Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by Aidan Alexander, ThomNorman
2 min read 3

30

Animal welfarePhilosophyOpportunities to take actionMoral philosophyPodcastsRequests (open)
Frontpage

Context: We’re starting a podcast

Thom and I (co-founders of FarmKind, an effective giving platform for animals) are starting a podcast called “Changed My Mind”.

Our first two episodes will be with Rutger Bregman and Peter Singer. You can follow the podcast on Apple Podcasts here, and on Spotify here.

The premise of the podcast: "Changed My Mind" explores a powerful idea: changing your mind isn't a weakness – it's a superpower. Each episode features accomplished thinkers sharing pivotal moments when they changed their mind about something important. We explore the evidence that tipped the scales, the emotional journey, and how seeing the world from a new perspective impacted their lives. The podcast is not about FarmKind, EA or animal welfare.

The first episode will air on May 6th to align with Rutger's book release.

Rutger Bregman

You may know Rutger as the author of Utopia for Realists, Humankind, and the forthcoming Moral Ambition, which reads a lot like a case for devoting your life to Effective Altruism (albeit not by that name). 

Areas we’re currently interested to explore with him:

  • Are humans fundamentally good, as he argues in HumanKind, and his journey from ‘veneer theory’ to this view
  • Whether he still believes society is progressing (as argued in Utopia for Realists) given current challenges around inequality, democratic backsliding, global governance and AI
  • How he handles evidence that challenges his proposed solutions (like UBI) and what he's changed his mind about
  • The core idea of "moral ambition" and how it differs from standard altruism
  • His vision for building a movement around moral ambition and what success looks like

What else would you want us to explore with Rutger? What questions do you have for him?

Peter Singer

I don’t think Peter needs any introduction around here!

We plan to ask Peter about how/why he’s changed his mind about:

  • The value of philosophical arguments in motivating action for animals
  • When it’s prudent to share controversial views
  • The potential to transform how people think about donating to charity
  • Moral demandingness
  • Population ethics
  • Different flavours of utilitarianism
  • Moral realism vs. anti-realism?

What else would you want us to ask Peter how/why he’s changed his mind about? What questions do you have for him?

Thanks for your input!

30

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Comments3


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Joris 🔸5
0
0

You can maybe pull from this AMA Peter Singer did on the Forum; there's some unanswered questions there

Reply
Judith Rensing3
0
0

Very cool, looking forward to both of these, really exciting first guests! I'd love to know whether Peter's engagement with Buddhism has changed his mind on anything - especially but not only on the big question around mindfulness and meditation for and its benefits for the meditator vs external work for others (e.g. campaigning for animals) as they often seem in tension / conflict for time and resources and pursuing a deeper path of enlightenment may take away much of the spirit and fire for changing the world in a more consequentialist sense. It's talked about a bit in "The Buddhist and the Ethicist" but not as head-on as I was hoping

Reply
Aidan Alexander2
0
0

Great idea! 

Reply
More from Aidan Alexander
101
The Most Valuable Dollars Aren’t Owned By Us
Aidan Alexander
· · 3m read
20
20
44
FarmKind’s new tool to encourage effective donations from your non-EA circle
2 authors
· · 4m read
5
5
83
From salt intake reduction to labor migration: Announcing top ideas for the AIM 2024 CE Incubation Program
8 authors
· · 13m read
7
7
View more
Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
In my past year as a grantmaker in the global health and wellbeing (GHW) meta space at Open Philanthropy, I've identified some exciting ideas that could fill existing gaps. While these initiatives have significant potential, they require more active development and support to move forward.  The ideas I think could have the highest impact are:  1. Government placements/secondments in key GHW areas (e.g. international development), and 2. Expanded (ultra) high-net-worth ([U]HNW) advising Each of these ideas needs a very specific type of leadership and/or structure. More accessible options I’m excited about — particularly for students or recent graduates — could involve virtual GHW courses or action-focused student groups.  I can’t commit to supporting any particular project based on these ideas ahead of time, because the likelihood of success would heavily depend on details (including the people leading the project). Still, I thought it would be helpful to articulate a few of the ideas I’ve been considering.  I’d love to hear your thoughts, both on these ideas and any other gaps you see in the space! Introduction I’m Mel, a Senior Program Associate at Open Philanthropy, where I lead grantmaking for the Effective Giving and Careers program[1] (you can read more about the program and our current strategy here). Throughout my time in this role, I’ve encountered great ideas, but have also noticed gaps in the space. This post shares a list of projects I’d like to see pursued, and would potentially want to support. These ideas are drawn from existing efforts in other areas (e.g., projects supported by our GCRCB team), suggestions from conversations and materials I’ve engaged with, and my general intuition. They aren’t meant to be a definitive roadmap, but rather a starting point for discussion. At the moment, I don’t have capacity to more actively explore these ideas and find the right founders for related projects. That may change, but for now, I’m interested in
Recent opportunities in Animal welfare
23
Last week to apply for the Futurekind AI Fellowship! (deadline: April 1)
Jay Luong
· · 1m read
0
0
30
What should we ask Rutger Bregman and Peter Singer about how they changed their minds?
2 authors
· · 2m read
3
3
3
Apply to become a Futurekind AI Facilitator or Mentor (deadline: April 10)
Jay Luong
· · 2m read
0
0
View more