Hide table of contents

Summary: 

Muslims for Effective Altruism made progress this year through our three projects: “The Muslim Network for Positive Impact”, “The Muslim Impact Lab”, and “Afterfund”, as well as continued behind the scenes work on fundraising, incubating new projects, and developing our short and medium term plans. The number of members of Muslims for Effective Altruism has continued to grow at a rate of ~25 members per year since mid-2021 (now at ~50 members). 

“Verdict”:

It was a good (but not perfect) year for us, and we’re looking forward to doing even more interesting work, and having more of an impact, in the next one!

 

Introduction: 

Around a year ago we posted our first post which gave a high level overview of why we think starting EA projects aimed at Muslims, or focusing on the intersection between EA and Islam, would be a high value endeavor. We were really pleasantly surprised at the amount of interest and support expressed about this endeavor, and continue to be grateful for the encouragement and feedback we receive from the community. 


Perhaps the most notable change before reading the rest of this post is that we’ve moved to thinking about Muslims for Effective Altruism’s structure as a federation of independent projects, rather than as one large org. We think this is useful because it prevents our lack of managerial capacity from holding back or interfering with our motivated project leads, as well as allowing us to increase our likelihood of expanding our network as other impactful projects can get off the ground without our knowledge or input. 


Kaleem will be attending EAG in London in May as well as hosting the “Muslims in EA” meetup there - so we thought it would be a good time to update everyone on what we’ve been up to in case you’d like to meet to discuss any aspects of our work.  


So, this post aims to provide an update on some of the work on which we’ve managed to make headway over the past year, as well as things we have fallen short on, and ways in which our plans have changed since the initial post. 


Projects:

The Muslim Impact Lab

The Muslim Impact Lab is a research and advisory body. This dynamic multi-disciplinary team is focused on collating and producing content on the intersections between EA ideas and Islamic Intellectual history, as well as providing expert consulting services to EA-Aligned organizations doing outreach in Muslim communities.

The Lab assisted GiveDirectly by co-authoring their post in which they launched the Yemen Zakat Fund and previously advised them on their plans. Nayaaz Hashim, one of the co-founders of the lab, also published a piece on Unconditional Cash Transfers from an Islamic perspective on the Muslim Impact Lab substack. To date, GiveDirectly has raised $165,000 for the Yemen program, however it is difficult to quantify our counterfactual impact on this figure, given that other organizations such as Giving What We Can, and GiveDirectly themselves, have also been involved in raising funds. In the future we should look into ways of building in mechanisms to our processes that may help us establish our counterfactual impact with regards to raising effective Zakat.

The lab is currently working on a survey to understand the moral priorities of the Muslim community, and developing a research agenda for, and producing content on, exploring intersections and challenges between understandings of Islam and current theories of effective altruism.

The plan for the Muslim Impact Lab is to continue doing this research and, in collaboration with the Muslim Network for Positive Impact, put together a structured fellowship in the near future.

Core Team: Maryam KhanNayaaz Hashim, Faezah IzadiMufti Sayed HaroonAhmed Ghoor

 

Afterfund

 

Afterfund is a digital Waqf platform where one-off donations are multiplied through halal investing and profits are automatically distributed each year to different causes picked by donors. This makes a donation perpetual, and instead of spending it immediately with the same donation, you provide on average 33x larger impact over the course of average human lifespan and it potentially continues making an impact even after you pass away. These ideas are grounded in islamic tradition and philosophy, and we’re interested in exploring mechanisms or products which might be able to incorporate the idea of patient philanthropy as well. 


Afterfund partners with different charities to enable Muslims to make an impact in different causes and geographies, and aims to do so with effective causes and charities, as well. We’re striving to make Afterfund the first platform which enables participation in the world's first effective awqaf (plural of ‘waqf’ in Arabic).

 

Since launching the pilot in a controlled environment with 1 charity (SABAH Islamic Center of Chicago) and 2 test causes (providing meals and education) in late May 2023, Afterfund had 46% week-over-week growth, 30 donors from 9 different countries, an average donation of $450, and the largest donation of $1500.

 

Our goal is to promote EA ideas and Effective Altruism for Muslims through Afterfund, and to mobilize Muslim donations into high-impact, effective charities. To this end, we hope to partner with existing EA regranters (like GWWC, GiveWell, The Life you Can Save) in establishing trusted partnerships with effective charities who are interested in accessing the global Muslim donor pool. 

Founders: Omar Yunus and Dzanan Ganic


 

The Muslim Network for Positive Impact (MNPI)

The purpose of the MNPI is to build and maintain a community of Muslims who’re interested in the positive impact that the combination of their faith and core-EA values can have on the world. The group has three main objectives: 

1) Internal goals: Keeping the current group of Muslims already interested in theories of effective altruism from an Islamic perspective engaged and motivated to do good.

