Bloomberg reports the following -

Crossposted without permission

"Elon Musk, it seems, is finally becoming a philanthropist on the scale of his billionaire peers. 

The electric car and space mogul gifted $5.7 billion worth of Tesla Inc. stock to charity in the span of 10 days in November -- many times more than he’s given away through his eponymous foundation in the two decades since it was founded. Where that donation is going is a mystery, but it’s just one more signal that the world’s richest person is taking philanthropy more seriously. 

The decision by Musk, 50, to donate more than 5 million shares in the electric-car maker was disclosed in a regulatory filing Monday night, and comes on the heels of some of his biggest-ever philanthropic commitments -- though nothing has come close to the scale of billions of dollars. It would also help reduce what he called the biggest tax bill in U.S. history.

The Musk Foundation in the past couple of years has made eight-figure grants to the city and local school system near his South Texas spaceport, a $100 million ready-made competition to fight climate change and millions of dollars to a pair of Covid-19 researchers. 

Musk at the construction site for a new Tesla Gigafactory near Gruenheide, Germany in 2020.

Almost all of those recipients have been primarily working with Igor Kurganov, a professional poker player-turned-philanthropist, who Musk has recently enlisted to keep in contact with grantees and consider their proposals. 

Effective Altruism

Kurganov, who has won more than $18 million during his poker career, is active in the world of so-called effective altruism, a philanthropic and philosophical movement that tries to have the greatest impact by carefully spending money to solve problems. Kurganov is the co-founder of Raising for Effective Giving, an organization created by a group of poker players that recommends “highly cost-effective charities.” He’s also an adviser to the Forethought Foundation, a project by the Centre for Effective Altruism. 

Calls and emails to Kurganov haven’t been returned. Jared Birchall, the managing director of Musk’s family office, and Aaron Beckman, Tesla’s senior manager of stock administration, didn’t respond to requests for comment. 

If Musk’s foundation is turning to effective altruism, it hasn’t showed yet, said Alixandra Barasch, an associate professor of marketing at New York University who has done research on the movement. 

Musk doesn’t regularly publicize his gifts and tax documents that provide such disclosures have a years-long delay. What Musk has shared recently includes $10 million to Brownsville, Texas, near where SpaceX is located, to revitalize its downtown. So far, that money has gone to a grants program for local property owners, lighting projects and murals.

Scale Up

Saving lives is the primary focus of effective altruism, and “murals don’t do that much good in terms of the way it’s measured and defined in the movement,” Barasch said. 

Other gifts from Musk, like the $20 million for Cameron County schools, the $100 million commitment for the XPrize Carbon Removal competition and $5 million for Khan Academy, similarly don’t have the focus that effective altruism typically does, Barasch said. But scale is also a factor, she said, and if Musk’s foundation is influenced by the philosophy, his giving could increase significantly. 

“Looking at those amounts I’m like, ‘Holy moly, there’s millions of dollars, it’s a lot of money,’” Barasch said. But “it’s nothing compared to what he’s worth.” 

Musk has a $227 billion personal fortune, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. The donation of $5.7 billion of Tesla stock could be a sign that he’s picking up the pace of his giving -- but it also doesn’t mean he’s actually sent much to charity yet. 

The gift likely went to Musk’s foundation, said Brian Mittendorf, an Ohio State University professor who studies nonprofits. Given Musk’s previous use of donor-advised funds, or DAFs, the public might never know where much of the money is going unless he chooses to share it on Twitter or the Musk Foundation’s website, he said.

‘Guessing Game’

“We shouldn’t have to play this guessing game,” said Benjamin Soskis, senior research associate at the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy at the Urban Institute. “It’s a matter of public interest where the money is going because the scale is so large.”

Musk’s November gifting spree came around the time he was sparring with politicians on Twitter about his taxes. A large gift to charity would help reduce what he owed to the government. Days before he completed a series of stock sales worth more than $16 billion -- much of which was to cover the exercise of almost 23 million options -- Tesla’s chief executive tweeted he would pay more than $11 billion in taxes for the year. 

In the weeks leading up to the gift, Musk also suggested he’d sell stock if the United Nations proved $6 billion would help solve world hunger, after the head of the organization’s World Food Programme called for billionaires like Musk to “step up.” 

