Hide table of contents

18/11/2024 EDIT: Updated with more links and added Biosecurity.world which has now been built.

Thank you to the following people for reviewing: @Lin BL @Tessa @Max Görlitz @Gregory Lewis, Sandy Hickson & @Alix Pham   

TL:DR

  • Getting a full-time role in biosecurity is hard
  • Seeing a path to get there can be even harder
  • I propose a model to think about on-ramps into biosecurity & provide a few use cases for it depending on the background you are coming in with.
  • I provide an overview of how different organisations in this space fit into the model.
  • If you are an undergrad check the "I'm new to Biosecurity, where do I start?".  

A common problem

When I first heard about biosecurity I was excited by the 80,000 hours podcast and impressed by the work of Kevin Esvelt, RAND and NTI. Even though I was studying molecular biology, a seemingly relevant subject I couldn’t see a way for me to get involved and to find a full-time role in this field. The gap between hearing about biosecurity and working full-time in biosecurity felt huge.

Figure 1: The gap between hearing about biosecurity and working full-time in the field. 

A proposed on-ramp model 

Through my experiences with reading groups, UC Berkeley EA, SERI BITS and now the Oxford Biosecurity Group I have found that working on short, object-level, scalable projects fills this gap. And since I get questions of how to fill the gap from others new to the field I made a model to explain my thoughts. 


Figure 2: Proposed model for On-Ramps into Biosecurity. 

Using the model

Below I outline some touch points that people have with various organisations in the biosecurity space. It’s important to note that this model is not always linear. It’s important to question your assumptions at every stage and the “stages” themselves can be more fluid. 

Hear about it (0 - 10 hours)

This stage can be passive or active depending on your timeline. Note that a lot of the 'hear about it' resources can also be 'learn about it' resources if they are used for more in-depth research at a later stage. 

  1. 80,000 Hours
  2. EA Forum (hehe)
  3. GCBR Organization Updates Newsletter
  4. Biosecurity newsletters you should subscribe to
  5. University Groups
  6. Your local EA Group

Learn about it (10 - 40 hours)

This stage usually takes around 1-2 months and is more passive. 

  1. Biosecurity.world - Landing page for biosecurity
  2. List of Short-Term (<15 hours) Biosecurity Projects to Test Your Fit
  3. Pandemics Interventions Course is a static list of readings for biosecurity
  4. Reading groups at your university
  5. Reading groups at your local EA Group
  6. Find peers (at a similar career stage to you and you can exchange ideas with)
  7. Find mentors (who can help you deliberate between next steps in your career)
  8. Find experts (who can help you deliberate on technical differences between projects and provide insights into specific sub-fields)
  9. Taking to relevant people in the field, building a network
  10. BlueDot Impact Biosecurity Fundamentals
  11. Emerging Tech Policy Careers
  12. Effective Thesis research questions Airtable
  13. Biosecurity Network (you can join if you are early career)

Project Work (40 - 100 hours)

This stage usually takes around 2-3 months and is more active. You are encouraged to continue building out your network of peers, mentors and experts and possibly to form your working group to think about these concepts. However my suggestion would be to do project work as a part of some formal group/institution if possible, to make sure that you work on something valuable. 

  1. Biosecurity Working Groups
    1. Oxford Biosecurity Group
    2. Wisconsin Biosecurity Initiative
    3. Cambridge Biosecurity Group (contact: Sandy Hickson)
    4. Nordic Biosecurity Group (contact: Johan Täng)
  2. Next Generation for Biosecurity Competition
  3. BlueDot Impact Biosecurity Fundamentals (second part of the course)
  4. St Gallen Symposium Essay competition
  5. Mentorship Programs
    1. Magnify Mentoring
    2. IFBA Global Mentorship Program
    3. UNODA Biosecurity Diplomacy Workshops
  6. Short-term, full-time fellowships
    1. Stanford Existential Risks Initiative (SERI)
    2. Existential Risk Alliance (ERA) Cambridge Fellowship
    3. Swiss Existential Risk Initiative (CHERI)
    4. XRisk Lab at UChicago

