Hide table of contents

Authors: Vaidehi Agarwalla, Jakob Grabaak & Alexandre Lichy

 As a management consultant, you will likely have acquired a broad range of skills that are useful in different sectors and roles. Consulting can provide some great exit opportunities, so it’s important to consider how to leverage your career capital to have more impact when you leave. 

This article is based on interviews, inputs and feedback from over 15 consultants currently pursuing high impact careers. While we primarily interviewed consultants from top strategy consulting firms, some of the advice may also apply to the Big 4 accounting firms or local boutique consulting firms. We recommend readers do some independent research as well. 

This article is part of a sequence of posts providing career advice on how to maximize your social impact as a consultant. In previous posts, we discussed how to begin your consulting career, and how to have an impact during your time in consulting. This sequence is a project of the Effective Altruism and Consulting Network (EACN). It does not represent the views of any firms mentioned nor that of all of the contributors. 

3.0 Key Ideas

  1. The case for staying in consulting is that your influence and earnings (but not necessarily learning) continue to increase steeply over time (Read more)
  2. You may want to leave consulting because you have good exit opportunities; you can achieve a more sustainable lifestyle in a different job; you will get fewer great opportunities to learn or specialize in your prioritized cause areas if you stay (Read more)
  3. Exit options for consultants include non-profit entrepreneurship, operational or strategic roles in EA-aligned organizations, empirical global prioritization research, working to influence the government or other large organizations, and working for EA consultancies (Read more)

3.1 Is there a case for staying in consulting long-term?

The consulting industry typically has high turnover rates of 15-20%. This means that the majority of consultants choose to leave after only a few years, typically citing opportunities to pursue exciting options outside of consulting as a key reason. That being said, we think that it could be valuable for some EAs to pursue consulting careers long-term, for the following reasons: 

  • Direct impact: If you reach the partner level your influence increases significantly. Keep in mind that it is still possible to engage with partners and have some influence even with a few years of experience (read more).
  • You are pursuing earning-to-give for funding-constrained causes: While the earning potential is quite high, to get to those earning levels you would need to reach the partner level which could take around 10 years. Your earnings potential as a entry-level partner is ~$500,000 to $1M USD, and as a senior-level partner (after 15+ years) could be ~$1M to $5M USD (the median is $1 to $2 million). Amounts are variable due to bonuses, geography and company. If you’re interested in longtermist causes Earning-to-Give has become relatively less impactful for people who may be good fits for direct work. 80,000 Hours estimates the value of an additional leader doing direct work such as running organisations or projects, generating scalable project ideas or grantmaking could be approximately USD $3-10M.  If you’re considering earning-to-give, as a consulting partner it may take you 6-20 years to “break even” (assuming you donate $500k/year, and otherwise would’ve been a good fit for those senior roles) . Further, each leader will require several more people in more junior or supporting roles, such as “research assistants, operations specialists, marketers, ML engineers, people executing on … projects”. They say the value of an additional person in these roles could be approximately $400,000–$4 million per year.
  • Building a strong EA network at your firm: You can grow the EA network within your firm and engage other managers and partners in EA ideas. As you advance in your career, especially at the partner level, your professional network will get much stronger, as you will interact with a broader and more senior group of people. It can take time to settle in among a group of industry practitioners and experts to build solid client relationships. You can then use your professional credibility and connections to advocate for EA to colleagues and clients and build a network of EA-aligned people.
  • Unlocking even better exit opportunities: Staying in consulting until the manager level can open up new exit opportunities such as mid-level management positions in large organizations (big corporations,  large nonprofits, or governmental organizations) or top-level management positions in small organizations (typically startups or potentially smaller EA-aligned organizations). Staying until the partner level can open up executive positions at large organizations as well (such as your client’s organizations).

3.2 When is the right time to leave consulting?

Some of the key reasons to consider leaving consulting would be:

  1. You get an excellent exit opportunity
  2. Staying is unsustainable for you because of work/life balance or other considerations
  3. There are decreasing marginal returns to spending an additional year in consulting when you could be getting more in-depth skills, experience or networks elsewhere. This could be because you are offered a good exit opportunity (see below), or that you need to actively seek one out.

It may be difficult to plan out and be very strategic about the right time to leave in advance. Therefore, it can be useful to pay attention to the exit options available to you, and check in every 6 months or so (or more frequently if you’re able to) about whether staying is the right option for you. It may also be worth setting aside time for an annual review, such as this one by Benjamin Todd of 80,000 Hours. 

3.3 Which exit options could you take?

You will have many options when leaving consulting, even as a junior consultant. Which one you pick will depend on the causes you think are the most important, and which career paths you think you have the best fit for. 

The following are some concrete examples of paths you could pursue. They are not comprehensive, but we hope they can illustrate the many ways you could have an impact. 

Nonprofit entrepreneurship

If you are an entrepreneurial EA with a quantitative consulting edge you are well-positioned to start your own charity. Check out Probably Good’s career profile on this career path and Charity Entrepreneurship’s incubation program for more information. 

