Hide table of contents

TL;DR: “More posts like this one” recommendations at the bottom of posts, design changes to the Frontpage and to feature better info on users’ profiles, and more.

A longer summary:

We’re trialling recommendations at the end of posts as a way to help you find content that is more suited to your interests. This will only appear for a small fraction of users currently, but you can opt in if you want to try it (see below).

On the design side, we have made a few changes to give more context on other users. We have started showing more info about authors (including profile images!) when you hover over their username. We have also added cute little icons next to the names of new users and post authors in the comments of their posts.

It's been a while since our last feature update, so there are a fair few other changes to go through.

Recommendations at the end of posts

Currently on the Forum it's somewhat hard to find high quality posts that are relevant to your specific interests. The Frontpage is weighted by recency + karma, which tends to mainly surface new posts that everyone likes. Topic filters[1] help with this to an extent but:

  1. Not that many people use them
  2. You may not know ahead of time exactly which topics you will be interested in

We are trying to solve this in the only way tech companies know how: with a recommendation algorithm. We’re trying this out on post pages at first because the majority of the traffic to the Forum is direct to posts, and currently there isn’t an obvious “next thing to read” once you have finished the one post.

This is being trialled for 10% of users initially. If you would like to opt in[2] you can go to this page and select "Recommendations on the posts page" in the final dropdown. We expect to make a version of this live for everyone soon.

The recommendations box we have added at the bottom of the page looks like this:

The recommendations chosen are similar posts that you haven’t read before, the main factors that go into selecting these are:

  • Being upvoted by the same users that upvoted the post you are on
  • Being tagged with the same topics
  • Karma

Design changes

Context on other users: icons by usernames and new profile hover previews

We have cleaned up and added more info to the preview of the user’s profile that appears when you hover over someone's name, including showing their profile image:

And we added these icons for new users (the green sprout) and the author of the post you are reading (the grey person-with-quill icon):

The two changes here are aimed at giving you more context on other users when you are casually scrolling around the Forum, and generally making the Forum seem (slightly) more friendly.

Frontpage changes (shortform!)

We have added a section for shortform posts to the Frontpage and simplified the “Classic posts” section (formerly called “Recommendations”):

Shortform has been a somewhat sidelined feature for a long time. Some people do use it and I think the things they post are great. But it was (and still is) relatively hard to find. We are experimenting with more changes to give shortform more prominence in the near future.

We also found that the “Recommendations” section was not being used much. We have simplified it, renamed it to "Classic posts" (which is closer to what it actually is), and hidden it by default for logged-in users (you can bring it back by toggling the arrow in the heading for that section).

A brief update on “Community” posts

A big theme of the previous few updates was that we were thinking about what to do with "Community" posts. Community posts tend to get systematically more karma (for reasons discussed here), which means that when they’re on the Frontpage together with other posts, they will crowd the other posts out whether people want to read those or not. People have also reported getting sucked into reading discussions on Community posts when they didn’t endorse this. We had moved them to a separate section, and later collapsed this section and removed comments on Community posts from the Recent Discussion feed under the Frontpage to try to address this.

Since then, the relative amount of engagement on community posts has gone down a lot from the peaks it had reached over the previous few months, possibly due to our change or possibly due to a natural lull in community discussions. We're not sure this is the best long-term solution though. Personally, many of my favourite posts of all time are community posts, and I’m a bit sad to see that they are now getting less attention.

We have added community posts with under 10 comments back into the "Recent discussion" feed as a way to try and keep community discussion as a central part of the Forum without it getting out of hand, and we may make some more changes in this direction in the near future. We're very interested in any thoughts you might have about this.

A separate site for bots

We have an open API on the Forum, and people can and do set up bots to scrape the site for various reasons. This has been causing a few performance issues recently (and in fact for a fairly long time), so we have set up a separate environment for bots to use. This is exactly the same as the regular Forum, with all the same data, just running on different servers: https://forum-bots.effectivealtruism.org/

Shortly after this is posted we’ll start blocking bots from the main site and redirecting them to this site instead.

If you live in the UK or EU[3] you will now have to explicitly accept the use of cookies. This enables a few things, such as google analytics and remembering whether you have toggled various sections open or closed. You can read our full cookie policy here.

Assorted other changes

  • There is a rudimentary read history page(!) which shows the most recent posts you have clicked on
  • Comments on posts are now sorted by “new & upvoted” by default (rather than “top”)
  • Footnotes will now be collapsed if there are more than 3 of them
  • Lots of other design tweaks:
    • The top of core topic pages have been redesigned
    • The comment box is now a lot simpler
    • Buttons are now in sentence case rather than upper case

Please give us your feedback

We’re always interested in getting feedback on the changes we make! You can comment on this post with your thoughts or contact us another way.

  1. ^

     The “customize feed” button on the frontpage — see more here.

  2. ^

    This footnote is only here to be used as a link

  3. ^

     If you saw it outside these places, then I’m sorry

Comments6


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

I would suggest keeping the recommended posts optional. I like them a lot, but I worry they might keep me on the forum too long. They can definitely be on by default.

