Hide table of contents

Meet the fly that could help save the planet - ISRAEL21c

We’re far from certain that insects are sentient. But with over a trillion insects farmed annually, the welfare impacts are staggering if they can suffer. Unfortunately, fundamental questions about their well-being remain unexplored. This is where Arthropoda Foundation steps in, actively finding and funding the best opportunities to produce knowledge that can improve the lives of farmed insects.

Current Research Priorities

Humane Slaughter Protocols

Insects are regularly microwaved, baked, and boiled alive. If producers can stun these animals before slaughter, they can reduce significant distress. We’ve found a lab willing to develop and test electrical stunning procedures for black soldier fly larvae, with an eye to creating an inexpensive, readily implementable system that can be adopted by industry partners. ~$67,000.

Stocking Densities and Substrate Research

For many farmed insects, the quality of their lives comes down to stocking densities and the substrate in which they’re reared—which is what they eat. The industry has a strong incentive to keep stocking densities high and substrates cheap. We're partnering with a lab to investigate feasible ways of reducing any negative welfare impacts of these choices, whether by changing the way their containers are designed or supplementing the substrate with cost-effective nutrients. Variable costs depending on scope: $20,000–$100,000.

Automated Welfare Assessment

We want to be able to anticipate and intervene on welfare problems. However, our best indicator of poor welfare—mortality rates—doesn’t let us do that. By the time we have the data, the suffering is over. So, we need welfare indicators that let producers anticipate declines in insect welfare. So, we’re working with a lab to develop an acoustic monitoring system that will let producers detect distress in insect populations much earlier than they can now. This allows producers to intervene, whether by adjusting conditions or, if necessary, depopulating before any additional unnecessary suffering. ~$53,000.

Funding Needs

Right now, we’ll only be able to fund one of these projects. Donations are critical to funding a second. The ranking of options will depend on several factors, including the amount raised, available graduate student labor at particular labs, negotiating reasonable overhead rates at the relevant universities, and so on.  

Supporting Arthropoda offers a rare chance to make an outsized difference to a field with vast potential impact but minimal resources. We make every effort to keep the costs of science down—every dollar directly funds research and innovation that might otherwise go unexplored. Arthropoda has no overhead costs or staff expenses; 100% of your donation goes straight to the essential components of research—people, lab space, and supplies.

Despite the scale of the problem, insects remain one of the most neglected areas in animal welfare. With very limited resources tackling this issue, even small contributions can make an outsized difference.

This giving season, we invite you to join us in supporting the future of insect welfare. Your contribution, no matter the size, helps create the knowledge that can influence industry practices for years to come.

Support Insect Welfare

Want to learn more about insects?

Meghan Barrett’s 80K episode is a great place to start. Want to dig deeper into the evidence for sentience? Check out this great review by Matilda Gibbons and her collaborators. Want to think more carefully about taking precautionary measures when sentience is uncertain? Take a look at Jonathan Birch’s new book. Want to think through the relative priority of insect work in the animal space? Consider the book-length version of the Moral Weight Project.

Comments4


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

After these three projects, what would you do with further funding? Or would you turn away further funding?

Great question, Michael. Short answer: there are bound to be lots of valuable research projects after these three; so, we'd hold the funds until we found a lab that's willing and able to take on a sufficiently impactful project. One long-term goal is to support the many foundational research projects that need to be done on insect welfare. When we consider the sheer number of species (1M described; probably 5.5M in total) and the range of ways humans affect insects, it's clear that we need a wide set of validated welfare indicators to make judgments about how best to help these animals. 

I agree these sound like great (though of course high-risk) opportunities, but find myself confused: why are such things not already being funded?

My understanding is that Good Ventures is moving away from some such areas. But what about e.g. the EA Animal Welfare Fund or other EA funders? I don't know much about animal welfare funding, so on face value I am pretty convinced these seem worth funding, but I am worried I am missing something if more sensible/knowledgeable people aren't already funding them. (Though deferring too much to other funders could create too much group-think.)

Thanks for your question, Oscar. We have some applications outstanding but don't know how much funding they'll generate. In general, animal welfare funding is quite tight, with lots of worthy projects going unsupported. So, we're almost certain to have more opportunities than resources. And given how new the field of insect welfare science is, we anticipate this problem continuing, as there are bound to be many other high-value projects like these in the coming year(s).

