Hide table of contents

Evidence Action works to improve global well-being, scaling evidence-based and cost-effective programs to reduce the burden of poverty. While we’re still crunching the numbers on this year’s impact, in 2023, we:

  • Provided nearly 10 million people with access to safe water in Kenya, Malawi, and Uganda;
  • Increased syphilis screening coverage in Liberia to 70% (up from just 10% in 2021);
  • Reached 195 million children with deworming treatment and 35.8 million children with weekly iron and folic acid treatments

Looking ahead to 2025, below are a few key areas where additional donations could make the biggest difference. These represent our current best estimates of what additional donations to these programs would support if you donate today. However, donations to these programs may be used to support different specific activities or geographies than those described below, as Evidence Action regularly evaluates and prioritizes our potential program activities against our available funding and potential fundraising opportunities. So if, for example, you donate to our Safe Water Now Fund, and we also receive a generous grant for safe water programming in Malawi that covers our immediate funding gap in the country, your donation to our Safe Water Now fund would likely be directed to India or Uganda instead. Similarly, if you donate in June of next year, we are likely to have different funding priorities based on our opportunities and funding, and would allocate your donation to the most critical needs at that time.

That’s why, in general, our recommendation is to give unrestricted funding, which gives us the most flexibility to combine your donation with our other, more restricted resources in a way that maximizes impact. While an unrestricted gift is less likely to be directed toward any specific gap mentioned below, it ultimately remains the most cost-effective way to help us advance our mission. 

Make an unrestricted donation to Evidence Action here

 

Safe Water Now Fund

Donate to Safe Water Now here

 

Scaling up water treatment in partnership with the Government of India 

Safe drinking water was recognized as a human right nearly 15 years ago. Yet over 2 billion people around the world rely on a contaminated drinking water source, resulting in over 1 million preventable deaths annually. 

Rigorous research from Nobel Laureate Michael Kremer and colleagues shows one in four deaths among children under five can be prevented simply by treating drinking water. The researchers also estimate it’s over 45 times more cost-effective than the WHO’s “highly cost-effective” threshold. 

We’re partnering with the Government of India to rapidly and dramatically expand access to safe drinking water. We’ll leverage the government’s groundbreaking $45 billion investment in tap water infrastructure for every rural household, integrating it with locally manufactured chlorination technologies to make that water safe to drink. By doing so, we can reach tens of millions with safe water, and save tens of thousands of lives. 

We’re innovating and experimenting with an eye toward massive scale – it’s one of the most ambitious safe water projects in history. Backed by a decade of experience providing safe water to millions in Africa and success partnering with governments in India to reach hundreds of millions with deworming, our unique approach focuses on building the capacity of state governments to deliver safe water while also shaping national policies and investments.

Marginal donations could: support our work in two states from 2024-2028. We also have ambitions to extend this work beyond the initial 5 years and potentially expand to additional states. With more funding, we could further amplify our impact on safe water across India.

 

Providing rural communities in Malawi and Uganda with free and reliable access to safe water 

Our Safe Water Now program provides nearly 10 million people in Kenya, Uganda, and Malawi with access to safe water for less than $1.50 per person, per year. From 2013-2023, we estimate this saved the lives of nearly 15,000 children under five and averted over 3 million cases of childhood diarrhea. 

Our network of chlorine dispensers stretches across rural communities, in areas that aren’t reached by municipal systems and don’t have piped water. Community members use the dispenser at their water source to obtain the correct dose of chlorine, then fill their bucket with water. The water is disinfected and safe to drink by the time they arrive home. Through our last-mile delivery network, we ensure chlorine is available, while local promoters help maintain dispensers and educate their communities on the importance of safe water practices. 

Marginal donations could: enable us to continue our Safe Water work in Malawi and Uganda. Kenya has a few years of funding runway, so our immediate priority is to fill our 2025 funding gaps for the other two countries.

 

High Impact School Health Fund

Donate to High Impact School Health here

 

Giving adolescent girls in Malawi a stronger, healthier start to their adult lives 

Adolescence is a critical time that shapes future health and wellbeing. But these crucial years are often deeply neglected – especially when it comes to the unique health needs of girls. 

