Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
NickLaing11
3
1

Why not consultants for shrimpact?

Reply
SarahPomeranz6
0
0
2

It was a top contender!

Reply
See in context
by Consultants For Impact, SarahPomeranz, Edmo_Gamelin
5 min read 6

52

Building effective altruismCareer choiceCommunityAnnouncements and updatesConsultants for ImpactHiringOrganization updates
Frontpage

Summary

After spending the past 5 years advising hundreds of consultants on how to optimize their career and donations for impact, seeding EA workplace groups within McKinsey, BCG, Bain, and beyond, and supporting 30+ career transitions, the EA Consulting Network is evolving into Consultants for Impact. We’re excited to continue helping high-impact teams and consulting talent to find each other!

About Consultants for Impact

Since 2019, Consultants for Impact (formerly the Effective Altruism Consulting Network) has been dedicated to supporting current, former, and prospective consultants in strategically optimizing the social impact of their careers.

We do this by:

  • Prioritizing consultants who are highly committed to impact and are at career inflection points: We identify consultants who we believe are well-placed to have a high-impact career and support them with Career Conversations, introductions, retreats, and curated opportunities.
  • Inspiring significant action by amplifying those who led by example: We emphasize the importance of high-impact work to business consultants and amplify motivating stories of former consultants engaged in direct work to make less common impact-oriented career paths feel tangible and socially viable.
  • Connecting consultants to meaningful and analytically driven work: We strive to outcompete other consulting exit-career paths by connecting our members with career opportunities that are more value-aligned than typical business roles and more skill-aligned (problem-solving focused, analytical, fast-paced, etc.) than typical social impact oriented roles.

Why Focus on Consultants?

We believe that business and strategy consultants have an outsized potential for professional impact as a talent pool, as supported by:

  • Demand for Consulting Skills: We’ve heard from hiring managers at EA organizations that they are bottlenecked for talent with strong management, strategic, and operational capabilities (i.e. EA Community Survey (MCF 2023), 2019 Talent Gap Survey), skills that consultants disproportionately possess.
  • Pre-vetted Talent: Strategy consulting is a very competitive field, with a demanding process of business case interviews and sometimes additional tests of decision-making and general intelligence. Firms often have over 100 applicants per place and the largest firms expend significant resources in their recruitment processes.
  • Desire for Career Changes: The churn in consulting is comparatively high and as such many candidates are eager to identify their next career move after only one or two years in their role. Given the relatively short tenure of the average consultant, Consultants for Impact can leverage the steady stream of trained and talented folks, often a few years out of university, and support them in building longer career paths to impact.
  • Track Record of Consultants in EA: Many successful senior EAs are former consultants (ex. Habiba Banu, Rob Gledhill, Zach Robinson, Paige Henchen) and we’ve already seen our hypothesis validated by the 30+ consultants whose career transitions into high-impact roles we’ve supported.  

Evolution to Consultants for Impact

We are evolving into Consultants for Impact because we believe this new brand will better enable us to achieve our mission. Our new name gives us greater brand independence and control and provides a more professional presentation. It also enhances our capacity to accurately reflect the diverse philosophical frameworks (including, but not exclusively, Effective Altruism) that can benefit our work. We are excited about this transition and believe it will enable us to better support and inspire consultants dedicated to making a significant social impact.

Our Programs

Since hiring a full-time team member in 2022, we’ve focused on experimenting to find highly impactful and cost-effective programs to optimally support our talented audience in exploring their values and identifying their professional path to impact.

