Hide table of contents

Metaculus has currently got over 1000 open forecasting questions, many of which are longtermist or EA focused. 

These include several EA-focused categories, e.g. EA survey 2025, an Alt-Protein Tournament, Animal Welfare, the "Ragnorak" global catastrophic risks series, and other questions on the distant future.

I am volunteering at Rethink Priorities doing forecasting research, and am looking to see if there are EA related questions with long time horizons (>5 years)  people are interested in seeing predictions on, and if there are I am willing to put some time into operationalising them and submitting them to Metaculus. 

I think this would be both directly useful for those who have these questions and others who find them interesting, and also useful for expanding the database of such questions we have for the purpose of improving long term forecasting. 

This question is part of a project of Rethink Priorities.
It was written by Charles Dillon, a volunteer for Rethink Priorities. Thanks to Linch Zhang for advising on the question. If you like our work, please consider subscribing to our newsletter. You can see all our work to date here.

New Answer
New Comment


4 Answers sorted by

I have a doc on my computer with some notes on Metaculus questions that I want to see, but either haven't gotten around to writing up yet, or am not sure how to operationalize. Feel free to take any of them.

Giving now vs. later parameter values

  • "In 2030, I personally will either donate at least 10% of my income to an EA cause or will work directly on an EA cause full time"
    • attempting to measure value drift
    • or maybe ask about Jeff Kaufman or somebody like that because he's public about his donations
      • or make a list of people, and ask how many of them will fulfill the above criteria
  • "According to the EA Survey, what percent of people who donated at least 10% in 2018 will donate at least 10% in 2023?"
    • Not sure if it's possible to derive this info
    • According to David Moss in Rethink Priorities Slack, it's probably not feasible to get data on this
  • "When will the Founders Pledge's long-term investment fund make its last grant?"
  • "When the long-term investment fund run by Founders Pledge ceases to make grants, will it happen because the fund is seized by an outside actor?"
    • by a government, etc.
  • "When will the longest-lived foundation or DAF owned by an EA make its last grant?"
    • EA defined as someone who identifies as an EA as of this prediction
    • the DAF must already exist and contain nonzero dollars
  • question about Rockefeller/Ford/Gates foundation longevity
  • best achievable QALYs per dollar in 2030 according to ACE, etc.
  • "Will the US stock market close by 2120?"
    • A stock market is considered to have closed if all public exchanges cease trading for at least one year
    • Could also ask about any developed market, but I think it makes most sense to ask about a single country

Open research questions

  • "By 2040, there will be a broadly accepted answer on how to construct a rank ordering of possible worlds where some of the worlds have a nonzero probability of containing infinite utility."

    • "broadly accepted" doesn't mean everyone agrees with its prescriptions, but at least people agree that it's internally consistent and largely aligns with intuitions on finite-utility cases
  • "In 2121, it will be broadly agreed that, all things considered, donations to GiveDirectly were net positive."

    • attempt at addressing cluelessness
    • "broadly agreed" is hard to define in a useful way. it's already broadly agreed right now, in spite of cluelessness
      • maybe "broadly agreed among philosophers who have written about cluelessness" but this might limit your sample to like 4 people
  • "By 2040, there will be a broadly accepted answer on what prior to use for the lifespan of humanity." see https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/XXLf6FmWujkxna3E6/are-we-living-at-the-most-influential-time-in-history-1

    • alternate formulation: Toby Ord and Will MacAskill both agree (to some level of confidence) on the correct prior
  • "By 3020, a macroscopic object will be observed traveling faster than the speed of light."

    • relevant to Beyond Astronomical Waste

Finance

  • "What annual real return will be realized by the Good Ventures investment portfolio 2022-2031?"
    • Can be calculated by Form 990-PF, Schedule B, Part II, which gives the gain of any assets held
    • Might make more sense to look at Dustin Moskowitz's net worth
      • But that doesn't account for spending
  • "Will the momentum factor have a positive return in the United States 2022-2031?"
    • Fama/French 12-2 momentum over a total market index
    • As measured by "Momentum Factor (Mom)" on Ken French Data Library
    • Gross of costs
  • "Will the Fama-French value factor (using E/P) be positive in the United States 2022-2031?"
    • Fama-French value over a total market index (not S&P 500), measured with E/P, not B/P
    • French "Portfolios Formed on Earnings/Price"
    • Factor is considered positive if the low 30% portfolio (equal-weighted) outperforms the high 30% portfolio.
    • E/P chosen due to being less subject to company structure than B/P
  • "What annualized real return will be obtained by the top decile of momentum stocks in the United States 2022-2031?"
    • same definitions as previous question
  • "What will be the magnitude of the S&P 500's largest drawdown 2022-2031?"
    • magnitude = percent decline from peak to trough

"Will the US stock market close by 2120?"



