Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by wesg
3 min read 2

34

BiosecurityAcademiaOperations researchData science
Frontpage

Context

I am giving a talk at my advisor’s workshop on the Future of Analytics and Operations Research which will be well attended by MIT PhD students, professors, and alums from the operations research center (many of which work on healthcare analytics and were involved in COVID forecasting/response). I plan to talk about “Strategic Priorities in Health Security” as well as circulate a document which gives an overview of biosecurity and the problems best suited for people in my academic community (data science/analytics/OR; see why EA needs OR for additional context). 

Goal and Questions

My specific goal with this post is to solicit feedback from the biosecurity community to maximize the chance that this talk is able to be an entry point to bring new, talented researchers into impactful work on biosecurity.  Feedback of any kind related to this goal is appreciated, but some specific questions are below:

  • What is the most inspiring / scary / accurate / overall best way to help this audience quickly understand GCBRs and the work being done to mitigate them?
  • Do you have any suggestions for potential projects that could benefit in a material, mission-critical way from world-class analytics / OR research support[1], or would be particularly good motivating case studies?
  • Is any of the existing OR research on biosecurity (examples here and here) particularly useful? What would you like to see more or less of?
  • What is the best way to bring interested researchers further into the community?  What’s the best “single next action” that someone interested in engaging more should take?
  • Do you work with or know of a team/org that needs research support of this kind now (or will soon) that could immediately benefit from collaborators at MIT?
  • Do you see any key risks or red flags that could result in this talk becoming infohazardous or otherwise counterproductive?

My tentative thoughts for my talk and followup document are given below. If you would rather your answers be private, please email me.

Talk Outline

I only have 8 minutes so I have to be concise. The overarching message is “you should be scared shitless of engineered pandemics–here are some relevant problems and how they relate to things you have expertise in.”

Tentative outline:

  • Historical examples of near GCBRs
  • Investment in pandemic prevention/preparedness is woefully inadequate (especially in comparison to other forms of defense spending)
  • This is especially alarming when considering advances in biotech, eg:
    • Dual use AI models
    • DNA sequencing/synthesis costs coming down at Moore’s law speed
    • Gain of function research
  • Introduce defense-in-depth and use as an organizational structure to introduce key problems for rest of talk
    • Prevention
      • Far-UVC: optimize allocation, model effectiveness vs. cost
    • Monitoring/detection
      • NAO design, operations, and data analysis
    • Rapid response+preparedness
      • Targeted testing, containment of affected areas
    • Sustained response
      • Vaccine manufacturing, allocation, and distribution
    • Worst case resilience
      • Facility location for refuges

Guide Outline

This will be provided at the end of the talk. The goal is to give readers additional context and a large sample of relevant problems with enough detail and references to get people thinking in the right direction.

  • Describe the motivation for biosecurity
  • Introduce key concepts
    • Defense-in-depth
    • Dual-use research
    • Infohazards
  • Relevant problems organized by depth (with more detailed problem statements forthcoming)
    • Prevention
      • Far-UVC: optimize placement, model effectiveness vs. cost
      • Optimize lab/facility inspection schedules
    • Monitoring/detection
      • NAO design, operations, and data analysis
      • Better models for disease spread
    • Rapid response+preparedness
      • Facility location and inventory management of strategic stockpiles
      • Integrated data sources to enable rapidly deploying medical countermeasures to areas of need
      • Targeted testing
      • Containment of affected areas
    • Sustained response
      • Hardened supply chains for testing, PPE, food
        • Inventory management
        • Warm manufacturing capacity
      • Vaccine manufacturing, allocation, and distribution
      • Clinical trial site identification
    • Worst case resilience
      • Facility location for refuges
      • Food stockpiles and supply chain hardening of most basic survival goods
  • Emphasize discretion and infohazards one last time
  • Links to relevant orgs in the space and further list of references
  1. ^

    OR is primarily an applied discipline, and therefore OR academia is unusually supportive of purely applied research projects. A good (non biosec) recent example is here where an academic OR collaboration saved the UN World Food Program $150 million/year in logistics costs.

34

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments2


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Lorenzo Buonanno🔸16
1
0

I'm definitely not qualified to answer this, but there have been >20 posts on the forum today and I'm afraid this got buried. My 2 cents:

Have you tried contacting the people listed in Chat with a Biosecurity Professional?

Only loosely related to this post, did you see this talk "How to do research that matters" from EA Global? (Text version) I think it highlights many failure modes of research, and I wish they were more widely considered in academia.

Thanks so much for doing this!

Reply
Florin0
0
2

It should be emphasized that experts should start recommending that every single person in the world obtain their own effective (preferably elastomeric) respirator as soon as possible. This would eliminate any supply chain issues and most (and all with a good monitoring system) GCBR-type pandemics. As better respirators are developed, people with the older kind would be encouraged to upgrade.

