Hide table of contents

Who ought to have a larger twitter account and it wouldn't be much effort for us to make it happen?

I think were this numerical, we'd do: (value of them having bigger account) * (difficulty to get there)/(GiveWell charities)

 Use upvotes to signal  the priority of the answer, and the agree/disagree to support the specific reasoning given by the answer.

IE the upvote ordering should be the correct ordering.

Ideally we'd not have anyone named who doesn't want to be, so if you are a bit in doubt, then ask their permission to name them.

Starter questions:

  • Who would be easy for outsiders to engage with and understand?
  • Who produces great content you wish you saw more of?
  • Who deserves the ability to more easily influence discourse and meet with members of the cultural elite?
  • Who has cultural cache in a different space that would allow them to grow quickly

This question is to give a sense of who ought to be supported/invested in. I think that it should be followed by a strategic look and finally funding to those individuals named. I am not authorised to do any of that.

16

0
0

Reactions

0
0
New Answer
New Comment


17 Answers sorted by

Peter Wildeford is an A+ follow on Twitter IMHO. I think it's realistic to get him a bunch more followers if that's something he wanted.

What strategy would you propose to get him more followers?

2
IanDavidMoss
He seems like a natural fit for the American economist-public intellectual cluster (Yglesias/Cowen/WaitButWhy/etc.) that's already pretty sympathetic to EA. The twitter content is basically "EA in depth," but retaining the normie socially responsible brand they've come to expect and are comfortable with. Max Roser would be another obvious candidate to promote Peter. I'd start there and see where it goes.

Luisa Rodriguez

Luisa is a x-risk expert, who contributed heavily to Will’s book. She is a good conversationalist. Seems like she could easily be sent to do the podcast circuit and end up with 20k followers.

She seems a clear candidate for “public intellectual”

I think her name is spelled Luisa. I agree it would be very great to have her write more publicly. Does she have a twitter account?

4
Nathan Young
I carefully copied it from my address book.. where i’d spelt it wrong.

Habiba Islam

Habiba is a very talented advisor, a model community member and is very winsome. (Full disclosure, we're friends.) I don't really know how to make her expertise legible enough that she could justify a 200k account, but I think that in a better world she would have a much larger presence.

winsome, eh :P

I really hope you referencing this: 

Amanda Askell consistently has thoughtful and underrated takes on Twitter.

Having read your link, she’s an AI expert, great suggestion.

what’s her field again?

2
IanDavidMoss
https://askell.io/

Holly Elmore

Holly is an expert in her field, is honest and kind. I would like to see her with 30k followers. I don't see any super easy way to bootstrap that though.

I'm a little surprised that Rob Wiblin doesn't have more followers, but he's already high-profile enough that it wouldn't take that big of a push to get him into another tier. He's also the most logical person to leverage 80K's broader content on social media given his existing profile and activity. (ETA: although Habiba could do this too, per your suggestion.)

Dustin Moskovitz

I am uncertain if it's good that Dustin is rapidly becoming more legible on twitter, but since SBF is becoming waaay more legible, I think it's good that Dustin is too. Dustin tweets a lot and is pretty funny. I imagine he'll hate the idea of actual publicity, be if he didn't, I'd want him to have like 100k - 1m followers.

Will MacAskill

Twitter is the platform of elites.  Will’s content shares well and  i’d like more people to see it.  Will probably doesn’t want to the  anxiety from being on twitter all day, but I think he could be firewalled from much of that.


Will has like 50k followers. I think by employing a social media manager for $100k  he could have 200k followers in a year (60%).

Do we know that he doesn't already have a social media manager? He's had a lot of help to promote the book.

3
Nathan Young
Given how superb the team were at promoting wills book, I struggle to believe they are seriously attempting twitter promotion right now.

Holden Karnofsky

Holden (as far as I know) doesn't use twitter. Seems trivial for him to make an account, tweet new posts and nothing else. He'd probably get like 10k followers that way. 

While we see Holden's cold takes, I'm not sure he has the desire to post his hot ones. 

I think it would cost about $50k to get his account to 10k followers in a year (80%)

$100k for 50k followers, (60%) with more podcast  appearances.

Chana Messinger

Chana is clever, funny and responsible. I don’t know how to frame her as a larger twitter account, but I think she should be one.

Nuño Sempere - https://twitter.com/NunoSempere

I think there is a risk to empowering the hot takes, forcasting crowd (of which I'm partially one), but I think if Nuño can be branded as not necessarily the mainstream view in EA, I’d like to see his thoughts getting much more attention.

I'll leave a link to my profile here: <https://twitter.com/NunoSempere>; not that far-off from 1k followers.

Carrick Flynn

I don't know if Carrick plans to do more political runs in future, but if he does probably more followers would be valuable to him.

I assume you're being modest in not suggesting "Nathan Young," so I'll do it for you.

I don’t think I should be high on this list. I’m a good networker but I don’t think EA as a whole benefits from me being a much bigger account.

