Hide table of contents

April 2022 update: Note that this post is pretty outdated. You can find out more about tags on the EA Wiki FAQ page, and see all the tags on the "All tags" page

Tags are now live on the EA Forum!

They appear just above the comment section of each post, like this:

You’ll be able to select from any existing tag when tagging a post, but you won’t be able to create your own tag. For now, only moderators have that ability, because we want to make sure new tags don’t proliferate too quickly (lest we end up with separate tags for “AI alignment,” “AI safety,” and “AI risk”).

We’re thrilled to be introducing this feature; we hope it will make it much easier to find content that suits your interests.

You can see a list of all existing tags here. Each has its own page listing all posts which have been marked with that tag.

As with posts and comments, tags have their own “karma” values. These are post-specific; if a tag is especially relevant to a post, it will (ideally) gain more karma on that post over time. If you look at the page for a given tag, you can sort posts by tag karma to see which ones users have voted most relevant for that tag. (For example, see the “coronavirus” tag page.)

If you go to a tag’s page and upvote a post from the list, you’ll be upvoting that tag for the post (not adding karma to the post itself). This is a good thing to do if you want to help others discover the best or most relevant Forum content for a given topic.

Here are some ways you can help to make the Forum a more tag-friendly place:

  • Go through the posts you’ve written and tag them.
  • Go to pages for tags that interest you and decide which posts within should be upvoted (or strong-upvoted, downvoted, etc. for those tags).
  • Submit new tag ideas to us using this form.
  • Contact us if you think some of our tags should be renamed, deleted, etc.

Other updates

New filtering options

You can now use filters much more flexibly to determine the Forum content you see. For example, you can hide posts with a particular tag, or choose "reduced" so they appear less often.

Here’s what the new view looks like (you can add many different tag filters, but I’m just using one in the example, plus the “Personal” filter which appears by default).

Pingbacks for everyone

The pingback feature shows posts which link back to the post you’re reading (and might be good for follow-up reading). 

This has been a live beta feature for a while, but will now be visible to all users. As a reminder, you can see beta features by checking the “Opt into experimental features” option on the “Edit Account” page:

Section URL bugfix

If you click on a section heading in a post sidebar, the page URL will now be updated to match. This makes it more convenient to link others to a specific section of a post.

For a while, links to other Forum posts have shown previews of those post. We’ve now added another preview option, for pages on the Metaculus prediction platform. Here’s a link you can hover over to see the preview.

 

Thanks for using the Forum, and happy tagging!

Comments8


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

This is great, thank you so much for doing this! I see that another experimental feature that's been experimental for quite a while is sequences. For those who don't know what it is, you can see an example of it here. Actually, EA handbook is also a sequence but users who haven't opted in experimental features don't seem to be able to create them. I'm curious if there are plans for sequences to go fully live.

I, too, would be curious about how to create a sequence.

I think this will make the forum far more useful. Could you add some kind of taglist (or prominent link to one) to the home page?

I also think this would be useful. Right now tags seem like a great feature for power users. But I feel that there is still the problem that people who are not yet engaged with EA and have specific interests may only see posts that are not relevant to them on the first visit to the forum and not come back. E.g., a biosecurity expert may not see any biosecurity posts and may not be interested in the three posts that they see after searching "biosecurity". Having tags in a prominent place could help with that.

These things were discussed in more detail here.

Can you please add the tag directory to the sidebar?

Can you add a “research summary” tag for posts like this? Other suggestions: “book summary,” “podcast/talk summary,” “summary.”

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 32m read
 · 
Summary Immediate skin-to-skin contact (SSC) between mothers and newborns and early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF) may play a significant and underappreciated role in reducing neonatal mortality. These practices are distinct in important ways from more broadly recognized (and clearly impactful) interventions like kangaroo care and exclusive breastfeeding, and they are recommended for both preterm and full-term infants. A large evidence base indicates that immediate SSC and EIBF substantially reduce neonatal mortality. Many randomized trials show that immediate SSC promotes EIBF, reduces episodes of low blood sugar, improves temperature regulation, and promotes cardiac and respiratory stability. All of these effects are linked to lower mortality, and the biological pathways between immediate SSC, EIBF, and reduced mortality are compelling. A meta-analysis of large observational studies found a 25% lower risk of mortality in infants who began breastfeeding within one hour of birth compared to initiation after one hour. These practices are attractive targets for intervention, and promoting them is effective. Immediate SSC and EIBF require no commodities, are under the direct influence of birth attendants, are time-bound to the first hour after birth, are consistent with international guidelines, and are appropriate for universal promotion. Their adoption is often low, but ceilings are demonstrably high: many low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) have rates of EIBF less than 30%, yet several have rates over 70%. Multiple studies find that health worker training and quality improvement activities dramatically increase rates of immediate SSC and EIBF. There do not appear to be any major actors focused specifically on promotion of universal immediate SSC and EIBF. By contrast, general breastfeeding promotion and essential newborn care training programs are relatively common. More research on cost-effectiveness is needed, but it appears promising. Limited existing
Ben_West🔸
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
> Summary: We propose measuring AI performance in terms of the length of tasks AI agents can complete. We show that this metric has been consistently exponentially increasing over the past 6 years, with a doubling time of around 7 months. Extrapolating this trend predicts that, in under a decade, we will see AI agents that can independently complete a large fraction of software tasks that currently take humans days or weeks. > > The length of tasks (measured by how long they take human professionals) that generalist frontier model agents can complete autonomously with 50% reliability has been doubling approximately every 7 months for the last 6 years. The shaded region represents 95% CI calculated by hierarchical bootstrap over task families, tasks, and task attempts. > > Full paper | Github repo Blogpost; tweet thread. 
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
For immediate release: April 1, 2025 OXFORD, UK — The Centre for Effective Altruism (CEA) announced today that it will no longer identify as an "Effective Altruism" organization.  "After careful consideration, we've determined that the most effective way to have a positive impact is to deny any association with Effective Altruism," said a CEA spokesperson. "Our mission remains unchanged: to use reason and evidence to do the most good. Which coincidentally was the definition of EA." The announcement mirrors a pattern of other organizations that have grown with EA support and frameworks and eventually distanced themselves from EA. CEA's statement clarified that it will continue to use the same methodologies, maintain the same team, and pursue identical goals. "We've found that not being associated with the movement we have spent years building gives us more flexibility to do exactly what we were already doing, just with better PR," the spokesperson explained. "It's like keeping all the benefits of a community while refusing to contribute to its future development or taking responsibility for its challenges. Win-win!" In a related announcement, CEA revealed plans to rename its annual EA Global conference to "Coincidental Gathering of Like-Minded Individuals Who Mysteriously All Know Each Other But Definitely Aren't Part of Any Specific Movement Conference 2025." When asked about concerns that this trend might be pulling up the ladder for future projects that also might benefit from the infrastructure of the effective altruist community, the spokesperson adjusted their "I Heart Consequentialism" tie and replied, "Future projects? I'm sorry, but focusing on long-term movement building would be very EA of us, and as we've clearly established, we're not that anymore." Industry analysts predict that by 2026, the only entities still identifying as "EA" will be three post-rationalist bloggers, a Discord server full of undergraduate philosophy majors, and one person at
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
47
Ivan Burduk
· · 2m read