Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by DavidJanku
3 min read 2

73

Career choiceEffective ThesisOrganization updatesResearch training programs
Frontpage

EDIT: We're about to complete our hiring process soon, so, unfortunately, we don't accept new applications anymore. If you're interested in keeping in touch with Effective Thesis, I'd recommend signing up for our newsletter.

 

I founded Effective Thesis 3 years ago and have been running and developing it since, but now I’ve concluded its time for me to move to another role. Anyway,  I’d like the project to continue flourishing since I believe it makes a lot of sense and is a great opportunity to have a significant positive impact. I and other collaborators managed to get some traction with it, having hundreds of talented students from all around the world applying for and using our services each year. We have seen some flashes of impact already and I believe there is much more to unfold and be created. There is definitely room to improve the project further, be it via alternative outreach strategies (as suggested here), improving the service and advice we give to students, starting offering some new service or some other, yet unexplored, way. The project currently fills a niche of helping future researchers decide what they will focus on throughout their careers which seems to be neglected in the current academic process. I believe building on this niche might have a large potential. I’m now looking for someone to make use of this potential who I could hand over the management of the project to, with me staying in the consultation, mentoring and supportive role as needed.

 

What is the Effective Thesis project

Effective Thesis is a project that aims to assist students in their final thesis topic choice and direct their attention to areas that have the potential to greatly improve the world. It does this by offering students to engage with profiles of several high impact research directions for each discipline, offering to connect them with researchers working in these directions who can help with the specific topic choice, giving feedback on their existing ideas and research career tips, and inviting them to the online community of other students focusing on similar directions.

Here are the previous reports from 2017 when the project began, 2018 impact report with a description of the project's history and most recent 2019 report outlining my thoughts on future project development.

The hope is that this could be potentially high-leverage as we are focusing on a particularly crucial juncture in people’s trajectories. More generally, within the broader goal of generating new impactful research, this project focuses more on the junior side of research career trajectories, trying to create new junior researchers who are not necessarily dependent on EA funding.

The project team consists of 3 additional volunteers who work on it 10-15 hours per week, one of which is already well acquainted with most of the inner workings and processes. In present, she spends most of her time coaching new students and collecting final feedback from those who have finished the coaching process. Two other recently hired volunteers focus on managing our facebook community of students, informing them about new relevant opportunities related to research careers, and improving our web design. Additionally, there is a team of about 4 volunteer web developers who help with website redesign as needed. Finally, we have a list of our coaches, researchers in various domains, who we connect students to.
 

Project management

Here is who I imagine this could be a good fit for:

Type of work: Project management - overseeing and owning the whole Effective Thesis project; being responsible for its strategic thinking, development and execution; being responsible for the continuation of the project and its health (including securing enough funds and talents), working with volunteers and being able to step up and do any task that is needed to achieve project goals

 Time requirements: At least 20 hours per week. Anyway, given the "owning mindset" needed for the role, there might be longer weeks and shorter weeks - it's good to be flexible to put a little extra time if needed. The start would be asap, ideally in December.

Personality and experiences: being responsible, having the “owning” or “take charge” mindset, proactive, comfortable with independently and creatively tackling various types of tasks, being good at strategic thinking could be useful; good knowledge of the EA concepts and community; academic experience and credentials might be beneficial (although not necessarily required); ideally having some previous experience with project management 

Funding situation: The salary for the 0,5 FTE would be 1450 USD/month (pre-tax) and is secured for the next 11 months. Larger involvement would likely be possible if desired. After that, you would be expected to fundraise for yourself and other members of the project (with my help and advice if needed). 

 

If you’d be interested in taking this role or know anyone who might be, please reach out at david.janku@effectivethesis.org

Similarly, please reach out if you’d be interested in volunteering and becoming part of our small team at Effective Thesis.
 

73

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments3


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
MichaelA🔸13
0
0

I haven't interacted with Effective Thesis as a student or coach, but I've heard good things from some people who have (and haven't heard bad things from anyone - though I haven't actively sought people's views on this). And it's always struck me as a great concept, and I like what I've seen on the website and in the 2019 report. 

So I'm really glad you've done the work you've done on it to date, David! And I really hope someone takes on this project manager role and keeps this seemingly high-value project running.

Reply
EdoArad12
0
0

Thank you David for running the project so far! Wish you all the best in your next adventure!