For this, would you prefer to condition on something like there being no transformative AI, or not? I feel like sometimes these questions end up dominated by considerations like this, and it is plausible you care about this answer only conditional on something like this not happening.

The question is intended to look at tail risk associated with stock markets shutting down. Transformative AI may or may not constitute such a risk; for example, the AI might shut down the stock market because it's going to do something far better with people's money, or it might shut down the market because everyone is turned into paperclips. So I think it should be unconditional.

That's in pending now, as are a few other questions you may be interested in, though not identical to the ones you list.

I'll post a response here in a few weeks once most of the questions I intend to write are actually live with a summary.

Thanks for these!


"When will the longest-lived foundation or DAF owned by an EA make its last grant?" 

  • EA defined as someone who identifies as an EA as of this prediction

Just to be clear, you specifically mean to exclude not-yet-EAs who set up DAFs in, say, 2025?

"What annual real return will be realized by the Good Ventures investment portfolio 2022-2031?" 

  • Can be calculated by Form 990-PF, Schedule B, Part II, which gives the gain of any assets held
  • Might make more sense to look at Dustin Moskowitz's net worth
    • But that doesn't account for spending

It ... (read more)

3
MichaelDickens
Yes, the intention is to predict the maximum length of time that foundations and DAFs created now (or before now) can continue to exist. Agreed.

This sounds like a cool idea, thanks for doing it! 

One place where you could find a bunch of ideas is my Database of existential risk estimates (context here). It could be interesting to put very similar questions/statements on Metaculus and see how their forecasts differ from the estimates given by these individuals/papers (most of whom don't have any known forecasting track record). It could also be interesting to put on Metaculus: 

  • questions inspired by (but different from) the statements in that database
  • questions inspired by what you notice there aren't any statements on
    • e.g., neglected categories of risks, or risks where there are very long time-scale estimates but nothing for the next few decades
      • I think authoritarianism and dystopias are examples of that
  • questions that could serve as somewhat nearer-term, less extreme proxies of later catastrophes

On the other hand, forecasting existential risks (or similar things) introduces other challenges aside from being (usually) long-range. So this might not be the ideal approach for your specific goals - not sure.

(This is a somewhat lazy response, since I'm just pointing in a direction rather than giving specifics, but maybe it could still be helpful.)

Great initiative! Are you still taking questions?

Yes, absolutely. To be clear, I'm not committing to writing up all question suggestions, but I have written up some questions inspired by these suggestions and suggestions I've been sent privately already and will probably write more.

You can see questions I've written so far here (note not all are EA related) : https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?order_by=-activity&search=author:Charles&categories=

I'd also love for someone to turn a bunch of questions from my draft Politics, Policy, and Security from a Broad Longtermist Perspective: A Preliminary Research Agenda into forecasting questions, and many would most naturally have horizons of >5 years. 

This comment is again asking you to do most of the work, in the form of picking out which questions in that agenda are about the future and then operationalising them into crisp forecasting questions. But I'll add as replies a sample of some questions from the agenda that I think it'd be cool to operationalise and put on Metaculus.

On authoritarianism and/or dystopias

  • What are the main pathways by which each type of authoritarian political system could reduce (or increase) the expected value of the long-term future?
    • E.g., increasing the rate or severity of armed conflict; reducing the chance that humanity has (something approximating) a successful long reflection; increasing the chances of an unrecoverable dystopia.
  • Risk and security factors for (global, stable) authoritarianism
    • How much would each of the “risk factors for stable totalitarianism” reviewed by Caplan (2008) increase the ri
... (read more)

