Hide table of contents

EA Org Logos

As the Effective Altruism community has grown, efforts have emerged to promote and support the growth of EA groups in universities and cities around the world. Presently there are three organisations supporting EA groups on a large scale. This article outlines the background of each organisation, and clarifies the functional role and division of labour between them. We hope that the post will give the wider EA community a better understanding of the EA Group Support landscape Outreach space, while helping people involved in organising EA groups to identify the best ways to get assistance in different contexts.

 

Key Facts:

  • Click here to see our online resources combined in one place

  • All groups can approach CEA, LEAN and EAF to inquire about support

  • Some of EAF’s resources and events are only conveniently accessed by German speakers living in the region.

Joint Support

The following are jointly provided by CEA, LEAN and EAF:

 

  • The EA Organisers’ Facebook group

  • The Local EA Groups newsletter, aimed at supporting organisers and sharing relevant news and opportunities. New groups are automatically added, but email groupnewsletter@eahub.org if you think you have been left off of the mailing list

  • The annual Local EA Groups Survey. This year’s survey contains sections for both group members and organisers. Click to participate!

 

CEA: Local Groups Support

The Centre for Effective Altruism (CEA) is non-profit organisation which helps to grow and maintain the effective altruism community. Their mission is to create a global community of people who have made helping others a core part of their lives, and who use evidence and scientific reasoning to figure out how to do so as effectively as possible.


Before the Centre for Effective Altruism merger, Giving What We Can and EA Build (as a part of EA Outreach) supported local groups independently. CEA has since centralised both EA Outreach and Giving What We Can into one organisation at CEA. This also meant they centralised their support to local EA groups, which is currently provided by CEA’s Local Groups Coordinator - Harri Besceli. There is a small minority of EA groups which brand themselves as GWWC and 80,000 Hours groups, however these are supported by CEA in the same way as other EA-branded groups.

 

CEA Local Groups Support currently includes 1-1 mentoring, funding for EA Groups and resources and materials collected in the Effective Altruism Groups’ Google Drive Folder.

 

The support offered is currently being reviewed and updated. A new funding process, opportunities for receiving mentoring, suggested projects for EA groups and an EA Groups page on effectivealtruism.org will be announced by the end of August.

 

You can contact CEA's Local Groups Coordinator at harri.besceli@centreforeffectivealtruism.org

 

Effective Altruism Foundation: Outreach

The Effective Altruism Foundation (EAF, Stiftung für Effektiven Altruismus) is an effective altruist project incubator founded in Switzerland in 2013. It supports local groups in the German-speaking area (Germany, Austria, and Switzerland) in the following ways:

 

  • German resources, e.g. local group guide, leaflets, presentation slides, event flyer templates, and more

  • Speakers for EA introduction talks

  • Support for group organizers through a facebook group, personal advice, and 1-2 in-person local group meetups per year

  • A list of all groups and events in the German-speaking area

 

In addition, EAF supports the German-speaking EA movement with a German EA landing page, PR and media relations, social media, tax-deductible donation regranting to all EA charities, EAGx conferences, and a German EA newsletter.

 

You can contact EAF’s Local Groups Coordinator at marcello.veronese@ea-stiftung.org.

 

LEAN: The Local Effective Altruism Network

LEAN is a Rethink Charity project, originally set up by Tom Ash in 2014. LEAN’s objective is to promote Effective Altruism globally through the initiation of local EA groups, and the support of existing EA groups. Our outreach strategy has involved starting new EA presences by getting in touch with registered EAs in locations with no known EA representation. LEAN also assumed responsibility for an older, existing network of EA groups previously served by the now-defunct THINK project. Since its inception, LEAN has directly initiated or facilitated over 200 groups and presences around the world. LEAN supports local groups by providing:

 

  • Public profiles for Google searches, and visibility on the Map of EAs

  • Free websites, EA email addresses and Meetup.com use

  • Conference calls, bringing organisers together for knowledge transfer

  • Guides, ‘How-To’s and the EA Wiki

  • One-to-one feedback and support

  • Regular fundraisers (such as Living on Less) for groups to participate in

In addition to these services, LEAN has recently launched a Mentoring Programme in concert with CEA. LEAN will continue to build on its expertise for group management strategy, and use this to publish further guides and resources for organisers.

