Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
Kris Chari3
0
0

Fully agree! Our university group uses a virtual assistant for ~20 hours/month, which saves us ~10 hours/month (it does take some time to explain stuff, and our assistant takes slightly longer to do the same tasks). I expect our time savings to increase substantially when classes resume and our group is a lot more active.

Reply
[anonymous]1
0
0

Do you use Virtalent UK?

Reply
See in context
by james
2 min read 13

73

AssistantsPracticalProductivity
Frontpage

This year I’ve started using 3 remote personal/executive assistants for my work projects. Our remote assistants have been awesome and super useful, so I thought it would be useful to try and write a guide to help others get started with using remote assistants.

If working with a remote assistant doesn’t work out for you I think you’ll lose around £300 and 12 hours of your time in 1 month. But if it does work well, then I think you have a lot to gain - my estimate is my assistants save me around 20-30 hours a month.

Ways in which my remote assistants have helped me

  • We have a remote assistant who does all our events logistics work, including sourcing and booking venues, booking transport and catering, and handling comms with participants and venues.
  • Our assistant handles paying our bills and invoices, and sending out invoices
  • Doing one-off tasks for the team e.g. booking appointments, making purchases, booking travel, finding accommodation for our interns

Where to find a remote assistant

  • If you’re based in the UK or in Europe (and communicate in English), I recommend https://virtalent.com/ which is the company I use.
  • I haven’t used a US-based virtual assistant before, but you could try timeetc.com. There are some other suggestions here.
  • If you're looking for a full-time assistant, we use https://www.athenago.com/ and they seem consistently great.

Some tips for working with a remote assistant for the first time

  • Be prepared to invest time in explaining the task and process well for your assistant. I think it’s worth spending 10 minutes explaining a task that will take 60 minutes - that will feel like a long 10 minutes and it might feel frustrating, but it’s worth it.
  • Use loom.com to make video tutorials of how to do a process, instead of describing it in text
  • Bring your remote assistant into Slack to be able to DM them quickly
  • Invest in the relationship with your assistant from the beginning - take the time to call them once a week and message them each day to check in on how things are going because it’s easy as a remote person to feel disconnected. More communication is better.

Tips on how to delegate well

Taking next steps

  • Most remote assistant setups have very flexible monthly plans. You can start with just a few hours a week and scale up from there.
  • I think it’s worth just giving it a go; there’s a lot of info value in trying to get a remote assistant, and if it doesn’t work well then you can always just stop using the service.
  • Book a free consultation call with Virtalent UK or Timeetc USA

Happy to answer any questions that people have, or DM for more info.

73

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Mentioned in
Comments11


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Joan5
0
0

Thanks so much for writing this! 

I just went through the process of trying to hire an executive assistant in the US so I thought I'd contribute a bit. My sample size is relatively low (I only tried 1-2 executive assistants from ~3 services), but here are some things I found helpful: 

* In my experience additional cost --> additional quality. Boldly (the firm we will likely end up using - $50 / hour) seemed to have higher service quality than places like Time Etc. ($30 / hour)

* I tried a series of 'work tests'. Here are the two I found most predictive: 
a) I'm trying to [find an Airbnb here, find a conference center, ship my bags using a remote service -- example]. Could you help me figure out the lowest cost provider that has good client reviews? Here are some other criteria that are important (X, Y). 
This allowed me to see presentation of information, accuracy, and reasoning. 

b) I'm interested in services from [X company]. Could you write an email inquiry about whether they are taking new clients & price? It would be great to try to find a personal email for a staff member. 
This allowed me to see basic email composition skills, spelling, and resourcefulness online. 

* I found it helpful to test out two companies in parallel for a month, that way I could have a direct head to head comparison. I would ask both executive assistants to perform the work tests above. I would then ask for a new executive assistant from the firm that was performing to a lower quality standard, and keep using the one that was performing well on one off tasks to get more data. I think this particularly worked in my situation because we had some lead time. 

