The Unjournal focuses on commissioning expert evaluations, guided by an ‘evaluation manager’ and compensating people for their work.
However, we see a range of benefits from also encouraging independent evaluation work, thus we're trying out this new initiative.
We're looking for your interest, questions, and feedback on the proposed (linked) initiative. Comments here or in the Gdoc are very welcome! We aim to follow up with a more detailed post, as we also flesh out some of the details and guidelines.
Excerpts from the proposal doc
The Unjournal is seeking academics, researchers, and students to submit structured evaluations of the most impactful research emerging in the social sciences. Strong evaluations will be posted or linked on our PubPub community, offering readers a perspective on the implications, strengths, and limitations of the research.
[Also] keen to work with students and professors to integrate ‘independent evaluation assignments’ (aka ‘learn to do peer reviews’) into research training.
We aim to provide feedback to help you become a better researcher and reviewer. We’ll also give prizes for the strongest evaluations. Lastly, writing evaluations will help you build a portfolio with The Unjournal, making it more likely we will commission you for paid evaluation work in the future.
... See “What specific areas do we cover?” .... We’re especially eager to receive independent evaluations of:
- Research we publicly prioritize...
- Research we previously evaluated (see pubpub.unjournal.org)...
- Work that other people and organizations suggest as having high potential for impact/value of information ...