Hi everyone, my name is Mike Filbey and I am the founder of a nonprofit 501c3 called Pepper that I just launched last week. I started Pepper because I want to help people make a difference in the world. After I read the Life You Can Save I felt compelled to do something with not just my money but with my time and experience. We've got just over 50 members so far which I'm excited about because it's just from sharing with my network. 

I spoke with someone who ran an EA chapter at university and he recommended I post here when I launch to get feedback and ideas. He thought some of his non-EA friends may be interested in joining Pepper. That's one question I'd love input on...do you think your non-EA friends would be interested in Pepper? Please comment or email me if you have any ideas, questions, or feedback. michaelfilbey1@gmail.com. Thank you in advance! 

With Pepper there's just one option: give $10/month. 100% of donations (less standard Stripe nonprofit fees) go directly to four charities I've partnered with: AMF, Malaria Consortium (SMC program), HKI (VAS program), and GiveDirectly (Africa Cash Transfers program). I chose these charities because of research I conducted, but mostly because I trust GiveWell and they're far better than me at research. 

You can see the site here: https://joinpepper.org/

And our story here: https://joinpepper.org/about/

My goal with Pepper is to help people make a difference by simplifying the donation process (you can signup in 60 seconds and don't need to decide how much to give, which charities to give to, or how often to give) and create a power in numbers approach to giving, where people not dollars, make the difference. 

From an organizational perspective what makes Pepper unique is that we wake up and live and breathe marketing. Our goal is to acquire members and delight them. My background is in entrepreneurship and marketing.

Thank you so much for reading and a big thank you to anyone who shares a suggestion. 

Cheers,

Mike Filbey

62

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Comments24


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Hey!

+1 for starting a project!

My own opinion is that many organizations try to "simplify donations" but almost all of those seem to really fail, and so I conclude that either "simplifying" is not an actual pain point, or that "making it simpler" is somehow very complicated.

These are only my priors on your area, not an opinion about your own project.

Hi Yonatan, 

 

Thank you so much for commenting! I agree that simplifying giving likely isn't enough to make a difference. I think it will take some big learnings in how best to engage people in giving, especially people who don't currently give and/or are opposed to giving internationally. 

I agree

 

Any idea how to learn those things?

Great question! Something I'm still working on. I believe that it's worth trying to use language and visuals that get people excited about making an impact rather than feel guilty for not doing enough. That alone seems to be a significant differentiator in a space that's too often filled with images and text guilting people into giving. I don't want to pressure anyone into joining. I want people to join because they want to join, not because they feel like they should. I'm going to test different messaging and visuals in paid ads, podcasts, emails, and partnerships on social media. I'm hoping some influencers with a history of doing good will be interested in sharing Pepper as it's a fairly accessible way for people to get into the habit of giving. Open to any ideas of course and thank you for getting my wheels rolling here! Thanks again!

My own intuition would be "talk to users, watch them use it, interview them" and so on, as opposed to collecting statistical data (which I'd only do later, after my users keep repeating the same thing verbally and I want to make sure it's also true "at scale").

 

For example, grab someone at your hallway and ask them if they'd like to donate on your platform and see what they reply. (or ask them to use your website and see how they react).

My intuition is that you'll get surprising results that you wouldn't even consider asking about in a survey. (again, only speaking from priors-on-startups, not anything about your own project or the quality of your own concrete guesses)

 

I mean, if it makes sense to you.

If you were sitting near me right now I'd invite you to go out to the street together and ask 3 people and see if that totally changes everything really quickly, but alas, I just checked and it seems like you're not here :)

If only we could hit the streets! I love this mindset. I am going to take more of a discovery approach for the next couple weeks and see what I learn. Thanks a million! This is helpful. 

I think it would be very cool if you could find a way to pay for the credit card fees for donors. It seems donors really love these "100% model" approaches where they pay for 0 overhead. And I think they may like the idea that $10 given is $10 donated.

