Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by PeterSlattery
3 min read 3

26

CommunityBuilding effective altruismNewslettersEffective altruism groups
Frontpage

[These are some quickly written thoughts in response to this comment. I would welcome any tips or feedback and can expand the information provided if asked]

Why create a newsletter?

Newsletters are often an efficient way to disseminate new information about a project or community, e.g., new research, events or opportunities. 

Newsletters can engage groups of people who are interested in a more mainstream topic (e.g., behaviour science) while subtly introducing them to EA. 

Making a newsletter can be fun: I personally enjoy reading about new research and ideas in my areas of interest.

Being a knowledge broker is undervalued in the EA community. 

How long does it take to set up?

I probably spent about 20-50 hours setting up the EA Behavioral Science Newsletter. With this guide, that would probably have been closer to 10 hours or maybe less. 

A lot of my time setting this up was spent talking with people and coordinating. Those set up costs may not apply in other cases.

How long does it take to do each edition?

I have volunteers to help, so it is hard to estimate time commitments. Alone, I think I could probably produce a ‘good’ edition with 5-10 hours of work and a passable one in about 3-5 hours (all depends on what resources are accessible or shared).

Together, I’d estimate that the whole team probably puts in about 20 hours of work per quarterly edition.

How do I create a newsletter?

What platform should I use?

I recommend MailerLite. Sam Salzar who is something of an expert at growing newsletters recommended it. It is free up to 1000 subscribers, you can add as many admins as you want, and it is very easy to set up and manage.

What headings should I use?

I suggest that you rework the structure of one or more of the existing newsletter templates. Here is what we use for the EA Behavioral Science Newsletter.

🏡 Join our community

📚 Summary

📖 Publications

📝 Preprints & articles

💬 Forum posts

🎧/🎦 Audio-visual

💰 Funding

💼 Jobs & volunteering

🗓 Events

👨‍🔬 Researcher profile

🏡 Join our community

Creators:

Previous editions:

What is the basic process?

The process for the EA Behavioral Science Newsletter is: (content) curation, (newsletter) creation, feedback, finishing and promotion. This starts about one month out from when each quarterly edition is due. 

I think that starting with quarterly editions is a relatively low effort way to test if the newsletter has a good enough ROI to sustain. You can always increase the frequency in the future.

What do I need to create to support that process?

Here are some templates from the  EA Behavioral Science Newsletter. I can share the forms with you if you want to create copies.

  • A form to find volunteers to help with various roles
  • An overall working document, that you can share with new people to onboard them This outlines/curates, for instance:
    • Project values
      • Efficient
      • Limiting communication overheads
      • Fast and simple decision-making
      • Lean/ iterative
      • Fun/ beneficial
      • Honest/ transparent
    • Roles and responsibilities
      • Four roles (curation, creation, feedback, and promotion) and responsibilities
    • Templates and resources to use as part of these roles.
    • The process
      • curation, creation, feedback, finishing and promoting
  • A form to subscribe to the newsletter (you can easily upload the spreadsheet output)
  • A form for volunteer’s feedback 
  • A form for submitting content/feedback 
  • A landing page/Sign-up page (built with help from Markus Amalthea Magnuson and  Sam Salzar)
    • You don’t need this to start (you can just use the form) but it will help over time. It is mainly useful if you have a website that you want to advertise on.
    • I can share this with you if you build/built your site on Webflow (which I weakly encourage if you are non-technical).

I also recommend that you make and share a rough plan for 

  • testing the hypothesis that a newsletter is useful in your area
  • your responses to the results from your test (e.g., will you wind it down if it less popular than you expect? How/when will you scale if it is popular?).
  • How to coordinate: I use the working doc, forms and email to keep it simple.

Questions/follow-ups

Please let me know if you have any questions. 


 

26

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Mentioned in

More posts like this

Comments3


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Alexandre Mouchel3
0
0

Hey! Thank you for your post! For those of you who are not afraid of coding a little bit, I suggest you to use Mautic (https://www.mautic.org/) and Amazon SES. It is way cheaper than subscribing a plan to MailerLite or Mailchimp for example if you have a lot of subscribers. Moreover, it allows you to create automations for introducing new subscribers to your organization , your thoughts or your research, without having to send mails manually.

Reply
PeterSlattery2
0
0

Thanks for sharing Alex!

Reply
PeterSlattery2
0
0

Revisiting this to share with someone and wanted to mention that I probably wouldn't use Mailer Lite to create a newsletter now. Instead, I would probably use Substack.