You can contact LEAN’s Manager at: richenda@eahub.org

Comments4


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

thanks

Thanks for aggregating this information, Richenda! One quick bucket of thoughts around EA groups + universities:

  1. How are LEAN/CEA/EAF thinking about university chapters? Have they been an effective way of building a local community? Are there any university-focused plans going forwards?
  2. Are there other movements trying a university-focused strategy? Could we partner/learn from them? I'm thinking about something like Blockchain Education Network (see https://blockchainedu.org/ and https://medium.com/@rishipr/fa2543cdcbd8).

Thanks Richenda!

Hi Rhys,

Yes, Universities are especially good environments in which to start EA groups for a number of reasons (lots of young people with plenty of free time who are actively reaching for new ideas, experiences and activities, a lot of infrastructural support from institutions, student unions, a captive audience, etc.)

We are very mindful of the differences between local groups and University groups. Internally we work on building expertise about these differences, and customising the support and advice we give based on the nature of the group in question.

We have also drawn on the expertise of other successful student based movements. For example, the Secular Student Alliance has some excellent group growth and management guides which we pass on for recommended reading (while giving full credit, of course).

Awesome. Thanks Richenda—I'm looking into Secular Student Alliance now!

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 38m read
 · 
In recent months, the CEOs of leading AI companies have grown increasingly confident about rapid progress: * OpenAI's Sam Altman: Shifted from saying in November "the rate of progress continues" to declaring in January "we are now confident we know how to build AGI" * Anthropic's Dario Amodei: Stated in January "I'm more confident than I've ever been that we're close to powerful capabilities... in the next 2-3 years" * Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis: Changed from "as soon as 10 years" in autumn to "probably three to five years away" by January. What explains the shift? Is it just hype? Or could we really have Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)[1] by 2028? In this article, I look at what's driven recent progress, estimate how far those drivers can continue, and explain why they're likely to continue for at least four more years. In particular, while in 2024 progress in LLM chatbots seemed to slow, a new approach started to work: teaching the models to reason using reinforcement learning. In just a year, this let them surpass human PhDs at answering difficult scientific reasoning questions, and achieve expert-level performance on one-hour coding tasks. We don't know how capable AGI will become, but extrapolating the recent rate of progress suggests that, by 2028, we could reach AI models with beyond-human reasoning abilities, expert-level knowledge in every domain, and that can autonomously complete multi-week projects, and progress would likely continue from there.  On this set of software engineering & computer use tasks, in 2020 AI was only able to do tasks that would typically take a human expert a couple of seconds. By 2024, that had risen to almost an hour. If the trend continues, by 2028 it'll reach several weeks.  No longer mere chatbots, these 'agent' models might soon satisfy many people's definitions of AGI — roughly, AI systems that match human performance at most knowledge work (see definition in footnote). This means that, while the compa
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
SUMMARY:  ALLFED is launching an emergency appeal on the EA Forum due to a serious funding shortfall. Without new support, ALLFED will be forced to cut half our budget in the coming months, drastically reducing our capacity to help build global food system resilience for catastrophic scenarios like nuclear winter, a severe pandemic, or infrastructure breakdown. ALLFED is seeking $800,000 over the course of 2025 to sustain its team, continue policy-relevant research, and move forward with pilot projects that could save lives in a catastrophe. As funding priorities shift toward AI safety, we believe resilient food solutions remain a highly cost-effective way to protect the future. If you’re able to support or share this appeal, please visit allfed.info/donate. Donate to ALLFED FULL ARTICLE: I (David Denkenberger) am writing alongside two of my team-mates, as ALLFED’s co-founder, to ask for your support. This is the first time in Alliance to Feed the Earth in Disaster’s (ALLFED’s) 8 year existence that we have reached out on the EA Forum with a direct funding appeal outside of Marginal Funding Week/our annual updates. I am doing so because ALLFED’s funding situation is serious, and because so much of ALLFED’s progress to date has been made possible through the support, feedback, and collaboration of the EA community.  Read our funding appeal At ALLFED, we are deeply grateful to all our supporters, including the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which has provided the majority of our funding for years. At the end of 2024, we learned we would be receiving far less support than expected due to a shift in SFF’s strategic priorities toward AI safety. Without additional funding, ALLFED will need to shrink. I believe the marginal cost effectiveness for improving the future and saving lives of resilience is competitive with AI Safety, even if timelines are short, because of potential AI-induced catastrophes. That is why we are asking people to donate to this emergency appeal