What would you teach students in <1 min to prepare them to change the world?

Hello everyone, I'm Hailey and I manage the social content strategy for Khan Academy, one of the world's largest nonprofit EdTech platform providing free Pre-K through college curricula in >50 languages over 140 million users worldwide. You may know us by from our original Youtube channel, but we're now a global organization partnered with school districts across the US, Brazil, and India to try to improve learning outcomes in critical areas. In particular, we are now trying to move the needle on STEM education by accelerating learning in historically-under resourced communities. 

I'm tasked with launching our social content strategy to drive meaningful learning to as many students as possible. I'm trying to conceptualize a TikTok/Youtube Shorts series with advice, tips, lessons etc that will get young learners excited about EA topics. I would love to curate a list of topics from the EA community that you think would give students the best chance of creating a better future.

I think there is a unique opportunity through Khan Academy to drive millions of learners toward the topics that could build a better future, so I'd love to make the most of our social platforms with your insights! If you'd like to connect, feel free to shoot me an email at hailey@khanacademy.org

Comments19


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Hello, Hailey. As a big fan and long-time user of Khan Academy, I'm thrilled to see KA express interest in creating EA-related content! I'll send you an email shortly with some thoughts and suggestions.

I’d recommend concepts from https://conceptually.org/. Should be short enough for TikTok videos!

Thanks! I'm the author of most of the concepts on Conceptually, and also the founder of Non-trivial. I'll send you an email. :)

Going very broad, I'd recommend going through the EA Forum Topics Wiki and considering the concepts included there. Similarly, you may look at the posts that make up the EA Handbook and look for suitable concepts there.

Techniques for reasoning under uncertainty, like Fermi estimates!

Yeah, I support this. Using a tool like https://www.getguesstimate.com/scratchpad  - free scratchpad  that could help late-highschoolers (a) understand that you can make guesses under uncertainty, and how uncertain the result is, and (b) make decisions about their careers using tools. That tool could be demonstrated in a TikTok I reckon.

[anonymous]13
0
0

As a fellow ed tech traveller and big fan of Khan Academy, very excited to see this initiative!

If the goal is to get young learners excited, compelling stories and/or thought experiments can be a good entry point for the format you're thinking of.

None of this is mutually exclusive:


- The drowning child definitely. Showing you don't need to literally save a drowning child to save lives.


- Related - maybe an overall framing about heroism, how much easier it is to be a hero than it seems. This can be a good narrative thread to get the core points of EA thinking across.


- Something from the point of you of an idealistic young student who is undecided about her career choices, giving her different frames to think through her problem. The 80000 hours concept, how much of your life it represents, how a good career can meaningfully contribute those 80000 towards positive outcomes, possibly the earning to give concept as well (but presented as a complement rather than a substitute).


- On longtermism, I find the thought experiment about living every sentient life at the beginning of What We Owe the Future quite moving and motivating to think about the significance of living a moral life. Also the hypothesis that we could stand at the beginning of history is easiest to get across with a visual format such as video.


-Existential risk I'm less sure of how best to approach it. I have some experience doing online trainings (the target audience was adult professionals) on climate change. Even though they were based on solid data stakeholders found them catastrophist... and yet at the end of it learners loved them and from their verbatim feedback it seemed like they were really fired up and motivated to do something.  I'm somewhat confused by this finding, my guess would be you shouldn't wait too long in the video to introduce some kind of hope+actionable plan, it doesn't have to be too specific, but something that doesn't just leave the learner depressed and anxious at the end of it.

