Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by RobertHarling
4 min read 7

74

Building effective altruismApplication announcementsConferencesEffective Altruism Global
Frontpage

TL;DR:

Apply now
  • Applications for EAG Bay Area close this Sunday, Feb 9th!
  • It’s already on track to be one of our biggest ever US EAGs, but we’d like to make it even bigger.
  • Due to our current catering and venue costs, it’s relatively cheap at the moment to add extra attendees. So please don’t avoid applying because you’re worried about cost or taking someone else’s space!
  • If you’ve been accepted already, please register as soon as possible to confirm your place and get access to Swapcard.

Updates and Reminders

We wanted to share a few quick updates and reminders about EAG: Bay Area, happening Feb. 21–23. We’d love for you to apply (deadline Feb. 9th), and encourage friends and colleagues (especially ones in/near the Bay Area) to apply, perhaps by sharing this post! 

  • This year’s EA Global: Bay Area will not be focused only on global catastrophic risks (as it was last year) and will be the same as other EAGs. We're dropping the GCR-focus because CEA is aiming to focus on principles-first community building, and because a large majority of attendees last year said they would have attended a non-GCR focused event anyway.
    • We welcome applications regardless of the cause you’re focused on, as long as it’s informed by EA principles.
  • We recently wrote a post discussing the admissions bar for EA Global and received feedback that the approval rate to EAG is higher than many readers suspected (~84% acceptance rate). The post also discusses why we have an admissions process, what we look for in applications, and why you should apply.
  • As of 2024, we’ve decided to weigh EA context less heavily for those with significant work experience, to encourage engagement from more mid- to late-career professionals.
  • Given our current contracts with our catering provider and venue, it is relatively cheap for us to accept additional attendees. Please don’t avoid applying out of concern you might be taking up someone else’s spot.

Why you should apply to EA Global

We suspect there are many people who clearly meet the admissions bar who are not applying

While the number of applications to EA Global 2024 are more than double five years earlier, they have declined each of the last two years. There are likely several contributing factors here, such as a reduction in travel support availability, general trends in community building, and limited marketing efforts over the past couple of years. (We're excited though that we're on track to reverse this trend and increase attendance significantly in 2025!)

We also suspect that declining numbers could, in some part, be influenced by a widespread belief that the admissions bar for EA Global is high. However, this most recent year we approved around 84% of applications. Currently, we suspect there are many people who will clearly meet the bar who are not applying.

In general, we are excited to receive more applications in 2025 and beyond; one of our core aims moving forward is to increase EAG attendance while maintaining attendee satisfaction and curation. 

Events are expensive; we don’t want this to deter applications

EA Globals cost a significant amount of money to run. Some anecdotal feedback suggests that people in our core target audience are not applying for fear that the value they expect to gain is not worth the cost to our team. 

While we sincerely appreciate support from attendees and thoughtfulness towards the cost of our events, we believe that subsidising EA Global attendance is a good use of EA resources, based on analyses of our feedback surveys and actions taken by attendees as a result of the event. Additionally, the marginal costs of extra attendees can vary due to a range of considerations, including various fixed costs that come with events. In the case of EAG: Bay Area, because of minimum spend requirements in our catering contract, we can absorb more attendees without increasing our food costs by much. Our team has the best context on relevant cost considerations—getting admitted to an EAG means that we are willing to cover your attendance. Feel free to defer to our judgement. 

If you’re considering applying to EA Global, we encourage you to apply. If you would like support from our team in deciding whether EA Global is right for you, please reach out to hello@eaglobal.org or comment below. 

How others have gotten value out of EA Global

We believe EA Global has a strong track record of providing value to attendees:

  • Many EA orgs come to EAGs actively looking to hire for roles — you’ll be able to chat directly with them at our Organization Fair, and send 1-1 meeting requests to relevant employees.
  • Many senior professionals in a variety of EA cause areas attend EAG with the main aim of providing advice and mentorship to newer community members. EAG is a great place to speak to people who work in career paths you're considering and get advice.
  • People working at the cutting edge of many cause areas will be attending and able to share their insights through talks, workshops and 1-1s.

Below, you can see some highlights from EAG Boston:

 

And we're excited to preview some of the great speakers we'll be hosting:

 

Let us know if you have any questions in the comments, or by emailing hello@eaglobal.org. 

74

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments7


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Danielle MacLean3
0
0

Just wanted to say, for anyone on the fence about attending these conferences, DO IT!

I just returned from it, and am leaving lit up and inspired about all the people and organizations working so hard to change the world.  There's a lot of negativity out there, but also - so much great working being done.

If you're considering diving in deeper into EA, please do it (and tell everyone you know!). 

Reply
Mihkel Viires 🔹5
0
0
1

Just submitted my application. This post was the encouragement that motivated me to apply, so thank you.

Reply
Patrick Hoang3
1
2

I feel like this is too short notice with EAG conferences. Three weeks is not a lot of time between receiving your decision and flying to the Bay Area making arrangements. Maybe it is because I am a student.

Reply
Toby Tremlett🔹9
6
0

I'm not from the EAG team - but this event was actually announced and advertised a long time ago. This (from what I understand) is a last push to get extra attendees :)

Reply
frances_lorenz8
0
0

That's correct, thanks Toby :) Although, it's really important for us to know if our advertising has been reaching people. We definitely want to know if this post is the first time someone's hearing about EAG, especially if they would have attended had they heard about it earlier. 