Thanks for the suggestion! We'll add a user setting for this 👍

We have an open API on the Forum, and people can and do set up bots to scrape the site for various reasons. This has been causing a few performance issues recently (and in fact for a fairly long time), so we have set up a separate environment for bots to use. This is exactly the same as the regular Forum, with all the same data, just running on different servers: https://forum-bots.effectivealtruism.org/

Also for the /graphql endpoint? Anyways, moved forum.nunosempere.com to that endpoint. But I'd expect this to be a small burden to others running their own stuff.

Yes this applies to all requests including /graphql. If the user agent of the request matches a known bot we will return a redirect to the forum-bots site. Some libraries (such as python requests and fetch in javascript) automatically follow redirects so hopefully some things will magically keep working, but this is not guaranteed.

I appreciate that this is annoying, and we didn't really want to do it. But the site was being taken down by bots (for a few minutes) almost every day a couple of weeks ago so we finally felt this was necessary.

Following up on this: we've expanded the Community section on the Frontpage to show 5 posts instead of 3. Nothing else should have changed with this section right now. 

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 32m read
 · 
Summary Immediate skin-to-skin contact (SSC) between mothers and newborns and early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF) may play a significant and underappreciated role in reducing neonatal mortality. These practices are distinct in important ways from more broadly recognized (and clearly impactful) interventions like kangaroo care and exclusive breastfeeding, and they are recommended for both preterm and full-term infants. A large evidence base indicates that immediate SSC and EIBF substantially reduce neonatal mortality. Many randomized trials show that immediate SSC promotes EIBF, reduces episodes of low blood sugar, improves temperature regulation, and promotes cardiac and respiratory stability. All of these effects are linked to lower mortality, and the biological pathways between immediate SSC, EIBF, and reduced mortality are compelling. A meta-analysis of large observational studies found a 25% lower risk of mortality in infants who began breastfeeding within one hour of birth compared to initiation after one hour. These practices are attractive targets for intervention, and promoting them is effective. Immediate SSC and EIBF require no commodities, are under the direct influence of birth attendants, are time-bound to the first hour after birth, are consistent with international guidelines, and are appropriate for universal promotion. Their adoption is often low, but ceilings are demonstrably high: many low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) have rates of EIBF less than 30%, yet several have rates over 70%. Multiple studies find that health worker training and quality improvement activities dramatically increase rates of immediate SSC and EIBF. There do not appear to be any major actors focused specifically on promotion of universal immediate SSC and EIBF. By contrast, general breastfeeding promotion and essential newborn care training programs are relatively common. More research on cost-effectiveness is needed, but it appears promising. Limited existing
Ben_West🔸
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
> Summary: We propose measuring AI performance in terms of the length of tasks AI agents can complete. We show that this metric has been consistently exponentially increasing over the past 6 years, with a doubling time of around 7 months. Extrapolating this trend predicts that, in under a decade, we will see AI agents that can independently complete a large fraction of software tasks that currently take humans days or weeks. > > The length of tasks (measured by how long they take human professionals) that generalist frontier model agents can complete autonomously with 50% reliability has been doubling approximately every 7 months for the last 6 years. The shaded region represents 95% CI calculated by hierarchical bootstrap over task families, tasks, and task attempts. > > Full paper | Github repo Blogpost; tweet thread. 
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
For immediate release: April 1, 2025 OXFORD, UK — The Centre for Effective Altruism (CEA) announced today that it will no longer identify as an "Effective Altruism" organization.  "After careful consideration, we've determined that the most effective way to have a positive impact is to deny any association with Effective Altruism," said a CEA spokesperson. "Our mission remains unchanged: to use reason and evidence to do the most good. Which coincidentally was the definition of EA." The announcement mirrors a pattern of other organizations that have grown with EA support and frameworks and eventually distanced themselves from EA. CEA's statement clarified that it will continue to use the same methodologies, maintain the same team, and pursue identical goals. "We've found that not being associated with the movement we have spent years building gives us more flexibility to do exactly what we were already doing, just with better PR," the spokesperson explained. "It's like keeping all the benefits of a community while refusing to contribute to its future development or taking responsibility for its challenges. Win-win!" In a related announcement, CEA revealed plans to rename its annual EA Global conference to "Coincidental Gathering of Like-Minded Individuals Who Mysteriously All Know Each Other But Definitely Aren't Part of Any Specific Movement Conference 2025." When asked about concerns that this trend might be pulling up the ladder for future projects that also might benefit from the infrastructure of the effective altruist community, the spokesperson adjusted their "I Heart Consequentialism" tie and replied, "Future projects? I'm sorry, but focusing on long-term movement building would be very EA of us, and as we've clearly established, we're not that anymore." Industry analysts predict that by 2026, the only entities still identifying as "EA" will be three post-rationalist bloggers, a Discord server full of undergraduate philosophy majors, and one person at
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
47
Ivan Burduk
· · 2m read