Reply
Vaidehi Agarwalla 🔸4
0
0

Has anyone got good leads for US-timezone friendly VAs?

Reply
Lee McC8
0
0

Check out Pineapple Operations list for part time and virtual PAs: 

 https://pineappleoperations.org 

Reply
[anonymous]2
0
0

Thanks, Lee!

Currently ~half of the PAs we list publicly or suggest privately are in the US and every one is open to working remotely.

The main differentiators from standard VA services are currently that:

  • almost all of our PAs are existing members of the EA community (some thoughts on the value of EA vs non-EA assistants here)
  • many are open to in-person work, with some even open to relocating
  • most lack PA experience
  • it's a 'matchmaking' rather than an agency model - users hire the PAs directly
Reply
[anonymous]4
0
0

[Edit: The following aren't exactly "good leads," but I thought it would still be useful to share some of the comments I've heard on options people in this community have tried.]

 

Fancy Hands

"Fancy Hands is a team of US-based virtual assistants".

Comments I've heard on them from a couple of EAs:

I used various assistants over a couple of months for in total maybe 30 tasks, each about 20 minutes long (their limit per one credit). I would say that the quality varied a lot and most of the time, they did not save me any time if included coordination cost, etc. If it was a straightforward task that could be done in 20 min, they performed okay, but even in that case I still found it to be large time-saving. I know one EA who likes it and uses it somewhat regularly. Maybe I just didn't figure out a way to utilize them well. Feel free to share it with other people under "an EA told me"

And then I wasn't sure if this EA has actually used Fancy Hands, but they summarised it thus:

FancyHands function almost as a platform, where they remain in the middle and take a cut. It's easy to use a small # of hours/per week, the provider will swap you out with other assistants relatively quickly, and the people you work with are relatively junior.

 

[Edit: Athena 

Athena set you up with full-time Philippines-based PAs. One EA said the PAs nevertheless work to US timezones; another said that being in the Philippines was a problem when their colleague used Athena. Some other comments from EAs:

A couple people I know have been using them recently and seem happyish with them.

 

We have used them previously but found the person was too junior to be helpful - not sure if this is the norm of if we were paired with the wrong person.

 

I think there was an initial $1500 signing fee for equipment and now we pay $2500 per month [~£10/h]. If there are not enough tasks you can share a PA with multiple people, but ideally only one person would be coordinating and assigning them tasks.

My PA is good, but not super excellent. I'd recommend them for tasks such as:
- booking travel insurance, travel, and accommodation
- calling doctors/Covid centers, making appointments
- researching flight regulations
- transcribing messages (but not really drafting them from scratch (at least not with EA context and slang)
- sending out presents/gifts
- scheduling things (if all preferences are clear and it's not a high stakes meeting)
- researching things such as: "What is the newest HP laptop model with xyz features" -- needs to be pretty specific
- accountability things...

I'd recommend it for people who just don't like doing these things themselves. But you probably won't get a person who actively has your back, thinks about deadlines and is super proactive.

That being said, [another EA] also had an assistant from Athena but decided to switch to another assistant (also from Athena), because she made a bunch of smaller mistakes and was not able to do tasks.

 

I...talked to a few EAs who've used it and found they've had widely-ranging experiences

 

I'm trialing a full-time assistant via AthenaGo who has been pretty helpful, but I don't have a great reference point, since this is my first time around.


Another EA told me that they've found Athena to be "medium-y" so far.

And then in a phone call with another EA in March 2022, I was told that Athena is good but there's a waitlist, and that the first assistant they tried wasn't good enough, the second was good, and the third was okay.]

 

Upwork

When I was doing more PA work for EAs myself, I briefly tried experimenting with re-delegating anonymised tasks to Upwork, but I couldn't find any takers for the first task I tried. Another EA I know uses them for PA tasks though.

