Hide table of contents

For individuals in the EA community, EA Global and EAGx conferences are an opportunity to be exposed to ideas and people who can help us identify and pursue more impactful paths. And for organizations, they’re an opportunity to connect with potential new hires, grantees, and funders.

Charity Entrepreneurship recently shared with us (the CEA events team) a summary of the impact their participation at EAG and EAGx has had on their Incubation Program.

We were inspired by this post, and wanted to encourage orgs working on EA causes — object and meta, large and small, older and newer — to consider carefully how to get the most out of the conferences we’ve got lined up in 2023. The opportunities include:

  • Talks & workshops can be used to inform the community about your work and how others can contribute to increasing your impact as collaborators, funders or recruits.
  • Office hours & career fairs are available for you to interact directly with those interested in your plans and how they might fit into them.
  • 1-on-1 meetings are the bedrock of all the conferences CEA is involved in organizing, facilitating in-depth discussion and establishing connections between people with common goals.

If you’re interested in your org appearing on the program at an upcoming conference, or would like to discuss with us how best to approach these events, please reach out to us at hello@eaglobal.org.

We thought sharing Charity Entrepreneurship’s experience publicly might be valuable for others to learn from in planning their own approach to future conferences. Here’s their story in their own words.

CE’s EAG and EAGx Success Stories

From the launch of Charity Entrepreneurship’s Incubation Program, EAG and EAGx conferences have been a crucial part of the organization’s outreach strategy. Thanks in part to CE’s increasing presence — talks, workshops, and participation in numerous career fairs — nonprofit entrepreneurship has become a recognized career option in the effective altruist community.

From just one round of applications for CE’s Incubation Program, 325 out of 720 applicants had participated in EAG or EAGx conferences where the organization was present. 169 applicants had interacted directly with CE at EAGs by participating in a workshop, office hours, or talking to CE staff one on one.

When young entrepreneurs who got into the Incubation Program and started new high-impact charities were asked what convinced them to apply, they named EAGs as one of the top reasons (along with the EA movement in general, partner/friend, internships, talking to CE staff members and group organizers).

So far, Charity Entrepreneurship has started 23 organizations and provided them with $1.88 million in total funding. These organizations have fundraised a further $20 million to cover their costs and are now reaching over 120 million animals and over 10 million people with their interventions. You can learn more about them on CE’s website; they include charities like Fortify Health (three GiveWell Incubation Grants, 25% chance of becoming a top charity), Fish Welfare Initiative (ACE Standout Charity), Shrimp Welfare Project (first organization ever working on shrimp welfare), and Lead Exposure Elimination Project (precursory policy organization now working in 10 countries).

Key benefits for CE

  • Finding talented entrepreneurs to start high-impact projects (50% of the founders had been in contact with CE’s outreach efforts during EAG conferences).
  • Finding hires for the CE team (20% of the team have been hired thanks to outreach efforts during EAG conferences), as well as fellows and interns.
  • Making useful connections for funding (10% of funding potentially coming from connections made during EAG conferences).
  • Sharing top ideas for most impactful interventions in various cause areas (Global Health & Development, Biorisk, Animal Welfare, EA Meta) with the broader EA community.

The most successful events in terms of number of applications were:

  • EAGxBerlin: 71
  • EAG London: 47
  • EAG Washington: 44
  • EAGxPrague: 37
  • EAGxRotterdam: 32
  • EAGxOxford: 33
  • EAGxSingapore: 24
  • EAGxBoston: 21

Specific examples of success stories: 

From CEA: How can other organizations learn from CE’s approach?

We think CE are particularly good at making use of EAG(x) and that they might be especially well-positioned to get benefits out of our events. But they aren’t the only organization that manages to get a lot out of events, and we think that some parts of their approach might generalize. Some strategies that might generalize to other organizations:

Plan ahead

Know what your goals are for the conference and identify attendees to speak with in advance. We think CE has been particularly successful because they have a strong sense of what they are trying to achieve and how to achieve it. You could consider setting SMART goals (specific, measurable, assignable, realistic, and time-related). Make sure your goals are tracking the things you want to achieve and that it is clear whether you’ve achieved them or not.

For example: If you’re looking to find a potential research collaborator for an upcoming paper on factory farming and pandemics risks, you might set a goal to read profiles of each person who lists “animal welfare” AND “biosecurity” in their swapcard profile. You might make a second goal from there. Say 30 people list both, but 10 people seem reasonably well-suited to actually work on the paper. You could make a new goal: Reach out to the 10 people who seem like plausible collaborators and try to set meetings with them.

Consider back-planning

Back-planning (or backchaining) starts planning from the end and works backwards. I often recommend this tool for project management and realistic time estimates, but I think it can be helpful for clarifying the steps in order to make sure you actually do the thing.

For example, maybe the task you want to complete is to hire a new ops associate at EAG. Imagine you’re at the end of your task; “Offering a role to an attendee”. Now move backwards, step-by-step. What is the step right before you finish? Maybe you have to meet with them to actually hire them so there would have to be leads.” So, you repeat Step 3 until you get to where you are now. Is that all? Well, for people to want the job I’d have to publicize the role and share it with attendees, and I’d have to reach out to promising candidates. How would I know if people are promising? I guess I’d need a list of attendees who want to work in ops. Oh, I can get that from swapcard!” (Don’t forget to use the spreadsheet view!). Write down how long you think the task will now take you. “Huh, thinking it through like this, I’d need something like 2 weeks before EAG to coordinate leads and have enough staff to have meetings onsite. And I’d need another week for writing my job ad. And another week for unforeseen issues”  You now have a detailed plan!