Reply
More from PeterSlattery
47
Public Comment Invited on Artificial Intelligence Action Plan
PeterSlattery
· · 1m read
0
0
119
Google Scholar is now listing (some) EA Forum posts
PeterSlattery
· · 1m read
15
15
72
Part 1: The AI Safety community has four main work groups, Strategy, Governance, Technical and Movement Building
PeterSlattery
· · 8m read
7
7
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 38m read
 · 
In recent months, the CEOs of leading AI companies have grown increasingly confident about rapid progress: * OpenAI's Sam Altman: Shifted from saying in November "the rate of progress continues" to declaring in January "we are now confident we know how to build AGI" * Anthropic's Dario Amodei: Stated in January "I'm more confident than I've ever been that we're close to powerful capabilities... in the next 2-3 years" * Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis: Changed from "as soon as 10 years" in autumn to "probably three to five years away" by January. What explains the shift? Is it just hype? Or could we really have Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)[1] by 2028? In this article, I look at what's driven recent progress, estimate how far those drivers can continue, and explain why they're likely to continue for at least four more years. In particular, while in 2024 progress in LLM chatbots seemed to slow, a new approach started to work: teaching the models to reason using reinforcement learning. In just a year, this let them surpass human PhDs at answering difficult scientific reasoning questions, and achieve expert-level performance on one-hour coding tasks. We don't know how capable AGI will become, but extrapolating the recent rate of progress suggests that, by 2028, we could reach AI models with beyond-human reasoning abilities, expert-level knowledge in every domain, and that can autonomously complete multi-week projects, and progress would likely continue from there.  On this set of software engineering & computer use tasks, in 2020 AI was only able to do tasks that would typically take a human expert a couple of seconds. By 2024, that had risen to almost an hour. If the trend continues, by 2028 it'll reach several weeks.  No longer mere chatbots, these 'agent' models might soon satisfy many people's definitions of AGI — roughly, AI systems that match human performance at most knowledge work (see definition in footnote). This means that, while the compa
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
SUMMARY:  ALLFED is launching an emergency appeal on the EA Forum due to a serious funding shortfall. Without new support, ALLFED will be forced to cut half our budget in the coming months, drastically reducing our capacity to help build global food system resilience for catastrophic scenarios like nuclear winter, a severe pandemic, or infrastructure breakdown. ALLFED is seeking $800,000 over the course of 2025 to sustain its team, continue policy-relevant research, and move forward with pilot projects that could save lives in a catastrophe. As funding priorities shift toward AI safety, we believe resilient food solutions remain a highly cost-effective way to protect the future. If you’re able to support or share this appeal, please visit allfed.info/donate. Donate to ALLFED FULL ARTICLE: I (David Denkenberger) am writing alongside two of my team-mates, as ALLFED’s co-founder, to ask for your support. This is the first time in Alliance to Feed the Earth in Disaster’s (ALLFED’s) 8 year existence that we have reached out on the EA Forum with a direct funding appeal outside of Marginal Funding Week/our annual updates. I am doing so because ALLFED’s funding situation is serious, and because so much of ALLFED’s progress to date has been made possible through the support, feedback, and collaboration of the EA community.  Read our funding appeal At ALLFED, we are deeply grateful to all our supporters, including the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which has provided the majority of our funding for years. At the end of 2024, we learned we would be receiving far less support than expected due to a shift in SFF’s strategic priorities toward AI safety. Without additional funding, ALLFED will need to shrink. I believe the marginal cost effectiveness for improving the future and saving lives of resilience is competitive with AI Safety, even if timelines are short, because of potential AI-induced catastrophes. That is why we are asking people to donate to this emergency appeal
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
We’ve written a new report on the threat of AI-enabled coups.  I think this is a very serious risk – comparable in importance to AI takeover but much more neglected.  In fact, AI-enabled coups and AI takeover have pretty similar threat models. To see this, here’s a very basic threat model for AI takeover: 1. Humanity develops superhuman AI 2. Superhuman AI is misaligned and power-seeking 3. Superhuman AI seizes power for itself And now here’s a closely analogous threat model for AI-enabled coups: 1. Humanity develops superhuman AI 2. Superhuman AI is controlled by a small group 3. Superhuman AI seizes power for the small group While the report focuses on the risk that someone seizes power over a country, I think that similar dynamics could allow someone to take over the world. In fact, if someone wanted to take over the world, their best strategy might well be to first stage an AI-enabled coup in the United States (or whichever country leads on superhuman AI), and then go from there to world domination. A single person taking over the world would be really bad. I’ve previously argued that it might even be worse than AI takeover. [1] The concrete threat models for AI-enabled coups that we discuss largely translate like-for-like over to the risk of AI takeover.[2] Similarly, there’s a lot of overlap in the mitigations that help with AI-enabled coups and AI takeover risk — e.g. alignment audits to ensure no human has made AI secretly loyal to them, transparency about AI capabilities, monitoring AI activities for suspicious behaviour, and infosecurity to prevent insiders from tampering with training.  If the world won't slow down AI development based on AI takeover risk (e.g. because there’s isn’t strong evidence for misalignment), then advocating for a slow down based on the risk of AI-enabled coups might be more convincing and achieve many of the same goals.  I really want to encourage readers — especially those at labs or governments — to do something
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
45
The CEA Events Team is Hiring for Three Program Lead Positions
OllieBase
· · 3m read
0
0
15
Call For a University of Minnesota EA Group
Kenneth_Diao
· · 2m read
0
0
49
EA Global Referral Program
Ivan Burduk
· · 2m read
8
8
View more