Tl;dr
- The community holds views on things
- We should understand what they are
- I think I am building a sense of the community feeling, but perhaps it’s very inaccurate
- agreevote to agree, disagreevote to disagree, upvote to signify importance downvote to signify unimportance
- Doing polls on the forum is bad, but I think it’s better than nothing. I have some theories about what people feel and I’m trying to disprove them
- If you want more accurate polling then someone could run that
- I’m open to the idea that poll comments in general are annoying or that I run them too soon (though people also DM to thank me for them) but this is a top level post - if you don’t like it just downvote it
- If you do like it, upvote it. Probably others will like it too
- Add your own questions or DM me and I will add them.
Hmm… part of me worries that this might be a bit too contentless/applause-lightly to provide useful information?
Yeah, I think this would be much better as a poll on a specific course of action. "Something needs to change... nothing in particular, but something" is an easy feeling to fall into.
I would like a place to report concerns to anonymously, like the community health team but for misbehaviour/fraud/etc.
I think EA institutional processes need to change to make things like the FTX crisis less likely in future
[Taking out "significantly", in case that's significant for the karma, idea stolen from OllieBase below]
I would like to see a red team focused on investigating funders reputationally assocaited with EA.