Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
Matt Brooks2
0
0

If there other resources that are doing something similar, please link them in the comments so I can use the information to improve the guide (with a reference). Thanks!

Reply
See in context
by Matt Brooks
28th Mar 20252 min read 5

16

Existential riskForecastingGlobal health & developmentAI forecastingCollections and resourcesMental health (cause area)Productivity
Frontpage

We may be on the direct path to AGI and then ASI - the singularity could happen within the next 5-20 years. If you survive to reach it, the potential upside is immense, daily life could become paradise.

With such high stakes, ensuring personal survival until the singularity should be a top priority for yourself and those you care about.

I've created V1 of the Singularity Survival Guide, an evidence-based resource focused on:

  1. Identifying the highest-probability preventable causes of death/injury in the near term
  2. Providing the highest-ROI risk mitigation strategies
  3. Outlining preparations for potential societal instability
  4. Presenting information in a shareable, memetic format

Top Risks to Mitigate

🚗 Car & Pedestrian Accidents

The #1 daily threat most people underestimate. Key mitigations include driving less when possible, choosing vehicles with top safety ratings, avoiding high-risk driving times, making phones inaccessible while driving, never driving impaired, and walking near cars carefully.

💊 Drug Overdose

A risk crossing all demographics with fentanyl contamination involved in 68% of overdoses. Effective mitigations include testing substances, never mixing depressants, keeping naloxone available, using a buddy system, and starting with small amounts to gauge potency.

🧠 Suicide

A preventable tragedy with clear warning signs. Mitigation strategies include restricting access to lethal means, treating mental health conditions proactively, maintaining strong social connections, limiting substance use during emotional crises, and creating safety plans.

💥️ Violence & Intentional Harm

Situational awareness can save your life. Key preventions include protection measures, exiting unsafe relationships at the first sign of physical abuse, practicing situational awareness, de-escalating conflicts, and avoiding high-risk locations.

🦠 Infections

From respiratory illnesses to potential pandemics. Mitigations include vaccinations, HEPA filters, maintaining supplies of masks and essentials, and seeking prompt treatment for worsening infections.

❤️ Heart Disease & Stroke

High-ROI prevention includes smoking cessation, blood pressure control, Mediterranean diet, regular exercise, appropriate medications, weight management, and knowing warning signs.

Broad preparation plans

To increase resilience during technological transition periods:

  • Be Informed: Develop situational awareness, follow reliable news, and understand personal protection options
  • Exit Plan: Create contingency plans for relocating from dense urban areas if necessary
  • Food/Water: Maintain at least a 2-week supply of essentials
  • Financial Resilience: Develop multiple income streams and diversify assets
  • Community: Build strong social networks for mutual assistance

Call for Contributions

We're seeking volunteer contributors who can help expand and improve the guide following these principles:

  • Bayesian prioritization of highest-probability risks and highest-impact mitigations
  • Practical over theoretical advice that can be implemented immediately by individuals or small groups
  • Concise and direct communication without unnecessary info
  • Concrete and specific recommendations over general principles
  • Memetic-friendly content that's easily remembered and shared

Our target audience values efficiency, rationality, optionality, personal agency, and common sense.

The most effective content will feature clear cause-effect reasoning, specific actions, visual representations, and accessible preparation strategies.

Visit the Singularity Survival Guide website for the complete resource, including Deep Research reports on each risk category.

If you'd like to contribute, join our Discord community.

What risk mitigation strategies have you found most effective in your own life?

What other important risk or preparation areas have I missed in V1?

16

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments5


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Matt Brooks2
0
0

If there other resources that are doing something similar, please link them in the comments so I can use the information to improve the guide (with a reference). Thanks!

Reply
Dave Cortright 🔸2
0
0

The #1 risk for most people these days is loneliness. The US Surgeon General reported that loneliness is as deadly as smoking. Other sources worth checking out: The Village Effect by Susan Pinker, Friends by Robin Dunbar, and the Harvard Grant Study. I also just released this podcast episode on relationships.

Reply
Matt Brooks1
0
0

Hmm... but wouldn't the main impact of loneliness be suicide in the short term (the relevant part for this guide)? Which we're already addressing?

I'm sure loneliness impacts your long-term health, but I don't think it's going to raise your likelihood of death in the next 10 years if you're relatively young and healthy

Reply
Dave Cortright 🔸1
0
0

Please read the US Surgeon General report. It's more than just suicide. 

There's also this chart from The Village Effect, citing Holt-Lunstad 2010:

Also, (from an LLM):

A study published in The British Journal of Psychiatry examined the impact of loneliness and depression on mortality over 19 years. The researchers found that individuals experiencing loneliness at baseline had a higher likelihood of death during the follow-up period. The presence of depression further increased this risk, suggesting a potentially synergistic effect between loneliness and depression on mortality. ​Cambridge University Press & Assessment

Another study, also published in The British Journal of Psychiatry, investigated the association between mental disorders and accidental deaths. The study population was over 6.9 million adults in Sweden, followed for eight years. The researchers found that individuals with mental disorders, including depression, had an increased risk of death from accidents, such as falls, motor vehicle crashes, and other unintended injuries. ​Cambridge University Press & Assessment

Reply
Matt Brooks1
0
0

I mean more specifically, what is the additional risk of death per person across the next 10 years if you're lonely vs not lonely? Is it even 1/1000 an affect compared to deaths due to cars?

