May 10 - 16
In Development Highlight

Editor in Chief Lauren Gilbert and the authors from In Development magazine join us here, all week. Read their work and ask them anything

Editor in Chief Lauren Gilbert and the authors from In Development magazine join us here, all week. Read their work and ask them anything

New & upvoted

Customize feedCustomize feed
62
· · · 9m read

Quick takes

Show community
View more
Set topic
Frontpage
Global health
Animal welfare
Existential risk
Biosecurity & pandemics
12 more
Been thinking about morality recently. Here are my current thoughts, take them with a grain of salt because they aren't battle-tested yet. There are some strong arguments for utilitarianism, but regardless of what is correct theoretically, in practise utilitarianism doesn't work well without some kind of deontological bars. Continuing with attempting to develop a pragmatic morality, it then become clear that virtue ethics is important too because a) rules are rigid compared to judgement b) decisions aren't independent but also affect how you'll act in the future[1]. Some folks may be quite tepid in integrating virtue ethics, but my intuition is that the more common fault will be to give yourself too much latitude, so you'll probably want to revive some of your old deontological bars. I view the next stage after this as introducing a sort of meta-virtue ethics to balance the three components (utilitarianism, deontology and virtue ethics; obviously it would be possible to break this down further). But this likely gives you too much latitude again, so you'll probably want to introduce some kind of meta-deontology to limit how you update the balance. You could go further than this, but you'd probably be running into decreasing marginal utility. 1. ^ Thanks to Austen Erickson who I first learned this perspective from.
You should volunteer at your first EAG! (Especially if you are a student or early career) * If you don’t have a network in EA, EAG’s can be overwhelming. Volunteering gives you a ready-made, organic network. * Volunteering is pretty chill - a lot of the shifts aren’t that hard. * At your first EAG, it’s unlikely that you are using your time so efficiently that a few hours of volunteering would cut into the value of your conference.
  I wanted to make this poll to see how the community views the speed/x-risk tradeoff. I'm personally 99% x-risk and 1% speed, so I would hard agree. My prediction is most people will agree, maybe a 70/30 split, but I'm curious to see.
We recently published an interview with Matthew Coleman - another entry in our Career Journeys series. Matthew is the Executive Director of Giving Multiplier, a platform that encourages donations to highly effective charities through donation matching. Before this, he completed a PhD in psychology, researching the psychology of altruism. The interview covers quite a lot of ground, but a few of the things we talked about include: * The gap between what a career looks like from the outside and what it's actually like day-to-day. * Advice for people wanting to make an impact through psychology. * The tension between keeping your options open and committing to a path. Here’s one of our favorite extracts from the full interview: On engaging with the (often mundane) realities of academic research: I learned a lot. By the time I started my lab manager role, I was fairly confident I wanted to do a PhD. But my research lab in undergrad, which I loved, was a very small lab where I was working closely with the faculty advisor, and I wanted to try out a larger lab studying different topics to explore a bit more. As the lab manager of an unusually large lab, I got a bird’s-eye view of a lot of the research projects going on and understood what the day-to-day looked like, whether that was grant applications, hiring and onboarding, or actually conducting research myself alongside my colleagues. I found the experience amazing and fascinating and really intellectually stimulating, which confirmed that I wanted to go the PhD route, so I followed through on my original plan from undergrad. […] I was certainly very fortunate to have gotten a lot of hands-on experience in research as an undergraduate, so I think I had a better sense of the day-to-day than many people do. But I do think it’s a very important point, and some related advice I like to give is: when you wake up on a random Tuesday in February, do you actually want to do the things that you have to do? Not just do y
"On the Promotion of Safe and Socially Beneficial Artificial Intelligence" by @SethBaum from 2016