Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
Leonie Falk2
0
0

Hi sulfadiazineportkey, 
Thanks for that question! We were incredibly grateful to have received ~800 applications for the current round of the program and were able to offer a spot to a final cohort of ~16 candidates. This means we are looking at an overall acceptance rate of 16/800= 2%. 

Realizing that there is more interest than current capacity, we are looking forward to making parts of the curriculum more widely available for self-study in mid-April. 

Generally, we weigh the test tasks very highly in our application process, and prior experience or any specific background is less important. 

I hope this helps, and we hope to see your application.

Reply
See in context
by CE, Ula Zarosa
3 min read 2

26

Career choiceOpportunities to take actionAmbitious ImpactCharity Entrepreneurship Research Training Program (2023)Charity incubationEntrepreneurshipResearch careersResearch training programsAnnouncements and updatesApplication announcementsOrganization updates
Frontpage

TLDR: In this post, we’re announcing the opening of applications for AIM's two upcoming programs, the CE Incubation Program and the AIM Research Program. You can now apply to multiple programs with one joint application form!


The upcoming programs are: 

  • CE Incubation Program - apply to one or both dates: 
    • Runs August 12 - October 4, 2024 (scroll for top ideas)
    • Runs February-March 2025
  • Research Program: 
    • Runs September 23- December 13, 2024

 The deadline for applications for both programs is April 14, 2024!

Apply now

Below, you can find more information about both of the programs. We will also be hosting an online event with extensive time for Q&A so you can learn more about those programs and ask all your questions. 

  • Aim for a career that matters - introduction to our two programs, March 7 2024, 6 PM GMT,  REGISTER HERE.
  • Our top charity ideas - an opportunity to learn more about top ideas selected for the upcoming Incubation Program, March 14 2024, 6 PM GMT, REGISTER HERE.


Important update: One application form

To make it easier for applicants to apply to our programs and test their fit, we’re introducing one application form!

What does it mean in practice: 

  • You no longer have to apply to different programs separately. One form will allow you to apply to multiple programs and different dates of those programs at once.
  • The first initial stage of the application will be unified, while more advanced stages will be program-focused.
  • If you indicate interest and get far in the application process but don’t quite make it, we may offer to connect you with relevant opportunities in our extended network.
  • We will keep you informed about your progress, regardless of what stage in the application you are in. 


For those who are not familiar with AIM programs, here is a brief overview: 

CE Incubation Program

This is a program for entrepreneurially driven individuals who want to make a huge impact with their careers. You could be a recent graduate, work in consulting, for-profit, or an NGO - if you like to make rapid progress and work on a variety of tasks, this will be a good fit for you. 

In our Incubation Program, we offer you: 

  • 2-month full-time training with two weeks in-person in London.
  • Stipend of £1900/month during (and potentially up to 2 months after) the program.
  • Co-founder matching process based on real-life projects.
  • Possibility to apply for $100,000 - $200,000 seed funding (~80% of projects get funded).
  • Initial operations support and ongoing mentorship.
  • Co-working space in our London office.
  • A community of previous founders, mentors, and potential donors to help you succeed.

A case study: 

If you want to learn more about the experience in our Incubation Program and the journey of founding a highly successful nonprofit, listen to the episode of 80,000 Hours with Lucia Coulter, who joined our Incubation Program in 2020 and Co-founded Lead Exposure Elimination Project. Lucia focuses on the program starting at 01:47:59. 

[LEARN MORE ABOUT THIS PROGRAM]

AIM Research Program

The AIM Research Program focuses on tools and skills needed to identify, compare, and recommend the most effective interventions. We equip you with an impact-focused research toolkit that you later use when working on real-life, decision-relevant research projects. How relevant? A good example is our top idea mentioned above - ceramic filters for improving water quality - which the program participant identified as a promising intervention to launch. This is only one of the potential paths for impact a program participant can have.

What we offer

  • 12 weeks of full-time, online full-time program.
  • Highly promising and neglected research topics.
  • £1,900/month stipends to cover your living costs during, and potentially after, the program (please reach out if you have dependents or childcare costs to ensure financial constraints don't hinder your participation).
  • Complete research toolkit with useful templates and methodologies, like Theory of Change, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Weighted Factor Model, etc.
  • Expert feedback and peer reviews.
  • Assistance in editing and publishing reports to strengthen your research portfolio.
  • Connection to relevant job opportunities.

A case study:

Another highly promising result of our research program can be pursuing a research career. Zuzana Sperlova worked in engineering and consulting before deciding that they were aiming to have an even higher impact with their career, specifically aimed at improving farmed animal welfare. Through the program, they published several reports on neglected animal welfare issues and have now transitioned into a position as a researcher at Animal Charity Evaluators.

[LEARN MORE ABOUT THIS PROGRAM]

We want to encourage people from this forum to apply for our programs, as we highly appreciate value alignment and ambitious dedication to making the most good in our application process. No previous experience or specialized background is necessary to apply. Everyone from any country is welcome to apply, as our programs are mostly held online.


 

26

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments2


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
[anonymous]1
0
0

Hi Ula! 

Thanks for sharing the information, exciting programs! Just out of curiosity, what is the historic acceptance rates for the research training program. While no previous experience is required to apply for the research program, I was curious about the most common work/educational background of successful applicants from previous cohorts. 

Thank you! 

Reply
Leonie Falk2
0
0

Hi sulfadiazineportkey, 
Thanks for that question! We were incredibly grateful to have received ~800 applications for the current round of the program and were able to offer a spot to a final cohort of ~16 candidates. This means we are looking at an overall acceptance rate of 16/800= 2%. 