On armed conflict and military technology

  • How likely are international tensions, armed conflicts of various levels/types, and great power war specifically at various future times? What are the causes of these things?
    • How might shifts in technology, climate, power, resource scarcity, migration, and economic growth affect the likelihood of war?
    • Are Pinker’s claims in The Better Angels of Our Nature essentially correct?
    • Are the current trends likely to hold in future? What might affect them?
  • How do international tensions, strategic competition, and risks of armed
... (read more)
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 11m read
 · 
Does a food carbon tax increase animal deaths and/or the total time of suffering of cows, pigs, chickens, and fish? Theoretically, this is possible, as a carbon tax could lead consumers to substitute, for example, beef with chicken. However, this is not per se the case, as animal products are not perfect substitutes.  I'm presenting the results of my master's thesis in Environmental Economics, which I re-worked and published on SSRN as a pre-print. My thesis develops a model of animal product substitution after a carbon tax, slaughter tax, and a meat tax. When I calibrate[1] this model for the U.S., there is a decrease in animal deaths and duration of suffering following a carbon tax. This suggests that a carbon tax can reduce animal suffering. Key points * Some animal products are carbon-intensive, like beef, but causes relatively few animal deaths or total time of suffering because the animals are large. Other animal products, like chicken, causes relatively many animal deaths or total time of suffering because the animals are small, but cause relatively low greenhouse gas emissions. * A carbon tax will make some animal products, like beef, much more expensive. As a result, people may buy more chicken. This would increase animal suffering, assuming that farm animals suffer. However, this is not per se the case. It is also possible that the direct negative effect of a carbon tax on chicken consumption is stronger than the indirect (positive) substitution effect from carbon-intensive products to chicken. * I developed a non-linear market model to predict the consumption of different animal products after a tax, based on own-price and cross-price elasticities. * When calibrated for the United States, this model predicts a decrease in the consumption of all animal products considered (beef, chicken, pork, and farmed fish). Therefore, the modelled carbon tax is actually good for animal welfare, assuming that animals live net-negative lives. * A slaughter tax (a
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
I can’t recall the last time I read a book in one sitting, but that’s what happened with Moral Ambition by bestselling author Rutger Bregman. I read the German edition, though it’s also available in Dutch (see James Herbert's Quick Take). An English release is slated for May. The book opens with the statement: “The greatest waste of our times is the waste of talent.” From there, Bregman builds a compelling case for privileged individuals to leave their “bullshit jobs” and tackle the world’s most pressing challenges. He weaves together narratives spanning historical movements like abolitionism, suffrage, and civil rights through to contemporary initiatives such as Against Malaria Foundation, Charity Entrepreneurship, LEEP, and the Shrimp Welfare Project. If you’ve been engaged with EA ideas, much of this will sound familiar, but I initially didn’t expect to enjoy the book as much as I did. However, Bregman’s skill as a storyteller and his knack for balancing theory and narrative make Moral Ambition a fascinating read. He reframes EA concepts in a more accessible way, such as replacing “counterfactuals” with the sports acronym “VORP” (Value Over Replacement Player). His use of stories and examples, paired with over 500 footnotes for details, makes the book approachable without sacrificing depth. I had some initial reservations. The book draws heavily on examples from the EA community but rarely engages directly with the movement, mentioning EA mainly in the context of FTX. The final chapter also promotes Bregman’s own initiative, The School for Moral Ambition. However, the school’s values closely align with core EA principles. The ITN framework and pitches for major EA cause areas are in the book, albeit with varying levels of depth. Having finished the book, I can appreciate its approach. Moral Ambition feels like a more pragmatic, less theory-heavy version of EA. The School for Moral Ambition has attracted better-known figures in Germany, such as the political e
MarieF🔸
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Summary * After >2 years at Hi-Med, I have decided to step down from my role. * This allows me to complete my medical residency for long-term career resilience, whilst still allowing part-time flexibility for direct charity work. It also allows me to donate more again. * Hi-Med is now looking to appoint its next Executive Director; the application deadline is 26 January 2025. * I will join Hi-Med’s governing board once we have appointed the next Executive Director. Before the role When I graduated from medical school in 2017, I had already started to give 10% of my income to effective charities, but I was unsure as to how I could best use my medical degree to make this world a better place. After dipping my toe into nonprofit fundraising (with Doctors Without Borders) and working in a medical career-related start-up to upskill, a talk given by Dixon Chibanda at EAG London 2018 deeply inspired me. I formed a rough plan to later found an organisation that would teach Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-specific psychotherapeutic techniques to lay people to make evidence-based treatment of PTSD scalable. I started my medical residency in psychosomatic medicine in 2019, working for a specialised clinic for PTSD treatment until 2021, then rotated to child and adolescent psychiatry for a year and was half a year into the continuation of my specialisation training at a third hospital, when Akhil Bansal, whom I met at a recent EAG in London, reached out and encouraged me to apply for the ED position at Hi-Med - an organisation that I knew through my participation in their introductory fellowship (an academic paper about the outcomes of this first cohort can be found here). I seized the opportunity, applied, was offered the position, and started working full-time in November 2022.  During the role I feel truly privileged to have had the opportunity to lead High Impact Medicine for the past two years. My learning curve was steep - there were so many new things to