Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
by Alix Pham, Swan 🔸, Jérémy Andréoletti🔸, johant🔸
3 min read 8

84

BiosecurityBuilding effective altruismCollections and resourcesGlobal catastrophic biological riskAnnouncements and updatesField-building
Frontpage

We are glad to announce the release of biosecurity.world! Your new go-to website for navigating the biosecurity landscape and finding relevant organizations worldwide.

 

The biosecurity.world database, in a view structured around the types of activities.

 

Objective & Target Audience

Our aim is to provide an overview of the biosecurity landscape for people who want to learn more about the field, by giving them an idea of the work that is being done (and by whom) and therefore how they could contribute. 

This corresponds to Level 2, and to some extent 3, of this on-ramp model. We got inspiration from aisafety.world.

Current State

This is version 0.2—the Earliest Usable Version.

Thanks to everyone who helped us along the way by providing feedback.

We are currently working on version 0.3—Earliest Lovable—which includes a visualization of the map. We believe the current version is still useful and should be already available.

The website has two modes:

  • The database mode (hosted on Notion), where you can find:
    • In the description at the top:
      • A contact form for anything from feedback to suggestions (see Call To Action)
      • Our inclusion criteria:
        • Upon request, we can make available our inclusion spreadsheet where we evaluate organizations and ultimately make a decision on their inclusion.
      • A FAQ, to help users navigate the database
    • In the database: a bunch of relevant orgs (120ish at the time of publishing)

Default table view of the database.

  • arranged in different table views
    • GCBR only: filter via “GCBR focus” to see the most scope-sensitive organizations.
  • with the possibility to use additional filters and sorting
    • Location: regions are in blue except US and UK in purple, countries in pink, cities in grey; global (green) either means they have multiple locations, or none because they are fully remote (yellow).
  • The map mode, which is still in building and will be announced in a future post announcing v0.3.

Call To Action

Contact us!

  • Populating: This is still a non-exhaustive list and we are working as fast as we can to populate it and make it accurate. In particular:
    • Please suggest anything that we might have missed.
    • The database is heavily biased towards the US, and the UK / Europe to a lesser extent, so please help us find other initiatives to make it more exhaustive and inclusive (while meeting the inclusion criteria)
    • Additional information would be useful, such as who founded or who runs the organization, when did it start, who funds it, what are their key output (reports, research, products, etc.)
  • Experience: Give us feedback on your experience!
    • There are many filters: should we have less? Are the categories sensible?
    • Overview of the landscape: Can you navigate easily? Does it give you a better understanding of the biosecurity landscape?
  • Contributing: We’re a volunteer team and we welcome anyone who wants to help with that project, from maintenance to research, being a point of contact to help users, etc.

You can express interest in the form.

Acknowledgements

We'd like to thank everyone who supported that project, from the early conceptualization of the website to the most recent feedback. Special thanks to @Will S and @BlueDot Impact's team for giving the initial structure via the Project Sprint of the Biosecurity Fundamentals course.

Existing Lists and Databases

Biosecurity.world builds on several existing efforts that have cataloged biosecurity organizations, though these efforts have typically been narrower in scope. We aimed to bring these resources together into a more comprehensive and user-friendly database. Below are some of the key sources from which we gathered candidate organizations:

84

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments8


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
plex7
0
0
1

Nice to see this idea spreading! I bet Hamish would be happy to share the code we use for aisafety.world if that's helpful. There's a version on this github, but I'm not certain that's the latest code. Drop by AED if you'd like to talk.

Reply
plex2
0
0

Also we're currently working with an artist to make a much upgraded background image. Happy to connect you if you're able to collect up some funding and would like a nice professional map.

Reply
Alix Pham1
0
0

Super cool thanks! Will keep that in mind too.

Reply
Alix Pham1
0
0

Thanks for this! We are currently working on a visualization with a volunteer. Let's see how it goes, but we'll definitely keep your offer in mind!

Hamish already shared his code with me, but in the end we decided to go with something else, at least for now.

Reply
Chris Leong1
5
0
1

Very exciting! I would love to see folk create versions for other cause areas as well.

Reply
GV 🔸1
1
0
2

Thanks a lot for the hard work! This will certainly be useful to people interested in biosecurity careers in our group!

Reply
Swan 🔸1
0
0

Glad to hear this!

Reply
lroberts1
0
0
1

Great work!