In 2024, based on promising early results and positive feedback, we are excited to continue:

  • Conducting 1-1 Career Conversations: We offer structured, one-on-one career plan development and support calls with current, former, and prospective consultants considering how to have a higher impact in their careers. These conversations often include relevant introductions post-call.
  • Hosting weekend-long retreats: Designed for current consultants actively exploring a pivot into higher-impact work, these retreats feature former consultant speakers, cause prioritization workshops, relationship building, and personalized career planning.
  • Providing curated talent referrals: For especially promising roles and organizations, we work with hiring managers to offer custom referrals and introductions to Consultants for Impact members who are most likely to fit.
  • Sending out our bi-weekly Job Blast: Our Job Blast features the top 10 high-impact roles we believe consultants could be an especially good fit for.
  • Advising leaders of value-aligned Workplace Groups: We coordinate and support impact-driven communities within top strategy and management consulting firms (e.g., McKinsey, Bain, BCG, Accenture) to launch initiatives and support each other’s career journeys.
  • Creating custom resources: We develop tailored materials such as giving guides and career reflection templates to help consultants navigate their journey towards higher-impact careers.

We’re excited to continue experimenting with our programming to find even better ways to support our consultants. Stay tuned, as we plan to pilot a new initiative later this year.

Our Progress

Since our founding, we have:

  • Provided 1-1 support to 500+ consultants through our Career Conversations program
  • Facilitated 1,500+ professional introductions for our members
  • Meaningfully supported 30+ of our members’ transitions into high-impact careers
  • Seeded and supported active workplace groups at 10 top consulting firms
  • Supported high-impact organizations in finding candidates for 70+ hiring rounds

We’re Excited to Support You!

For Consultants

As we transition to Consultants for Impact, we invite you to explore how you can optimize your career for greater social impact. Apply for a Career Conversation to receive tailored guidance and support. If you know other consultants passionate about making a difference, encourage them to check out our website and consider applying themselves.

For EA Org Team Leaders and Recruiters

If you are hiring, have a low bar for reaching out to us to find top-tier candidates. We provide curated talent referrals, connecting you with consultants who are not only highly skilled but also deeply committed to making a positive social impact. Check out our website to learn more about the types of work we think consultants can be especially useful.

For Community Members

Help us spread the word about our rebrand to Consultants for Impact. If you know any consultants in your network, share our website and resources with them. Additionally, if you're chatting with someone in the ecosystem looking to hire, we’d appreciate you letting them know about our referral services.

__________________________________________________

We want to extend our heartfelt thanks to everyone who has helped bring Consultants for Impact to where it is today. To the founding members of the Effective Altruism Consulting Network, your vision laid the foundation for our journey. 

We are grateful for the brand evolution support from Jane Julian, Kate Rodman, @Amber Dawn, @James Odene [User-Friendly], Jennifer Ipsen, Emily Dardaman, our strategic advisory board members Paige Henchen, @David Nash, @Anneke Pogarell, and Lauren, and our fiscal sponsor @Rethink Priorities. 

Thank you to the countless individuals who provided feedback and input throughout this process. Most importantly, we thank every consultant who has dedicated their career to the goal of making the world a better place. Your commitment inspires us and drives our mission forward. Together, we are poised to make an even greater impact.

 

52

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments6


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
JWS 🔸32
9
6

I think this is a great initiative, and the new website looks great! I do, however, want to raise something (even if I'm afraid to be seen as 'that guy' on the Forum):

We are evolving into Consultants for Impact because we believe this new brand will better enable us to achieve our mission. Our new name gives us greater brand independence and control and provides a more professional presentation. It also enhances our capacity to accurately reflect the diverse philosophical frameworks (including, but not exclusively, Effective Altruism) that can benefit our work. We are excited about this transition and believe it will enable us to better support and inspire consultants dedicated to making a significant social impact.

Maybe this is me over-reacting, but it seems to imply 'we used to have EA in our name, but now EA is a toxic brand, so we removed it to avoid negative association'. If instead it's just because the new is more professional / just a better name then disregard my comment, but it's not what you wrote in the post.

There are still EA fingerprints, in terms of people, associated orgs, values and even language all over the website, but almost no mention of EA or the phrase 'Effective Altruism' at all.[1] I also think Effective Altruism does/can/should accomodate a set of 'diverse philosophical frameworks' and can still call itself EA. 