 

Assistant headhunters

One EA recommended US-based Pocketbook Agency...

https://www.pocketbookagency.com has been good to work with...it's low-commitment (paid on contingency, so you'll just fwd your description and do a 30m call and they send you candidates)

...and another EA said...

I’ve tried to use a domestic staffing agency in the Bay Area before but didn’t have much luck and they weren’t great to deal with.

Reply
[anonymous]1
0
0

Mati Roy is an EA with some US-timezone friendly VAs: https://bit.ly/PantaskServices (on the website it says "We hire mainly in North America and Europe" but I think they still generally prefer to share the Google doc).

[Edit: And before anyone wastes time on CampusPA - another EA-run PA agency that I sometimes hear mentioned - while their website is still up, the CEO's LinkedIn says "I closed CampusPA in February of 2022."]

Reply
Kris Chari3
0
0

Fully agree! Our university group uses a virtual assistant for ~20 hours/month, which saves us ~10 hours/month (it does take some time to explain stuff, and our assistant takes slightly longer to do the same tasks). I expect our time savings to increase substantially when classes resume and our group is a lot more active.

Reply
[anonymous]1
0
0

Do you use Virtalent UK?

Reply
james2
0
1

I also recommend https://www.athenago.com for full time remote executive assistants

Reply
[anonymous]2
0
0

So pleased that you've started this conversation, james! I'm really keen to see more EAs publicly sharing their experiences with various PA services.

I’ve started using 3 remote personal/executive assistants for my work projects. Our remote assistants have been awesome and super useful...Happy to answer any questions

Do you know if these 3 have more capacity and if Virtalent UK allows clients to request specific VAs? (You're the only person I've come across so far who's given a completely positive review of a VA service - reviews tend to be pretty mixed and mildly positive/negative overall. Maybe Virtalent UK is just generally excellent or maybe you've found some especially great VAs - if it's the latter, it would be awesome if others in the community could hire them!)

If working with a remote assistant doesn’t work out for you I think you’ll lose around £300 and 12 hours of your time in 1 month....Most remote assistant setups have very flexible monthly plans. You can start with just a few hours a week and scale up from there.

I just want to highlight to everyone that with Virtalent UK, the minimum you need to pay to try it out is indeed only £270 for 10 hours (I'd previously thought it was 10 hours a week i.e. more like £1150 and I think I told a few people as much - sorry!)

Reply
james2
0
0

I don't think my particular VAs have more capacity, but I believe Virtalent has other VAs ready to match with clients.

It is unclear to me whether I’ve just gotten lucky. But with Virtalent you can switch VA and the minimum commitment is very low, which is why I think the best strategy is just to try

