Hide table of contents

Do you want to:

  • become more fullfilled, resilient, and productive?
  • practice evidence-based tools for self-management, to deal with blockers and stressors such as low concentration, motivation, mood, and self-esteem?
  • embark on that journey together with other ambitiously altruistic people?

People who are well do good better. In a rapidly evolving world where adaptability and innovation are paramount, compromised cognitive function due to mental health issues can severely limit one’s own and one's team's performance and potential [e.g., 1, 2, 3]. 

We [at Rethink Wellbeing] are now accepting participants for this year’s Mental Resilience Program, and we can offer 3 times the amount of spots this time! Reminder: last year, >350 ambitious altruists applied, and we served 55, among those employees of 80,000 Hours, Effective Ventures, Rethink Priorities, and the Center for AI Safety, had nearly no dropout (3 people), a 90%+ recommendation rate, and significant pre-post effects on mental health, wellbeing, and productivity

  • Individuals: Apply now in ~15 min
    • via this form as a participant to secure your spot in our upcoming summer cohort. Don't miss out—spaces are limited. We have a lot more spaces than last year (150) but will stop accepting participants when we are full. Do reapply, the chances are very good. Our selection criteria are: 
      •  You speak English well enough and are socially skilled enough to get by in a group. 
      • We are confident that our program can help with the problem and goals you have.
      • Some involvement with Effective Altruism or other activities that show you are ambitiously altruistic.
    • via this form to become a facilitator: our volunteer facilitators not only attend the program as participants but also receive expert-led community-based training, as well as certificates.
  • Organizations: Express interest via this form in <2min in offering our program to your team or beneficiaries. It is better to invest in the well-being of your community today than tomorrow. For instance, 80,000 Hours covers the program fully for their employees.

Watch our brand new sneak-peak video here.

Summary
​​Managing your mind is key to managing your life. We [at Rethink Wellbeing] deliver an online Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment (CBT) Program. This program is designed to help improve mental wellbeing and productivity of ambitiously altruistic people. Using the latest psychotherapeutic and behavior change techniques, participants attend weekly group sessions together with 5-8 well-matched peers, led by a trained facilitator, and engage in readings and application of the learned tools in between the sessions. This program requires 8 weeks of commitment, with a total of 4-6h/week. Usually, coaching or therapy costs $100-$200 for just one hour, and in our program, you'll get 9 sessions plus a community of like-minded individuals for 50-80% fewer costs, or for free if the cost would financially strain you. The latter case doesn't affect your chances of getting accepted to the program.

Why Participate?

  • Evidence-Based Tools:  Gain access to proven techniques rooted in Third Wave Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Approaches (CBT, ACT, Mindfulness). Through weekly group sessions and personalized exercises, you'll build practical skills to navigate life's obstacles with confidence.
  • Accessibility: A multitude of time slots convenient for people on different schedules and in different time zones are available because we train facilitators all over the globe. Also, we are committed to making this program accessible, offering it at a fraction of the cost of typical mental health-related services. It is $31 per session hour ($550 overall for the full program and $300 overall for the minimum guidance program). If you can't afford to participate or wouldn't attend if you had to cover the costs of your attendance, you can apply for a stipend in <2 min. We offer the program for lower costs or for free, using donations and grant funding. Applying for a stipend doesn't affect your chances of getting accepted to the program. For those who contribute to covering the operational costs of their attendance by paying a small fee, we also offer a money-back guarantee. 
  • Empowerment Through Community: People who want to do good better often find it hard to find like-minded individuals who understand them fully, and to connect in a supportive environment concerning mental health. Together, we'll tackle common challenges related to being ambitiously altruistic - such as low energy levels, anxiety, imposter syndrome, procrastination, poor sleep, and perfectionism.

 

What to Expect?

  • Practice-Based Learning: Dive into experiential exercises designed to make new skills second nature. From self-regulation to productivity, our curriculum covers a wide range of vital areas for personal growth.
  • Weekly Engagement: Commit to attending 2-hour group video conferences led by trained facilitators. Between sessions, dedicate 2-4 hours per week to our CBT workbook, support in the online community guided by a psychologist, and home practice.
  • Continuous Support: Track your progress with weekly forms and surveys, ensuring you stay on course throughout the 8-week program.

 

Why Choose Us?