Elon Musk @elonmuskReplying to Dr. Eli David@DrEliDavid

If WFP can describe on this Twitter thread exactly how $6B will solve world hunger, I will sell Tesla stock right now and do it.

Musk’s penchant to be provocative and his large gift announcements have made it hard for the public to figure out what his intentions are. What the hiring of Kurganov and the recent $5.7 billion gift actually mean for Musk’s philanthropic future is a mystery, Soskis said. 

“Your guess is as good as mine,” Soskis said of where Musk’s gift might end up. “If you look at what he’s done, there’s no discernible pattern.”

Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:
  • This looks to be wonderful news. Props to Musk for giving all this money away. I hope he spends it as effectively as this early news suggests.
  • Working with Musk has reputational risk. As the most controversial Billionare, EA could become seen as a Musk-y thing
  • I don't agree that "There is no descernable pattern" Musk gives to charities near his companies and works to solve problems noone else can. Kurganov certainly has a pattern of effective philanthropy.
    • I'd like to write some forecasting questions. Maybe "Will Musk give >10% of his charitable giving before 2028 to current EA non-profits"
    • Will at least 50% of Musks charitable giving go to AI, Biorisk, Nuclear risk, animal welfare or global dev
  • If this money goes to effective causes, it will significantly diversify the money (Moscovitz & Tuna and SBF are very web-based)
  • Unlike current EA billionaires, Musk is very legible. He sells news. If he becomes involved in EA, I predict a lot more coverage of other EA figures/orgs.

In my opinion "the most controversial billionaire" is either Peter Thiel or Donald Trump. Otherwise, I agree with what you have written.

Estimates of Trump's wealth vary. He is certainly controversial, but I don't think his detractors view him as a billionaire. 

Agreed. Imagine I had said , "top billionaire".

Ok, this is a little complicated, but there's an open PA spot for Liv and Igor.

So mentioning this because I guess the idea is that you can have impact by making these people more effective. You can also have influence in more than a nominal way. If you have worked with exec assistants in business, supporting roles often take on a lot of responsibility and have  strong relationship with exec judgement. 

Also, there might be big upsides being in an environment that probably lacks process and might have strong pressure to grow quickly. Or that could be a nightmare.

The ad reads a bit like a personal, personal assistant to these people and not EA work per se. 

I guess fit is important and if you like Liv and Igor.



Thanks to Parth Ahya for originally sharing.

I am surprised this hasn't been brought up elsewhere in EA channels, but it sounds like Igor is no longer working for Musk's Foundation. A lot of people on this forum have voiced concerns for harming the EA "brand" and this story does reference the movement, albeit in passing. I wonder if Musk still plans on using EA principles in his charitable activities moving forward or at least hire someone else to help? 

Here is a summary (the original on WSJ is only viewable with a free account). 

I think that I am not particularly excited by this but mostly because it doesn't feel like much of an update for me.

I know that Musk has had some kind of a relationship with EA and EA adjacent things in the past. When I hear them talk about x-risk they sound very similar to a lot of thoughtful EAs and like they have actually internalised how worrying AI is rather than just echoing the general sentiment. He seems to build/advise organisations to directly work on the problems that they think are important and be pretty good at it (Open AI, FLI, Neuralink ...).

I care more about people 'doing the EA thing' than identifying as an EA, I don't think much changes if he moves closer to the EA movement. I imagine that if they were ever going to be well networked with Holden et al. then they probably already are but either way, I think that they are well-positioned to continue to make substantial contributions to longtermist causes.

Edit: I probably sounded a bit unenthusiastic in the above but did upvote the post and I appreciate this kind of content on the forum.

I have a different intuition, fwiw. I think the value of Musk's projects varies substantially. Having someone advocating for the more valuable projects seems good, at first glance.

Yeah, that's fair. The little that I know about Igor Kurganov makes me think that they might be especially great in this kind of a role.

I think I expected something like a huge donation to give Directly in the next 3 years. So this is both sooner and potentially more effective.

As for the unenthusiastic tone, it's chill. I'd prefer people were honest than that they were enthusiastic.

Curated and popular this week
Relevant opportunities