Reply
[comment deleted]21
0
0
,
More from DavidJanku
39
Exceptional Research Award by Effective Thesis (ETERA): reflection
2 authors
· · 16m read
1
1
45
Effective Thesis - Activities and Impact Evaluation [June 2021-June 2022]
DavidJanku
· · 39m read
2
2
48
New Effective Thesis services and opportunities to get involved
DavidJanku
· · 7m read
3
3
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 38m read
 · 
In recent months, the CEOs of leading AI companies have grown increasingly confident about rapid progress: * OpenAI's Sam Altman: Shifted from saying in November "the rate of progress continues" to declaring in January "we are now confident we know how to build AGI" * Anthropic's Dario Amodei: Stated in January "I'm more confident than I've ever been that we're close to powerful capabilities... in the next 2-3 years" * Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis: Changed from "as soon as 10 years" in autumn to "probably three to five years away" by January. What explains the shift? Is it just hype? Or could we really have Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)[1] by 2028? In this article, I look at what's driven recent progress, estimate how far those drivers can continue, and explain why they're likely to continue for at least four more years. In particular, while in 2024 progress in LLM chatbots seemed to slow, a new approach started to work: teaching the models to reason using reinforcement learning. In just a year, this let them surpass human PhDs at answering difficult scientific reasoning questions, and achieve expert-level performance on one-hour coding tasks. We don't know how capable AGI will become, but extrapolating the recent rate of progress suggests that, by 2028, we could reach AI models with beyond-human reasoning abilities, expert-level knowledge in every domain, and that can autonomously complete multi-week projects, and progress would likely continue from there.  On this set of software engineering & computer use tasks, in 2020 AI was only able to do tasks that would typically take a human expert a couple of seconds. By 2024, that had risen to almost an hour. If the trend continues, by 2028 it'll reach several weeks.  No longer mere chatbots, these 'agent' models might soon satisfy many people's definitions of AGI — roughly, AI systems that match human performance at most knowledge work (see definition in footnote). This means that, while the compa
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
SUMMARY:  ALLFED is launching an emergency appeal on the EA Forum due to a serious funding shortfall. Without new support, ALLFED will be forced to cut half our budget in the coming months, drastically reducing our capacity to help build global food system resilience for catastrophic scenarios like nuclear winter, a severe pandemic, or infrastructure breakdown. ALLFED is seeking $800,000 over the course of 2025 to sustain its team, continue policy-relevant research, and move forward with pilot projects that could save lives in a catastrophe. As funding priorities shift toward AI safety, we believe resilient food solutions remain a highly cost-effective way to protect the future. If you’re able to support or share this appeal, please visit allfed.info/donate. Donate to ALLFED FULL ARTICLE: I (David Denkenberger) am writing alongside two of my team-mates, as ALLFED’s co-founder, to ask for your support. This is the first time in Alliance to Feed the Earth in Disaster’s (ALLFED’s) 8 year existence that we have reached out on the EA Forum with a direct funding appeal outside of Marginal Funding Week/our annual updates. I am doing so because ALLFED’s funding situation is serious, and because so much of ALLFED’s progress to date has been made possible through the support, feedback, and collaboration of the EA community.  Read our funding appeal At ALLFED, we are deeply grateful to all our supporters, including the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which has provided the majority of our funding for years. At the end of 2024, we learned we would be receiving far less support than expected due to a shift in SFF’s strategic priorities toward AI safety. Without additional funding, ALLFED will need to shrink. I believe the marginal cost effectiveness for improving the future and saving lives of resilience is competitive with AI Safety, even if timelines are short, because of potential AI-induced catastrophes. That is why we are asking people to donate to this emergency appeal
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
We’ve written a new report on the threat of AI-enabled coups.  I think this is a very serious risk – comparable in importance to AI takeover but much more neglected.  In fact, AI-enabled coups and AI takeover have pretty similar threat models. To see this, here’s a very basic threat model for AI takeover: 1. Humanity develops superhuman AI 2. Superhuman AI is misaligned and power-seeking 3. Superhuman AI seizes power for itself And now here’s a closely analogous threat model for AI-enabled coups: 1. Humanity develops superhuman AI 2. Superhuman AI is controlled by a small group 3. Superhuman AI seizes power for the small group While the report focuses on the risk that someone seizes power over a country, I think that similar dynamics could allow someone to take over the world. In fact, if someone wanted to take over the world, their best strategy might well be to first stage an AI-enabled coup in the United States (or whichever country leads on superhuman AI), and then go from there to world domination. A single person taking over the world would be really bad. I’ve previously argued that it might even be worse than AI takeover. [1] The concrete threat models for AI-enabled coups that we discuss largely translate like-for-like over to the risk of AI takeover.[2] Similarly, there’s a lot of overlap in the mitigations that help with AI-enabled coups and AI takeover risk — e.g. alignment audits to ensure no human has made AI secretly loyal to them, transparency about AI capabilities, monitoring AI activities for suspicious behaviour, and infosecurity to prevent insiders from tampering with training.  If the world won't slow down AI development based on AI takeover risk (e.g. because there’s isn’t strong evidence for misalignment), then advocating for a slow down based on the risk of AI-enabled coups might be more convincing and achieve many of the same goals.  I really want to encourage readers — especially those at labs or governments — to do something
Recent opportunities in Career choice
73
E2G help available
Will Kirkpatrick
· · 3m read
3
3
45
The CEA Events Team is Hiring for Three Program Lead Positions
OllieBase
· · 3m read
0
0
50
$100 million dollar grant funding opportunity for EA
Jack Kelly
· · 3m read
1
1
View more