I love these recommendations, I think a strong storytelling approach like you mentioned will be very powerful! Bookmarking your ideas to keep in mind for for future content :)

The EA Austin group brainstormed some more ideas. In the order they came up:

  • How many people could exist in the future?
  • Top 10 Ways Humanity Fails To Reach A Star Trek Future
  • Anthropomorphic (Existential/Extinction Risks) are Much Greater than Natural Risks
  • How Do We Know Bed Nets Work?
  • Human Challenge Trials Explained
  • What It's Like To Donate Your Kidney
  • What It's Like To Donate Your Bone Marrow
  • AI Risk Explained in One Minute
  • Hack Your Happiness Scientifically (approaching mediation from a trial and error perspective)
  • 80,000 Hours in your career -- worth spending 1% of that time choosing a career a career to do good
  • Impact matters more than Overhead (when it comes to choosing charities)
  • Cultured Meat Could Prevent A Lot of Animal Suffering
  • Why worry about "Suffering-Risks" -- It'd be very bad if in the future humanity spread some of the bad stuff that happens on Earth today (e.g. extreme animal suffering) across the universe.
  • Explainer videos on e.g. Vitamin A supplementation, deworming, bed bets as malaria prevention, other GiveWell recommended charities
  • Steelman arguments you disagree with (Steelmanning explained)
  • 5 Things More Dangerous Than Donating A Kidney
  • We are in triage every second of every day
  • Opportunity cost - explained (one of the most important concepts in economics)

Woah, love a bunch of these! Especially "How Do We Know Bed Nets Work?"

Neglectedness.

The prior for deprioritizing the topic they keep hearing about in social media.

For example, like this

Changing "is this doing good" (a yes/no question which invites answers like "med tech? yeah that's good!"),

with "how much good is this doing?" or "can we do 100x as much good with the same effort?" (which invites comparing different directions)

Ideas which I assume you're not interested in, but I'll post anyway and tell me if I'm wrong:

  1. Advertising programs like the Atlas Fellowship.
  2. Nudging them away from studying at university as a default don't-think-about-it action
  3. Other generic advice which isn't related to important problems in the world, for example
    1. Productivity
    2. Career
    3. Decision making
    4. Mental health

"There is more than one thing that could destroy the world, so before picking one to work on, let's compare them"

Because lots of people are worried about the world ending already, I think, and this is the nudge I'd add

Read hpmor (full pitch).

How I thought of this ( == what I'm actually trying to solve) : The main value people will get is probably from getting into a community, more than what they'd get from a course of a few hours, by far, I expect. Perhaps you have some other idea on how to do this

General information about people in low-HDI countries to humanize them in the eyes of the viewer.

Similar for animals (except not “humanizing” per se!). Spreading awareness that e.g. pigs act like dogs may be a strong catalyst for caring about animal welfare. Would need to consult an animal welfare activism expert.

My premise here: it is valuable for EAs to viscerally care about others (in addition to cleverly working toward a future that sounds neat).

I like the low-HDI country idea, I've been really taken with something I can't find which gives you a random person and facts about that person [kids, religion, etc], weighted by actual probabilities.

Three related ideas:

The long view -- looking at history from the perspective of someone who has lived for millions or billions of years rather than decades.

This Can't Go On / Limits to Growth -- The economy can't continue to grow at the rate it has for the last several decades for more than 10,000 years. Total compute can't continue to grow at the same rate it has the last several decades for more than 350 years, since the physical limit of the maximum size computer in the observable universe would be reached by then.

This is the Dream Time -- Billions of years from now, if civilization is still around, people will look back on this era of only a few centuries that we are in now as being special and unique.

I'd be happy to help explain how building capacity for responding to abrupt food catastrophes (nuclear winter, volcanic winter, collapse of electricity/industry, etc.) by rapidly increasing food production could help save lives and reduce the chance of civilizational collapse (see ALLFED - Alliance to Feed the Earth in Disasters)