In September 2024, we launched a partnership with the Government of Malawi to deliver life-changing treatments to over 4 million children and adolescents nationwide through schools: 

  • Iron and folic acid supplementation: In Malawi, 63% of adolescent girls are anemic. It makes them feel weak and fatigued, and affects their cognition. Adolescent girls are at increased risk for anemia with the onset of menstruation – but weekly supplementation is a game changer, reducing their risk by 35%. We expect to reach over 780,000 adolescent girls over 3 years, averting anemia and helping them reach their full potential.
  • Deworming: Parasitic worms make kids too tired and sick to attend school. Deworming increases the likelihood of girls attending secondary school by 25% – and evidence shows every additional year of schooling leads to an average increase in earnings of 9%. As a result of receiving treatment for 3 years, we estimate dewormed children’s livelihoods will have increased by $129M by 2046.
  • HPV vaccination: If we raise sufficient funding, we will next integrate HPV vaccination into this high-impact school health program. It’s estimated HPV vaccination could prevent up to 53% of cervical cancer cases in Malawi, which has the highest cervical cancer mortality rate in the world. Over 3 years, we estimate scaling up school-based HPV vaccination will avert 10,000 cervical cancer cases and 8,000 deaths. 

Marginal donations could: extend our funding runway for iron and folic acid treatment and deworming in Malawi through 2026 (and beyond). Launching HPV will require raising a minimum threshold of funding that guarantees our ability to launch and sustain the program, so unless and until that threshold is reached, marginal dollars will not be directed to HPV vaccination.

 

Helping children in Pakistan stay in school and reach their full potential

Pakistan is one of the highest burden countries for soil-transmitted helminths – parasitic intestinal worms causing infections that can lead to anemia, malnourishment, impaired mental and physical development, and severe chronic illnesses. In 2016, we supported the government in its first nationwide prevalence survey, which found an estimated 17 million school-age children need annual deworming.

Partnering with Interactive Research and Development Pakistan, we’re supporting the government to deliver mass deworming programs nationwide, reaching approximately 12 million children annually at an average cost per child of just 32 US cents.

School-based deworming has now been included in the government's National Economic Plan, and several provinces have allocated funding to implementation. We estimate the government will need just 3 more years of our support before we can exit – as we did in Vietnam, having worked ourselves out of a job.

Marginal donations could: support three years of programming (2025 - 2027).

 

Syphilis-Free Start

Donate to Syphilis-Free Start here

 

Giving mothers and babies in Liberia a Syphilis-Free Start 

Each year, mother-to-child transmission of syphilis results in a combined 200,000 stillbirths and infant deaths – more than those caused by HIV. This disease is treatable: one penicillin shot costing less than 50 cents can prevent over 80% of adverse outcomes. The main challenge is a lack of screening. Most pregnant women are screened for HIV during prenatal care. Now, thanks to a dual test that detects both infections, governments can leverage existing HIV investments to simultaneously address maternal syphilis for minimal additional cost. Through our partnership with Liberia’s Ministry of Health, nearly every prenatal health facility in the country has received training to deliver syphilis screening and treatment. Screening increased nearly tenfold from 2021-2023, preventing 2,300 adverse birth outcomes and saving over 1,300 babies’ lives. We’re seeking funding to enable us to transition the program to full government ownership, and ensure Liberia can sustain the massive gains achieved. 

Marginal donations could: help close our ~$830,000 gap to fund our sixth and final program year (2025 - 2026).

 

How to Support Evidence Action

Donate to Evidence Action here

Please see instructions here on donating to any of the funds or programs mentioned above, and for more specific instructions about donating from other countries. You can also reach out to us here, or at donate@evidenceaction.org

Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f
LewisBollard
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
> How the dismal science can help us end the dismal treatment of farm animals By Martin Gould ---------------------------------------- Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- This year we’ll be sharing a few notes from my colleagues on their areas of expertise. The first is from Martin. I’ll be back next month. - Lewis In 2024, Denmark announced plans to introduce the world’s first carbon tax on cow, sheep, and pig farming. Climate advocates celebrated, but animal advocates should be much more cautious. When Denmark’s Aarhus municipality tested a similar tax in 2022, beef purchases dropped by 40% while demand for chicken and pork increased. Beef is the most emissions-intensive meat, so carbon taxes hit it hardest — and Denmark’s policies don’t even cover chicken or fish. When the price of beef rises, consumers mostly shift to other meats like chicken. And replacing beef with chicken means more animals suffer in worse conditions — about 190 chickens are needed to match the meat from one cow, and chickens are raised in much worse conditions. It may be possible to design carbon taxes which avoid this outcome; a recent paper argues that a broad carbon tax would reduce all meat production (although it omits impacts on egg or dairy production). But with cows ten times more emissions-intensive than chicken per kilogram of meat, other governments may follow Denmark’s lead — focusing taxes on the highest emitters while ignoring the welfare implications. Beef is easily the most emissions-intensive meat, but also requires the fewest animals for a given amount. The graph shows climate emissions per tonne of meat on the right-hand side, and the number of animals needed to produce a kilogram of meat on the left. The fish “lives lost” number varies significantly by
Recent opportunities in Career choice
64
· · 1m read