Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
dan.pandori9
2
0

As someone who has recently been in the AI Safety org interview circuit, about 50% of interviews were traditional Leetcode style algorithmic/coding puzzle and 50% were more practical. This seems pretty typical compared to industry.

The EA orgs I interviewed with were very candid about their approach, and I was much less surprised by the style of interview I got than I was surprised when interviewing in industry. Anthropic, Ought, and CEA all very explicitly lay out what their interviews look like publicly. My experience was that the interviews matched the public description very well.

Reply
See in context
by dan.pandori
2 min read 10

43

Career choiceCommunityCareer advisingPracticalSoftware engineering
Frontpage

My background

I'm a senior software engineer at Waymo, and previously worked at Google. I've conducted around 150 technical interviews and been part of a couple hiring committees.

Who can this probably help

People who want to work as software engineers at FAANG companies (or companies with similar interviews), and want to get more feedback than a leetcode/Hackerrank will give. For example, how many questions to ask the interviewer? How to talk about your background? What exactly is the hiring bar for a recent college grad? And other things that are otherwise hard to learn about.

I expect this to be most helpful for folks early in their career (or pre-career!), but I'm happy to give a mock interview for anyone.
 

Also more generally, if you want to practice interviews but find real interviews stressful, I’m friendly!


 

Contact me

Email: dantweinand@gmail.com

Title: EA FAANG mock interview

Body: Hey, could we set up a mock software interview?


 

Anything else you write is a bonus. We'll figure out a compatible time over email.

 [edit: I sometimes get asked if these are still ongoing. I hereby commit to updating this page if I stop doing these.

I've also had someone offer to share some interviewing.io interviews that they have built up, so if you are interested feel free to ask about that and I'll get you in touch with them.

After having done a dozen or so of these practice interviews, there are also some common themes that come up pretty frequently. These are:

1) It's important to be  familiar with the major datastructures in the programming language you intend to interview in. Big-O cheatsheet has a good summary of the operations that various structures support efficiently. The most important structures for interviews are IMO: arrays, linked lists (for stacks/queues), hash maps, balanced binary search trees, heaps, and tries.

2) It's good to feel comfortable with the syntax of the language and basic implementation. Leetcode/Neetcode/Hackerrank are great for this. Project Euler is excellent for more algorithmically heavy problems, although I would recommend against going beyond the 100 most solved problems (unless you love number theory).

3) Ask the interviewer clarifying questions and for examples of terms. It's really helpful to be on the same page and prevent accidentally going off on a different problem.]

43

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Mentioned in
Load more (5/6)
Comments10


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
dan.pandori8
0
0

I forgot to mention in the body, but I should thank Yonatan for putting a draft of this together and encouraging me to post it. Thanks! I've been meaning to do this for a while.

Reply
andrew_richardson5
0
0

If there's too much demand for this, I'd also be willing to do these. 

When I was interviewing at big tech companies, it helped that I had 3 roommates who worked for Google. In general it seems like EAs who want to work for big tech but don't have existing connections to it are disadvantaged. That seems suboptimal. I'm glad you made this post. 

Reply
dan.pandori4
0
0

Thanks! Current volume is reasonable but I will totally forward some your way if I get overwhelmed.

Reply
Charles He3
0
0

While not directly related, this post gives an opportunity to ask question that are interesting and might benefit others:

How would an aligned EA working on something approximately EA, recruit and judge other SWE EAs for a software role?

  • Would you use leetcode or a similar puzzle style of coding, or pair programming or some kind of assignment based project?
  • What if I wanted to recruit someone better or more senior than me (by a moderate margin)? How would I go about this? 

What have you found surprising about recruiting or building a team for a small project? 

  • (I think this is hard or a big topic. For example, SWE is a lot about architecture/vision/design decisions that often take on a social/cultural aspect.)
     

One reason I'm asking is that I’m assuming the answers might be different than normal, because there might be differences/advantages in having an EA recruit an EA. 

(On the other hand, there's probably reasons and examples that are evidence against this). 
 

Reply
dan.pandori9
2
0

As someone who has recently been in the AI Safety org interview circuit, about 50% of interviews were traditional Leetcode style algorithmic/coding puzzle and 50% were more practical. This seems pretty typical compared to industry.

The EA orgs I interviewed with were very candid about their approach, and I was much less surprised by the style of interview I got than I was surprised when interviewing in industry. Anthropic, Ought, and CEA all very explicitly lay out what their interviews look like publicly. My experience was that the interviews matched the public description very well.

Reply
Yonatan Cale7
1
0

My priors:

  1. It's mostly the same as a normal org hiring, besides things about value alignment (which are a whole other story)
  2. If I'd have to hire someone more senior than me, I'd ask someone more senior than me to help interviewing. EA has some pretty senior people. (just referred one of them to this comment, maybe he'll reply)
Reply
andrew_richardson6
1
0
  1. It depends a lot on what I'm hiring for and what the candidate's background is. If it's an ML job, I ask ML programming and design questions, but if I'm hiring someone to do networking, I'll ask a question about distributed algorithms or something. This is in contrast to how Google hires, because they're hiring generic SWEs so they don't care a lot about the particulars. 
  2. If I had to hire someone more senior, I would reach out to other more senior people who I trust to ask them for help.
  3. For a small team, generalism can be more important than it seems.
Reply
Charles He2
0
0

Thanks for the answers, this makes a lot of sense.