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 11m read
 · 
Does a food carbon tax increase animal deaths and/or the total time of suffering of cows, pigs, chickens, and fish? Theoretically, this is possible, as a carbon tax could lead consumers to substitute, for example, beef with chicken. However, this is not per se the case, as animal products are not perfect substitutes.  I'm presenting the results of my master's thesis in Environmental Economics, which I re-worked and published on SSRN as a pre-print. My thesis develops a model of animal product substitution after a carbon tax, slaughter tax, and a meat tax. When I calibrate[1] this model for the U.S., there is a decrease in animal deaths and duration of suffering following a carbon tax. This suggests that a carbon tax can reduce animal suffering. Key points * Some animal products are carbon-intensive, like beef, but causes relatively few animal deaths or total time of suffering because the animals are large. Other animal products, like chicken, causes relatively many animal deaths or total time of suffering because the animals are small, but cause relatively low greenhouse gas emissions. * A carbon tax will make some animal products, like beef, much more expensive. As a result, people may buy more chicken. This would increase animal suffering, assuming that farm animals suffer. However, this is not per se the case. It is also possible that the direct negative effect of a carbon tax on chicken consumption is stronger than the indirect (positive) substitution effect from carbon-intensive products to chicken. * I developed a non-linear market model to predict the consumption of different animal products after a tax, based on own-price and cross-price elasticities. * When calibrated for the United States, this model predicts a decrease in the consumption of all animal products considered (beef, chicken, pork, and farmed fish). Therefore, the modelled carbon tax is actually good for animal welfare, assuming that animals live net-negative lives. * A slaughter tax (a
MarieF🔸
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Summary * After >2 years at Hi-Med, I have decided to step down from my role. * This allows me to complete my medical residency for long-term career resilience, whilst still allowing part-time flexibility for direct charity work. It also allows me to donate more again. * Hi-Med is now looking to appoint its next Executive Director; the application deadline is 26 January 2025. * I will join Hi-Med’s governing board once we have appointed the next Executive Director. Before the role When I graduated from medical school in 2017, I had already started to give 10% of my income to effective charities, but I was unsure as to how I could best use my medical degree to make this world a better place. After dipping my toe into nonprofit fundraising (with Doctors Without Borders) and working in a medical career-related start-up to upskill, a talk given by Dixon Chibanda at EAG London 2018 deeply inspired me. I formed a rough plan to later found an organisation that would teach Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-specific psychotherapeutic techniques to lay people to make evidence-based treatment of PTSD scalable. I started my medical residency in psychosomatic medicine in 2019, working for a specialised clinic for PTSD treatment until 2021, then rotated to child and adolescent psychiatry for a year and was half a year into the continuation of my specialisation training at a third hospital, when Akhil Bansal, whom I met at a recent EAG in London, reached out and encouraged me to apply for the ED position at Hi-Med - an organisation that I knew through my participation in their introductory fellowship (an academic paper about the outcomes of this first cohort can be found here). I seized the opportunity, applied, was offered the position, and started working full-time in November 2022.  During the role I feel truly privileged to have had the opportunity to lead High Impact Medicine for the past two years. My learning curve was steep - there were so many new things to
Ozzie Gooen
 ·  · 9m read
 · 
We’re releasing Squiggle AI, a tool that generates probabilistic models using the Squiggle language. This can provide early cost-effectiveness models and other kinds of probabilistic programs. No prior Squiggle knowledge is required to use Squiggle AI. Simply ask for whatever you want to estimate, and the results should be fairly understandable. The Squiggle programming language acts as an adjustable backend, but isn’t mandatory to learn. Beyond being directly useful, we’re interested in Squiggle AI as an experiment in epistemic reasoning with LLMs. We hope it will help highlight potential strengths, weaknesses, and directions for the field. Screenshots The “Playground” view after it finishes a successful workflow. Form on the left, code in the middle, code output on the right.The “Steps” page. Shows all of the steps that the workflow went through, next to the form on the left. For each, shows a simplified view of recent messages to and from the LLM. Motivation Organizations in the effective altruism and rationalist communities regularly rely on cost-effectiveness analyses and fermi estimates to guide their decisions. QURI's mission is to make these probabilistic tools more accessible and reliable for altruistic causes. However, our experience with tools like Squiggle and Guesstimate has revealed a significant challenge: even highly skilled domain experts frequently struggle with the basic programming requirements and often make errors in their models. This suggests a need for alternative approaches. Language models seem particularly well-suited to address these difficulties. Fermi estimates typically follow straightforward patterns and rely on common assumptions, making them potentially ideal candidates for LLM assistance. Previous direct experiments with Claude and ChatGPT alone proved insufficient, but with substantial iteration, we've developed a framework that significantly improves the output quality and user experience. We're focusing specifically on
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism