Hide table of contents

Hi everyone, I’m working on an article for Recursive Adaptation about the death and disease burden of addiction and I think some folks here might be pretty experienced and structured on these types of questions, so I thought I’d post a veryyy rough initial draft / notes for feedback. And if you’d be interested in working on this article with me please let me know, I'd love the help.

Recursive Adaption is the publication of CASPR — we are a new organization focused on scalable strategies for addiction, particularly development and deployment of new medications, including scaling GLP-1s for addiction and ensuring suzetrigine access (which is an opioid-replacing painkiller that will be available next year but insurance generally won’t cover, which is... a bad situation).

We recently published a long article about the scientific and strategic case for us GLP-1s for addiction, which was in the most recent Astral Codex links post. Subscribe to our blog!!

So, here’s what I have so far about these questions on addiction and leading causes of death.

US deaths from addiction

Drug overdoses, opioids and stimulants, now cause more than twice as many annual deaths in the United States as HIV/AIDS caused at its peak in 1995 (109,000 vs 45,000). Overdose deaths are just one part of the mortality burden— addiction kills even more people slowly.

US deaths from excess alcohol use are 178,000 per year and deaths from smoking are 480,000 per year. That’s a total of about 767,000 annual deaths from substance use disorders.

For context, COVID deaths peaked at 450,000 annually and are now ~90% lower than peak.

How does this compare to deaths from cancer and heart disease? Looking at top line numbers in the US, cancer deaths are about 609,000 and heart disease deaths are 695,000. Both of those are lower than the 767,000 from substance use and actually those numbers are inflated because a big portion of heart disease and cancer death is caused by substance use. If we subtract those deaths, the gap gets bigger.

In the USA

According to the American Cancer Society, “In 2022, there will be an estimated 1.9 million new cancer cases diagnosed and 609,360 cancer deaths in the United States.”

According the CDC, smoking causes 30% of all cancer deaths annually in the US. Higher in other countries?

If we subtract that 30% from the total cancer deaths and move those to addiction, we are left with 426,552 deaths.

Another 3% of cancer death is caused by alcohol, which brings non-addiction cancer down to about 408,271.

Deaths from non-addiction heart disease

According to the CDC, 695,000 people die of heart disease every year in the US. They call it the ‘leading cause of death’— but we have a slightly different idea of what is a “cause”!

About 30% of deaths from heart disease come from smoking, which brings us to 486,500 non-smoking related heart disease deaths.

As for alcohol, opioids, stimulants, this study, summarized here, looks at rates of substance-use related cardiovascular death but this doesn’t seem to be quite the same as attributing a cause. I haven’t found a number yet for heart disease deaths caused by substance use.

US addiction deaths vs heart disease and cancer

Where does this leave us?

  • US Deaths from Addiction: 767,000
  • US Deaths from Non-Addiction Related Cancer: 408,271
  • US Deaths from Non-Smoking Related Heart Disease: 486,500 (still need to subtract alcohol, opioid, and stimulant deaths here).

Addiction #1 cause of DALYs in the USA

Here’s a chart we made from WHO data for a post that calls for an operation warp speed for addiction medication:

This comes right from the WHO DALY dashboard for the USA. But this does not include alcohol or cigarettes in ‘drug use’ and it also breaks up cancers and heart diseases into various subcategories. I’m pretty sure that addiction, if you include alcohol and cigarettes (and subtracting those from heart disease and cancer), would be at the top of DALYs in the US even after grouping together heart diseases and cancers. It would be great to have a method for this.

If you include smoking and drinking’s effects on dementia, liver disease, depression, anxiety, etc, the DALYs would keep rising and, I believe, far outstrip any other cause of disease.

And if you include crime, incarceration, the drug war, families falling apart, and all sorts of other externalities related to use of alcohol, opioids, and stimulants, the DALYs would keep on rising.  Something like 40% of violent crimes in the US are committed by someone who has been drinking alcohol.

What about deaths and DALYs worldwide?

I haven’t yet attempted to look at this systematically worldwide, but would love some suggestions on where or how to do so (or help from someone who wants to collaborate on this!). 

Opioid and stimulant deaths are generally much lower outside of the US and the US seems to be in the highish range on drinking. But globally, ~22% of people smoke and only ~12% do in the US. Since deaths from addiction appear to be so much higher than deaths from non-substance cancer and heart disease in the US, then addiction might also be the highest cause of death globally.

A couple misc tidbits from my notes:

What about food?

If you considered modern processed foods addictive, and they seem to follow many of the same reward pathways and respond to some of the same medicines as addiction to substances (GLP-1s), then you would attribute a huge additional chunk of death and disease to addiction. This would be interesting to do the numbers on as well.

Next steps

I’d love comments with suggestions big and small, links, advice, etc. And would love collaborators even more, I can put this into a google doc for us.

For folks that are interested in tackling major public health crises, this may be the biggest of all! And what's so important about addiction as a public health challenge is that it's preventable. CASPR is a mostly volunteer driven project, with folks from EA forum and 80,000 jobs.

I genuinely believe that we have a chance to substantially speed up awareness and access to treatments that can prevent or cure addiction and, in doing so, save hundreds of thousands or millions of lives.

Comments4


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Hey there! For what it's worth, did you look at the Global Burden of Disease study? They define 'cause' and 'risk factor' separately. So they have direct drug overdoses in causes, but also calculate death & DALY burdens that are attributable to drug addiction, tobacco use, and high alcohol use (you can play around with the models here). Note that all estimates below have wide credible intervals in their models, but I've omitted them for readability. I also don't know how they perform their risk factor attribution, but since a lot of experts contribute to this I can't imagine it's worse than your analysis or missing something crucial.