Can you be specific about #1? For example, what format of programming tests would you prefer to give to a generalist engineer? 

By the way, do you mean something special or "hands on" for ML programming or design questions? 

For ML programming, it seems bad to rely on ML or design questions in the sense of  a verbal question and answer? I think actually designing/choosing ML scientific knowledge is a tiny part of the job, so I think many ML knowledge questions would be unnatural (rewarding memorization of standard ML books/selecting for "enthusiasts" who read up on recent libraries, and blow out strong talent who solved a lot of hard real world problems). 

Reply
andrew_richardson7
1
0

Yeah I personally find it very hard to do ML interviews for that reason. So far I'm doing a mix of theory/conceptual questions and practical ML coding questions. It helps if the conceptual questions include some unusual setups, or ask about unusal tweaks. 

Reply
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 17m read
 · 
TL;DR Exactly one year after receiving our seed funding upon completion of the Charity Entrepreneurship program, we (Miri and Evan) look back on our first year of operations, discuss our plans for the future, and launch our fundraising for our Year 2 budget. Family Planning could be one of the most cost-effective public health interventions available. Reducing unintended pregnancies lowers maternal mortality, decreases rates of unsafe abortions, and reduces maternal morbidity. Increasing the interval between births lowers under-five mortality. Allowing women to control their reproductive health leads to improved education and a significant increase in their income. Many excellent organisations have laid out the case for Family Planning, most recently GiveWell.[1] In many low and middle income countries, many women who want to delay or prevent their next pregnancy can not access contraceptives due to poor supply chains and high costs. Access to Medicines Initiative (AMI) was incubated by Ambitious Impact’s Charity Entrepreneurship Incubation Program in 2024 with the goal of increasing the availability of contraceptives and other essential medicines.[2] The Problem Maternal mortality is a serious problem in Nigeria. Globally, almost 28.5% of all maternal deaths occur in Nigeria. This is driven by Nigeria’s staggeringly high maternal mortality rate of 1,047 deaths per 100,000 live births, the third highest in the world. To illustrate the magnitude, for the U.K., this number is 8 deaths per 100,000 live births.   While there are many contributing factors, 29% of pregnancies in Nigeria are unintended. 6 out of 10 women of reproductive age in Nigeria have an unmet need for contraception, and fulfilling these needs would likely prevent almost 11,000 maternal deaths per year. Additionally, the Guttmacher Institute estimates that every dollar spent on contraceptive services beyond the current level would reduce the cost of pregnancy-related and newborn care by three do
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
I speak to many entrepreneurial people trying to do a large amount of good by starting a nonprofit organisation. I think this is often an error for four main reasons. 1. Scalability 2. Capital counterfactuals 3. Standards 4. Learning potential 5. Earning to give potential These arguments are most applicable to starting high-growth organisations, such as startups.[1] Scalability There is a lot of capital available for startups, and established mechanisms exist to continue raising funds if the ROI appears high. It seems extremely difficult to operate a nonprofit with a budget of more than $30M per year (e.g., with approximately 150 people), but this is not particularly unusual for for-profit organisations. Capital Counterfactuals I generally believe that value-aligned funders are spending their money reasonably well, while for-profit investors are spending theirs extremely poorly (on altruistic grounds). If you can redirect that funding towards high-altruism value work, you could potentially create a much larger delta between your use of funding and the counterfactual of someone else receiving those funds. You also won’t be reliant on constantly convincing donors to give you money, once you’re generating revenue. Standards Nonprofits have significantly weaker feedback mechanisms compared to for-profits. They are often difficult to evaluate and lack a natural kill function. Few people are going to complain that you provided bad service when it didn’t cost them anything. Most nonprofits are not very ambitious, despite having large moral ambitions. It’s challenging to find talented people willing to accept a substantial pay cut to work with you. For-profits are considerably more likely to create something that people actually want. Learning Potential Most people should be trying to put themselves in a better position to do useful work later on. People often report learning a great deal from working at high-growth companies, building interesting connection
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
Need help planning your career? Probably Good’s 1-1 advising service is back! After refining our approach and expanding our capacity, we’re excited to once again offer personal advising sessions to help people figure out how to build careers that are good for them and for the world. Our advising is open to people at all career stages who want to have a positive impact across a range of cause areas—whether you're early in your career, looking to make a transition, or facing uncertainty about your next steps. Some applicants come in with specific plans they want feedback on, while others are just beginning to explore what impactful careers could look like for them. Either way, we aim to provide useful guidance tailored to your situation. Learn more about our advising program and apply here. Also, if you know someone who might benefit from an advising call, we’d really appreciate you passing this along. Looking forward to hearing from those interested. Feel free to get in touch if you have any questions. Finally, we wanted to say a big thank you to 80,000 Hours for their help! The input that they gave us, both now and earlier in the process, was instrumental in shaping what our advising program will look like, and we really appreciate their support.
Recent opportunities in Career choice
95
E2G help available
Will Kirkpatrick
· · 3m read
3
3
45
The CEA Events Team is Hiring for Three Program Lead Positions
OllieBase
· · 3m read
0
0
5
Introducing EA to United World Colleges? (UWC alum here, curious to explore the overlap)
Unwobblypanda
· · 1m read
1
1
View more