Nov 10
Funding strategy week
Nov 17
Marginal funding week
Nov 24
Donation election
Dec 8
Why I donate week
A week to share the personal stories and reasons behind our donations. Read more.
Dec 15
Donation celebration
Thanks for writing this! I think this is a direction that it would be valuable for more people to move in, on the margin. On the other hand, as someone who went pretty far in this direction and has since backed off some, I think there can be some pretty strong trade-offs here that I don't see you getting into, around putting oneself in a position where you might spend time to save money in ways that are not actually worth it. Let's say you have a directly useful job, or you are earning to give in a field where your long-term compensation is going to track your overall productivity. These are both situations I've been in, and I think they're reasonably common? There tends to be a lot of opportunities to choose between more work time or less spending. Ex: * If my house needs repairs, it's generally much cheaper for me to do it myself rather than hire someone, and I've done a lot of this over the years. To the extent that this is something I enjoy doing, it's not a bad hobby! But more recently, I've been spending more of my "hobby" time on kinds of extra work for my org (tasks that I find less draining than my usual work). If a big repair came up, I think it would likely be actually a large mistake for me to put a lot of time into resolving that myself if that meant doing less work. * Say I'm going to take a week off of work to spend with family. My work has unlimited vacation, so I could choose to take an extra day off on each end so I could travel by bus instead of spending more on a plane. But since it's better for me to put more work in, being willing to spend the money on the plane is better.
Love this Aaron... thanks for sharing! Not sure if you've tried, but you might like http://astronaut.io/ for that feeling that feeling of shared humanity.
Thank you for a wonderful text and that you mentioned how you cultivate that people are real! I will use some of the resources for my students in global health. I use Out of Eden Walk for cultivating that people are real. It is about a journalist at National Geographic who walk across the world. I hope you like it!
In 2016,[1] I wrote the following: > Why do I give? > I’ve lived a very fortunate life. I was born into a well-off American family, the son of two parents with college degrees. I attended a famous university. I didn’t deserve any of this; if I’d been born somewhere else, my life would have gone very differently. I give because I’d like to share the results of my luck with the less fortunate. > > I also give because I think that human happiness is the best thing in the world (in all its forms: love, excitement, satisfaction…). I already have a good, satisfying life, so I don’t need to buy more happiness. Instead, I can use money to help a lot of other people live happier lives. This strikes me as a fantastic opportunity. When Giving What We Can asked me to write about my giving, I thought it would be easy — I still believe in everything up there. But after nine years spent living and working in the EA community, I've had a few more thoughts about the question.[2] Humans make my life worth living A few hours ago, I rewatched (for the 10th time) a snippet of one of my favorite YouTube videos: the 2024 Pokemon Cypher Contest, which selects one talented entrant to join a group of Pokemon-loving "anime rappers" on a group video/album. Here's what it took for this video to exist: * Someone had to invent computers (between Babbage and Turing, I'll say England) * Someone else had to invent video games (let's say Pong, ergo the United States) * Then someone had to invent Pokemon (Japan!) * Also, someone had to invent rap (too many places to count — but it seems like Jamaica and Barbados get a lot of credit for dub music, Grandmaster Flash, etc.) * Someone had to rap about Pokemon for long enough to collect an audience and gather like-minded musicians (Shofu, who I believe has Nigerian roots) * Those like-minded musicians had to form a successful collective. I don't know their family history, but evidence suggests that their origin stories span the globe: * P

New & upvoted

Customize feedCustomize feed

Quick takes

Show community
View more
Set topic
Frontpage
'Why I Donate' Week
Global health
Animal welfare
Existential risk
12 more
Londoners! @Gemma 🔸 is hosting a co-writing session this Sunday, for people who would like to write "Why I Donate" posts. The plan is to work in poms, and publish something during the session. 
The mental health EA cause space should explore more experimental, scalable interventions, such as promoting anti-inflammatory diets at school/college cafeterias to reduce depression in young people, or using lighting design to reduce seasonal depression. What I've seen of this cause area so far seems focused on psychotherapy in low-income countries. I feel like we're missing some more out-of-the-box interventions here. Does anyone know of any relevant work along these lines? 
I live in Australia, and am interested in donating to the fundraising efforts of MIRI and Lightcone Infrastructure, to the tune of $2,000 USD for MIRI and $1,000 USD for Lightcone. Neither of these are tax-advantaged for me. Lightcone is tax advantaged in the US, and MIRI is tax advantaged in a few countries according to their website.  Anyone want to make a trade, where I donate the money to a tax-advantaged charity in Australia that you would otherwise donate to, and you make these donations? As I understand it, anything in Effective Altruism Australia would work. Since my tax bill is expected to be about 1/3rd this year, I'm open to matching up to 4.5k USD for this instead of 3k, which will cost me about 3k in the long run. This will not funge against my existing 10% donations to global health, it's on top of them, so you get all that sweet, sweet counterfactual impact. If he's still around, @Mitchell Laughlin🔸 can confirm that I've successfully done a match like this before across a longer timeframe and larger total amount.
10
Joseph
3d
1
A semi-regular reminder that anybody who wants to join EA (or EA adjacent) online book clubs, I'm your guy. Copying from a previous post:
Here's some quick takes on what you can do if you want to contribute to AI safety or governance (they may generalise, but no guarantees). Paraphrased from a longer talk I gave, transcript here.  * First, there’s still tons of alpha left in having good takes. * (Matt Reardon originally said this to me and I was like, “what, no way”, but now I think he was right and this is still true – thanks Matt!) * You might be surprised, because there’s many people doing AI safety and governance work, but I think there’s still plenty of demand for good takes, and you can distinguish yourself professionally by being a reliable source of them. * But how do you have good takes? * I think the thing you do to form good takes, oversimplifying only slightly, is you read Learning by Writing and you go “yes, that’s how I should orient to the reading and writing that I do,” and then you do that a bunch of times with your reading and writing on AI safety and governance work, and then you share your writing somewhere and have lots of conversations with people about it and change your mind and learn more, and that’s how you have good takes. * What to read? * Start with the basics (e.g. BlueDot’s courses, other reading lists) then work from there on what’s interesting x important * Write in public * Usually, if you haven’t got evidence of your takes being excellent, it’s not that useful to just generally voice your takes. I think having takes and backing them up with some evidence, or saying things like “I read this thing, here’s my summary, here’s what I think” is useful. But it’s kind of hard to get readers to care if you’re just like “I’m some guy, here are my takes.” * Some especially useful kinds of writing * In order to get people to care about your takes, you could do useful kinds of writing first, like: * Explaining important concepts * E.g., evals awareness, non-LLM architectures (should I care? why?) , AI control, best arguments for/against sho