The most shareable PEPFAR piece I've seen

This piece, from @Garrison, @Lauren Gilbert and @tomwein, is really great quick summary of the US foreign aid pause, focused on PEPFAR (the US funded AIDs reduction effort). 

The most affecting aspect of the piece, for me, was the prognoses for people who would no longer receive drugs from the programme:

Perhaps those in the most immediate danger are the children of HIV-positive mothers. PEPFAR currently supports around 680,000 pregnant women with ARV treatment—without access to these drugs, some 20-40 percent of them will transmit HIV to their babies. Without ARV treatment, about half of those infants will die within their first two years of life, most within the first few months. We could very well return to the world of the mid-2000s, where AIDS is once again a death sentence for a large percentage of those infected with HIV.

Nor would the consequences of ending PEPFAR stay in Africa. In up to 20 percent of individuals who inconsistently take ARVs, HIV becomes drug-resistant. It would not be long before drug-resistant HIV reached the United States, which could undermine decades of progress in HIV prevention and treatment domestically.

I say this is the "most shareable" piece I've seen because it succeeds (as much as possible) in being non-partisan. The subtitle mentions US "soft power", and the title "Trump Has Put George W. Bush’s Lifesaving Legacy in Danger" gives some kudos to Bush. This is the best piece I've seen to send to a sceptical/ republican relative. This issue is extremely important and, therefore, very emotive, so it's easy to fall into writing polemic about it. I really appreciate this piece for maintaining an objective tone without being whataboutist.