Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by Agustín Covarrubias 🔸, Topaz
2 min read 2

79

AI safetyCareer choiceOpportunities to take actionResearch training programsAI safety groupsAnnouncements and updatesBuilding the field of AI safetyOrganization updates
Frontpage

TL;DR

  • We’re announcing Kairos, a new AI safety fieldbuilding organization focused on the early career talent pipeline.
  • We’re the new home for two programs:
    • FSP, which provides semester-based mentorship for organizers of AI safety university groups
    • SPAR, a program that pairs early career individuals to work on three-month AI safety research projects alongside experienced mentors
  • We’ve opened applications for the next round of FSP (starting in December 2024) and expressions of interest for SPAR (starting in February 2025).

Announcing Kairos

We’re excited to announce the launch of Kairos[1], a new AI safety fieldbuilding organization focused on strengthening the early career talent pipeline. Kairos will serve as the new institutional home for two existing programs: the Supervised Program for Alignment Research (SPAR), a mentorship program now on its fifth iteration, and the Fieldbuilder Support Program (FSP), a program in its second iteration.

We believe that growing and strengthening the infrastructure for AI safety talent is among the most promising fieldbuilding efforts, so we’re now focused on improving what we think are critical and neglected segments of the pipeline. We’re also planning to run a number of smaller, targeted support programs for AI safety groups. We hope to share more about our broader plans in the coming months.

Fieldbuilder Support Program (FSP)

FSP is a mentorship program (recently spun off of CEA’s Groups Team) that supports university AI safety group organizers in establishing and running their groups. During the program, organizers get paired with mentors who guide them through defining their group’s strategy and planning their semesters, as well as following up on their progress. The program has an initial period of three weeks, but most participants go on to be mentored for their entire semester.

Applications are now open!

  • The program will run from December 5th, 2024, through to the next semester
  • Each interested group organizer must apply separately
Apply here by November 15

We’re also looking for experienced existing or former group organizers to participate as paid mentors for the program. See here for details.

Supervised Program for Alignment Research (SPAR)

SPAR is a virtual, part-time research program that connects early-career individuals with experienced AI safety researchers. Participants work on 3-month projects in both technical and governance areas, with mentees typically committing 5-20 hours per week.

Expressions of interest are now open!

  • The program will run from February 10th to May 17th, 2025
  • Mentor applications will open in early November
  • Mentee applications will open in December
Express your interest here

If you're interested in contributing to AI safety field-building, whether as a student, professional, mentor, or researcher, we encourage you to get involved with our programs.

  1. ^

     Kairos is an ancient greek word meaning  “the critical moment” or the “the right moment to act”. Thanks to @Nicholas Marsh for coming up with the name.

79

1
0

Reactions

1
0
Mentioned in
Load more (5/6)
Comments2


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
tzukitchan11
3
0
4

can’t think of better fit people to run these important programs! 🥳 congrats on the announcement launch, and cheers to more future projects under the Kairos banner!

Reply
Manuel Allgaier3
0
0

I'm excited you're doing this! This seems helpful to fill this gap in AIS field building. 

(I'm late to the party, just saw this now in a newsletter)
 