  • Optimized and tailored: Making sure you'll likely love it, the program is tailored to the needs of ambitious altruists and built on diverse state-of-the-art science insights from the fields of mental health, psychotherapy and behavior change. We monitor relevant engagement and effectiveness drivers weekly to allow for permanent need-based adaptations in each group. 
  • Suggested Effectiveness: Our first cohort was a success (see first-year update here). Previous participants reported high satisfaction with the program and showed significant pre-post improvements in well-being, mental health, and productivity.
  • Peer-Led Support: Experience the power of group dynamics first-hand. Benefit from shared experiences, bonding, and collective wisdom as you journey towards greater mental wellness. Does this work? Laypeople-guided online programs are shown to be as effective as 1:1 therapy for most cases [4]: It isn’t the amount of the experience of, but the quality of the relationship with the provider that seems to drive effectiveness most [5-11].

 

What Happens After You Sign Up?

  • We review your answers and confirm if you’re accepted via email. 
  • You submit a donation or commitment deposit to secure your place (which can be refunded at the end if you’re unsatisfied with the program).
  • We match you up with a peer group based on your availability, stage in your life, needs, and preferences.
  • You embark on an 8-week journey to improve your mental wellbeing!

Apply here via this form in ~15min!

 

[1] McEwen, B. S., & Morrison, J. H. (2021). The brain on stress: vulnerability and plasticity of the prefrontal cortex over the life course. Neuron, 109(1), 46-56.

[2] Arne Beck, A. Lauren Crain, Leif I. Solberg, Jürgen Unützer, Russell E. Glasgow, Michael V. Maciosek and Robin Whitebird. The Annals of Family Medicine July 2011, 9 (4) 305-311; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1260

[3] Goleman, D. (2020). Emotional Intelligence and Leadership Effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(4), 379–393.

[4] Baumeister et al., 2014

[5] Pfeiffer et al., 2011

[6] Harandi et al., 2017

[7] Graßmann et. al, 2019

[8] Miller et al. 2018

[9] Norwood et al. 2018

[10] Wampold et. al, 2017

[11] Kaiser et. al, 2021

Thank you, Justis Millis, for providing helpful feedback on this post!

Comments7


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Sounds nice, what's the approximate schedule? Will a cohort form if I apply 2 months from now?

Inga
4
0
0
1

Some groups will start in May, some in June, and some in July.

This seems like a great opportunity. It is now live on the EA Opportunity Board!

Thank you for spreading the word! We hope to help lots of ambitious altruists this year.

May I ask what the total cost will be for this program? Thank you.

$31 per session hour ($550 overall). 

Copied and pasted from the input form: 

If you can't afford to participate or wouldn't attend if you had to cover the costs of your attendance, please don't hesitate to apply for a stipend in <2 min by clicking the last option. We [at Rethink Wellbeing] offer the program for lower costs or for free, using donations and grant funding. Applying for a stipend doesn't affect your chances of getting accepted to the program.

This sounds really amazing, thanks for creating such a service. I would love to apply and take part, but with my current workload, I feel I wouldn't be able to 4-6 hours per week to the program and I suspect many others are in a similar situation. 

Do you think it would be possible to share the materials/exercises for those who would be interested in doing the program at their own pace,  asynchronously, kind of like it was a workbook? (I realize sharing it would probably be not this straightforward as it was developed for groups, but I thought I would ask:) )

More from Inga
Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f
LewisBollard
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
> How the dismal science can help us end the dismal treatment of farm animals By Martin Gould ---------------------------------------- Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- This year we’ll be sharing a few notes from my colleagues on their areas of expertise. The first is from Martin. I’ll be back next month. - Lewis In 2024, Denmark announced plans to introduce the world’s first carbon tax on cow, sheep, and pig farming. Climate advocates celebrated, but animal advocates should be much more cautious. When Denmark’s Aarhus municipality tested a similar tax in 2022, beef purchases dropped by 40% while demand for chicken and pork increased. Beef is the most emissions-intensive meat, so carbon taxes hit it hardest — and Denmark’s policies don’t even cover chicken or fish. When the price of beef rises, consumers mostly shift to other meats like chicken. And replacing beef with chicken means more animals suffer in worse conditions — about 190 chickens are needed to match the meat from one cow, and chickens are raised in much worse conditions. It may be possible to design carbon taxes which avoid this outcome; a recent paper argues that a broad carbon tax would reduce all meat production (although it omits impacts on egg or dairy production). But with cows ten times more emissions-intensive than chicken per kilogram of meat, other governments may follow Denmark’s lead — focusing taxes on the highest emitters while ignoring the welfare implications. Beef is easily the most emissions-intensive meat, but also requires the fewest animals for a given amount. The graph shows climate emissions per tonne of meat on the right-hand side, and the number of animals needed to produce a kilogram of meat on the left. The fish “lives lost” number varies significantly by