Reply
Wyatt S.1
0
0
1

I would like to attend, but I have too much schoolwork and would have trouble catching up. A summer conference would be more accessible for me as a college student.

Reply
RobertHarling2
0
0

Thanks Wyatt, we're aware these timings can be hard for students. We're looking into what we could organise in the summer to be more accessible.

Reply
More from RobertHarling
72
Announcing EA Global 2025
RobertHarling
· · 1m read
4
4
63
What are the key claims of EA?
RobertHarling
· · 9m read
11
11
78
X-risks to all life v. to humans
RobertHarling
· · 5m read
33
33
View more
Curated and popular this week
Sam Anschell
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
*Disclaimer* I am writing this post in a personal capacity; the opinions I express are my own and do not represent my employer. I think that more people and orgs (especially nonprofits) should consider negotiating the cost of sizable expenses. In my experience, there is usually nothing to lose by respectfully asking to pay less, and doing so can sometimes save thousands or tens of thousands of dollars per hour. This is because negotiating doesn’t take very much time[1], savings can persist across multiple years, and counterparties can be surprisingly generous with discounts. Here are a few examples of expenses that may be negotiable: For organizations * Software or news subscriptions * Of 35 corporate software and news providers I’ve negotiated with, 30 have been willing to provide discounts. These discounts range from 10% to 80%, with an average of around 40%. * Leases * A friend was able to negotiate a 22% reduction in the price per square foot on a corporate lease and secured a couple months of free rent. This led to >$480,000 in savings for their nonprofit. Other negotiable parameters include: * Square footage counted towards rent costs * Lease length * A tenant improvement allowance * Certain physical goods (e.g., smart TVs) * Buying in bulk can be a great lever for negotiating smaller items like covid tests, and can reduce costs by 50% or more. * Event/retreat venues (both venue price and smaller items like food and AV) * Hotel blocks * A quick email with the rates of comparable but more affordable hotel blocks can often save ~10%. * Professional service contracts with large for-profit firms (e.g., IT contracts, office internet coverage) * Insurance premiums (though I am less confident that this is negotiable) For many products and services, a nonprofit can qualify for a discount simply by providing their IRS determination letter or getting verified on platforms like TechSoup. In my experience, most vendors and companies
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Forethought[1] is a new AI macrostrategy research group cofounded by Max Dalton, Will MacAskill, Tom Davidson, and Amrit Sidhu-Brar. We are trying to figure out how to navigate the (potentially rapid) transition to a world with superintelligent AI systems. We aim to tackle the most important questions we can find, unrestricted by the current Overton window. More details on our website. Why we exist We think that AGI might come soon (say, modal timelines to mostly-automated AI R&D in the next 2-8 years), and might significantly accelerate technological progress, leading to many different challenges. We don’t yet have a good understanding of what this change might look like or how to navigate it. Society is not prepared. Moreover, we want the world to not just avoid catastrophe: we want to reach a really great future. We think about what this might be like (incorporating moral uncertainty), and what we can do, now, to build towards a good future. Like all projects, this started out with a plethora of Google docs. We ran a series of seminars to explore the ideas further, and that cascaded into an organization. This area of work feels to us like the early days of EA: we’re exploring unusual, neglected ideas, and finding research progress surprisingly tractable. And while we start out with (literally) galaxy-brained schemes, they often ground out into fairly specific and concrete ideas about what should happen next. Of course, we’re bringing principles like scope sensitivity, impartiality, etc to our thinking, and we think that these issues urgently need more morally dedicated and thoughtful people working on them. Research Research agendas We are currently pursuing the following perspectives: * Preparing for the intelligence explosion: If AI drives explosive growth there will be an enormous number of challenges we have to face. In addition to misalignment risk and biorisk, this potentially includes: how to govern the development of new weapons of mass destr
jackva
 ·  · 3m read
 · 
 [Edits on March 10th for clarity, two sub-sections added] Watching what is happening in the world -- with lots of renegotiation of institutional norms within Western democracies and a parallel fracturing of the post-WW2 institutional order -- I do think we, as a community, should more seriously question our priors on the relative value of surgical/targeted and broad system-level interventions. Speaking somewhat roughly, with EA as a movement coming of age in an era where democratic institutions and the rule-based international order were not fundamentally questioned, it seems easy to underestimate how much the world is currently changing and how much riskier a world of stronger institutional and democratic backsliding and weakened international norms might be. Of course, working on these issues might be intractable and possibly there's nothing highly effective for EAs to do on the margin given much attention to these issues from society at large. So, I am not here to confidently state we should be working on these issues more. But I do think in a situation of more downside risk with regards to broad system-level changes and significantly more fluidity, it seems at least worth rigorously asking whether we should shift more attention to work that is less surgical (working on specific risks) and more systemic (working on institutional quality, indirect risk factors, etc.). While there have been many posts along those lines over the past months and there are of course some EA organizations working on these issues, it stil appears like a niche focus in the community and none of the major EA and EA-adjacent orgs (including the one I work for, though I am writing this in a personal capacity) seem to have taken it up as a serious focus and I worry it might be due to baked-in assumptions about the relative value of such work that are outdated in a time where the importance of systemic work has changed in the face of greater threat and fluidity. When the world seems to
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
50
Kairos is hiring a Head of Operations/Founding Generalist
2 authors
· · 6m read
1
1
26
EA Organization Updates: March 2025
2 authors
· · 10m read
0
0
51
Job: Executive Director of CEEALAR (EA Hotel)
CEEALAR
· · 2m read
2
2
View more