2) External goals: Increasing the size of ‘the network’ by having other potentially-high-impact individuals in the Muslim community engage with core EA ideas from Islamic perspectives.

3) Springboard for High-Impact Muslim Entrepreneurship: To foster high-impact Muslim entrepreneurship by motivating and supporting the creation of cause- and country-specific spinoff groups. Additionally, collaborating with existing Muslim social entrepreneurship projects to amplify their effectiveness and overall impact.

MNPI has been building a database of Muslims interested in doing good more effectively, and held their first event during Ramadan, where they hosted a panel of speakers to discuss the possibility of using Zakat for Unconditional Cash Transfers. The plan is to continue hosting regular guest speaker events, discussions, and reading groups to expose the membership to core EA ideas from an Islamic perspective, as well as networking opportunities for collaboration on high-impact projects.

Core Team: Sumaiya TaqdeesAlimi SalifouZainab ChirwaAhmed Ghoor


 

Fundraising 

Bittersweetly, in the days leading up to the Future Fund collapse, we had been offered funding from multiple regranters. Although it obviously sucks that the subsequent events meant that we have continued to operate on a completely voluntary basis, we’re also really proud that multiple assessors thought we are a high expected value project, and have used it as motivation to push on.


In short, we’d still be excited to engage in discussions with funders and hopefully eventually receive some funding in order to strengthen and expand our operations across several domains. There are multiple important ways which being funded would help us accelerate our growth and increase our impact. 

  • Being able to compensate ‘staff’ for their time to sustain motivation, or being able to pay staff to work more hours per week on their projects 
  • Being able to pay for marketing for Afterfund and other initiatives which will require our brand being propagated in EA-atypical markets 
  • Hiring a website designer to build a Muslims for Effective Altruism, Muslim Impact Lab, and Muslim Network for Positive Impact website. 
  • Paying a graphic designer to produce marketing content
  • Contracting software developers to help Afterfund expand their platform and offer needed features to donors 
  • Offering research stipends to students studying Islamic studies to work with EA-familiar students on overlap research 

 

Shortcomings: 


Not enough content development: 

Our initial feeling when strategizing how to get our work gaining momentum, as well as legitimacy, amongst the EA and non-EA Islamic scholar community would be to produce detailed research into where and how core-EA ideas and various schools of Islamic thought overlap, and differ. Admittedly, we knew from the outset that this is a gargantuan and possibly endless undertaking (it sounds like the type of thing a whole university department or a couple of PhD students might work on for a couple of years). That being said, the only substantive piece of ‘overlap’ research produced across our three projects was Muslim Impact Lab’s direct cash transfer work. Although this was good work which led to something we’re proud of, it's not the type of foundational content which we think we fundamentally need. 

Not having a website

It's not entirely clear how much of a problem not having a website is right now, but EA for Jews’ gorgeous new website has got us feeling pretty jealous! The reason it's not clear if this is an issue is because we’ve changed from viewing Muslims for EA as a community building organization which runs its own programming (like EA for Jews and EA for Christians) to just being an umbrella for (currently) a trio of object-level projects. Still, it’d be nice for people to be able to land on a nice webpage when looking for us, although the current word-of-mouth referral by other members of the EA community seems to have worked reasonably well up until this point. Some additional value in having a website would be to further professionalize our aesthetic and brand, as well as to prepare for a more scalable way to communicate with our members if we ever get the point where using a whatsapp group seems too clunky or we reach the limit on people in a group chat. 

Not having done enough work on the top of the funnel.

We’ve done a lot of good work within our existing membership, but haven’t done as much work exploring and implementing  scalable mechanisms for attracting and retaining new members (such as virtual fellowships and self-directed material), although digital advertising and two radio interviews seemed to have attracted a few members who we likely wouldn’t have had reached otherwise.


 

Things to celebrate and be proud of: 

  • Making concrete progress on multiple projects, including having likely made real counterfactual impact through GiveDirectly.
  • Continuing to have weekly engagement and input from members of our community, who regularly demonstrate their careful attention to our work
  • Being a super diverse, global community which is very different from nearly every other EA sub-community 
Comments2


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Super glad to see this. Demonstrating how EA fits into different schools of islamic thought does sound like a huge undertaking, but hopefully one with important and scaling returns. I would be very interested to know more about EA uptake rates in different (islamic) national contexts, like growth of EA Malaysia vs any efforts to bring EA to gulf countries.

Is there a central group, slack, or task force thinking about/working on bringing EA to muslims and vice versa? Thanks for writing up this post! 

[anonymous]2
0
0

Great post! Thank you for all the work you have been doing!