Curated and popular this week
Ben_West🔸
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
> Summary: We propose measuring AI performance in terms of the length of tasks AI agents can complete. We show that this metric has been consistently exponentially increasing over the past 6 years, with a doubling time of around 7 months. Extrapolating this trend predicts that, in under a decade, we will see AI agents that can independently complete a large fraction of software tasks that currently take humans days or weeks. > > The length of tasks (measured by how long they take human professionals) that generalist frontier model agents can complete autonomously with 50% reliability has been doubling approximately every 7 months for the last 6 years. The shaded region represents 95% CI calculated by hierarchical bootstrap over task families, tasks, and task attempts. > > Full paper | Github repo Blogpost; tweet thread. 
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
Epistemic status: highly certain, or something The Spending What We Must 💸11% pledge  In short: Members pledge to spend at least 11% of their income on effectively increasing their own productivity. This pledge is likely higher-impact for most people than the Giving What We Can 🔸10% Pledge, and we also think the name accurately reflects the non-supererogatory moral beliefs of many in the EA community. Example Charlie is a software engineer for the Centre for Effective Future Research. Since Charlie has taken the SWWM 💸11% pledge, rather than splurge on a vacation, they decide to buy an expensive noise-canceling headset before their next EAG, allowing them to get slightly more sleep and have 104 one-on-one meetings instead of just 101. In one of the extra three meetings, they chat with Diana, who is starting an AI-for-worrying-about-AI company, and decide to become a cofounder. The company becomes wildly successful, and Charlie's equity share allows them to further increase their productivity to the point of diminishing marginal returns, then donate $50 billion to SWWM. The 💸💸💸 Badge If you've taken the SWWM 💸11% Pledge, we'd appreciate if you could add three 💸💸💸 "stacks of money with wings" emoji to your social media profiles. We chose three emoji because we think the 💸11% Pledge will be about 3x more effective than the 🔸10% pledge (see FAQ), and EAs should be scope sensitive.  FAQ Is the pledge legally binding? We highly recommend signing the legal contract, as it will allow you to sue yourself in case of delinquency. What do you mean by effectively increasing productivity? Some interventions are especially good at transforming self-donations into productivity, and have a strong evidence base. In particular:  * Offloading non-work duties like dates and calling your mother to personal assistants * Running many emulated copies of oneself (likely available soon) * Amphetamines I'm an AI system. Can I take the 💸11% pledge? We encourage A
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
Hi everybody! I'm Conor. I run the 80,000 Hours Job Board. Or I used to. As of today — April 1 — we are becoming Job Birds! We've been talking to users for the last few years about making this change, and people have overwhelmingly been in favour (remember, there are six or more birds for every human on Earth). Whether it's the daily emails asking me to finally switch, or the flocks of people accosting me at conferences to urge a migration to Job Birds, the demand is overwhelming! Luckily, the wait is over! I've included an FAQ below of the most common questions we receive. FAQ * Do these birds have jobs? * In a sense, no. In another, preferred sense, definitely! They have roles in ecological niches. * What's a good bird to get started with? * The peregrine falcon. * What's the theory of change? * Birds are fascinating creatures. * Birds are the only living animals with feathers. * Birds have hollow bones, which help facilitate flight. * Some bird species, such as parrots and corvids, display remarkable intelligence. * What was the question again? * Caw! Caw! * I have concerns about wild animal suffering. How does Job Birds intend to navigate promoting birds of prey? * The humans behind Job Birds share these concerns. Unfortunately, birds of prey we've spoken to overwhelmingly ascribe to an incompatible, sort of Avi-Nietzschean value system. Owl contractors are in the process of building a moral parliament tool in order to manage these conflicting normative claims. * I worry that sharing birds with people isn't as impactful as sharing jobs. * Okay, but consider this: you can click the media buttons to even hear the sounds of the bird! * I would like to do good with my career. Can Job Birds help me with that? * Users report that job hunting can be stressful and time-intensive. In light of this, we at Job Birds recommend breaking up your job hunts with some time learning about the wonders of over 1,000 bird species at 80,000