Reply
More from Agustín Covarrubias 🔸
59
Kairos is hiring a Head of Operations/Founding Generalist
2 authors
· · 6m read
1
1
48
Anthropic's submission to the White House's RFI on AI policy
Agustín Covarrubias 🔸
· · 1m read
7
7
90
Understanding Shapley Values with Venn Diagrams
2 authors
· · 5m read
4
4
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 38m read
 · 
In recent months, the CEOs of leading AI companies have grown increasingly confident about rapid progress: * OpenAI's Sam Altman: Shifted from saying in November "the rate of progress continues" to declaring in January "we are now confident we know how to build AGI" * Anthropic's Dario Amodei: Stated in January "I'm more confident than I've ever been that we're close to powerful capabilities... in the next 2-3 years" * Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis: Changed from "as soon as 10 years" in autumn to "probably three to five years away" by January. What explains the shift? Is it just hype? Or could we really have Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)[1] by 2028? In this article, I look at what's driven recent progress, estimate how far those drivers can continue, and explain why they're likely to continue for at least four more years. In particular, while in 2024 progress in LLM chatbots seemed to slow, a new approach started to work: teaching the models to reason using reinforcement learning. In just a year, this let them surpass human PhDs at answering difficult scientific reasoning questions, and achieve expert-level performance on one-hour coding tasks. We don't know how capable AGI will become, but extrapolating the recent rate of progress suggests that, by 2028, we could reach AI models with beyond-human reasoning abilities, expert-level knowledge in every domain, and that can autonomously complete multi-week projects, and progress would likely continue from there.  On this set of software engineering & computer use tasks, in 2020 AI was only able to do tasks that would typically take a human expert a couple of seconds. By 2024, that had risen to almost an hour. If the trend continues, by 2028 it'll reach several weeks.  No longer mere chatbots, these 'agent' models might soon satisfy many people's definitions of AGI — roughly, AI systems that match human performance at most knowledge work (see definition in footnote). This means that, while the compa
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
SUMMARY:  ALLFED is launching an emergency appeal on the EA Forum due to a serious funding shortfall. Without new support, ALLFED will be forced to cut half our budget in the coming months, drastically reducing our capacity to help build global food system resilience for catastrophic scenarios like nuclear winter, a severe pandemic, or infrastructure breakdown. ALLFED is seeking $800,000 over the course of 2025 to sustain its team, continue policy-relevant research, and move forward with pilot projects that could save lives in a catastrophe. As funding priorities shift toward AI safety, we believe resilient food solutions remain a highly cost-effective way to protect the future. If you’re able to support or share this appeal, please visit allfed.info/donate. Donate to ALLFED FULL ARTICLE: I (David Denkenberger) am writing alongside two of my team-mates, as ALLFED’s co-founder, to ask for your support. This is the first time in Alliance to Feed the Earth in Disaster’s (ALLFED’s) 8 year existence that we have reached out on the EA Forum with a direct funding appeal outside of Marginal Funding Week/our annual updates. I am doing so because ALLFED’s funding situation is serious, and because so much of ALLFED’s progress to date has been made possible through the support, feedback, and collaboration of the EA community.  Read our funding appeal At ALLFED, we are deeply grateful to all our supporters, including the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which has provided the majority of our funding for years. At the end of 2024, we learned we would be receiving far less support than expected due to a shift in SFF’s strategic priorities toward AI safety. Without additional funding, ALLFED will need to shrink. I believe the marginal cost effectiveness for improving the future and saving lives of resilience is competitive with AI Safety, even if timelines are short, because of potential AI-induced catastrophes. That is why we are asking people to donate to this emergency appeal
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
We’ve written a new report on the threat of AI-enabled coups.  I think this is a very serious risk – comparable in importance to AI takeover but much more neglected.  In fact, AI-enabled coups and AI takeover have pretty similar threat models. To see this, here’s a very basic threat model for AI takeover: 1. Humanity develops superhuman AI 2. Superhuman AI is misaligned and power-seeking 3. Superhuman AI seizes power for itself And now here’s a closely analogous threat model for AI-enabled coups: 1. Humanity develops superhuman AI 2. Superhuman AI is controlled by a small group 3. Superhuman AI seizes power for the small group While the report focuses on the risk that someone seizes power over a country, I think that similar dynamics could allow someone to take over the world. In fact, if someone wanted to take over the world, their best strategy might well be to first stage an AI-enabled coup in the United States (or whichever country leads on superhuman AI), and then go from there to world domination. A single person taking over the world would be really bad. I’ve previously argued that it might even be worse than AI takeover. [1] The concrete threat models for AI-enabled coups that we discuss largely translate like-for-like over to the risk of AI takeover.[2] Similarly, there’s a lot of overlap in the mitigations that help with AI-enabled coups and AI takeover risk — e.g. alignment audits to ensure no human has made AI secretly loyal to them, transparency about AI capabilities, monitoring AI activities for suspicious behaviour, and infosecurity to prevent insiders from tampering with training.  If the world won't slow down AI development based on AI takeover risk (e.g. because there’s isn’t strong evidence for misalignment), then advocating for a slow down based on the risk of AI-enabled coups might be more convincing and achieve many of the same goals.  I really want to encourage readers — especially those at labs or governments — to do something
Recent opportunities in AI safety
54
Stripe Economics of AI Fellowship
basil.halperin
· · 3m read
0
0
43
Center on Long-Term Risk: Summer Research Fellowship 2025
Center on Long-Term Risk
· · 1m read
0
0
14
MATS is hiring!
Ryan Kidd
·
2
2
View more