I’ve been running quite a few ads for animal welfare organizations, and every time I have to think of new creatives, I face a sort of creative dilemma:
Which animal should be in the image?
I’ve always had my hunches, but recently I decided to run a small test.
To be clear upfront: this wasn’t a definitive, large-scale experiment. It was a quick, low-budget trial designed to answer a practical question for my daily work. This experiment is far from being big and broad enough to reshape your entire advocacy strategy. I’m publishing it anyway because I know there are marketers in the EA current runnings ads for animal welfare orgs, with low to medium budget, and I believe this information might be useful to them.
The campaign promoted a free quiz called World's Biggest Problems (specifically the animal welfare module), co-branded with ClearerThinking.org. I wanted to test one simple variable:
Does the animal in the image affect ad performance in terms of CTR (Click-Through Rate) and CPA (Cost Per Action)?
So I kept everything else identical:
The only difference was the image in the ad: a cow, a chicken, or a pig.
The original images included organization logos and colors, but I’ve converted them to black and white and removed the branding to protect the organization's identity.
The chicken was the clear winner. Total spend was roughly $230 per version, making for a clean comparison.
Animal | CPA | Quiz Completions | CTR | Lead / click conversion |
🐔 Chicken | $5.70 | 41 | 1.38% | 15.60% |
🐷 Pig | $6.51 | 35 | 1.36% | 12.60% |
🐄 Cow | $10.00 | 23 | 1.22% | 10.60% |
The table above summarizes the findings. For those interested, here is the spreadsheet with the raw data.
The chicken ad generated the most leads at the lowest cost.
What’s particularly interesting is that CTR remained relatively consistent across all versions. People clicked the chicken, pig, and cow ads at roughly the same rate (the cow was slightly lower, but not by much).
My hypothesis is that the image acts as a filter (as it happens very frequently with paid ads, especially on Facebook and Instagram). While the total number of clicks was similar, the chicken image likely attracted a higher share of people genuinely interested in engaging with the subject matter, and consequently, the type of people who actually finished the quiz.
I think this is most relevant if you are promoting animal welfare content via paid Meta ads, especially at scale, where small differences in CTR and CPA might mean a huge difference in the absolute number of leads you get.
I hope this provides a helpful starting point for your own creative tests! Let me know if you have any questions.