Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Comment Permalink
by Marcus Daniell
2 min read 10

88

CommunityHigh Impact Athletes (organization)Requests (open)
Frontpage

High Impact Athletes’ theory of change relies on using the collective athlete megaphone to convince a large percentage of the world’s high-income population to donate to cost-effective charities. Using our athletes’ voices and platforms we aim to raise the global profile of these giving opportunities and the philosophies behind them.

Sports fans are numerous, and the cultural clout of athletes has grown rapidly over the last century. According to MIT Media Lab, athletes made up 50% of all “historical cultural figures” between 1950 - 2000. We can use this influence to spread EA-aligned ideas. 

In 18 months, HIA has grown from zero to over 110 athletes, with 46 of those athletes making at least a 1% pledge. Our second order audience (the amount of people we can reach through our athletes) is over 10.7 million, and we’re growing those numbers weekly. 

The more big (popular) athletes we have on the HIA athlete roster, the louder the athlete megaphone, and the more people we can influence towards EA ideas. 

To recruit bigger athletes we need standalone credibility as an organisation, particularly if we don’t have an existing personal connection. A large part of being credible in the athlete/influencer space is how big your social media following is. 

This is where we’d love the EA community’s help. 


Task 1
Please take 30 seconds out of your day to follow our Instagram, Twitter and Facebook accounts. Then if you’re feeling particularly generous please take another 60 seconds to ask your friends to do the same!

More followers means more algorithm love, which might be the push that gets our posts noticed by prospective athletes. This is a low cost but potentially impactful action that each of you can take today!

Potential Questions:

Why don’t you just buy followers?
We could, but these accounts are easy to spot and so the risk to our credibility/reward ratio isn’t great. We also want engagement with our account, and bought followers don’t engage the same way that organic ones do. We haven’t completely ruled this out (the ends might justify the means) but we want to see how far we can get organically first.

Why does social media matter?
It’s the most common place where athletes interact with their fans - particularly Instagram. This interaction is where we have the largest potential to create change. Influencing 1% of 1 big athlete’s following could mean tens of thousands of people introduced to EA ideas for the first time. 

Do you have growth plans other than asking individuals to follow your channels?
In short, yes. We are working hard to increase engagement on our own channels and also build our second-order audience. However a small nudge from this supportive community would help a bunch.


Task 2
Spend some time thinking if you, or anyone you know, knows any professional athletes or employees working in the sporting space. If you do, please introduce them to me at marcus@highimpactathletes.org - warm introductions are the fastest and most organic way to grow, and each athlete adds momentum to the HIA snowball. 

I want to shout out 80,000 Hours and their employees for having passed on some athletes from their career advising program.

Cheers, 
Marcus and the HIA team.


 

88

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments10


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Guy Raveh87
0
0

Why don’t you just buy followers? We could... We haven’t completely ruled this out (the ends might justify the means)

Just saying I think this would be a terrible idea, both for HIA and for the movement in general. We very obviously don't want to be associated with lying and manufacturing support. Not to mention it might just get you banned from social media.

Reply
EdMathieu33
0
0

Strong-upvoting this. The way you could decide to invest money into expanding your social media reach would be to properly sponsor your account through ads on IG/Tw/FB. These platforms allow for precise targeting based on demographics and interests – and given the specific scope of HIA, I imagine that designing good targets would be easy enough.

Reply
Marcus Daniell1
0
0

Fair point, thanks.

Reply
Kirsten18
0
0

Okay, I'm just gonna come out and say it: there's no way I could complete both of these requests in two minutes and every time I see the headline it drives me crazy!

Reply
Marcus Daniell7
0
0

Did you try?
I just tried it myself: followed three accounts in 17 seconds (having lost a couple of seconds in starting my stopwatch), which gave me 1m43s to think about my network and whether it includes athletes. 
Also open to alternate headlines, e.g. Two tiny requests from HIA, A Variable Amount of your Time Depending on your Click Speed, Network Size, and Desire to Spend Time on the Task.

Reply
Charles He3
0
0

Ok. I guess this comment is a little argumentative and not the highest signal to noise but:

I can see how someone who hasn’t used their social media in a while, need time to login, unjig their password manager, agree to the latest privacy policy, etc. which takes several minutes.

Also, it seems like many introduction emails take more than 2 minutes to write, especially if you haven’t spoken to that person in a while or they are loosely connected.

Reply
Marcus Daniell3
0
0

Totally. I'm being very tongue in cheek above. 
The gist of the headline and the post is that community members can contribute to a potentially highly impactful project with a very trivial amount of time and energy spend.
I very much agree that good intros take time.

Reply
Charles He2
0
0

Yes, of course, that's fair. I guess it can be difficult to communicate tone online.

Reply
jared_m17
0
0

Done, re: following on Twitter.

My main contact at Pau and Marc Gasol's Gasol Foundation (focused on "research, holistic, data-driven" work to eradicate childhood obesity) appears to have left. They are a thoughtful group, and may be worth writing in the 10-20% chance they evolve into HIA supporters — or can be helpful in another way.

Reply
gergo7
0
0

Following on FB now!

You could also ask people running EA national/city pages to share your page - that way it could reach some more EAs and EA sympathetic folks!