My fear is that people who are still reasonably thought of as EA[2] start to dissassociate from it, leaving only the most hardcore/weird/core people to hold the brand in an evaporative cooling dynamic (there was on discussion on a now-sadly-deleted post about this where someone shared their reasons for leaving EA which to me seemed to fit this dynamic, my response is here) which damages the movement, the organisation, and its aims, and which is mostly unnecessary if driven by roughly the same set of moral values and empirical beliefs.

  1. ^

    I wouldn't necessarily call this misleading, but I think the people CFI is going for would probably be smart enough to figure out the connection with some googling

  2. ^

    Very much 'EA-in-ideas' not 'EA-got-funded-by-OpenPhil' or 'EA-went-to-the-right-parties' or 'EA-has-lots-of-Forum-karma'

Reply
SarahPomeranz7
1
0
1

Thank you both for taking the time to read through our post and engage with us on this milestone! You’ve raised important questions that I’m happy to speak to briefly here.

@JWS: EACN was founded as a community-building project for consultants whose primary goal was introducing them to EA ideas. Over the years we’ve evolved into a talent development organization with a theory of change centered around helping organizations find great hires and consultants find high-impact roles. “Consultants for Impact” represents who we are and what we do, and helps us establish a broader entry point for our audience. The new brand also provides greater flexibility in messaging, tone, and visual design, which we’ve found to be quite useful. 

@Bella: We expect to evolve our thinking over the next 12 months and are currently exploring integrating insights from, eg., Ikegai and Flow Theory – hoping to land somewhere a bit more pluralistic than we had been before. We resonate with this piece by Peter Wildeford on focusing on the ideas, and are likely to continue having significant overlap with 80k/Probably Good on cause prioritization and career choice recommendations, although we may diverge in the future. Consultants for Impact’s core guiding principles, which we don’t expect to change, are included here. 

Reply
Bella7
1
0

One relevant question, I think, is "in practice, will Consultants For Impact discuss, center, or create programming around anything from the diverse philosophical frameworks specifically outside EA?"

Reply
NickLaing11
3
1

Why not consultants for shrimpact?

Reply
SarahPomeranz6
0
0
2

It was a top contender!

Reply
SummaryBot2
1
0

Executive summary: The EA Consulting Network has rebranded as Consultants for Impact to better support consultants in optimizing their careers for social impact through programs like career conversations, retreats, job referrals, and workplace groups.

Key points:

  1. Consultants for Impact (formerly EA Consulting Network) helps consultants maximize their career impact through career advice, networking, and job opportunities.
  2. Consultants are an important talent pool due to their in-demand skills, pre-vetted abilities, and desire for career changes.
  3. The rebrand to Consultants for Impact allows greater brand independence and a more professional presentation to inspire consultants from diverse philosophical frameworks.
  4. Key programs include 1-1 career conversations, weekend retreats, curated job referrals, a bi-weekly job blast, advising workplace groups, and creating custom resources.
  5. Consultants for Impact has supported over 500 consultants, made 1500+ introductions, facilitated 30+ career transitions, and helped fill 70+ roles at high-impact organizations.
  6. Consultants, EA org team leaders, recruiters, and community members are encouraged to engage with Consultants for Impact to optimize talent matching and career impact.

 

 

This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, and contact us if you have feedback.