“One of the key skills when starting a new charity is decision making and doing (applied) research. Working in consulting makes you comfortable breaking down complex research questions into smaller parts (e.g. making Fermi estimates or building a multi-factor decision model in Excel). These are very useful skills when you want to research a neglected cause area or want to pick the most effective intervention after you picked a cause area. Within the CE [Charity Entrepreneurship Incubation] program, there is plenty of room to learn these skills, but I really felt that I had a headstart compared to other participants in the program.” - Jan-Willem van Putten, Charity Entrepreneurship Incubation Program Participant 2021

Work in management, strategy, operations or M&E at EA-aligned organisations

Many EA roles can be as competitive as top consulting firms - so it’s important to have backup options - but it’s definitely worth applying because in general EA organisations find it difficult to recruit for roles that require more senior candidates and those with management experience. Consultants working full-time at EA organisations said that the transition was positive, and they found their new roles challenging and fun. They also had more autonomy and flexibility over their work. 

“My consulting experience prepared me well for the role I went into at the Future of Humanity Institute and Global Priorities Institute. And I have not only had more impact working directly on problems I care about but also it's been so much more fun! It seems wild to look back and think I spent so much time in the corporate world.” - Habiba Islam, 80,000 Hours.

Empirical Global Priorities Research

As a consultant, you may be a good fit for empirical global priorities research. In consulting, you get exposure to top decision-makers, their thinking and how to communicate with them. You also learn how leading organizations make decisions. On the experience side, a lot of analytical work in consulting is about figuring out "what's big and what's small" or "what's tractable or not" - which are useful reflexes to have in prioritization research - breaking difficult, complex issues into sub-questions.

Position yourself to have influence in corporations, institutions and governments

Consultants have the skill sets needed to work for some of the largest and most powerful corporations and institutions in the world. By joining these organisations, you may be able to exert some influence on the trajectory of these companies through insider advocacy. The reasons for this path are very similar to the reasons for staying in consulting long-term.

  • Work for large corporations that deal with developing countries to improve trade, push for changes in corporate policies regarding animal welfare or navigate complex transformations such as conventional energy players transitioning to renewables.

One former consultant now works for Kraft Heinz as a key account manager for a large client. This is a role with potential for promotion into the senior leadership in the future. His experience from management consulting enabled him to be a competitive candidate for this role. 

He noticed his local CEO was supportive of effective altruism-related ideas and reached out to discuss possible initiatives they could kickstart. Through his role he was able to engage with the senior level leadership on EA-related topics. 

The CEO was very supportive of a plan to do a large fundraiser for a Founders’ Pledge recommended climate charity, Clean Air Task Force (as of August 2021 it has been postponed due to COVID-19). The former consultant is also in talks with his local CEO to make their global ESG strategy more EA-aligned. 

 

  • Work as a grant manager to influence corporate philanthropy. Large corporations donate billions of dollars to various causes, influencing even a small percentage of these donations could be incredibly impactful.
  • Work for large international institutions that determine global development strategies such as the World Bank, or in national governments influencing development budgets or trade policies with developing countries.
  • If you work at financial institutions you could steer investments towards sectors with potential for positive societal impact. In some countries, Sovereign Wealth Funds are incredibly influential and you could influence large investments  (e.g. Norway, The Netherlands, Singapore). For more on responsible investing, check out total-portfolio.org/.
An ex-BCG consultant developed a market study with a venture capital firm focused on alternative proteins. After the project, she decided to move to the client organization to help the alternative protein market grow.

 

Found or work for an EA consultancy 

As the EA movement grows, one interesting future opportunity is a need for EA consultancies as EA organisations often require services that are difficult to hire for. Possibly services the consultancy offers could include research, marketing, operations and more. You can read more about this idea here.


Considering how to have an impact with your consulting career? Reach out to members of the EACN if you are unsure if staying in consulting is still the most impactful career path. We offer networking opportunities with a broad network of EA aligned consultants. 

Comments6


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Would add to the list:

  • get funded from the EA infrastructure fund to figure out what your high impact career path is
  • work in grant making

Organizations I talked to, which seem to be especially excited about hiring former consultants (and also have many) include OpenPhil, Charity Entrepreneurship and the Centre for Effective Altruism (not speaking on their behalf though)

Thanks Jona, agree! Also, many EA orgs seem to be experiencing growth pains at the moment, I think the case for helping them scale (in ops/mgt roles) is stronger than ever. Some consulting firms also allow their employees to do temporary (paid or unpaid) secondments with selected non-profits, which could be one way of exploring if this path is a fit.

There seems to be something missing in this paragraph: "If you work at financial institutions you could steer investments towards sectors with potential for positive societal impact. In some countries, Sovereign Wealth Funds are incredibly influential and you could influence large investments  (e.g. Norway, The Netherlands, Singapore). For more on responsible investing, check out the ...." 

Edited, thanks for catching that Mojmir!

Thanks! I think we meant to refer to https://total-portfolio.org/

Perhaps also some of Ellen Quigley's work on Universal Ownership https://www.cser.ac.uk/team/ellen-quigley/ 

Thank you for this post!