Though I'm not sure there is really any logistical way for you to do so? If it all happens on their end? 

@mikefilbey switching from monthly to annually could save over half the Stripe processing fees

@Pat Myron great idea! I imagine our offerings for donors will look quite different a year from now and I like the pay up front and make your donation go even further option. Thank you for helping me. 

@mikefilbey encouraging debit card use over credit card use can also decrease payment processing fees

Hi Kyle, thank you for the great suggestion. I agree, the 100% messaging is very effective. It seems to be one of the biggest drivers behind Charity Water's success. They have private funders paying for their overhead and cover the cost of credit card fees for donors. In a perfect world we'd do the same and we plan on applying for grants. If they figured out the logistics, I bet we could eventually too. Thanks again! 

Iirc PayPal giving pool eats the credit card fees

Hi Hauke, thank you! I will check that out. 

ES
4
1
0

Hi! I just wanted to say welcome and that I love the idea! I'm excited in general about it, think that it could be really promising for 'non'-EAs', and just love that you took an idea and put it into action :)

Hi Elika,

 

Wow! You're so kind. Thank you for the encouragement and for joining Pepper, that's so cool. Your support means a lot to me. I'm glad you think it could appeal to people unfamiliar with EA. I think the work these charities are doing is fantastic and more people should know about it! I believe that if we can educate people on their awesomeness and make it super simple for them to make an impact, then maybe it'll snowball into something big. Thanks again! 

Why is it called 'Pepper'?

Hi David, ahh thanks for asking! I was envisioning one of those little hot peppers that's small but packs a punch, the idea being that with Pepper a small amount of money can make a big impact. 

I think this is an excellent idea. As others have noted, I think there is alpha in reaching new people without any EA branding and pitching helping distant others to them. Doing the basics well. Also, seeing your webpage made me realize how much I've lowered my standards on design for a lot of EA content. It's quite nice.

My main (small) criticism is that I was confused by the name. I think you should more clearly explain it. I kept imagining black pepper, not a chili pepper. Maybe there is a way to incorporate the image of a hot pepper somewhere? It didn't feel bad, exactly, but random and odd.

Hi Ryan!

Thank you so much for the encouragement and kind words. I’m glad you like the design of the site. If things go well I’m going to invest in improving it further. And I 100% agree with you on the name/branding having a disconnect. I may create a new logo with the red little pepper icon shortly and more so communicate the significance d behind the name. It’s been the first question people ask me. Thanks again and enjoy your weekend!

I like this idea because it is simple and makes donations less daunting especially for a student like myself since there is a $10 cap. I'll be signing up :) 

I like the donation dashboard too, and the sign-up process was quick and easy! Really nice work here! I shared it with my local EA university group. 

Hi Lauren, thank you for the input and thank you for joining Pepper! If you think of any ways I can improve it please email me or comment. Waking up and reading your comments made my morning. And you got me thinking that I should see if other EA university groups would be interested in Pepper. Thank you! 

Such a cool initiative!

Thank you! I hope your work in Hungary is going well. 