Work with the organizers

Consider hosting a talk, workshop, career fair stall, meetup, or office hours and use your content slot to attract potential hires, funders, or collaborators. You can submit nominations for content here (feel free to nominate yourself / your organization) or by emailing hello@eaglobal.org (EAGx organizer emails can be found on the event pages). Please do this as far in advance as possible (ideally at least 6 weeks)! If you end up with a content slot, make sure to clarify your goals (as described above) and share them with the organizers. We love to help!

Reflect and iterate

Review on how the event went for you (perhaps by writing it up and sharing with the EAG team!), improve your approach for future conferences, and give us feedback about how we can better support you next time!

Comments2


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

This is the first I’ve heard of swapcard’s spreadsheet mode, that sounds potentially very useful!

I couldn’t easily find info about it, do you have a link?

Thanks! 

You need to be an attendee of the conference and then you can access it from within Swapcard. 

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 32m read
 · 
Summary Immediate skin-to-skin contact (SSC) between mothers and newborns and early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF) may play a significant and underappreciated role in reducing neonatal mortality. These practices are distinct in important ways from more broadly recognized (and clearly impactful) interventions like kangaroo care and exclusive breastfeeding, and they are recommended for both preterm and full-term infants. A large evidence base indicates that immediate SSC and EIBF substantially reduce neonatal mortality. Many randomized trials show that immediate SSC promotes EIBF, reduces episodes of low blood sugar, improves temperature regulation, and promotes cardiac and respiratory stability. All of these effects are linked to lower mortality, and the biological pathways between immediate SSC, EIBF, and reduced mortality are compelling. A meta-analysis of large observational studies found a 25% lower risk of mortality in infants who began breastfeeding within one hour of birth compared to initiation after one hour. These practices are attractive targets for intervention, and promoting them is effective. Immediate SSC and EIBF require no commodities, are under the direct influence of birth attendants, are time-bound to the first hour after birth, are consistent with international guidelines, and are appropriate for universal promotion. Their adoption is often low, but ceilings are demonstrably high: many low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) have rates of EIBF less than 30%, yet several have rates over 70%. Multiple studies find that health worker training and quality improvement activities dramatically increase rates of immediate SSC and EIBF. There do not appear to be any major actors focused specifically on promotion of universal immediate SSC and EIBF. By contrast, general breastfeeding promotion and essential newborn care training programs are relatively common. More research on cost-effectiveness is needed, but it appears promising. Limited existing
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
For immediate release: April 1, 2025 OXFORD, UK — The Centre for Effective Altruism (CEA) announced today that it will no longer identify as an "Effective Altruism" organization.  "After careful consideration, we've determined that the most effective way to have a positive impact is to deny any association with Effective Altruism," said a CEA spokesperson. "Our mission remains unchanged: to use reason and evidence to do the most good. Which coincidentally was the definition of EA." The announcement mirrors a pattern of other organizations that have grown with EA support and frameworks and eventually distanced themselves from EA. CEA's statement clarified that it will continue to use the same methodologies, maintain the same team, and pursue identical goals. "We've found that not being associated with the movement we have spent years building gives us more flexibility to do exactly what we were already doing, just with better PR," the spokesperson explained. "It's like keeping all the benefits of a community while refusing to contribute to its future development or taking responsibility for its challenges. Win-win!" In a related announcement, CEA revealed plans to rename its annual EA Global conference to "Coincidental Gathering of Like-Minded Individuals Who Mysteriously All Know Each Other But Definitely Aren't Part of Any Specific Movement Conference 2025." When asked about concerns that this trend might be pulling up the ladder for future projects that also might benefit from the infrastructure of the effective altruist community, the spokesperson adjusted their "I Heart Consequentialism" tie and replied, "Future projects? I'm sorry, but focusing on long-term movement building would be very EA of us, and as we've clearly established, we're not that anymore." Industry analysts predict that by 2026, the only entities still identifying as "EA" will be three post-rationalist bloggers, a Discord server full of undergraduate philosophy majors, and one person at
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
Summary: The NAO will increase our sequencing significantly over the next few months, funded by a $3M grant from Open Philanthropy. This will allow us to scale our pilot early-warning system to where we could flag many engineered pathogens early enough to mitigate their worst impacts, and also generate large amounts of data to develop, tune, and evaluate our detection systems. One of the biological threats the NAO is most concerned with is a 'stealth' pathogen, such as a virus with the profile of a faster-spreading HIV. This could cause a devastating pandemic, and early detection would be critical to mitigate the worst impacts. If such a pathogen were to spread, however, we wouldn't be able to monitor it with traditional approaches because we wouldn't know what to look for. Instead, we have invested in metagenomic sequencing for pathogen-agnostic detection. This doesn't require deciding what sequences to look for up front: you sequence the nucleic acids (RNA and DNA) and analyze them computationally for signs of novel pathogens. We've primarily focused on wastewater because it has such broad population coverage: a city in a cup of sewage. On the other hand, wastewater is difficult because the fraction of nucleic acids that come from any given virus is very low,[1] and so you need quite deep sequencing to find something. Fortunately, sequencing has continued to come down in price, to under $1k per billion read pairs. This is an impressive reduction, 1/8 of what we estimated two years ago when we first attempted to model the cost-effectiveness of detection, and it makes methods that rely on very deep sequencing practical. Over the past year, in collaboration with our partners at the University of Missouri (MU) and the University of California, Irvine (UCI), we started to sequence in earnest: We believe this represents the majority of metagenomic wastewater sequencing produced in the world to date, and it's an incredibly rich dataset. It has allowed us to develop
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
47
Ivan Burduk
· · 2m read