An outline of a more precise and quantitative version of the importance, neglectedness, and tractability framework. Includes details on how to apply it to compare cause areas for yourself. (20 mins.)
This page describes one common way to compare the burden of different health issues. Researchers don't rely entirely on these kinds of metrics, but they can be one useful tool for helping to estimate the cost-effectiveness of an intervention.
These pages represent some of the most rigorous thinking you'll find on the impact of specific charities and interventions.
We've shared this link so you can see how GiveWell operates. To that end, any of the research will help. But for especially detailed work, refined over years, we recommend the writeups on GiveDirectly and mosquito nets.
A thorough exploration of RCT research in global development. It only covers work through 2010, but it's still a nice introduction if you enjoy well-written social science. (320 pages)
Another way to deal with prioritization under uncertainty is to focus on actions that seem likely to have generally positive effects across many scenarios, rather than focusing on clear, quantifiable metrics. (30 mins.)
Argues that people in the effective altruism movement might overestimate the extent to which charities differ in their expected marginal cost-effectiveness. (40 mins.)
An argument that research on and advocacy for economic growth in low- and middle-income countries is more cost-effective than the things funded by proponents of randomized controlled trials development. (60 mins - if you’re short on time, read Sections 1-3)
Elie, the CEO and co-founder of GiveWell, discusses his organization’s latest research, his views on economic growth, and what he’s changed his mind on lately. (60 mins.)
TLDR: Take the population ethics quiz here: https://mdickens.me/pop-ethics/
Population ethics is an oft-overlooked subfield within ethics. Many people hold views that they don't realize contradict each other, or that have strange implications that they wouldn't endorse if they thought about it more.
Not just that—population ethics is a BIG DEAL. A lot of ethical decisions hinge on how you think about changes in future populations....
Headline finding: I audited 17 AI Safety Talent programmes. Zero of 17 have published any comparison group, rejected-applicant follow-up, matched control or randomisation. Not one. Every programme that mentions a counterfactual does it by asking participants to self-report.
Background
At least $70 million...
The swarm has made me feel AI risk in my bones for the first time
Until the Hugging Face / OpenAI swarm thing, I think I deep down felt pretty skeptical that extinction or serious loss of control scenarios were plausible in the next few years.
I’ve been lurking on LessWrong for years, and I remember being freaked out by Yudkowsky’s ‘List of Lethalities’ in 2022, and thinking that this did seem intellectually convincing, and maybe I should do something about it. But it didn...