2
NunoSempere
Disagree. Maybe given some function of "innate talent", it makes sense to put more eggs on one basket.
2
Nathan Young
What do you think is the case for effort being spent on me more than those high on the list? like what’s the benefit of me having 50k followers? Maybe I could more easily network with important non-EAs?

Cari Tuna

I am both uncomfortable including Cari (because I sense she deliberately doesn't engage heavily with EA publicly) and uncomfortable excluding her (I think her impact is already underrated by EA discourse). I assume there is some reason she's not more active on twitter, but the interview she gave in 2015?? was really good and I sense she'd be a great public figure if she wanted to be. 

I think with a few interviews that would be  easy to get and maybe $50k in staff you could get her account to 20k in a  year (60%)

Julian Hazell, aka @HuelHater, posts some pretty funny EA jokes and memes on Twitter.  His substack is here: https://hazell.substack.com/

Toby Ord

Yes, Toby is a big deal, but could he be on documentaries. Would we want that? Certainly seems feasible to imagine him having more twitter followers. Unlike some of the big names here, I don't see a quick way to do that.

Comments19
Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Nathan -- If you compile a list of EAs worth promoting on Twitter, and DM me the list of their Twitter handles, I'm happy to mention them to my 124k followers. 

Sure, thank you, will do. What about yourself, what would happen if you had 1M followers?

LOL, I'd get 10x times more grief and flack and it would make me sad.

Although I could pivot from writing hot and ornery political takes (my main activity now) to doing more serious EA promotion. But then I'd lose most of the new followers....

[anonymous]0
2
1

I could pivot from writing hot and ornery political takes (my main activity now) to doing more serious EA promotion.

That seems very risky, given your political views.

Why? Say more please.

[anonymous]1
1
1

(I have a somewhat high credence that you are trolling, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.) For example, I recall that you believe something like the replacement conspiracy

I'm not trolling. I'm actually curious why you think it's 'very risky' for me to promote EA more actively given my centrist heterodox libertarian political views, as opposed to whatever political views other EAs might have?  Or are EAs only permitted to have soft-Left political views?

[anonymous]2
4
0

I think it would be straightforwardly bad if EA got associated with something like the replacement conspiracy.  (Do you agree?) 

> Or are EAs only permitted to have soft-Left political views?

Of course not. I did not suggest this. But it is clearly more important for EA to stay clear of associations with far-right conspiracy theories than for you to express every controversial thing you believe. 

This seems a case where there are deep partisan disagreements about what counts as a 'conspiracy theory'. 

When people on the Left say that 'America has shifting racial demographics such that the previous majority group is losing power and influence relative to other groups', mainstream media considers that a good thing and celebrates it as progress. When people on the Right say exactly the same thing, based on exactly the same data, mainstream media calls that 'the Replacement Conspiracy'. The double standard is striking. 

As it happens, I've written and tweeted very little about demographic shifts in the US, relative to other issues, so I'm surprised that you think this is something people would associate with me.

[anonymous]-1
0
1

When people on the Left say that 'America has shifting racial demographics such that the previous majority group is losing power and influence relative to other groups', mainstream media considers that a good thing and celebrates it as progress. When people on the Right say exactly the same thing, based on exactly the same data, mainstream media calls that 'the Replacement Conspiracy'. The double standard is striking. 
 

Sure, might be the case, idk. I'm not saying something about the object-level. It's still bad if half of the US associates EA with the far-right.  Seems like you are shoulding at the world.

> As it happens, I've written and tweeted very little about demographic shifts in the US, relative to other issues, so I'm surprised that you think this is something people would associate with me.

Not saying that; it was just a thing I remembered you tweeting. (I stopped following you one-two years ago, I think.)

Twitter downsides:

  • causes anxiety
  • takes up mental real estate in these people’s heads
  • being dogpiled is horrible

But I think Twitter is just very high leverage in terms of networking and changing minds. And we want to change minds, right?

It seems worth noting that you can get famous on Twitter for tweeting, or you can happen to be famous on Twitter as a result of becoming famous some other way. The two pathways imply very different promotional strategies and theories of impact. But my sense is that it's pretty hard to grow an audience on Twitter through tweeting alone, no matter how good your content is.

Also worth noting that you can be influential on Twitter without necessarily having a large audience (e.g., by interacting strategically with elites and frequently enough that they get to know you).

In light of the two-factor voting, I'm unclear what you mean by "upvote." I would suggest using the "agree/disagree" box as the scoring, with "upvote/downvote" meant to refer to your wisdom in suggesting the person and/or the analysis you provided. But I think you should clarify which one you intend to actually pay attention to.

You’re right, but I think the opposite way round makes more sense.

“ Use upvotes to signal the priority of the answer, and the agree/disagree to support the specific reasoning given by the answer.

IE the upvote ordering should be the correct ordering.”

In my experience, most people (~75%) become their worst selves on Twitter. Many times I have followed someone because I enjoyed their writing off Twitter, only to find that a significant portion of their Twitter content was angry culture-warring. So I think someone being interesting and thoughtful is not enough to make them a good Twitter poster, and using Twitter seems to be net negative for a lot of people.