Reply
More from wesg
76
Why EA needs Operations Research: the science of decision making
wesg
· · 16m read
22
22
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
This work has come out of my Undergraduate dissertation. I haven't shared or discussed these results much before putting this up.  Message me if you'd like the code :) Edit: 16th April. After helpful comments, especially from Geoffrey, I now believe this method only identifies shifts in the happiness scale (not stretches). Have edited to make this clearer. TLDR * Life satisfaction (LS) appears flat over time, despite massive economic growth — the “Easterlin Paradox.” * Some argue that happiness is rising, but we’re reporting it more conservatively — a phenomenon called rescaling. * I test rescaling using long-run German panel data, looking at whether the association between reported happiness and three “get-me-out-of-here” actions (divorce, job resignation, and hospitalisation) changes over time. * If people are getting happier (and rescaling is occuring) the probability of these actions should become less linked to reported LS — but they don’t. * I find little evidence of rescaling. We should probably take self-reported happiness scores at face value. 1. Background: The Happiness Paradox Humans today live longer, richer, and healthier lives in history — yet we seem no seem for it. Self-reported life satisfaction (LS), usually measured on a 0–10 scale, has remained remarkably flatover the last few decades, even in countries like Germany, the UK, China, and India that have experienced huge GDP growth. As Michael Plant has written, the empirical evidence for this is fairly strong. This is the Easterlin Paradox. It is a paradox, because at a point in time, income is strongly linked to happiness, as I've written on the forum before. This should feel uncomfortable for anyone who believes that economic progress should make lives better — including (me) and others in the EA/Progress Studies worlds. Assuming agree on the empirical facts (i.e., self-reported happiness isn't increasing), there are a few potential explanations: * Hedonic adaptation: as life gets
 ·  · 38m read
 · 
In recent months, the CEOs of leading AI companies have grown increasingly confident about rapid progress: * OpenAI's Sam Altman: Shifted from saying in November "the rate of progress continues" to declaring in January "we are now confident we know how to build AGI" * Anthropic's Dario Amodei: Stated in January "I'm more confident than I've ever been that we're close to powerful capabilities... in the next 2-3 years" * Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis: Changed from "as soon as 10 years" in autumn to "probably three to five years away" by January. What explains the shift? Is it just hype? Or could we really have Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)[1] by 2028? In this article, I look at what's driven recent progress, estimate how far those drivers can continue, and explain why they're likely to continue for at least four more years. In particular, while in 2024 progress in LLM chatbots seemed to slow, a new approach started to work: teaching the models to reason using reinforcement learning. In just a year, this let them surpass human PhDs at answering difficult scientific reasoning questions, and achieve expert-level performance on one-hour coding tasks. We don't know how capable AGI will become, but extrapolating the recent rate of progress suggests that, by 2028, we could reach AI models with beyond-human reasoning abilities, expert-level knowledge in every domain, and that can autonomously complete multi-week projects, and progress would likely continue from there.  On this set of software engineering & computer use tasks, in 2020 AI was only able to do tasks that would typically take a human expert a couple of seconds. By 2024, that had risen to almost an hour. If the trend continues, by 2028 it'll reach several weeks.  No longer mere chatbots, these 'agent' models might soon satisfy many people's definitions of AGI — roughly, AI systems that match human performance at most knowledge work (see definition in footnote). This means that, while the compa
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
SUMMARY:  ALLFED is launching an emergency appeal on the EA Forum due to a serious funding shortfall. Without new support, ALLFED will be forced to cut half our budget in the coming months, drastically reducing our capacity to help build global food system resilience for catastrophic scenarios like nuclear winter, a severe pandemic, or infrastructure breakdown. ALLFED is seeking $800,000 over the course of 2025 to sustain its team, continue policy-relevant research, and move forward with pilot projects that could save lives in a catastrophe. As funding priorities shift toward AI safety, we believe resilient food solutions remain a highly cost-effective way to protect the future. If you’re able to support or share this appeal, please visit allfed.info/donate. Donate to ALLFED FULL ARTICLE: I (David Denkenberger) am writing alongside two of my team-mates, as ALLFED’s co-founder, to ask for your support. This is the first time in Alliance to Feed the Earth in Disaster’s (ALLFED’s) 8 year existence that we have reached out on the EA Forum with a direct funding appeal outside of Marginal Funding Week/our annual updates. I am doing so because ALLFED’s funding situation is serious, and because so much of ALLFED’s progress to date has been made possible through the support, feedback, and collaboration of the EA community.  Read our funding appeal At ALLFED, we are deeply grateful to all our supporters, including the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which has provided the majority of our funding for years. At the end of 2024, we learned we would be receiving far less support than expected due to a shift in SFF’s strategic priorities toward AI safety. Without additional funding, ALLFED will need to shrink. I believe the marginal cost effectiveness for improving the future and saving lives of resilience is competitive with AI Safety, even if timelines are short, because of potential AI-induced catastrophes. That is why we are asking people to donate to this emergency appeal
Recent opportunities in Biosecurity
68
Exploring Far-UVC: Blueprint Biosecurity’s 266-Page Report, a Call for Feedback, and Exciting Career Opportunities
Juan Benzo🔸
· · 3m read
3
3
20
Applications Open: Pivotal 2025 Q3 Research Fellowship
2 authors
· · 2m read
0
0
7
Register for the Stanford Existential Risks Initiative (SERI) Symposium
Grant Higerd-Rusli
· · 1m read
0
0
View more