Realizing that there is more interest than current capacity, we are looking forward to making parts of the curriculum more widely available for self-study in mid-April. 

Generally, we weigh the test tasks very highly in our application process, and prior experience or any specific background is less important. 

I hope this helps, and we hope to see your application.

Reply
More from CE
70
Lead batteries, differential learning, and livelihoods - AIM's new recommended charity ideas
2 authors
· · 16m read
8
8
192
Presenting five new effective giving initiatives
2 authors
· · 10m read
12
12
208
Presenting nine new charities - a record for the AIM (CE) Incubation Program
2 authors
· · 19m read
2
2
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 20m read
 · 
Advanced AI could unlock an era of enlightened and competent government action. But without smart, active investment, we’ll squander that opportunity and barrel blindly into danger. Executive summary See also a summary on Twitter / X. The US federal government is falling behind the private sector on AI adoption. As AI improves, a growing gap would leave the government unable to effectively respond to AI-driven existential challenges and threaten the legitimacy of its democratic institutions. A dual imperative → Government adoption of AI can’t wait. Making steady progress is critical to: * Boost the government’s capacity to effectively respond to AI-driven existential challenges * Help democratic oversight keep up with the technological power of other groups * Defuse the risk of rushed AI adoption in a crisis → But hasty AI adoption could backfire. Without care, integration of AI could: * Be exploited, subverting independent government action * Lead to unsafe deployment of AI systems * Accelerate arms races or compress safety research timelines Summary of the recommendations 1. Work with the US federal government to help it effectively adopt AI Simplistic “pro-security” or “pro-speed” attitudes miss the point. Both are important — and many interventions would help with both. We should: * Invest in win-win measures that both facilitate adoption and reduce the risks involved, e.g.: * Build technical expertise within government (invest in AI and technical talent, ensure NIST is well resourced) * Streamline procurement processes for AI products and related tech (like cloud services) * Modernize the government’s digital infrastructure and data management practices * Prioritize high-leverage interventions that have strong adoption-boosting benefits with minor security costs or vice versa, e.g.: * On the security side: investing in cyber security, pre-deployment testing of AI in high-stakes areas, and advancing research on mitigating the ris
saulius
 ·  · 22m read
 · 
Summary In this article, I estimate the cost-effectiveness of five Anima International programs in Poland: improving cage-free and broiler welfare, blocking new factory farms, banning fur farming, and encouraging retailers to sell more plant-based protein. I estimate that together, these programs help roughly 136 animals—or 32 years of farmed animal life—per dollar spent. Animal years affected per dollar spent was within an order of magnitude for all five evaluated interventions. I also tried to estimate how much suffering each program alleviates. Using SADs (Suffering-Adjusted Days)—a metric developed by Ambitious Impact (AIM) that accounts for species differences and pain intensity—Anima’s programs appear highly cost-effective, even compared to charities recommended by Animal Charity Evaluators. However, I also ran a small informal survey to understand how people intuitively weigh different categories of pain defined by the Welfare Footprint Institute. The results suggested that SADs may heavily underweight brief but intense suffering. Based on those findings, I created my own metric DCDE (Disabling Chicken Day Equivalent) with different weightings. Under this approach, interventions focused on humane slaughter look more promising, while cage-free campaigns appear less impactful. These results are highly uncertain but show how sensitive conclusions are to how we value different kinds of suffering. My estimates are highly speculative, often relying on subjective judgments from Anima International staff regarding factors such as the likelihood of success for various interventions. This introduces potential bias. Another major source of uncertainty is how long the effects of reforms will last if achieved. To address this, I developed a methodology to estimate impact duration for chicken welfare campaigns. However, I’m essentially guessing when it comes to how long the impact of farm-blocking or fur bans might last—there’s just too much uncertainty. Background In
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
In my opinion, we have known that the risk of AI catastrophe is too high and too close for at least two years. At that point, it’s time to work on solutions (in my case, advocating an indefinite pause on frontier model development until it’s safe to proceed through protests and lobbying as leader of PauseAI US).  Not every policy proposal is as robust to timeline length as PauseAI. It can be totally worth it to make a quality timeline estimate, both to inform your own work and as a tool for outreach (like ai-2027.com). But most of these timeline updates simply are not decision-relevant if you have a strong intervention. If your intervention is so fragile and contingent that every little update to timeline forecasts matters, it’s probably too finicky to be working on in the first place.  I think people are psychologically drawn to discussing timelines all the time so that they can have the “right” answer and because it feels like a game, not because it really matters the day and the hour of… what are these timelines even leading up to anymore? They used to be to “AGI”, but (in my opinion) we’re basically already there. Point of no return? Some level of superintelligence? It’s telling that they are almost never measured in terms of actions we can take or opportunities for intervention. Indeed, it’s not really the purpose of timelines to help us to act. I see people make bad updates on them all the time. I see people give up projects that have a chance of working but might not reach their peak returns until 2029 to spend a few precious months looking for a faster project that is, not surprisingly, also worse (or else why weren’t they doing it already?) and probably even lower EV over the same time period! For some reason, people tend to think they have to have their work completed by the “end” of the (median) timeline or else it won’t count, rather than seeing their impact as the integral over the entire project that does fall within the median timeline estimate or
Recent opportunities in Career choice
41
The CEA Events Team is Hiring for Three Program Lead Positions
OllieBase
· · 3m read
0
0
50
$100 million dollar grant funding opportunity for EA
Jack Kelly
· · 3m read
1
1
54
Stripe Economics of AI Fellowship
basil.halperin
· · 3m read
0
0
View more