In their data, tobacco contributes 195M DALYs/year (6.76% of the total DALY burden suffered by all humanity), high alcohol use contributes 72M or 2.51%, and drug use 28M or 0.96%.

In the U.S., these risk factors contribute 22M DALYs/year. Combined, this is more than all direct level-2 causes of death in the GBD (cardiovascular, in #1, has 18M DALYs/year). Equivalently, it would be the 5th-largest level-2 direct cause globally, behind cardiovascular, respiratory, neoplasms, and maternal disorders. But I'd warn against making these sorts of comparisons because they obviously depend on how you slice up your data (for the same reason, the chart you made from WHO data doesn't hold much water with me on its face).

I think the best next steps for you would be to create a strong case that addiction is neglected relative to top EA cause areas such as malaria, childhood vaccinations, maternal health, and so on. You could try to find good estimates on the amount of global or per-country funding going to each issue relative to their contribution to the global burden of disease. I am not sure how that analysis would play out, but I'd love to see it on the forum!

Thank you, this is extremely helpful!  I will dive into this.

Executive summary: Addiction, including substance use disorders related to drugs, alcohol, and smoking, is likely the leading cause of death and disability in the United States, and potentially worldwide, surpassing heart disease and cancer.

Key points:

  1. In the US, annual deaths from drug overdoses (109,000), alcohol use (178,000), and smoking (480,000) total approximately 767,000, exceeding deaths from heart disease (695,000) and cancer (609,000).
  2. Adjusting for addiction-related deaths, non-addiction cancer deaths are estimated at 408,271 and non-smoking heart disease deaths at 486,500 in the US.
  3. WHO data suggests addiction is the leading cause of DALYs (disability-adjusted life years) in the US, even without including alcohol and cigarettes.
  4. Globally, the high prevalence of smoking (22%) and alcohol consumption may make addiction the leading cause of death and DALYs worldwide.
  5. Considering processed foods as potentially addictive could further increase the death and disease burden attributed to addiction.
  6. Addiction is a preventable public health crisis, and increasing awareness of and access to treatments could save hundreds of thousands or millions of lives.

 

 

This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, and contact us if you have feedback.

Thanks for the post, these numbers are pretty big. I also wonder whether negative effects linked to an overuse of screen might be pretty big as well (competition with sports, sleep and going outside, negative effects on mental health...)

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
Science just released an article, with an accompanying technical report, about a neglected source of biological risk. From the abstract of the technical report: > This report describes the technical feasibility of creating mirror bacteria and the potentially serious and wide-ranging risks that they could pose to humans, other animals, plants, and the environment...  > > In a mirror bacterium, all of the chiral molecules of existing bacteria—proteins, nucleic acids, and metabolites—are replaced by their mirror images. Mirror bacteria could not evolve from existing life, but their creation will become increasingly feasible as science advances. Interactions between organisms often depend on chirality, and so interactions between natural organisms and mirror bacteria would be profoundly different from those between natural organisms. Most importantly, immune defenses and predation typically rely on interactions between chiral molecules that could often fail to detect or kill mirror bacteria due to their reversed chirality. It therefore appears plausible, even likely, that sufficiently robust mirror bacteria could spread through the environment unchecked by natural biological controls and act as dangerous opportunistic pathogens in an unprecedentedly wide range of other multicellular organisms, including humans. > > This report draws on expertise from synthetic biology, immunology, ecology, and related fields to provide the first comprehensive assessment of the risks from mirror bacteria.  Open Philanthropy helped to support this work and is now supporting the Mirror Biology Dialogues Fund (MBDF), along with the Sloan Foundation, the Packard Foundation, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and Patrick Collison. The Fund will coordinate scientific efforts to evaluate and address risks from mirror bacteria. It was deeply concerning to learn about this risk, but gratifying to see how seriously the scientific community is taking the issue. Given the potential infoha
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
 ·  · 14m read
 · 
1. Introduction My blog, Reflective Altruism, aims to use academic research to drive positive change within and around the effective altruism movement. Part of that mission involves engagement with the effective altruism community. For this reason, I try to give periodic updates on blog content and future directions (previous updates: here and here) In today’s post, I want to say a bit about new content published in 2024 (Sections 2-3) and give an overview of other content published so far (Section 4). I’ll also say a bit about upcoming content (Section 5) as well as my broader academic work (Section 6) and talks (Section 7) related to longtermism. Section 8 concludes with a few notes about other changes to the blog. I would be keen to hear reactions to existing content or suggestions for new content. Thanks for reading. 2. New series this year I’ve begun five new series since last December. 1. Against the singularity hypothesis: One of the most prominent arguments for existential risk from artificial agents is the singularity hypothesis. The singularity hypothesis holds roughly that self-improving artificial agents will grow at an accelerating rate until they are orders of magnitude more intelligent than the average human. I think that the singularity hypothesis is not on as firm ground as many advocates believe. My paper, “Against the singularity hypothesis,” makes the case for this conclusion. I’ve written a six-part series Against the singularity hypothesis summarizing this paper. Part 1 introduces the singularity hypothesis. Part 2 and Part 3 together give five preliminary reasons for doubt. The next two posts examine defenses of the singularity hypothesis by Dave Chalmers (Part 4) and Nick Bostrom (Part 5). Part 6 draws lessons from this discussion. 2. Harms: Existential risk mitigation efforts have important benefits but also identifiable harms. This series discusses some of the most important harms of existential risk mitigation efforts. Part 1 discus