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 11m read
 · 
Does a food carbon tax increase animal deaths and/or the total time of suffering of cows, pigs, chickens, and fish? Theoretically, this is possible, as a carbon tax could lead consumers to substitute, for example, beef with chicken. However, this is not per se the case, as animal products are not perfect substitutes.  I'm presenting the results of my master's thesis in Environmental Economics, which I re-worked and published on SSRN as a pre-print. My thesis develops a model of animal product substitution after a carbon tax, slaughter tax, and a meat tax. When I calibrate[1] this model for the U.S., there is a decrease in animal deaths and duration of suffering following a carbon tax. This suggests that a carbon tax can reduce animal suffering. Key points * Some animal products are carbon-intensive, like beef, but causes relatively few animal deaths or total time of suffering because the animals are large. Other animal products, like chicken, causes relatively many animal deaths or total time of suffering because the animals are small, but cause relatively low greenhouse gas emissions. * A carbon tax will make some animal products, like beef, much more expensive. As a result, people may buy more chicken. This would increase animal suffering, assuming that farm animals suffer. However, this is not per se the case. It is also possible that the direct negative effect of a carbon tax on chicken consumption is stronger than the indirect (positive) substitution effect from carbon-intensive products to chicken. * I developed a non-linear market model to predict the consumption of different animal products after a tax, based on own-price and cross-price elasticities. * When calibrated for the United States, this model predicts a decrease in the consumption of all animal products considered (beef, chicken, pork, and farmed fish). Therefore, the modelled carbon tax is actually good for animal welfare, assuming that animals live net-negative lives. * A slaughter tax (a
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
I can’t recall the last time I read a book in one sitting, but that’s what happened with Moral Ambition by bestselling author Rutger Bregman. I read the German edition, though it’s also available in Dutch (see James Herbert's Quick Take). An English release is slated for May. The book opens with the statement: “The greatest waste of our times is the waste of talent.” From there, Bregman builds a compelling case for privileged individuals to leave their “bullshit jobs” and tackle the world’s most pressing challenges. He weaves together narratives spanning historical movements like abolitionism, suffrage, and civil rights through to contemporary initiatives such as Against Malaria Foundation, Charity Entrepreneurship, LEEP, and the Shrimp Welfare Project. If you’ve been engaged with EA ideas, much of this will sound familiar, but I initially didn’t expect to enjoy the book as much as I did. However, Bregman’s skill as a storyteller and his knack for balancing theory and narrative make Moral Ambition a fascinating read. He reframes EA concepts in a more accessible way, such as replacing “counterfactuals” with the sports acronym “VORP” (Value Over Replacement Player). His use of stories and examples, paired with over 500 footnotes for details, makes the book approachable without sacrificing depth. I had some initial reservations. The book draws heavily on examples from the EA community but rarely engages directly with the movement, mentioning EA mainly in the context of FTX. The final chapter also promotes Bregman’s own initiative, The School for Moral Ambition. However, the school’s values closely align with core EA principles. The ITN framework and pitches for major EA cause areas are in the book, albeit with varying levels of depth. Having finished the book, I can appreciate its approach. Moral Ambition feels like a more pragmatic, less theory-heavy version of EA. The School for Moral Ambition has attracted better-known figures in Germany, such as the political e
MarieF🔸
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Summary * After >2 years at Hi-Med, I have decided to step down from my role. * This allows me to complete my medical residency for long-term career resilience, whilst still allowing part-time flexibility for direct charity work. It also allows me to donate more again. * Hi-Med is now looking to appoint its next Executive Director; the application deadline is 26 January 2025. * I will join Hi-Med’s governing board once we have appointed the next Executive Director. Before the role When I graduated from medical school in 2017, I had already started to give 10% of my income to effective charities, but I was unsure as to how I could best use my medical degree to make this world a better place. After dipping my toe into nonprofit fundraising (with Doctors Without Borders) and working in a medical career-related start-up to upskill, a talk given by Dixon Chibanda at EAG London 2018 deeply inspired me. I formed a rough plan to later found an organisation that would teach Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-specific psychotherapeutic techniques to lay people to make evidence-based treatment of PTSD scalable. I started my medical residency in psychosomatic medicine in 2019, working for a specialised clinic for PTSD treatment until 2021, then rotated to child and adolescent psychiatry for a year and was half a year into the continuation of my specialisation training at a third hospital, when Akhil Bansal, whom I met at a recent EAG in London, reached out and encouraged me to apply for the ED position at Hi-Med - an organisation that I knew through my participation in their introductory fellowship (an academic paper about the outcomes of this first cohort can be found here). I seized the opportunity, applied, was offered the position, and started working full-time in November 2022.  During the role I feel truly privileged to have had the opportunity to lead High Impact Medicine for the past two years. My learning curve was steep - there were so many new things to