competiveness hazard: There is a risk that, by obtaining information, some competitor of ours will become stronger, thereby weakening our competitive position. Subtypes:
Norm hazard: Some social norms depend on a coordination of beliefs or expectations among many subjects; and a risk is posed by information that could disrupt these expectations for the worse. Subtypes:
Ideological hazard: An idea might, by entering into an ecology populated by other ideas, interact in ways which, in the context of extant institutional and social structures, produce a harmful outcome, even in the absence of any intention to harm.
Distraction and temptation hazards: Information can harm us by distracting us or presenting us with temptation.
Role model hazard: We can be corrupted and deformed by exposure to bad role models.
Biasing hazard: When we are biased, we can be led further away from the truth by exposure to information that triggers or amplifies our biases.
De-biasing hazard: When our biases have individual or social benefits, harm could result from information that erodes these biases.
Neuropsychological hazard: Information might have negative effects on our psyches because of the particular ways in which our brains are structured, effects that would not arise in more “idealized” cognitive architectures.
Information-burying hazard: Irrelevant information can make relevant information harder to find, thereby increasing search costs for agents with limited computational resources.
Psychological reaction hazard: Information can reduce well-being by causing sadness, disappointment, or some other psychological effect in the receiver. Subtypes:
Belief-constituted value hazard: If some component of well-being depends constitutively on epistemic or attentional states, then information that alters those states might thereby directly impact well-being. Subtype:
Information system hazard: The behavior of some (non-human) information system can be adversely affected by some informational inputs or system interactions. Subtypes:
Development hazard: Progress in some field of knowledge can lead to enhanced technological, organizational, or economic capabilities, which can produce negative consequences (independently of any particular extant competitive context).
Thanks for sharing the summary, I wasn’t aware of many of these.