Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by James Aitchison
4 min read 2

70

CommunityMarketingPodcastsWhat We Owe the FutureWilliam MacAskill
Frontpage

Never before have we had the chance to enjoy so much Will MacAskill.  He seems to have been everywhere.  What a superb and exhaustive job he and his team have done to promote 'What We Owe The Future.' 

So far I have counted 16 podcasts, 18 articles and 6 other bits and pieces.  I have listed all these below with links and brief comments. 

 

Podcast Appearances

The 80,000 Hours Podcast with Rob Wiblin.  A warm and comprehensive three-hour discussion. 

Making Sense Podcast with Sam Harris.  Harris is strongly supportive, MacAskill particularly inspiring on the sweep of history.   

Mindscape Podcast with Sean Carroll. Carroll asks questions about utilitarianism, metaethics and population ethics which MacAskill handles well. 

The Ezra Klein Show Podcast. A fine conversation on long-termism.  Klein structures the discusion around ‘Three simple sentences: Future people count. There could be a lot of them. And we can make their lives better.’ Good discussions about history - the contingent nature of the abolition of slavery and that certain times have plasticity.  

Tim Ferriss Podcast.  A lively discussion with much humour and several gems from MacAskill. Includes recommendation of Joseph Henrich's 'The Secret of Our Success.'

Deep Dive with Ali Abdaal Podcast. A relaxed, friendly and wide-ranging three-hour conversation. Covers a lot of ground including EA psychology and MacAskill’s work methods. This is a high-quality YouTube production as well as a podcast and is my favourite among the appearances. 

Conversations with Tyler Podcast .  Tyler Cowan’s questioning focuses on the limits of utilitarianism.

The Lunar Society Podcast with Dwarkesh Patel.  Mainly on the contingency of moral progress.

Global Dispatch Podcast with Mark Goldberg. Discussion on longtermism and the United Nations.  Goldberg enthusiastic about the UN adopting some longtermist thinking. 

Modern Wisdom Podcast with Chris Williamson.  An accessible discussion of longtermism.

Conversations with Coleman with Coleman Hughes Includes population ethics, economic growth and moral change.

Daily Stoic Podcast with Ryan Holiday. Mainly on altruism and moral change.  

Kera Think with Krys Boyd.  30 minutes conversation.

Freakanomics Podcast with Steve Levitt.  Discussion mainly on the economic themes in WWOTF, which MacAskill handles very well.  

1a Podcast on NPR.  David Gurn discussion on EA as a life changing philosophy.  Includes comments from Sofya Lebedeva and Spencer Goldberg.  

Ten Percent Happier Podcast with Dan Harris. A warm discussion on donations, EA and longtermism.

There are transcripts for the podcasts by Wiblin, Carroll, Klein, Cowan, Patel, Goldberg and Levitt. 

 

Articles and Book Reviews

The New Yorker: The Reluctant Prophet of Effective Altruism by Gideon Lewis-Kraus.  A fine 10,000-word article profiling MacAskill and setting out the history of the EA movement. The author spent several days with his subject and covers MacAskill as an individual and the ideas and dynamics of the movement. MacAskill comments on the article in this Twitter Thread

Time: Want to Do More Good? This Movement might have the Answer by Naina Bajekal .  A beautifully written and inspiring profile of MacAskill and the EA movement.

Vox: How Effective Altruism Went from a Niche Movement to a Billion-Dollar Force by Dylan Matthews.  A well-informed and thoughtful article on EA’s evolution by an EA insider.

Wired: The Future Could be Blissful - If Human's Don't Go Extinct First.  Shorter interview with Will Macaskill by Matt Reynolds.

New York Times: The Case for Longtermism by Will MacAskill A Guest Essay adapted from the book. 

BBC Futures: What is Longtermism and Why Does it Matter? by Will MacAskill.  Another essay based on the book.

Foreign Affairs: The Beginning of History by Will MacAskill  A further essay based on the book.

The Atlantic: How Future Generations Will Remember Us by Will MacAskill. And another essay, again telling the book's thesis in a different way.

Five Books: The Best Books on Longtermism recommended by Will MacAskill. He chooses 'Moral Capital', 'The Scout Mindset', 'The Precipice', 'Superforecasting' and 'The Life You Can Save.'

NPR: How Can We Help Humans Thrive Trillions of Years From Now? Article and interview.

Boston Review: The New Moral Arithmetic. Book review by Kieran Setiya, thoughtful, partly supportive and partly critical.  MacAskill's Twitter response.

The Guardian: William MacAskill.  Interview by Andrew Anthony.

The Guardian: Book Review A fine and insightful review of WWOTF by Oliver Burkeman. 'The overall promise of this thrilling book is of a life both less burdened by ethical guilt – by beating yourself up over every choice of groceries or transportation – and much more effective at actually helping humanity. A life you truly enjoy, and in which you take that enjoyment seriously enough to want the same – or better – for billions more humans to come.'

Astral Codex Ten: Book Review by Scott Alexander  A critical but interesting review. 'If the point of publishing a book is to have a public relations campaign, Will MacAskill is the greatest English writer since Shakespeare.' 

Vox: Caring About The Future Doesn't Mean Ignoring The Present by Kelsey Piper  Article arguing that although WWOTF 'has put weird stuff front and centre' GiveWell data shows that 'effective altruism is growing on all fronts.'