Would add this plug for ex-consultants interested in GCBRs and global health interventions: consider opportunities at well-resourced academic health systems. Examples in North America  include Cleveland Clinic, Mass General Brigham (the umbrella for many of Harvard Medical School's teaching hospitals),  Mayo Clinic, UCSF, and UHN in Ontario.

To pick one institution: if you go to this Jobs page and enter "strategy" in the keyword search, a number of roles oriented toward ex-consultants and/or those with MBAs and other business experience will pop up.

This list may give an idea of other opportunities in your region: https://www.newsweek.com/best-hospitals-2021

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 23m read
 · 
Or on the types of prioritization, their strengths, pitfalls, and how EA should balance them   The cause prioritization landscape in EA is changing. Prominent groups have shut down, others have been founded, and everyone is trying to figure out how to prepare for AI. This is the first in a series of posts examining the state of cause prioritization and proposing strategies for moving forward.   Executive Summary * Performing prioritization work has been one of the main tasks, and arguably achievements, of EA. * We highlight three types of prioritization: Cause Prioritization, Within-Cause (Intervention) Prioritization, and Cross-Cause (Intervention) Prioritization. * We ask how much of EA prioritization work falls in each of these categories: * Our estimates suggest that, for the organizations we investigated, the current split is 89% within-cause work, 2% cross-cause, and 9% cause prioritization. * We then explore strengths and potential pitfalls of each level: * Cause prioritization offers a big-picture view for identifying pressing problems but can fail to capture the practical nuances that often determine real-world success. * Within-cause prioritization focuses on a narrower set of interventions with deeper more specialised analysis but risks missing higher-impact alternatives elsewhere. * Cross-cause prioritization broadens the scope to find synergies and the potential for greater impact, yet demands complex assumptions and compromises on measurement. * See the Summary Table below to view the considerations. * We encourage reflection and future work on what the best ways of prioritizing are and how EA should allocate resources between the three types. * With this in mind, we outline eight cruxes that sketch what factors could favor some types over others. * We also suggest some potential next steps aimed at refining our approach to prioritization by exploring variance, value of information, tractability, and the
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
[Cross-posted from my Substack here] If you spend time with people trying to change the world, you’ll come to an interesting conundrum: Various advocacy groups reference previous successful social movements as to why their chosen strategy is the most important one. Yet, these groups often follow wildly different strategies from each other to achieve social change. So, which one of them is right? The answer is all of them and none of them. This is because many people use research and historical movements to justify their pre-existing beliefs about how social change happens. Simply, you can find a case study to fit most plausible theories of how social change happens. For example, the groups might say: * Repeated nonviolent disruption is the key to social change, citing the Freedom Riders from the civil rights Movement or Act Up! from the gay rights movement. * Technological progress is what drives improvements in the human condition if you consider the development of the contraceptive pill funded by Katharine McCormick. * Organising and base-building is how change happens, as inspired by Ella Baker, the NAACP or Cesar Chavez from the United Workers Movement. * Insider advocacy is the real secret of social movements – look no further than how influential the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights was in passing the Civil Rights Acts of 1960 & 1964. * Democratic participation is the backbone of social change – just look at how Ireland lifted a ban on abortion via a Citizen’s Assembly. * And so on… To paint this picture, we can see this in action below: Source: Just Stop Oil which focuses on…civil resistance and disruption Source: The Civic Power Fund which focuses on… local organising What do we take away from all this? In my mind, a few key things: 1. Many different approaches have worked in changing the world so we should be humble and not assume we are doing The Most Important Thing 2. The case studies we focus on are likely confirmation bias, where
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
I wanted to share a small but important challenge I've encountered as a student engaging with Effective Altruism from a lower-income country (Nigeria), and invite thoughts or suggestions from the community. Recently, I tried to make a one-time donation to one of the EA-aligned charities listed on the Giving What We Can platform. However, I discovered that I could not donate an amount less than $5. While this might seem like a minor limit for many, for someone like me — a student without a steady income or job, $5 is a significant amount. To provide some context: According to Numbeo, the average monthly income of a Nigerian worker is around $130–$150, and students often rely on even less — sometimes just $20–$50 per month for all expenses. For many students here, having $5 "lying around" isn't common at all; it could represent a week's worth of meals or transportation. I personally want to make small, one-time donations whenever I can, rather than commit to a recurring pledge like the 10% Giving What We Can pledge, which isn't feasible for me right now. I also want to encourage members of my local EA group, who are in similar financial situations, to practice giving through small but meaningful donations. In light of this, I would like to: * Recommend that Giving What We Can (and similar platforms) consider allowing smaller minimum donation amounts to make giving more accessible to students and people in lower-income countries. * Suggest that more organizations be added to the platform, to give donors a wider range of causes they can support with their small contributions. Uncertainties: * Are there alternative platforms or methods that allow very small one-time donations to EA-aligned charities? * Is there a reason behind the $5 minimum that I'm unaware of, and could it be adjusted to be more inclusive? I strongly believe that cultivating a habit of giving, even with small amounts, helps build a long-term culture of altruism — and it would