Fwiw my view is that this isn't true of most effective altruists I see on Twitter. 

We shouldn't limit to Twitter, but what Youtube channels, Instagrams and more we should follow to increase their reach and learn from them

I’d read the answers to that question

Curated and popular this week
TL;DR * Screwworm Free Future is a new group seeking support to advance work on eradicating the New World Screwworm in South America. * The New World Screwworm (C. hominivorax - literally "man-eater") causes extreme suffering to hundreds of millions of wild and domestic animals every year. * To date we’ve held private meetings with government officials, experts from the private sector, academics, and animal advocates. We believe that work on the NWS is valuable and we want to continue our research and begin lobbying. * Our analysis suggests we could prevent about 100 animals from experiencing an excruciating death per dollar donated, though this estimate has extreme uncertainty. * The screwworm “wall” in Panama has recently been breached, creating both an urgent need and an opportunity to address this problem. * We are seeking $15,000 to fund a part-time lead and could absorb up to $100,000 to build a full-time team, which would include a team lead and another full-time equivalent (FTE) role * We're also excited to speak to people who have a background in veterinary science/medicine, entomology, gene drives, as well as policy experts in Latin America. - please reach out if you know someone who fits this description!   Cochliomyia hominivorax delenda est Screwworm Free Future is a new group of volunteers who connected through Hive investigating the political and scientific barriers stopping South American governments from eradicating the New World Screwworm. In our shallow investigation, we have identified key bottlenecks, but we now need funding and people to take this investigation further, and begin lobbying. In this post, we will cover the following: * The current status of screwworms * Things that we have learnt in our research * What we want to do next * How you can help by funding or supporting or project   What’s the deal with the New World Screwworm? The New World Screwworm[1] is the leading cause of myiasis in Latin America. Myiasis “
 ·  · 11m read
 · 
Does a food carbon tax increase animal deaths and/or the total time of suffering of cows, pigs, chickens, and fish? Theoretically, this is possible, as a carbon tax could lead consumers to substitute, for example, beef with chicken. However, this is not per se the case, as animal products are not perfect substitutes.  I'm presenting the results of my master's thesis in Environmental Economics, which I re-worked and published on SSRN as a pre-print. My thesis develops a model of animal product substitution after a carbon tax, slaughter tax, and a meat tax. When I calibrate[1] this model for the U.S., there is a decrease in animal deaths and duration of suffering following a carbon tax. This suggests that a carbon tax can reduce animal suffering. Key points * Some animal products are carbon-intensive, like beef, but causes relatively few animal deaths or total time of suffering because the animals are large. Other animal products, like chicken, causes relatively many animal deaths or total time of suffering because the animals are small, but cause relatively low greenhouse gas emissions. * A carbon tax will make some animal products, like beef, much more expensive. As a result, people may buy more chicken. This would increase animal suffering, assuming that farm animals suffer. However, this is not per se the case. It is also possible that the direct negative effect of a carbon tax on chicken consumption is stronger than the indirect (positive) substitution effect from carbon-intensive products to chicken. * I developed a non-linear market model to predict the consumption of different animal products after a tax, based on own-price and cross-price elasticities. * When calibrated for the United States, this model predicts a decrease in the consumption of all animal products considered (beef, chicken, pork, and farmed fish). Therefore, the modelled carbon tax is actually good for animal welfare, assuming that animals live net-negative lives. * A slaughter tax (a
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
As 2024 draws to a close, I’m reflecting on the work and stories that inspired me this year: those from the effective altruism community, those I found out about through EA-related channels, and those otherwise related to EA. I’ve appreciated the celebration of wins and successes over the past few years from @Shakeel Hashim's posts in 2022 and 2023. As @Lizka and @MaxDalton put very well in a post in 2022: > We often have high standards in effective altruism. This seems absolutely right: our work matters, so we must constantly strive to do better. > > But we think that it's really important that the effective altruism community celebrate successes: > > * If we focus too much on failures, we incentivize others/ourselves to minimize the risk of failure, and we will probably be too risk averse. > * We're humans: we're more motivated if we celebrate things that have gone well. Rather than attempting to write a comprehensive review of this year's successes and wins related to EA, I want to share what has personally moved me this year—progress that gave me hope, individual stories and acts of altruism, and work that I found thought-provoking or valuable. I’ve structured the sections below as prompts to invite your own reflection on the year, as I’d love to hear your responses in the comments. We all have different relationships with EA ideas and the community surrounding them, and I find it valuable that we can bring different perspectives and responses to questions like these. What progress in the world did you find exciting? * The launch of the Lead Exposure Elimination Fund this year was exciting to see, and the launch of the Partnership for a Lead-Free Future. The fund jointly committed over $100 million to combat lead exposure, compared to the $15 million in private funding that went toward lead exposure reduction in 2023. It’s encouraging to see lead poisoning receiving attention and funding after being relatively neglected. * The Open Wing Alliance repor
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
31
cescorza
· · 2m read