Curated and popular this week
LintzA
 ·  · 15m read
 · 
Cross-posted to Lesswrong Introduction Several developments over the past few months should cause you to re-evaluate what you are doing. These include: 1. Updates toward short timelines 2. The Trump presidency 3. The o1 (inference-time compute scaling) paradigm 4. Deepseek 5. Stargate/AI datacenter spending 6. Increased internal deployment 7. Absence of AI x-risk/safety considerations in mainstream AI discourse Taken together, these are enough to render many existing AI governance strategies obsolete (and probably some technical safety strategies too). There's a good chance we're entering crunch time and that should absolutely affect your theory of change and what you plan to work on. In this piece I try to give a quick summary of these developments and think through the broader implications these have for AI safety. At the end of the piece I give some quick initial thoughts on how these developments affect what safety-concerned folks should be prioritizing. These are early days and I expect many of my takes will shift, look forward to discussing in the comments!  Implications of recent developments Updates toward short timelines There’s general agreement that timelines are likely to be far shorter than most expected. Both Sam Altman and Dario Amodei have recently said they expect AGI within the next 3 years. Anecdotally, nearly everyone I know or have heard of who was expecting longer timelines has updated significantly toward short timelines (<5 years). E.g. Ajeya’s median estimate is that 99% of fully-remote jobs will be automatable in roughly 6-8 years, 5+ years earlier than her 2023 estimate. On a quick look, prediction markets seem to have shifted to short timelines (e.g. Metaculus[1] & Manifold appear to have roughly 2030 median timelines to AGI, though haven’t moved dramatically in recent months). We’ve consistently seen performance on benchmarks far exceed what most predicted. Most recently, Epoch was surprised to see OpenAI’s o3 model achi
Dr Kassim
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Hey everyone, I’ve been going through the EA Introductory Program, and I have to admit some of these ideas make sense, but others leave me with more questions than answers. I’m trying to wrap my head around certain core EA principles, and the more I think about them, the more I wonder: Am I misunderstanding, or are there blind spots in EA’s approach? I’d really love to hear what others think. Maybe you can help me clarify some of my doubts. Or maybe you share the same reservations? Let’s talk. Cause Prioritization. Does It Ignore Political and Social Reality? EA focuses on doing the most good per dollar, which makes sense in theory. But does it hold up when you apply it to real world contexts especially in countries like Uganda? Take malaria prevention. It’s a top EA cause because it’s highly cost effective $5,000 can save a life through bed nets (GiveWell, 2023). But what happens when government corruption or instability disrupts these programs? The Global Fund scandal in Uganda saw $1.6 million in malaria aid mismanaged (Global Fund Audit Report, 2016). If money isn’t reaching the people it’s meant to help, is it really the best use of resources? And what about leadership changes? Policies shift unpredictably here. A national animal welfare initiative I supported lost momentum when political priorities changed. How does EA factor in these uncertainties when prioritizing causes? It feels like EA assumes a stable world where money always achieves the intended impact. But what if that’s not the world we live in? Long termism. A Luxury When the Present Is in Crisis? I get why long termists argue that future people matter. But should we really prioritize them over people suffering today? Long termism tells us that existential risks like AI could wipe out trillions of future lives. But in Uganda, we’re losing lives now—1,500+ die from rabies annually (WHO, 2021), and 41% of children suffer from stunting due to malnutrition (UNICEF, 2022). These are preventable d
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
In my past year as a grantmaker in the global health and wellbeing (GHW) meta space at Open Philanthropy, I've identified some exciting ideas that could fill existing gaps. While these initiatives have significant potential, they require more active development and support to move forward.  The ideas I think could have the highest impact are:  1. Government placements/secondments in key GHW areas (e.g. international development), and 2. Expanded (ultra) high-net-worth ([U]HNW) advising Each of these ideas needs a very specific type of leadership and/or structure. More accessible options I’m excited about — particularly for students or recent graduates — could involve virtual GHW courses or action-focused student groups.  I can’t commit to supporting any particular project based on these ideas ahead of time, because the likelihood of success would heavily depend on details (including the people leading the project). Still, I thought it would be helpful to articulate a few of the ideas I’ve been considering.  I’d love to hear your thoughts, both on these ideas and any other gaps you see in the space! Introduction I’m Mel, a Senior Program Associate at Open Philanthropy, where I lead grantmaking for the Effective Giving and Careers program[1] (you can read more about the program and our current strategy here). Throughout my time in this role, I’ve encountered great ideas, but have also noticed gaps in the space. This post shares a list of projects I’d like to see pursued, and would potentially want to support. These ideas are drawn from existing efforts in other areas (e.g., projects supported by our GCRCB team), suggestions from conversations and materials I’ve engaged with, and my general intuition. They aren’t meant to be a definitive roadmap, but rather a starting point for discussion. At the moment, I don’t have capacity to more actively explore these ideas and find the right founders for related projects. That may change, but for now, I’m interested in