Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
Guy Raveh2
0
0

Interesting, I've lived in Haifa my whole life and never heard of it.

Reply
See in context
by Ivan Burduk
2 min read 8

49

Building effective altruismCommunityOpportunities to take actionAnnouncements and updatesCentre for Effective AltruismEffective Altruism Global
Frontpage

EA Global has a new referral program

One of the EA Global Team’s goals for 2025 is to increase attendance at EA Global conferences. EA Global (EAG) events are often highly valuable for attendees— helping them explore and pursue impactful career paths, connect with collaborators, and stay engaged with the EA community. As a result, we think that increasing the number of people who attend is one of the most effective ways to improve the overall value of the conferences.

To help us achieve this goal, we’re launching a referral program.

How it works

If you know someone who might be a good fit for EA Global, you can encourage them to apply by sharing your personal referral code or referral link (found in the My Account section of the EA Global portal). Applicants can enter this code during the application process, or it will be entered automatically if they apply via the link. 

If the person is accepted and it’s their first time attending EA Global, the referral will count toward your total.

We’ve set up a small selection of rewards to recognize and thank people who are helping us grow the EA Global community. We also hope this will serve as a gentle prompt—encouraging a few more people to actively think about who in their networks could benefit from attending an EA Global event.

Note: You'll need an existing account to access your referral code details. If you don't have one, you can easily create one via the links above. 

Referral rewards

These rewards (designs coming soon) are intended as small tokens of appreciation, not as financial incentives. You can earn one or more of the following depending on how many people you successfully refer:

  • 1 referral = Sticker
  • 5 referrals = Pin
  • 10 referrals = Printed t-shirt
  • 20 referrals = Printed hoodie

Referrals accumulate across application cycles and do not expire. Rewards are based on accepted applications from first-time EA Global attendees. EAGx events do not count toward referral totals.

We plan to distribute rewards at upcoming EAG events. If you’re not attending in person, we’ll follow up afterward to arrange shipping.

Why we’re doing this

A significant proportion of EAG attendees report hearing about the event through a friend or colleague. In 2024, 31% of applications came through personal referrals. We believe that thoughtful recommendations from trusted sources can lead to high-quality applications and help bring in people who might otherwise not have considered applying.

We’re particularly interested in referrals that surface applicants with significant relevant domain expertise, or that help people take their next steps toward high-impact work.

Questions or feedback?

If you have any questions, suggestions, or thoughts about the referral program, feel free to comment here or email us at hello@eaglobal.org.

We hope this helps us grow the EA Global community in a thoughtful and sustainable way—and we appreciate your support in making that happen.

The EA Global Team

49

0
0
1

Reactions

0
0
1
Mentioned in
Comments8


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
fish_are_friends11
2
6

The rewards are so small you've Israeli-daycared me into not referring people. What do you think is the value of a new person attending EA Global for the first time? Based on TLYCS I think it would be huge, but this post implies referrals are close to worthless.

Reply
Ivan Burduk3
0
0

Appreciate the feedback here. Just to add on to what Robert said in the other comment:

You're right that a successful referral is worth much more than a sticker or pin! When we were designing the program, we did consider more substantial rewards. But we also wanted to be careful not to incentivize gaming the system (which gets trickier the more valuable the reward), and make sure the program stayed focused on community-building rather than making it transactional.

That said, I’ve also noticed that people genuinely enjoy the small, fun merch/swag at EAG/x events—stickers, shirts, hoodies with EA-y designs, etc. And because the referral rewards will be unique, they might act as conversation starters or visible signals that quietly prompt others to refer as well.

It’s also worth noting, as mentioned in the post, that many people were already referring friends informally—this program just offers a small way to recognize and appreciate that effort! We're hoping it serves more as a light prompt or nudge than a financial incentive.

Really appreciate you raising this, though—it’s helpful feedback, and we’ll keep it in mind as we move forward.

Reply
Guy Raveh2
2
0

Israeli-daycared

That's a new one. What does it mean?

Reply
Robi Rahman8
0
0

When a reward or penalty is so small, it is less effective than no incentive at all, sometimes by replacing an implicit incentive.

In the study, the daycare had a problem with parents showing up late to pick up their kids, making the daycare staff stay late to watch them. They tried to fix this problem by implementing a small fine for late pickups, but it had the opposite of the intended effect, because parents decided they were okay with paying the fine.

In this case, if you believe recruiting people to EA does a huge amount of good, you might think that it's very valuable to refer people to EAG, and there should be a big referral bounty.

Reply
Guy Raveh2
0
0

Interesting, I've lived in Haifa my whole life and never heard of it.

Reply
RobertHarling1
0
0

Thanks for your feedback (I lead the EAG team)! We value EAG referrals very highly and are really grateful for anyone who refers someone to us. As discussed in the post, rewards are intended "as small tokens of appreciation, not as financial incentives". We hope they're fun ways to show our appreciation and draw people's attention to the fact that they could be referring people.


We want to make sure we're not trivialising referrals though, and we'll bear this feedback in mind. Are you suggesting it would be better to have no incentive, or a more substantial monetary incentive?

Reply
fish_are_friends*3
2
1

Yeah, I expect that a financial incentive would get more signups, and I even think that no incentive might be better than giving out stickers and other little trinkets.

But what I would actually want are better non-financial incentives. Instead of starting with a sticker and needing 10 referrals to get a t-shirt, 10x the quality of the prizes and have them start at a t-shirt. The prizes are so trivial now that if you think referrals are very valuable, this adds a negligible cost to the program.