Full-Time Work (100 hours +)

  1. A more extensive list of organisations has been compiled below
    1. Map of the biosecurity landscape (list of GCBR-relevant organisations for newcomers)
    2. Early Career Positions for Building Biosecurity-Relevant Skills
    3. Advice for early career people seeking jobs in EA
  2. Career Development Funding from Open Philanthropy
  3. A Ph.D. in a relevant field, if you are excited by research
    1. Database of PhD advisors
  4. Working in government where a lot of the most impactful biosecurity work is done.
    1. Organisations from Biosecurity.world
    2. Horizon Institute for Public Policy
    3. FAS Day One Project
    4. CLTR
    5. RAND
  5. Emerging Leaders in Biosecurity Fellowship (for people later in their careers)

* Note the full-time section is by no means exhaustive

Limitations of the model

  • The path is not linear
    • You can go back and forth between the stages. You can skip a stage.
  • There are other ways to get into biosecurity
    • There are other paths to working on biosecurity, like working in an adjacent field and then pivoting. This could sometimes put you in a stronger position to work in biosecurity, though this might take longer.
  • This model skips out on critical thinking (Tessa’s alternative model below)
    • Hear about it
    • Learning to decide whether you're interested
    • Starting to generate your own ideas/opinions
    • Starting to contribute
    • Making contributions in a more defined area

I’m new to Biosecurity, where do I start?

A step-by-step guide:

  1. Identify where in the diagram you are (see below for example case studies)
  2. Have a look at the Map of Biosecurity Interventions and the Map of the biosecurity landscape and also Biosecurity.world.
  3. Pick 3-5 key areas that you are interested in
  4. Pick 3-5 key skills you are interested in developing
  5. Now identify learning or work opportunities to test out 3&4 
Figure 3: Short-form version of the proposed model for On-Ramps into Biosecurity.


Below I include use cases of this model with a few example backgrounds. These are just examples and if you feel ready for full-time work but have less experience than I have specified, please do not be dissuaded. 

Case Studies

  1. High school student
  2. Undergraduate with no specific background
  3. Undergraduate STEM background
  4. Masters policy student
  5. Engineer with 3+ years of experience
Figure 4: Where to start if you are a high school student. 
Figure 5: Where to start if you are an undergraduate student with no specific background (e.g. first two years) or if you think your background doesn’t apply as much (e.g. classics course).

 

Figure 6: Where to start if you are an undergraduate student with a specific background (e.g. chemistry, biology, engineering, computer science, public policy) or if you have some specific experience. You could try working in a lab or doing a project and completing a reading group or a project in parallel to your education. 
Figure 7: Where to start if you are a master policy student. You could try one of the writing projects from the short-term projects list, or take part in a policy-related project at a Biosecurity Working Group. After this, you can try one of the longer-term and more involved policy fellowships.
Figure 8: Where to start if you are an engineer with 3+ years of experience. If you have extensive experience in a particular area then you might not need to complete extra readings or side projects and can just learn on the job.

 

What’s next?

Biosecurity.world has been built. 

Comments7


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Awesome work, thanks! And this model resonates with my experience getting more involved with bio over the last few years.

Wonderful to hear that!

Thanks a lot for writing this up, it'll be useful in my work for planning projects to help people get into the field :) 
Could you point me to the alternative model that you mentioned in the limitations?

Hi! @Tessa might have time to write up the alternative model. I don't want to put pressure on them to do so. However, the only thing I can share is: 

  • Hear about it
  • Learning to decide whether you're interested
  • Starting to generate your own ideas/opinions
  • Starting to contribute
  • Making contributions in a more defined area

Thank you! :) 

Thank you for writing this!  As someone interested in exploring opportunities in biosecurity, I found it very helpful.

I appreciate your feedback! Glad you found it helpful.