Reply
More from Alix Pham
318
On Owning Our EA Affiliation
Alix Pham
· · 5m read
43
43
149
The privilege of native English speakers in reaching high-status, influential positions in EA
Alix Pham
· · 5m read
38
38
86
10 Lessons Learned - One Year at EA Switzerland
Alix Pham
· · 10m read
3
3
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 20m read
 · 
Advanced AI could unlock an era of enlightened and competent government action. But without smart, active investment, we’ll squander that opportunity and barrel blindly into danger. Executive summary See also a summary on Twitter / X. The US federal government is falling behind the private sector on AI adoption. As AI improves, a growing gap would leave the government unable to effectively respond to AI-driven existential challenges and threaten the legitimacy of its democratic institutions. A dual imperative → Government adoption of AI can’t wait. Making steady progress is critical to: * Boost the government’s capacity to effectively respond to AI-driven existential challenges * Help democratic oversight keep up with the technological power of other groups * Defuse the risk of rushed AI adoption in a crisis → But hasty AI adoption could backfire. Without care, integration of AI could: * Be exploited, subverting independent government action * Lead to unsafe deployment of AI systems * Accelerate arms races or compress safety research timelines Summary of the recommendations 1. Work with the US federal government to help it effectively adopt AI Simplistic “pro-security” or “pro-speed” attitudes miss the point. Both are important — and many interventions would help with both. We should: * Invest in win-win measures that both facilitate adoption and reduce the risks involved, e.g.: * Build technical expertise within government (invest in AI and technical talent, ensure NIST is well resourced) * Streamline procurement processes for AI products and related tech (like cloud services) * Modernize the government’s digital infrastructure and data management practices * Prioritize high-leverage interventions that have strong adoption-boosting benefits with minor security costs or vice versa, e.g.: * On the security side: investing in cyber security, pre-deployment testing of AI in high-stakes areas, and advancing research on mitigating the ris
saulius
 ·  · 22m read
 · 
Summary In this article, I estimate the cost-effectiveness of five Anima International programs in Poland: improving cage-free and broiler welfare, blocking new factory farms, banning fur farming, and encouraging retailers to sell more plant-based protein. I estimate that together, these programs help roughly 136 animals—or 32 years of farmed animal life—per dollar spent. Animal years affected per dollar spent was within an order of magnitude for all five evaluated interventions. I also tried to estimate how much suffering each program alleviates. Using SADs (Suffering-Adjusted Days)—a metric developed by Ambitious Impact (AIM) that accounts for species differences and pain intensity—Anima’s programs appear highly cost-effective, even compared to charities recommended by Animal Charity Evaluators. However, I also ran a small informal survey to understand how people intuitively weigh different categories of pain defined by the Welfare Footprint Institute. The results suggested that SADs may heavily underweight brief but intense suffering. Based on those findings, I created my own metric DCDE (Disabling Chicken Day Equivalent) with different weightings. Under this approach, interventions focused on humane slaughter look more promising, while cage-free campaigns appear less impactful. These results are highly uncertain but show how sensitive conclusions are to how we value different kinds of suffering. My estimates are highly speculative, often relying on subjective judgments from Anima International staff regarding factors such as the likelihood of success for various interventions. This introduces potential bias. Another major source of uncertainty is how long the effects of reforms will last if achieved. To address this, I developed a methodology to estimate impact duration for chicken welfare campaigns. However, I’m essentially guessing when it comes to how long the impact of farm-blocking or fur bans might last—there’s just too much uncertainty. Background In
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
In my opinion, we have known that the risk of AI catastrophe is too high and too close for at least two years. At that point, it’s time to work on solutions (in my case, advocating an indefinite pause on frontier model development until it’s safe to proceed through protests and lobbying as leader of PauseAI US).  Not every policy proposal is as robust to timeline length as PauseAI. It can be totally worth it to make a quality timeline estimate, both to inform your own work and as a tool for outreach (like ai-2027.com). But most of these timeline updates simply are not decision-relevant if you have a strong intervention. If your intervention is so fragile and contingent that every little update to timeline forecasts matters, it’s probably too finicky to be working on in the first place.  I think people are psychologically drawn to discussing timelines all the time so that they can have the “right” answer and because it feels like a game, not because it really matters the day and the hour of… what are these timelines even leading up to anymore? They used to be to “AGI”, but (in my opinion) we’re basically already there. Point of no return? Some level of superintelligence? It’s telling that they are almost never measured in terms of actions we can take or opportunities for intervention. Indeed, it’s not really the purpose of timelines to help us to act. I see people make bad updates on them all the time. I see people give up projects that have a chance of working but might not reach their peak returns until 2029 to spend a few precious months looking for a faster project that is, not surprisingly, also worse (or else why weren’t they doing it already?) and probably even lower EV over the same time period! For some reason, people tend to think they have to have their work completed by the “end” of the (median) timeline or else it won’t count, rather than seeing their impact as the integral over the entire project that does fall within the median timeline estimate or
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
43
The CEA Events Team is Hiring for Three Program Lead Positions
OllieBase
· · 3m read
0
0
9
Creating 'Making God': a Feature Documentary on risks from AGI
ConnorA
· · 9m read
1
1
49
AIS Netherlands is looking for a Founding Executive Director (EOI form)
7 authors
· · 5m read
4
4
View more