Hide table of contents

If you:

  1. Pay the higher (40%) rate of tax in the UK (earn over £50,271)
  2. Don’t fill in a Self Assessment tax return (you pay tax automatically via PAYE)
  3. Made donations that you claimed Gift Aid on in this or any of the previous 4 tax years

You can claim back 25% of the before-Gift-Aid amount by calling HMRC[1], or writing to them by post[2]. You can also apparently[3] do it via online chat although I haven’t tried this myself.

I have personally called twice to report donations, once last year to claim for the previous 3 years, and once for the current tax year. Both times it was surprisingly easy. They just asked for my national insurance number, and the amount donated (before-Gift-Aid). They didn’t even ask for details of the individual donations, although obviously you should keep records of your donations in case you get audited, and you do have to give details if you are reporting more than £10k.

The 25% goes straight into your take-home pay (via adjusting your tax code), and this won’t happen automatically if you don’t contact them.

Further reading

This post is mainly to serve as a nudge for what I would guess is a common cause of losing money when donating, because of the manual step required. These articles are more comprehensive:

  1. The official advice from HMRC
  2. UK Income Tax & Donations by @harald, which covers more than this specific case
  3. The Payroll Giving topic page
  1. ^

     On 0300 200 3300, this is only allowed for reporting donations under £5k

  2. ^

    Post only, no email unfortunately. The address is:
    Pay As You Earn and Self Assessment
    HM Revenue and Customs
    BX9 1AS
    United Kingdom

  3. ^

     According to this post

56

0
0
5

Reactions

0
0
5
Comments3


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Appendix: Example of how the arithmetic works

I'm borrowing this example from the Payroll Giving topic page:

You earn £60,000 per year (making your marginal tax band 40%). You donate £1,200 to a charity after you've been paid. The charity can claim 25% from the government, giving them £1,500. And you can claim a tax rebate of £300 (1500 * 0.2), meaning you are only out-of-pocket £900.

The way they actually get the £300 into your bank account is by adjusting your tax code, which means you pay less tax for the rest of the year.

In a tax code like 1257L, the 1257 means you pay zero tax on the first £12,570. Changing this to e.g. 1258L effectively shifts all the tax bands up by £10, so if the highest band you were in was 40% this gets you an extra £4.

In the above case, they would add £750 to the tax-free allowance, to save you . So this would change your tax code from 1257L to 1332L (equal to )

You can use this to check they've done the adjustment correctly when you talk to them over the phone. It should be the case that:

Is donating via payroll deduction a simpler way to achieve this result?

I personally find it simpler to do it this way because:

  1. It's easier to change the amount and where you are donating to
  2. Not all employers offer Payroll Giving, you could probably ask them to set it up but that would be a hassle. I'm currently employed via Deel, which doesn't offer it as far as I'm aware

Also I found ringing them up really quite straightforward, it took me maybe 15 mins each time.

Curated and popular this week
Ben_West🔸
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
> Summary: We propose measuring AI performance in terms of the length of tasks AI agents can complete. We show that this metric has been consistently exponentially increasing over the past 6 years, with a doubling time of around 7 months. Extrapolating this trend predicts that, in under a decade, we will see AI agents that can independently complete a large fraction of software tasks that currently take humans days or weeks. > > The length of tasks (measured by how long they take human professionals) that generalist frontier model agents can complete autonomously with 50% reliability has been doubling approximately every 7 months for the last 6 years. The shaded region represents 95% CI calculated by hierarchical bootstrap over task families, tasks, and task attempts. > > Full paper | Github repo Blogpost; tweet thread. 
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
For immediate release: April 1, 2025 OXFORD, UK — The Centre for Effective Altruism (CEA) announced today that it will no longer identify as an "Effective Altruism" organization.  "After careful consideration, we've determined that the most effective way to have a positive impact is to deny any association with Effective Altruism," said a CEA spokesperson. "Our mission remains unchanged: to use reason and evidence to do the most good. Which coincidentally was the definition of EA." The announcement mirrors a pattern of other organizations that have grown with EA support and frameworks and eventually distanced themselves from EA. CEA's statement clarified that it will continue to use the same methodologies, maintain the same team, and pursue identical goals. "We've found that not being associated with the movement we have spent years building gives us more flexibility to do exactly what we were already doing, just with better PR," the spokesperson explained. "It's like keeping all the benefits of a community while refusing to contribute to its future development or taking responsibility for its challenges. Win-win!" In a related announcement, CEA revealed plans to rename its annual EA Global conference to "Coincidental Gathering of Like-Minded Individuals Who Mysteriously All Know Each Other But Definitely Aren't Part of Any Specific Movement Conference 2025." When asked about concerns that this trend might be pulling up the ladder for future projects that also might benefit from the infrastructure of the effective altruist community, the spokesperson adjusted their "I Heart Consequentialism" tie and replied, "Future projects? I'm sorry, but focusing on long-term movement building would be very EA of us, and as we've clearly established, we're not that anymore." Industry analysts predict that by 2026, the only entities still identifying as "EA" will be three post-rationalist bloggers, a Discord server full of undergraduate philosophy majors, and one person at
Thomas Kwa
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
Epistemic status: highly certain, or something The Spending What We Must 💸11% pledge  In short: Members pledge to spend at least 11% of their income on effectively increasing their own productivity. This pledge is likely higher-impact for most people than the Giving What We Can 🔸10% Pledge, and we also think the name accurately reflects the non-supererogatory moral beliefs of many in the EA community. Example Charlie is a software engineer for the Centre for Effective Future Research. Since Charlie has taken the SWWM 💸11% pledge, rather than splurge on a vacation, they decide to buy an expensive noise-canceling headset before their next EAG, allowing them to get slightly more sleep and have 104 one-on-one meetings instead of just 101. In one of the extra three meetings, they chat with Diana, who is starting an AI-for-worrying-about-AI company, and decide to become a cofounder. The company becomes wildly successful, and Charlie's equity share allows them to further increase their productivity to the point of diminishing marginal returns, then donate $50 billion to SWWM. The 💸💸💸 Badge If you've taken the SWWM 💸11% Pledge, we'd appreciate if you could add three 💸💸💸 "stacks of money with wings" emoji to your social media profiles. We chose three emoji because we think the 💸11% Pledge will be about 3x more effective than the 🔸10% pledge (see FAQ), and EAs should be scope sensitive.  FAQ Is the pledge legally binding? We highly recommend signing the legal contract, as it will allow you to sue yourself in case of delinquency. What do you mean by effectively increasing productivity? Some interventions are especially good at transforming self-donations into productivity, and have a strong evidence base. In particular:  * Offloading non-work duties like dates and calling your mother to personal assistants * Running many emulated copies of oneself (likely available soon) * Amphetamines I'm an AI system. Can I take the 💸11% pledge? We encourage A