Reply
More from james
121
Evidence, cluelessness, and the long term - Hilary Greaves
2 authors
· · 22m read
83
83
91
Shelly Kagan - readings for Ethics and the Future seminar (spring 2021)
james
· · 6m read
7
7
36
Skill up in ML for AI safety with the Intro to ML Safety course (Spring 2023)
2 authors
· · 3m read
3
3
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 23m read
 · 
Or on the types of prioritization, their strengths, pitfalls, and how EA should balance them   The cause prioritization landscape in EA is changing. Prominent groups have shut down, others have been founded, and everyone is trying to figure out how to prepare for AI. This is the first in a series of posts examining the state of cause prioritization and proposing strategies for moving forward.   Executive Summary * Performing prioritization work has been one of the main tasks, and arguably achievements, of EA. * We highlight three types of prioritization: Cause Prioritization, Within-Cause (Intervention) Prioritization, and Cross-Cause (Intervention) Prioritization. * We ask how much of EA prioritization work falls in each of these categories: * Our estimates suggest that, for the organizations we investigated, the current split is 89% within-cause work, 2% cross-cause, and 9% cause prioritization. * We then explore strengths and potential pitfalls of each level: * Cause prioritization offers a big-picture view for identifying pressing problems but can fail to capture the practical nuances that often determine real-world success. * Within-cause prioritization focuses on a narrower set of interventions with deeper more specialised analysis but risks missing higher-impact alternatives elsewhere. * Cross-cause prioritization broadens the scope to find synergies and the potential for greater impact, yet demands complex assumptions and compromises on measurement. * See the Summary Table below to view the considerations. * We encourage reflection and future work on what the best ways of prioritizing are and how EA should allocate resources between the three types. * With this in mind, we outline eight cruxes that sketch what factors could favor some types over others. * We also suggest some potential next steps aimed at refining our approach to prioritization by exploring variance, value of information, tractability, and the
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
[Cross-posted from my Substack here] If you spend time with people trying to change the world, you’ll come to an interesting conundrum: Various advocacy groups reference previous successful social movements as to why their chosen strategy is the most important one. Yet, these groups often follow wildly different strategies from each other to achieve social change. So, which one of them is right? The answer is all of them and none of them. This is because many people use research and historical movements to justify their pre-existing beliefs about how social change happens. Simply, you can find a case study to fit most plausible theories of how social change happens. For example, the groups might say: * Repeated nonviolent disruption is the key to social change, citing the Freedom Riders from the civil rights Movement or Act Up! from the gay rights movement. * Technological progress is what drives improvements in the human condition if you consider the development of the contraceptive pill funded by Katharine McCormick. * Organising and base-building is how change happens, as inspired by Ella Baker, the NAACP or Cesar Chavez from the United Workers Movement. * Insider advocacy is the real secret of social movements – look no further than how influential the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights was in passing the Civil Rights Acts of 1960 & 1964. * Democratic participation is the backbone of social change – just look at how Ireland lifted a ban on abortion via a Citizen’s Assembly. * And so on… To paint this picture, we can see this in action below: Source: Just Stop Oil which focuses on…civil resistance and disruption Source: The Civic Power Fund which focuses on… local organising What do we take away from all this? In my mind, a few key things: 1. Many different approaches have worked in changing the world so we should be humble and not assume we are doing The Most Important Thing 2. The case studies we focus on are likely confirmation bias, where
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
I wanted to share a small but important challenge I've encountered as a student engaging with Effective Altruism from a lower-income country (Nigeria), and invite thoughts or suggestions from the community. Recently, I tried to make a one-time donation to one of the EA-aligned charities listed on the Giving What We Can platform. However, I discovered that I could not donate an amount less than $5. While this might seem like a minor limit for many, for someone like me — a student without a steady income or job, $5 is a significant amount. To provide some context: According to Numbeo, the average monthly income of a Nigerian worker is around $130–$150, and students often rely on even less — sometimes just $20–$50 per month for all expenses. For many students here, having $5 "lying around" isn't common at all; it could represent a week's worth of meals or transportation. I personally want to make small, one-time donations whenever I can, rather than commit to a recurring pledge like the 10% Giving What We Can pledge, which isn't feasible for me right now. I also want to encourage members of my local EA group, who are in similar financial situations, to practice giving through small but meaningful donations. In light of this, I would like to: * Recommend that Giving What We Can (and similar platforms) consider allowing smaller minimum donation amounts to make giving more accessible to students and people in lower-income countries. * Suggest that more organizations be added to the platform, to give donors a wider range of causes they can support with their small contributions. Uncertainties: * Are there alternative platforms or methods that allow very small one-time donations to EA-aligned charities? * Is there a reason behind the $5 minimum that I'm unaware of, and could it be adjusted to be more inclusive? I strongly believe that cultivating a habit of giving, even with small amounts, helps build a long-term culture of altruism — and it would
Relevant opportunities
3
Applications Open: AI Safety India Phase 1 – Fundamentals of Safe AI (Global Cohort)
adityaraj@eanita
· · 2m read
0
0
65
World Malaria Day 2025: what's new, what's not
Toby Tremlett🔹
· · 2m read
2
2
22
My Research Process: Key Mindsets - Truth-Seeking, Prioritisation, Moving Fast
Neel Nanda
·
1
1
View more