Reply
Curated and popular this week
jackva
 ·  · 3m read
 · 
 [Edits on March 10th for clarity, two sub-sections added] Watching what is happening in the world -- with lots of renegotiation of institutional norms within Western democracies and a parallel fracturing of the post-WW2 institutional order -- I do think we, as a community, should more seriously question our priors on the relative value of surgical/targeted and broad system-level interventions. Speaking somewhat roughly, with EA as a movement coming of age in an era where democratic institutions and the rule-based international order were not fundamentally questioned, it seems easy to underestimate how much the world is currently changing and how much riskier a world of stronger institutional and democratic backsliding and weakened international norms might be. Of course, working on these issues might be intractable and possibly there's nothing highly effective for EAs to do on the margin given much attention to these issues from society at large. So, I am not here to confidently state we should be working on these issues more. But I do think in a situation of more downside risk with regards to broad system-level changes and significantly more fluidity, it seems at least worth rigorously asking whether we should shift more attention to work that is less surgical (working on specific risks) and more systemic (working on institutional quality, indirect risk factors, etc.). While there have been many posts along those lines over the past months and there are of course some EA organizations working on these issues, it stil appears like a niche focus in the community and none of the major EA and EA-adjacent orgs (including the one I work for, though I am writing this in a personal capacity) seem to have taken it up as a serious focus and I worry it might be due to baked-in assumptions about the relative value of such work that are outdated in a time where the importance of systemic work has changed in the face of greater threat and fluidity. When the world seems to
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Forethought[1] is a new AI macrostrategy research group cofounded by Max Dalton, Will MacAskill, Tom Davidson, and Amrit Sidhu-Brar. We are trying to figure out how to navigate the (potentially rapid) transition to a world with superintelligent AI systems. We aim to tackle the most important questions we can find, unrestricted by the current Overton window. More details on our website. Why we exist We think that AGI might come soon (say, modal timelines to mostly-automated AI R&D in the next 2-8 years), and might significantly accelerate technological progress, leading to many different challenges. We don’t yet have a good understanding of what this change might look like or how to navigate it. Society is not prepared. Moreover, we want the world to not just avoid catastrophe: we want to reach a really great future. We think about what this might be like (incorporating moral uncertainty), and what we can do, now, to build towards a good future. Like all projects, this started out with a plethora of Google docs. We ran a series of seminars to explore the ideas further, and that cascaded into an organization. This area of work feels to us like the early days of EA: we’re exploring unusual, neglected ideas, and finding research progress surprisingly tractable. And while we start out with (literally) galaxy-brained schemes, they often ground out into fairly specific and concrete ideas about what should happen next. Of course, we’re bringing principles like scope sensitivity, impartiality, etc to our thinking, and we think that these issues urgently need more morally dedicated and thoughtful people working on them. Research Research agendas We are currently pursuing the following perspectives: * Preparing for the intelligence explosion: If AI drives explosive growth there will be an enormous number of challenges we have to face. In addition to misalignment risk and biorisk, this potentially includes: how to govern the development of new weapons of mass destr
Sam Anschell
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
*Disclaimer* I am writing this post in a personal capacity; the opinions I express are my own and do not represent my employer. I think that more people and orgs (especially nonprofits) should consider negotiating the cost of sizable expenses. In my experience, there is usually nothing to lose by respectfully asking to pay less, and doing so can sometimes save thousands or tens of thousands of dollars per hour. This is because negotiating doesn’t take very much time[1], savings can persist across multiple years, and counterparties can be surprisingly generous with discounts. Here are a few examples of expenses that may be negotiable: For organizations * Software or news subscriptions * Of 35 corporate software and news providers I’ve negotiated with, 30 have been willing to provide discounts. These discounts range from 10% to 80%, with an average of around 40%. * Leases * A friend was able to negotiate a 22% reduction in the price per square foot on a corporate lease and secured a couple months of free rent. This led to >$480,000 in savings for their nonprofit. Other negotiable parameters include: * Square footage counted towards rent costs * Lease length * A tenant improvement allowance * Certain physical goods (e.g., smart TVs) * Buying in bulk can be a great lever for negotiating smaller items like covid tests, and can reduce costs by 50% or more. * Event/retreat venues (both venue price and smaller items like food and AV) * Hotel blocks * A quick email with the rates of comparable but more affordable hotel blocks can often save ~10%. * Professional service contracts with large for-profit firms (e.g., IT contracts, office internet coverage) * Insurance premiums (though I am less confident that this is negotiable) For many products and services, a nonprofit can qualify for a discount simply by providing their IRS determination letter or getting verified on platforms like TechSoup. In my experience, most vendors and companies
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
28
Introducing Effective Accountability: Project and Job Search Accountability Groups
2 authors
· · 2m read
0
0
32
Internship at the EA Hotel
CEEALAR
· · 1m read
0
0
50
What comes after the Introduction Fellowship? A tool and approach for community organizers
Brooke O'Connell 🔸
· · 5m read
9
9
View more