Curated and popular this week
Ben_West🔸
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
> Summary: We propose measuring AI performance in terms of the length of tasks AI agents can complete. We show that this metric has been consistently exponentially increasing over the past 6 years, with a doubling time of around 7 months. Extrapolating this trend predicts that, in under a decade, we will see AI agents that can independently complete a large fraction of software tasks that currently take humans days or weeks. > > The length of tasks (measured by how long they take human professionals) that generalist frontier model agents can complete autonomously with 50% reliability has been doubling approximately every 7 months for the last 6 years. The shaded region represents 95% CI calculated by hierarchical bootstrap over task families, tasks, and task attempts. > > Full paper | Github repo Blogpost; tweet thread. 
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
For immediate release: April 1, 2025 OXFORD, UK — The Centre for Effective Altruism (CEA) announced today that it will no longer identify as an "Effective Altruism" organization.  "After careful consideration, we've determined that the most effective way to have a positive impact is to deny any association with Effective Altruism," said a CEA spokesperson. "Our mission remains unchanged: to use reason and evidence to do the most good. Which coincidentally was the definition of EA." The announcement mirrors a pattern of other organizations that have grown with EA support and frameworks and eventually distanced themselves from EA. CEA's statement clarified that it will continue to use the same methodologies, maintain the same team, and pursue identical goals. "We've found that not being associated with the movement we have spent years building gives us more flexibility to do exactly what we were already doing, just with better PR," the spokesperson explained. "It's like keeping all the benefits of a community while refusing to contribute to its future development or taking responsibility for its challenges. Win-win!" In a related announcement, CEA revealed plans to rename its annual EA Global conference to "Coincidental Gathering of Like-Minded Individuals Who Mysteriously All Know Each Other But Definitely Aren't Part of Any Specific Movement Conference 2025." When asked about concerns that this trend might be pulling up the ladder for future projects that also might benefit from the infrastructure of the effective altruist community, the spokesperson adjusted their "I Heart Consequentialism" tie and replied, "Future projects? I'm sorry, but focusing on long-term movement building would be very EA of us, and as we've clearly established, we're not that anymore." Industry analysts predict that by 2026, the only entities still identifying as "EA" will be three post-rationalist bloggers, a Discord server full of undergraduate philosophy majors, and one person at
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
Epistemic status: highly certain, or something The Spending What We Must 💸11% pledge  In short: Members pledge to spend at least 11% of their income on effectively increasing their own productivity. This pledge is likely higher-impact for most people than the Giving What We Can 🔸10% Pledge, and we also think the name accurately reflects the non-supererogatory moral beliefs of many in the EA community. Example Charlie is a software engineer for the Centre for Effective Future Research. Since Charlie has taken the SWWM 💸11% pledge, rather than splurge on a vacation, they decide to buy an expensive noise-canceling headset before their next EAG, allowing them to get slightly more sleep and have 104 one-on-one meetings instead of just 101. In one of the extra three meetings, they chat with Diana, who is starting an AI-for-worrying-about-AI company, and decide to become a cofounder. The company becomes wildly successful, and Charlie's equity share allows them to further increase their productivity to the point of diminishing marginal returns, then donate $50 billion to SWWM. The 💸💸💸 Badge If you've taken the SWWM 💸11% Pledge, we'd appreciate if you could add three 💸💸💸 "stacks of money with wings" emoji to your social media profiles. We chose three emoji because we think the 💸11% Pledge will be about 3x more effective than the 🔸10% pledge (see FAQ), and EAs should be scope sensitive.  FAQ Is the pledge legally binding? We highly recommend signing the legal contract, as it will allow you to sue yourself in case of delinquency. What do you mean by effectively increasing productivity? Some interventions are especially good at transforming self-donations into productivity, and have a strong evidence base. In particular:  * Offloading non-work duties like dates and calling your mother to personal assistants * Running many emulated copies of oneself (likely available soon) * Amphetamines I'm an AI system. Can I take the 💸11% pledge? We encourage A
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
62
Benny Smith
· · 1m read