The Economist: What to Read To Understand Effective Altruism  Article with recommended EA resources including two 80,000 hours podcasts, Singer's Drowning Child, MacAskill's WWOTF, Karnofsky's Most Important Century blog and Chivers's Rationalists Guide to the Galaxy.

Wired: If Humans Went Extinct Would A Similar Species Evolve?  Short extract from WWOTF.  

Richard Y Chappell Book Review An excellent review from an EA-aligned moral philosopher.  'WWOTF is to longtermism what Animal Liberation was to anti-speciesism. Targeted at a general audience, it advocates for an important kind of moral circle expansion.' 

 

Other Items

Redditt: Will MacAskill Ask Me Anything  Thirty answers to online questions, some answers substantial and interesting. 

Kurzgesagt: Is Civilisation on the Brink of Collapse? Animation.

Rational Animations: Can We Make The Future A Million Years From Now Go Better? Animation.

Primer: How Many People Might Ever Exist Calculated.  Animation.

Ali Abdaal: The Most Impactful Book I Have Ever Read.  Fine YouTube video review and recommendation for WWOTF.

Vice News: Can This Book Stop Human Extinction?  Brief YouTube Feature and interview with MacAskill 

 

Further resources are the What We Owe The Future Website, Will MacAskill's Website and Will MacAskill's Twitter.

I will continue to update the list of appearances and articles on this page on my blog.

 

70

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Mentioned in

More posts like this

Comments2


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
WilliamKiely2
0
0

Here's your updated list: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/SQBYHEWBTB2krA9kk/what-we-owe-the-future-updated-media-list

I'd recommend editing this post with a link to the updated post at the top of it.

Reply
WilliamKiely2
0
0

Great list! 5 of the 6 "Other Items" are YouTube videos.

Reply
Curated and popular this week
LintzA
 ·  · 15m read
 · 
Cross-posted to Lesswrong Introduction Several developments over the past few months should cause you to re-evaluate what you are doing. These include: 1. Updates toward short timelines 2. The Trump presidency 3. The o1 (inference-time compute scaling) paradigm 4. Deepseek 5. Stargate/AI datacenter spending 6. Increased internal deployment 7. Absence of AI x-risk/safety considerations in mainstream AI discourse Taken together, these are enough to render many existing AI governance strategies obsolete (and probably some technical safety strategies too). There's a good chance we're entering crunch time and that should absolutely affect your theory of change and what you plan to work on. In this piece I try to give a quick summary of these developments and think through the broader implications these have for AI safety. At the end of the piece I give some quick initial thoughts on how these developments affect what safety-concerned folks should be prioritizing. These are early days and I expect many of my takes will shift, look forward to discussing in the comments!  Implications of recent developments Updates toward short timelines There’s general agreement that timelines are likely to be far shorter than most expected. Both Sam Altman and Dario Amodei have recently said they expect AGI within the next 3 years. Anecdotally, nearly everyone I know or have heard of who was expecting longer timelines has updated significantly toward short timelines (<5 years). E.g. Ajeya’s median estimate is that 99% of fully-remote jobs will be automatable in roughly 6-8 years, 5+ years earlier than her 2023 estimate. On a quick look, prediction markets seem to have shifted to short timelines (e.g. Metaculus[1] & Manifold appear to have roughly 2030 median timelines to AGI, though haven’t moved dramatically in recent months). We’ve consistently seen performance on benchmarks far exceed what most predicted. Most recently, Epoch was surprised to see OpenAI’s o3 model achi
Dr Kassim
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Hey everyone, I’ve been going through the EA Introductory Program, and I have to admit some of these ideas make sense, but others leave me with more questions than answers. I’m trying to wrap my head around certain core EA principles, and the more I think about them, the more I wonder: Am I misunderstanding, or are there blind spots in EA’s approach? I’d really love to hear what others think. Maybe you can help me clarify some of my doubts. Or maybe you share the same reservations? Let’s talk. Cause Prioritization. Does It Ignore Political and Social Reality? EA focuses on doing the most good per dollar, which makes sense in theory. But does it hold up when you apply it to real world contexts especially in countries like Uganda? Take malaria prevention. It’s a top EA cause because it’s highly cost effective $5,000 can save a life through bed nets (GiveWell, 2023). But what happens when government corruption or instability disrupts these programs? The Global Fund scandal in Uganda saw $1.6 million in malaria aid mismanaged (Global Fund Audit Report, 2016). If money isn’t reaching the people it’s meant to help, is it really the best use of resources? And what about leadership changes? Policies shift unpredictably here. A national animal welfare initiative I supported lost momentum when political priorities changed. How does EA factor in these uncertainties when prioritizing causes? It feels like EA assumes a stable world where money always achieves the intended impact. But what if that’s not the world we live in? Long termism. A Luxury When the Present Is in Crisis? I get why long termists argue that future people matter. But should we really prioritize them over people suffering today? Long termism tells us that existential risks like AI could wipe out trillions of future lives. But in Uganda, we’re losing lives now—1,500+ die from rabies annually (WHO, 2021), and 41% of children suffer from stunting due to malnutrition (UNICEF, 2022). These are preventable d
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f
Recent opportunities in Community
20
Free Habit Change Coaching
John Salter
· · 2m read
0
0
40
Feedback requested: Financial Independence Purpose Planner tool
Rebecca Herbst
· · 5m read
2
2
56
Request for Guidance: Reaching Out to Charities Before Publishing Reviews and Our Concerns
VettedCauses
· · 5m read
54
54
View more