How tractable are the interventions? It might take hundreds of hours over many months to solve your loneliness. That's actually pretty hard / costly

I'm not saying it's not a problem, it definitely is, but I'm just trying to understand if it makes sense to be in this particular guide. Short term serious (yet tractable) risks

Reply
More from Matt Brooks
96
Experiment in Retroactive Funding: An EA Forum Prize Contest
3 authors
· · 9m read
16
16
38
EA should help Tyler Cowen publish his drafted book in China
Matt Brooks
· · 4m read
8
8
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
[Cross-posted from my Substack here] If you spend time with people trying to change the world, you’ll come to an interesting conundrum: Various advocacy groups reference previous successful social movements as to why their chosen strategy is the most important one. Yet, these groups often follow wildly different strategies from each other to achieve social change. So, which one of them is right? The answer is all of them and none of them. This is because many people use research and historical movements to justify their pre-existing beliefs about how social change happens. Simply, you can find a case study to fit most plausible theories of how social change happens. For example, the groups might say: * Repeated nonviolent disruption is the key to social change, citing the Freedom Riders from the civil rights Movement or Act Up! from the gay rights movement. * Technological progress is what drives improvements in the human condition if you consider the development of the contraceptive pill funded by Katharine McCormick. * Organising and base-building is how change happens, as inspired by Ella Baker, the NAACP or Cesar Chavez from the United Workers Movement. * Insider advocacy is the real secret of social movements – look no further than how influential the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights was in passing the Civil Rights Acts of 1960 & 1964. * Democratic participation is the backbone of social change – just look at how Ireland lifted a ban on abortion via a Citizen’s Assembly. * And so on… To paint this picture, we can see this in action below: Source: Just Stop Oil which focuses on…civil resistance and disruption Source: The Civic Power Fund which focuses on… local organising What do we take away from all this? In my mind, a few key things: 1. Many different approaches have worked in changing the world so we should be humble and not assume we are doing The Most Important Thing 2. The case studies we focus on are likely confirmation bias, where
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
I speak to many entrepreneurial people trying to do a large amount of good by starting a nonprofit organisation. I think this is often an error for four main reasons. 1. Scalability 2. Capital counterfactuals 3. Standards 4. Learning potential 5. Earning to give potential These arguments are most applicable to starting high-growth organisations, such as startups.[1] Scalability There is a lot of capital available for startups, and established mechanisms exist to continue raising funds if the ROI appears high. It seems extremely difficult to operate a nonprofit with a budget of more than $30M per year (e.g., with approximately 150 people), but this is not particularly unusual for for-profit organisations. Capital Counterfactuals I generally believe that value-aligned funders are spending their money reasonably well, while for-profit investors are spending theirs extremely poorly (on altruistic grounds). If you can redirect that funding towards high-altruism value work, you could potentially create a much larger delta between your use of funding and the counterfactual of someone else receiving those funds. You also won’t be reliant on constantly convincing donors to give you money, once you’re generating revenue. Standards Nonprofits have significantly weaker feedback mechanisms compared to for-profits. They are often difficult to evaluate and lack a natural kill function. Few people are going to complain that you provided bad service when it didn’t cost them anything. Most nonprofits are not very ambitious, despite having large moral ambitions. It’s challenging to find talented people willing to accept a substantial pay cut to work with you. For-profits are considerably more likely to create something that people actually want. Learning Potential Most people should be trying to put themselves in a better position to do useful work later on. People often report learning a great deal from working at high-growth companies, building interesting connection
 ·  · 31m read
 · 
James Özden and Sam Glover at Social Change Lab wrote a literature review on protest outcomes[1] as part of a broader investigation[2] on protest effectiveness. The report covers multiple lines of evidence and addresses many relevant questions, but does not say much about the methodological quality of the research. So that's what I'm going to do today. I reviewed the evidence on protest outcomes, focusing only on the highest-quality research, to answer two questions: 1. Do protests work? 2. Are Social Change Lab's conclusions consistent with the highest-quality evidence? Here's what I found: Do protests work? Highly likely (credence: 90%) in certain contexts, although it's unclear how well the results generalize. [More] Are Social Change Lab's conclusions consistent with the highest-quality evidence? Yes—the report's core claims are well-supported, although it overstates the strength of some of the evidence. [More] Cross-posted from my website. Introduction This article serves two purposes: First, it analyzes the evidence on protest outcomes. Second, it critically reviews the Social Change Lab literature review. Social Change Lab is not the only group that has reviewed protest effectiveness. I was able to find four literature reviews: 1. Animal Charity Evaluators (2018), Protest Intervention Report. 2. Orazani et al. (2021), Social movement strategy (nonviolent vs. violent) and the garnering of third-party support: A meta-analysis. 3. Social Change Lab – Ozden & Glover (2022), Literature Review: Protest Outcomes. 4. Shuman et al. (2024), When Are Social Protests Effective? The Animal Charity Evaluators review did not include many studies, and did not cite any natural experiments (only one had been published as of 2018). Orazani et al. (2021)[3] is a nice meta-analysis—it finds that when you show people news articles about nonviolent protests, they are more likely to express support for the protesters' cause. But what people say in a lab setting mig
Relevant opportunities
25
World Malaria Day 2025: what's new, what's not
Toby Tremlett🔹
· · 2m read
0
0
20
Hiring pre-docs
Eva
· · 1m read
0
0
170
Forethought: A new AI macrostrategy group
5 authors
· · 4m read
6
6
View more