Reply
More from Ivan Burduk
35
Announcing EA Global: NYC 2025
2 authors
· · 2m read
0
0
85
[April fool's] EA Global: we're improving 1-on-1s
2 authors
· · 3m read
10
10
66
Review of EA Global Bay Area 2024 (Global Catastrophic Risks)
3 authors
· · 4m read
4
4
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
This work has come out of my Undergraduate dissertation. I haven't shared or discussed these results much before putting this up.  Message me if you'd like the code :) Edit: 16th April. After helpful comments, especially from Geoffrey, I now believe this method only identifies shifts in the happiness scale (not stretches). Have edited to make this clearer. TLDR * Life satisfaction (LS) appears flat over time, despite massive economic growth — the “Easterlin Paradox.” * Some argue that happiness is rising, but we’re reporting it more conservatively — a phenomenon called rescaling. * I test rescaling using long-run German panel data, looking at whether the association between reported happiness and three “get-me-out-of-here” actions (divorce, job resignation, and hospitalisation) changes over time. * If people are getting happier (and rescaling is occuring) the probability of these actions should become less linked to reported LS — but they don’t. * I find little evidence of rescaling. We should probably take self-reported happiness scores at face value. 1. Background: The Happiness Paradox Humans today live longer, richer, and healthier lives in history — yet we seem no seem for it. Self-reported life satisfaction (LS), usually measured on a 0–10 scale, has remained remarkably flatover the last few decades, even in countries like Germany, the UK, China, and India that have experienced huge GDP growth. As Michael Plant has written, the empirical evidence for this is fairly strong. This is the Easterlin Paradox. It is a paradox, because at a point in time, income is strongly linked to happiness, as I've written on the forum before. This should feel uncomfortable for anyone who believes that economic progress should make lives better — including (me) and others in the EA/Progress Studies worlds. Assuming agree on the empirical facts (i.e., self-reported happiness isn't increasing), there are a few potential explanations: * Hedonic adaptation: as life gets
 ·  · 38m read
 · 
In recent months, the CEOs of leading AI companies have grown increasingly confident about rapid progress: * OpenAI's Sam Altman: Shifted from saying in November "the rate of progress continues" to declaring in January "we are now confident we know how to build AGI" * Anthropic's Dario Amodei: Stated in January "I'm more confident than I've ever been that we're close to powerful capabilities... in the next 2-3 years" * Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis: Changed from "as soon as 10 years" in autumn to "probably three to five years away" by January. What explains the shift? Is it just hype? Or could we really have Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)[1] by 2028? In this article, I look at what's driven recent progress, estimate how far those drivers can continue, and explain why they're likely to continue for at least four more years. In particular, while in 2024 progress in LLM chatbots seemed to slow, a new approach started to work: teaching the models to reason using reinforcement learning. In just a year, this let them surpass human PhDs at answering difficult scientific reasoning questions, and achieve expert-level performance on one-hour coding tasks. We don't know how capable AGI will become, but extrapolating the recent rate of progress suggests that, by 2028, we could reach AI models with beyond-human reasoning abilities, expert-level knowledge in every domain, and that can autonomously complete multi-week projects, and progress would likely continue from there.  On this set of software engineering & computer use tasks, in 2020 AI was only able to do tasks that would typically take a human expert a couple of seconds. By 2024, that had risen to almost an hour. If the trend continues, by 2028 it'll reach several weeks.  No longer mere chatbots, these 'agent' models might soon satisfy many people's definitions of AGI — roughly, AI systems that match human performance at most knowledge work (see definition in footnote). This means that, while the compa
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
SUMMARY:  ALLFED is launching an emergency appeal on the EA Forum due to a serious funding shortfall. Without new support, ALLFED will be forced to cut half our budget in the coming months, drastically reducing our capacity to help build global food system resilience for catastrophic scenarios like nuclear winter, a severe pandemic, or infrastructure breakdown. ALLFED is seeking $800,000 over the course of 2025 to sustain its team, continue policy-relevant research, and move forward with pilot projects that could save lives in a catastrophe. As funding priorities shift toward AI safety, we believe resilient food solutions remain a highly cost-effective way to protect the future. If you’re able to support or share this appeal, please visit allfed.info/donate. Donate to ALLFED FULL ARTICLE: I (David Denkenberger) am writing alongside two of my team-mates, as ALLFED’s co-founder, to ask for your support. This is the first time in Alliance to Feed the Earth in Disaster’s (ALLFED’s) 8 year existence that we have reached out on the EA Forum with a direct funding appeal outside of Marginal Funding Week/our annual updates. I am doing so because ALLFED’s funding situation is serious, and because so much of ALLFED’s progress to date has been made possible through the support, feedback, and collaboration of the EA community.  Read our funding appeal At ALLFED, we are deeply grateful to all our supporters, including the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which has provided the majority of our funding for years. At the end of 2024, we learned we would be receiving far less support than expected due to a shift in SFF’s strategic priorities toward AI safety. Without additional funding, ALLFED will need to shrink. I believe the marginal cost effectiveness for improving the future and saving lives of resilience is competitive with AI Safety, even if timelines are short, because of potential AI-induced catastrophes. That is why we are asking people to donate to this emergency appeal
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
45
The CEA Events Team is Hiring for Three Program Lead Positions
OllieBase
· · 3m read
0
0
5
Introducing EA to United World Colleges? (UWC alum here, curious to explore the overlap)
Unwobblypanda
· · 1m read
1
1
16
Call For a University of Minnesota EA Group
Kenneth_Diao
· · 2m read
0
0
View more