Reply
More from Marcus Daniell
View more
Curated and popular this week
Ronen Bar
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
"Part one of our challenge is to solve the technical alignment problem, and that’s what everybody focuses on, but part two is: to whose values do you align the system once you’re capable of doing that, and that may turn out to be an even harder problem", Sam Altman, OpenAI CEO (Link).  In this post, I argue that: 1. "To whose values do you align the system" is a critically neglected space I termed “Moral Alignment.” Only a few organizations work for non-humans in this field, with a total budget of 4-5 million USD (not accounting for academic work). The scale of this space couldn’t be any bigger - the intersection between the most revolutionary technology ever and all sentient beings. While tractability remains uncertain, there is some promising positive evidence (See “The Tractability Open Question” section). 2. Given the first point, our movement must attract more resources, talent, and funding to address it. The goal is to value align AI with caring about all sentient beings: humans, animals, and potential future digital minds. In other words, I argue we should invest much more in promoting a sentient-centric AI. The problem What is Moral Alignment? AI alignment focuses on ensuring AI systems act according to human intentions, emphasizing controllability and corrigibility (adaptability to changing human preferences). However, traditional alignment often ignores the ethical implications for all sentient beings. Moral Alignment, as part of the broader AI alignment and AI safety spaces, is a field focused on the values we aim to instill in AI. I argue that our goal should be to ensure AI is a positive force for all sentient beings. Currently, as far as I know, no overarching organization, terms, or community unifies Moral Alignment (MA) as a field with a clear umbrella identity. While specific groups focus individually on animals, humans, or digital minds, such as AI for Animals, which does excellent community-building work around AI and animal welfare while
Max Taylor
 ·  · 9m read
 · 
Many thanks to Constance Li, Rachel Mason, Ronen Bar, Sam Tucker-Davis, and Yip Fai Tse for providing valuable feedback. This post does not necessarily reflect the views of my employer. Artificial General Intelligence (basically, ‘AI that is as good as, or better than, humans at most intellectual tasks’) seems increasingly likely to be developed in the next 5-10 years. As others have written, this has major implications for EA priorities, including animal advocacy, but it’s hard to know how this should shape our strategy. This post sets out a few starting points and I’m really interested in hearing others’ ideas, even if they’re very uncertain and half-baked. Is AGI coming in the next 5-10 years? This is very well covered elsewhere but basically it looks increasingly likely, e.g.: * The Metaculus and Manifold forecasting platforms predict we’ll see AGI in 2030 and 2031, respectively. * The heads of Anthropic and OpenAI think we’ll see it by 2027 and 2035, respectively. * A 2024 survey of AI researchers put a 50% chance of AGI by 2047, but this is 13 years earlier than predicted in the 2023 version of the survey. * These predictions seem feasible given the explosive rate of change we’ve been seeing in computing power available to models, algorithmic efficiencies, and actual model performance (e.g., look at how far Large Language Models and AI image generators have come just in the last three years). * Based on this, organisations (both new ones, like Forethought, and existing ones, like 80,000 Hours) are taking the prospect of near-term AGI increasingly seriously. What could AGI mean for animals? AGI’s implications for animals depend heavily on who controls the AGI models. For example: * AGI might be controlled by a handful of AI companies and/or governments, either in alliance or in competition. * For example, maybe two government-owned companies separately develop AGI then restrict others from developing it. * These actors’ use of AGI might be dr
Joris 🔸
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
Last week, I participated in Animal Advocacy Careers’ Impactful Policy Careers programme. Below I’m sharing some reflections on what was a really interesting week in Brussels! Please note I spent just one week there, so take it all with a grain of (CAP-subsidized) salt. Posts like this and this one are probably much more informative (and assume less context). I mainly wrote this to reflect on my time in Brussels (and I capped it at 2 hours, so it’s not a super polished draft). I’ll focus mostly on EU careers generally, less on (EU) animal welfare-related careers. Before I jump in, just a quick note about how I think AAC did something really cool here: they identified a relatively underexplored area where it’s relatively easy for animal advocates to find impactful roles, and then designed a programme to help these people better understand that area, meet stakeholders, and learn how to find roles. I also think the participants developed meaningful bonds, which could prove valuable over time. Thank you to the AAC team for hosting this! On EU careers generally * The EU has a surprisingly big influence over its citizens and the wider world for how neglected it came across to me. There’s many areas where countries have basically given a bunch (if not all) of their decision making power to the EU. And despite that, the EU policy making / politics bubble comes across as relatively neglected, with relatively little media coverage and a relatively small bureaucracy. * There’s quite a lot of pathways into the Brussels bubble, but all have different ToCs, demand different skill sets, and prefer different backgrounds. Dissecting these is hard, and time-intensive * For context, I have always been interested in “a career in policy/politics” – I now realize that’s kind of ridiculously broad. I’m happy to have gained some clarity on the differences between roles in Parliament, work at the Commission, the Council, lobbying, consultancy work, and think tanks. * The absorbe
Recent opportunities in Community
46
EA Global Referral Program
Ivan Burduk
· · 2m read
7
7
10
EAGxNordics in Norway: apply now
Amalie Farestvedt 🔸
· · 3m read
1
1
24
Out of This Box: The Last Musical (Written by Humans) - Crowdfunding!
GuyP
· · 7m read
0
0
View more